RSS
Canada Finally Targets Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps; More Action Is Needed
Gen. Hossein Salami, commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). Photo: Reuters/Morteza Nikoubazl.
The recent move by Canada to list the Iranian regime’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization marks a significant moment in the international effort to curb Iran’s malignant activities on the global stage. This decision comes after years of extensive lobbying and is a clear indicator of the growing concern among nations about the IRGC’s role in fostering instability both regionally and internationally.
Iran’s IRGC, established in the aftermath of the 1979 mullahs’ terrorist revolt, is not merely a military organization; it is an influential political actor within Iran, wielding substantial economic power and executing the ideological and strategic intentions of the regime both domestically and internationally. More ominously, the IRGC’s mandate transcends traditional military duties, involving itself deeply in Iran’s political sphere, influencing its economic landscape, and most notably, orchestrating complex networks of proxy warfare across the Middle East and beyond.
The word Iran doesn’t appear in the name of the IRGC. Essentially, this terrorist organization is active in protecting the Islamic Caliphate of the Ayatollah Khamenei and promoting the destructive ideology of Khomeinism under the guise of Islamic Resistance (but in reality, it signifies Islamic terrorism).
The IRGC is a criminal terrorist organization with a global reach, shining wherever the name of terrorism is mentioned. The radical thugs of the IRGC are currently engaged in the domestic oppression and massacre of Iranians, and are expanding their global terrorism network abroad.
Strategic Export of Revolution
The core of the IRGC’s strategy has been to support non-state militant groups across the region, providing them with funding, weapons, and training to foment unrest and carry out attacks that align with Tehran’s strategic interests. This has been vividly demonstrated in their support for Hezbollah in Lebanon, various militia groups in Iraq, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, and their ongoing military support to the Assad regime in Syria. Such actions are not merely regional security issues, but are illustrative of the IRGC’s broader strategy to reshape Middle Eastern politics, counter Western influence, and promote Iran as the preeminent regional power.
Global Terror Operations
Internationally, the IRGC’s Quds Force, the branch responsible for extraterritorial operations, has been actively involved in planning and executing operations that clearly fall within the realm of international terrorism. These operations range from the orchestration of bombings and assassinations in Europe and South America, to the provision of arms and tactical support to various militant groups. The infamous case of the 1994 AMIA bombing in Buenos Aires, which killed 85 people, is a stark reminder of the deadly reach of the IRGC’s operations, directed and facilitated by its commanders.
Adapting to Modern Conflicts
In more recent years, the IRGC has adapted its methods and expanded its reach. It has increased its cyber capabilities, engaging in cyber espionage and attacks against foreign governments and industries, which constitutes a significant threat to global information security. The IRGC has also been implicated in military confrontations, such as the attacks on commercial shipping in the strategic waterways of the Middle East, which threaten global supply chains and international trade.
The international community must recognize the necessity of a robust, multi-faceted response to the IRGC’s activities. While the designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization by nations like Canada represents a crucial step forward, it is an inadequate measure if not part of a broader, cohesive strategy that includes enhanced sanctions, targeted legal actions against IRGC affiliates, and a comprehensive international legal and diplomatic framework aimed at curtailing its operations globally.
Humanitarian and Ideological Counteractions
Moreover, nations must work together to address the humanitarian crises precipitated by the IRGC’s actions or IRGC-supported conflicts, particularly in war-torn regions like Syria and Yemen. The international community must prioritize diplomatic and humanitarian strategies to mitigate the suffering of civilians, who are often the most affected by the IRGC-supported conflicts. Additionally, the global community must counteract Iran’s propaganda by supporting democratic values and human rights narratives within Iran and among its regional allies.
Strengthening Global Alliances
It is also essential for countries to cut off the financial streams that support the IRGC’s extensive network; this includes stricter controls on international banking and finance channels to ensure that funds cannot be funneled to the IRGC or its proxies. Collaborative international efforts are required to dismantle the sophisticated networks that the IRGC uses to fund its operations, including those involving illicit trade and smuggling.
The global community’s response to the IRGC must also be ideological. It involves countering Iran’s extensive propaganda machinery, which justifies its actions and spreads its revolutionary ideology. Supporting counter-narratives within Iran and among its allies, emphasizing democratic values and human rights, is crucial.
In essence, the IRGC represents a profound challenge to international peace and stability, necessitating a concerted global response. A comprehensive approach that includes legal, financial, military, and ideological responses is vital. The international community must be unified and resolute in its actions against the IRGC to effectively curb its influence and operations. Failure to take decisive action risks not only further regional destabilization, but also increased global insecurity.
In confronting the IRGC, the international community must demonstrate both resolve and strategic foresight, ensuring that measures taken are comprehensive and sustained to dismantle the power structures that support the IRGC’s global terrorist activities. This is not merely a regional necessity, but a global imperative.
