RSS
Iran’s Khamenei Urges Allies to Step Up Struggle Against Israel
Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei speaks during a meeting with a group of students in Tehran, Iran, Nov. 2, 2022. Photo: Office of the Iranian Supreme Leader/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS
Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei appeared in public on Friday for the first time since Iran’s missile attack on Israel, describing it as legitimate punishment for what he called Israeli crimes and calling for more anti-Israel struggle.
Delivering his first Friday prayers sermon in nearly five years, Khamenei said Israel’s adversaries in the region should “double your efforts and capabilities… and resist the aggressive enemy.”
The deputy commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, the country’s most powerful military force, said meanwhile that Iran would strike Israeli energy and gas installations if Israel attacked it.
“If the occupiers make such a mistake, we will target all their energy sources, installations and all refineries and gas fields,” the semi-official Iranian news agency SNN quoted Ali Fadavi as saying.
Iran launched a barrage of missiles against Israel on Tuesday in what it said was retaliation for the killing of Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in Beirut on Sept 27, and the assassination of Hamas chief Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran in July.
Iran blames Israel for Haniyeh’s killing. Israeli officials have not claimed responsibility.
Speaking alternately in Arabic and Persian, Khamenei eulogized Nasrallah, Iran’s top paramilitary ally in the region, and said the focus of the US and its allies was to preserve the security of Israel as a cover for seizing the region’s resources.
“Our resistant people in Lebanon and Palestine, all these testimonies and spilled blood will not shake your will, but rather strengthen your steadfastness,” Khamenei said.
“Israel pretends to win through assassinations, destruction, bombing and killing of civilians. This behavior increased the resistance’s motivation,” Khamenei added. “This reality shows us that every strike launched by any group against Israel is a service to the region and to all humanity.”
Every now and then his hand grasped the barrel of a rifle that stood to his left, a custom that has been followed by Friday prayer leaders across the country for decades.
Khamenei said Iran’s attack on Israel on Tuesday was “legal and legitimate” and was the minimum punishment for what he called Israel’s crimes.
Khamenei told the large crowd that Iran will not “procrastinate nor act hastily to carry out its duty” in confronting Israel, adding that the missile attack on Israel was “legal and legitimate.”
The post Iran’s Khamenei Urges Allies to Step Up Struggle Against Israel first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
There Is Trouble on Campus as the 2024-2025 Academic Year Ends

Demonstrators take part in an “Emergency Rally: Stand With Palestinians Under Siege in Gaza,” amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, Oct. 14, 2023. Photo: REUTERS/Brian Snyder
The Spring semester has ended with higher education in upheaval. The political and economic relationships with the Federal government are now rapidly changing, with billions of taxpayer funding frozen or and foreign student visas on hold.
Here are some recent incidents that have occurred on campus:
- Protestors briefly and violently occupied a library at Columbia University. Later reports indicated they were mostly Columbia students, Some 65 students were suspended by the university with many barred from campus. In court, the group’s lawyer described the action as a “teach-in”;
- At the University of Washington, pro-Hamas and Antifa protestors occupied a newly opened engineering building, setting fires and damaging equipment. Over 30 arrests were made, and damage to the building was estimated at $1.2 million. The state’s governor claimed those responsible would be held “accountable,” and a Federal investigation was launched;
- At Brooklyn College, protestors attempted to create an encampment, but were driven off campus by police. As protestors left, they stopped at the Hillel house where one individual gave a speech denouncing it as a “Zionist institution.” Altercations ensued, resulting in arrests;
- An encampment at Swarthmore College was removed by police, and nine individuals were arrested. The encampment was sparsely attended and Swarthmore activists reported frustration with “unambiguously ineffective” SJP tactics, hostility toward otherwise sympathetic supporters, and an “increasingly adversarial tone towards the general student body;”
- An encampment at Dartmouth College was dismantled after the administration agreed to provide subsidies to international students “in need” and to meet with protestors regarding divestment. Later in the month, protestors briefly occupied an area outside the university president’s office;
- At Rutgers University, a pro-Hamas demonstration was held outside the Hillel building, where Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-NJ) was holding a roundtable meeting. This resulted in four arrests. One police officer was assaulted;
A number of “Nakba Day” protests were held at universities including at Trinity College (Cambridge) and Tel Aviv University, and across major cities including New York and London.
Security precautions for Jewish communities and institutions were heightened after the Washington, D.C. murders. Even prior to this, Birmingham University’s Hillel house announced it would apply for permission construct a large fence around its property as protection from antisemitic protests and attacks.
In an especially disturbing development, a local Michigan judge considered ordering the state’s gay and Jewish Attorney General, Dana Nessel, to recuse herself from prosecuting pro-Hamas trespassers at the University of Michigan because of allegations that she is biased against Arabs and Muslims that were made in a separate case.
The Trump administration continues to target leading institutions, above all Harvard and Columbia, with funding cuts and other restrictions over their refusal to rapidly address new mandates regarding the eradication of DEI politics and campus antisemitism.
Other leading institutions including Vanderbilt University and Dartmouth College, which have explicitly adopted positions defending free speech as well as maintained campus safety and civility, have not been the focus of the Trump administration.
Administration efforts to remove foreign students who support Hamas and advocate for revolution against the US have been stymied by court orders. Most key individuals targeted by an early wave of deportation orders have been freed by courts — even though they openly supported a US-designated terror group on the streets of America.
The higher education industrial complex continues to complain about Federal cuts and pressure. A recent poll, however, indicates that significant numbers of Americans hold negative views of Ivy League institutions, suggesting that the elite sector of the industry has little social capital. But concerns remain that continued administration emphasis on antisemitism, along with DEI and resulting discrimination policies, will generate resentment and antisemitism as Jews are blamed for what is happening.
As the immense confrontation between the Trump administration and the higher education industrial complex unfolds, faculty find themselves trapped. The majority of faculty who are not pro-Palestinian — much less overt Hamas — supporters have been tarred by their ideologically committed colleagues, as have scientists who have found their funding and student staffing destroyed.
Professional organizations such as the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) have been built as left wing pressure groups, which now give credence to far left factions explicitly in support of Hamas. Other professional organizations, such as the American Psychological Association, are suffused with antisemitism and anti-Israel bias to the point where they have now attracted political attention.
Faculty groups continue to provide largely anonymous support for pro-Hamas protestors and anti-Israel policies:
- The University of Washington chapter of Faculty for Justice in Palestine strongly condemned the university for taking action against protestors who caused over $1 million in damage to an engineering building and for accepting donations from Boeing;
- Columbia University’s American Association of University Professors condemned the institution’s handling of the library takeover and for plans to revise “shared governance” structures;
- The George Washington University Faculty and Staff for Justice in Palestine condemned the university’s response to a student commencement speaker who had excoriated Israel. She was later barred from campus;
- The University of Toronto Faculty Association also narrowly voted to divest from Israel and demanded the university follow suit.
Largely in contrast to university administrations, faculty-led groups have also rewarded student protestors. In one example, two Harvard Law School students who had assaulted a Jewish student were awarded fellowships while other anti-Israel students were recommended for Rhodes and Truman scholarships. Also at Harvard, an honorary degree was awarded to Berkeley faculty member and BDS supporter Elaine Kim.
In parallel, reports continue to appear regarding the pervasiveness of anti-Israel bias in British university classrooms, and the systematic purging of Jewish adjuncts from the City University of New York’s accounting department. These and other incidents indicate that disparate faculty members have continued or even intensified both anti-Israel and antisemitic efforts in spire of media and Federal scrutiny.
Students continued to protest against Israel with particular emphasis on the anniversaries of 2024 encampments and “Nakba Day.” One protest strategy that has reemerged are hunger strikes by students and faculty, including at Stanford University, Yale University, Occidental College, Cal State Long Beach, and San Francisco State University.
As has been the norm in previous years, commencements were the scene of pro-Hamas protests. Columbia students drowned out president Claire Shipman’s remarks, including favorable comments regarding detained student Mahmoud Khalil, which produced angry jeers from the crowd. Later several students burned their diplomas. Two students were arrested. Barnard College president Laura Rosenbury was jeered by graduates who shouted “shame.” Graduates at many institutions waved Palestinian flags and jeered, including at Brooklyn College.