Erfan Fard is a counterterrorism analyst and Middle East Studies researcher based in Washington, DC. Twitter@EQFARD.
The post Canada Finally Targets Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps; More Action Is Needed first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Switzerland Moves to Close Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s Geneva Office Over Legal Irregularities

Palestinians carry aid supplies received from the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in the central Gaza Strip, May 29, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ramadan Abed/File Photo
Switzerland has moved to shut down the Geneva office of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US- and Israeli-backed aid group, citing legal irregularities in its establishment.
The GHF began distributing food packages in Gaza in late May, implementing a new aid delivery model aimed at preventing the diversion of supplies by Hamas, as Israel continues its defensive military campaign against the Palestinian terrorist group.
The initiative has drawn criticism from the UN and international organizations, some of which have claimed that Jerusalem is causing starvation in the war-torn enclave.
Israel has vehemently denied such accusations, noting that, until its recently imposed blockade, it had provided significant humanitarian aid in the enclave throughout the war.
Israeli officials have also said much of the aid that flows into Gaza is stolen by Hamas, which uses it for terrorist operations and sells the rest at high prices to Gazan civilians.
With a subsidiary registered in Geneva, the GHF — headquartered in Delaware — reports having delivered over 56 million meals to Palestinians in just one month.
According to a regulatory announcement published Wednesday in the Swiss Official Gazette of Commerce, the Federal Supervisory Authority for Foundations (ESA) may order the dissolution of the GHF if no creditors come forward within the legal 30-day period.
The Trump administration did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the Swiss decision to shut down its Geneva office.
“The GHF confirmed to the ESA that it had never carried out activities in Switzerland … and that it intends to dissolve the Geneva-registered branch,” the ESA said in a statement.
Last week, Geneva authorities gave the GHF a 30-day deadline to address legal shortcomings or risk facing enforcement measures.
Under local laws and regulations, the foundation failed to meet several requirements: it did not appoint a board member authorized to sign documents domiciled in Switzerland, did not have the minimum three board members, lacked a Swiss bank account and valid address, and operated without an auditing body.
The GHF operates independently from UN-backed mechanisms, which Hamas has sought to reinstate, arguing that these vehicles are more neutral.
Israeli and American officials have rejected those calls, saying Hamas previously exploited UN-run systems to siphon aid for its war effort.
The UN has denied those allegations while expressing concerns that the GHF’s approach forces civilians to risk their safety by traveling long distances across active conflict zones to reach food distribution points.
The post Switzerland Moves to Close Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s Geneva Office Over Legal Irregularities first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Key US Lawmaker Warns Ireland of Potential Economic Consequences for ‘Antisemitic Path’ Against Israel

US Sen. James Risch (R-ID) speaks during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Washington, DC, May 21, 2024. Photo: Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect
Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman James Risch (R-ID) issued a sharp warning Tuesday, accusing Ireland of embracing antisemitism and threatening potential economic consequences if the Irish government proceeds with new legislation targeting Israeli trade.
“Ireland, while often a valuable U.S. partner, is on a hateful, antisemitic path that will only lead to self-inflicted economic suffering,” Risch wrote in a post on X. “If this legislation is implemented, America will have to seriously reconsider its deep and ongoing economic ties. We will always stand up to blatant antisemitism.”
Marking a striking escalation in rhetoric from a senior US lawmaker, Risch’s comments came amid growing tensions between Ireland and Israel, which have intensified dramatically since the Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel on October 7, 2023. Those attacks, in which roughly 1,200 Israelis were killed and more than 200 taken hostage, prompted a months-long Israeli military campaign in Gaza that has drawn widespread international scrutiny. Ireland has positioned itself as one of the most vocal critics of Israel’s response, accusing the Israeli government of disproportionate use of force and calling for immediate humanitarian relief and accountability for the elevated number of Palestinian civilian casualties.
Dublin’s stance has included tangible policy shifts. In May 2024, Ireland formally recognized a Palestinian state, becoming one of the first European Union members to do so following the outbreak of the war in Gaza. The move was condemned by Israeli officials, who recalled their ambassador to Ireland and accused the Irish government of legitimizing terrorism. Since then, Irish lawmakers have proposed further measures, including legislation aimed at restricting imports from Israeli settlements in the West Bank, policies viewed in Israel and among many American lawmakers as aligning with the controversial Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement.
While Irish leaders have defended their approach as grounded in international law and human rights, critics in Washington, including Risch, have portrayed it as part of a broader pattern of hostility toward Israel. Some US lawmakers have begun raising the possibility of reevaluating trade and diplomatic ties with Ireland in response.
Risch’s warning is one of the clearest indications yet that Ireland’s policies toward Israel could carry economic consequences. The United States is one of Ireland’s largest trading partners, and American companies such as Apple, Google, Meta and Pfizer maintain substantial operations in the country, drawn by Ireland’s favorable tax regime and access to the EU market.