In another notable case at New York University’s Gallatin School of Individualized Study, the student commencement speaker deviated from the speech he had originally submitted and excoriated the US and Israel saying, “I want to say that the genocide currently occurring is supported politically and militarily by the United States, is paid for by our tax dollars, and has been live streamed to our phones for the past 18 months.” Students applauded the speech and the university stated the student “lied about the speech he was going to deliver and violated the commitment he made to comply with our rules.” It then withheld his diploma.
Other students deviated from approved remarks and called for divestment and accused Israel of “genocide” and their schools of complicity in their commencement speeches, such as at MIT and George Washington University. Disruptions were reported at City University of New York, Columbia University and Rutgers University. Faculty members dressed in keffiyehs at New York University.
Another commencement related incident saw Salman Rushdie, who was almost murdered by a Muslim protestor in 2022, withdraw as commencement speaker at Claremont McKenna College after complaints by the local CAIR branch and threats to protest by the school’s Muslim Student Association.
K-12
Anti-Israel bias and overt antisemitism continues to be integrated into K-12 education through teachers’ unions and “ethnic studies.” The continued promotion of “anti-Palestinian racism” as the pinnacle of intersectionalism is an especially ominous development. The concept, which sacralizes Palestinian narratives regarding “nakba” and Israeli evil, and makes factual counter-narratives and potentially Jewish expressions of identity and belief illegal on the basis of hurt feelings, is now official policy in Toronto public schools.
A variety of reports have shown how radical teachers in Philadelphia public schools have systematically dominated teacher training and curriculum development in the name of “racial justice,” and against Israel and Jews.
The role of teachers’ unions in promoting “Palestine” as a core principle is most developed in Britain. There, the National Education Union has been at the forefront of anti-Israel organizing with “days of action,” workshops to “advocate for Palestine in our schools,” celebrating Nakba Day, and circulating BDS petitions, all ostensibly aimed at teachers rather than students. In reality, reports continue to document how teacher routinely indoctrinate students against Israel and Jews both inside and outside classrooms, employing crude and vicious terms such as “ZioNazis.”
In the US, local teachers’ unions such as the Beaverton Education Association and internal affinity groups such as “NY Educators for Palestine” and “Teaching While Muslim” continue to push indoctrination efforts such as “Teach Palestine Week.” At the national level, the Democratic Socialists of America is currently running several candidates for the leadership of the United Federation of Teachers.
Local pushback against teachers’ unions, such as in Massachusetts, has had limited impact, since unions operate with impunity. Control of oversight institutions such as school boards has become critical, since these too are routinely taken over by BDS supporters. In an unusual outcome, in the New Rochelle, NY, school board vote a progressive candidate endorsed by former Congressman Jamaal Bowman (D) lost resoundingly to both another Black candidate and Jewish candidates. She then blamed anti-Blackness and her support for “Gaza.” Jewish and centrist voters had mobilized vigorously against her on the basis of Bowman’s endorsement.
The author is a contributor to SPME, where a completely different version of this article was published.
The post There Is Trouble on Campus as the 2024-2025 Academic Year Ends first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Sailing to Gaza: Greta Thunberg’s Latest Anti-Israel Publicity Stunt

Police officers detain Swedish climate campaigner Greta Thunberg, during an Oily Money Out and Fossil Free London protest in London, Britain, October 17, 2023. Photo: Reuters/Toby Melville
Greta Thunberg is on her way to save the people of Gaza.
The 22-year-old Swedish climate crusader is one of 12 anti-Israel activists sailing to the Gaza Strip on the vessel Madleen, allegedly to bring aid to the embattled enclave and to challenge Israel’s naval blockade.
Even though the boat is still days away from reaching the coast, it is already making news due to the high-profile status of some of those onboard. Along with Thunberg are Game of Thrones actor Liam Cunningham, French politician Rima Hassan, and Al Jazeera journalist Omar Faiad.
As social media becomes inundated with images of the activists galivanting on the high seas and mainstream media outlets like the Associated Press, ABC Australia, and CBS News are beginning to report on the vessel’s “humanitarian mission,” it is important that news consumers understand why there is a blockade of the Gaza Strip and are aware of the sordid history of past attempts to break the blockade.
Greta Thunberg’s so-called “freedom flotilla” encapsulates the delusion and hypocrisy surrounding the Israel-Gaza war.
This isn’t a humanitarian mission—it’s a Mediterranean leisure cruise. Participants are smiling, swimming, and filming TikTok videos. This is self-serving… pic.twitter.com/eUzhsXW54r
— Maccabee Task Force (@MacTaskForce) June 3, 2025
The Blockade of Gaza: A Brief History
Following Hamas’ violent takeover of the Gaza Strip in 2007, both Israel and Egypt restricted maritime traffic off the coast of Gaza to curb weapons smuggling by Hamas.
In 2008, Israel declared the Mediterranean Sea adjacent to Gaza a war zone, and reserved the right to inspect ships entering that area. Then, in 2009, Israel implemented a total naval blockade of the Gaza Strip.
Since the imposition of the naval blockade in 2009, there have been several incidents of the Israeli military intercepting ships carrying weapons bound for Hamas and other Gaza-based terror groups.
This includes the Victoria, which was intercepted in 2011 carrying 50 tons of Iranian weapons, the Klos-C, an Iranian arms ship that was seized in 2014, and a weapons-smuggling vessel disguised as a fishing boat that was intercepted in 2016.
Along with the naval blockade of the Gaza Strip, there are also restrictions on the importing of goods through the land crossings between the Gaza Strip and both Israel and Egypt that are also meant to contain Hamas’ ability to bring in weapons and other goods intended for its terror infrastructure.
While the Israeli-Egyptian land and maritime blockade of Gaza might appear to be harsh, it is a legal necessity that provides basic necessities for the people of Gaza while also serving as a deterrent to Hamas’ terror campaign.
It should also be noted that, contrary to its depiction as such by some activists and journalists, the blockade of Gaza is not a “siege.” Aside from a brief two-month period (March-May 2025) during the ongoing Israel-Hamas war, there have never been extended periods of time when food and other necessities were entirely barred from entering the Gaza Strip.
Attempts to Break the Blockade
For almost as long as the Gaza Strip blockade has existed, activists have attempted to break it, placing greater emphasis on public attention than actually bringing aid to the people of Gaza. Even in this current case of the Madleen, organizers have admitted that the limited amount of aid on the ship is “symbolic.”
The most famous attempt to break the blockade was in 2010, when Israeli forces intercepted a naval flotilla (led by the ship Mavi Marmara) as it attempted to reach the Gazan coast. After Israeli naval commandos boarded the lead ship, a violent confrontation broke out between the “peace activists” and the soldiers, resulting in the deaths of 10 Turkish activists and the wounding of several Israeli soldiers.
The Turkish organization that organized this flotilla, the Foundation for Human Rights and Freedoms and Humanitarian Relief (IHH), reportedly has ties to Hamas and was more focused on confronting the Israeli blockade than providing aid to the people of Gaza. The aid, which was offloaded in Israel, was later refused by the Hamas authorities in Gaza.
Now, 15 years later, the IHH continues to be involved with the Freedom Flotilla Coalition, which is sponsoring the latest blockade-breaking attempt by the Madleen.
As the publicity campaign around Greta Thunberg and the Madleen continues to gather steam, will the media provide their audience with a proper context for understanding Israel’s blockade of Gaza, or will this latest stunt merely serve as a lightning rod for false narratives and misleading information about Israel’s war against Hamas?
The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.
The post Sailing to Gaza: Greta Thunberg’s Latest Anti-Israel Publicity Stunt first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
France’s Double Battle: Facing Islamist Threats at Home, Undermining Allies Abroad

French President Emmanuel Macron is seen at the University of Lausanne in Switzerland. Photo: Reuters/Martial Trezzini
France’s recent crackdown on the Muslim Brotherhood marks a long-overdue defense of Western liberalism. A leaked intelligence report exposing the Brotherhood’s covert penetration of French institutions reflects a serious governmental shift — one that rightly sees this Islamist movement not as a misunderstood religious organization, but as a subversive ideological force bent on eroding secular democratic norms from within.
For nations like the United States and Israel, this is a welcome change. Yet France’s simultaneous drift toward antagonizing Israel exposes a deep contradiction in its foreign policy — one that threatens both the coherence of Western alliances and the broader struggle against political Islamism.