Though the Trump administration has not echoed Risch’s warning, the remarks reflect growing unease in Washington about the trajectory of Ireland’s foreign policy. The State Department has maintained a careful balancing act, expressing strong support for Israel’s security while calling for increased humanitarian access in Gaza. Officials have stopped short of condemning Ireland’s actions directly but have expressed concern about efforts they see as isolating Israel on the international stage.
Ireland’s stance is emblematic of a growing international divide over the war. While the US continues to provide military and diplomatic backing to Israel, many European countries have called for an immediate ceasefire and investigations into alleged war crimes.
Irish public opinion has long leaned pro-Palestinian, and Irish lawmakers have repeatedly voiced concern over the scale of destruction in Gaza and the dire humanitarian situation.
Irish officials have not yet responded to The Algemeiner’s request for comment.
The post Key US Lawmaker Warns Ireland of Potential Economic Consequences for ‘Antisemitic Path’ Against Israel first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Israel Condemns Iran’s Suspension of IAEA Cooperation, Urges Europe to Reinstate UN Sanctions

Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar at a press conference in Berlin, Germany, June 5, 2025. REUTERS/Christian Mang/File Photo
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar on Wednesday condemned Iran’s decision to halt cooperation with the UN’s nuclear watchdog and called on the international community to reinstate sanctions to curb Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.
“Iran has just issued a scandalous announcement about suspending its cooperation with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency),” Saar wrote in a post on X. “This is a complete renunciation of all its international nuclear obligations and commitments.”
Last week, the Iranian parliament voted to suspend cooperation with the IAEA “until the safety and security of [the country’s] nuclear activities can be guaranteed.”
“The IAEA and its Director-General are fully responsible for this sordid state of affairs,” Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi wrote in a post on X.
The top Iranian diplomat said this latest decision was “a direct result of [IAEA Director-General Rafael Grossi’s] regrettable role in obfuscating the fact that the Agency — a full decade ago — already closed all past issues.
“Through this malign action,” Araghchi continued, “he directly facilitated the adoption of a politically-motivated resolution against Iran by the IAEA [Board of Governors] as well as the unlawful Israeli and US bombings of Iranian nuclear sites.”
The Parliament of Iran has voted for a halt to collaboration with the IAEA until the safety and security of our nuclear activities can be guaranteed.
This is a direct result of @rafaelmgrossi‘s regrettable role in obfuscating the fact that the Agency—a full decade ago—already…
— Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) June 27, 2025
On Wednesday, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian approved a bill banning UN nuclear inspectors from entering the country until the Supreme National Security Council decides that there is no longer a threat to the safety of its nuclear sites.
In response, Saar urged European countries that were part of the now-defunct 2015 nuclear deal to activate its “snapback” clause and reinstate all UN sanctions lifted under the agreement.
Officially known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), this accord between Iran and several world powers imposed temporary restrictions on Tehran’s nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.
During his first term, US President Donald Trump withdrew from the deal and reinstated unilateral sanctions on Iran.
“The time to activate the Snapback mechanism is now! I call upon the E3 countries — Germany, France and the UK to reinstate all sanctions against Iran!” Saar wrote in a post on X.
“The international community must act decisively now and utilize all means at its disposal to stop Iranian nuclear ambitions,” he continued.
The time to activate the Snapback mechanism is now!
I call upon the E3 countries- Germany, France and the UK to reinstate all sanctions against Iran!
Iran has just issued a scandalous announcement about suspending its cooperation with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy…— Gideon Sa’ar | גדעון סער (@gidonsaar) July 2, 2025
Saar’s latest remarks come after Araghchi met last week in Geneva with his counterparts from Britain, France, Germany and the European Union’s Foreign Policy Chief Kaja Kallas — their first meeting since the Iran-Israel war began.
Europe is actively urging Iran to reengage in talks with the White House to prevent further escalation of tensions, but has yet to address the issue of reinstating sanctions.
Speaking during an official visit to Latvia on Tuesday, Saar said that “Operation Rising Lion” — Israel’s sweeping military campaign aimed at dismantling Iran’s nuclear capabilities — has “revealed the full extent of the Iranian regime’s threat to Israel, Europe, and the global order.”
“Iran deliberately targeted civilian population centers with its ballistic missiles,” Saar said at a press conference. “The same missile threat can reach Europe, including Latvia and the Baltic states.”
“Israel’s actions against the head of the snake in Iran contributed directly to the safety of Europe,” the Israeli top diplomat continued, adding that Israeli strikes have set back the Iranian nuclear program by many years.
The post Israel Condemns Iran’s Suspension of IAEA Cooperation, Urges Europe to Reinstate UN Sanctions first appeared on Algemeiner.com.