The French report highlights how the Brotherhood operates through “entryism” — embedding within institutions like schools, local governments, and NGOs — to reshape society along Islamist lines. This is not religious practice; it is political infiltration, designed to weaken the secular state and replace it with one governed by Islamic law. France’s determination to confront this head-on deserves credit. But the fight against Islamism cannot be confined to domestic policy — it must also inform international posture, particularly toward those democracies on the front lines of this ideological conflict.
France’s increasingly hostile stance toward Israel is deeply problematic. Even as Israel defends itself against Hamas — a direct offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood — France has escalated its rhetoric, threatened sanctions, and backed premature recognition of a Palestinian state. This is not principled diplomacy; it is a strategic blunder. It undermines a key democratic ally battling the same forces France claims to resist, and it emboldens the very actors seeking to dismantle the Western order from within and without.
The context matters. In the wake of Hamas’ October 7 atrocities — an unprovoked terrorist onslaught targeting civilians — Israel launched a necessary and lawful campaign to dismantle the group’s military and political infrastructure in Gaza. Yet rather than standing unequivocally with a fellow democracy under siege, French President Emmanuel Macron responded by warning of punitive measures unless Israel altered its military approach. Such moral equivalence dangerously misconstrues the nature of the conflict. Hamas embeds itself in civilian areas precisely to manufacture these dilemmas. To pressure Israel instead of condemning Hamas’ tactics outright is to reward terrorism and punish self-defense.
Moreover, Macron’s push for unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state, co-sponsored with Saudi Arabia at the UN, sidelines the only sustainable path to peace: direct negotiations. Statehood cannot be imposed through diplomatic fiat. It must be earned through renunciation of violence, institutional reform, and mutual recognition. France’s proposal bypasses all of this, incentivizing Palestinian intransigence while further isolating Israel in multilateral forums.
This imbalance raises a troubling question: why does France, so quick to sound the alarm over Islamist subversion at home, tolerate and even empower radical Islam’s most virulent expressions abroad? If the Muslim Brotherhood poses a threat to the secular French Republic, how can its ideological twin — Hamas — be treated as a legitimate political actor or representative of Palestinian aspirations? The contradiction reveals a failure to apply France’s newfound clarity consistently.
This inconsistency also weakens the broader Western effort to counter political Islamism. Israel is not just another Middle Eastern actor — it is the region’s only liberal democracy, a frontline state confronting threats that extend far beyond its borders. As Brotherhood-inspired movements gain ground across Europe, from radicalized suburbs to university campuses, their international legitimacy is often buoyed by diplomatic gestures like those France now champions. The message is clear: ideological extremism may be denounced domestically, but rewarded diplomatically.
France’s position also threatens to erode its credibility among allies. Israel, already wary of rising antisemitism and radicalization in Europe, sees in these developments not just diplomatic friction, but strategic abandonment. The demonstrations sweeping across French and other European cities in support of Hamas, often laced with virulent anti-Israel and anti-Jewish rhetoric, are no accident. They are the domestic fallout of decades of permissive attitudes toward Islamist activism — precisely the kind of threat France now claims to be confronting. A principled stand abroad must match the urgency at home.
To be clear, confronting political Islamism must never come at the expense of individual rights or religious freedom. Discrimination against Muslims is unacceptable. But there is a profound difference between protecting believers and tolerating movements that seek to replace liberal democracy with theocracy. France, through its doctrine of laïcité, upholds one of the clearest boundaries between faith and state. That clarity must extend beyond the domestic sphere if it is to be meaningful.
If France is serious about safeguarding Western values, it must rethink its posture toward Israel. Constructive diplomacy — one that prioritizes the hostages’ release, Israeli security, and a negotiated end to conflict — must replace coercive measures and inflammatory declarations. Hamas, not Israel, is the obstacle to peace. Recognizing this is not only a moral imperative; it is a strategic necessity.
Amine Ayoub, a fellow at the Middle East Forum, is a policy analyst and writer based in Morocco. Follow him on X: @amineayoubx
The post France’s Double Battle: Facing Islamist Threats at Home, Undermining Allies Abroad first appeared on Algemeiner.com.