RSS
The Artistic Director of a Theatre Posted Hateful Comments About Israel — And I Lost My Position
November 2023: An Israeli soldier helps to provide incubators to Al Shifa Hospital in Gaza. Photo: Screenshot
We tend to think of today’s antisemites and Israel-haters as the masked protesters trying to intimidate Jewish students on university campuses, or perhaps the professors who sympathize with Hamas and refuse to recognize Israel’s right to exist.
But there’s another kind of person who lurks beneath the surface, who cleverly knows how to spew hatred about Israel but remains outside the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s definition of antisemitism. They might even be soft-spoken and are usually supportive of diversity, equity, and inclusion. Yet, in a moment of weakness — perhaps after they’ve been watching the horrible images coming from Gaza — they can’t help themselves and take to social media.
This was the case with the artistic director of a small independent theatre company in Montreal, who in January 2023 posted an open letter to members of Parliament on his Facebook page.
It started on an empathetic note: “My stomach churns as I write to you on what should be a peaceful Saturday morning … I cherish all members of my community. I value mutual understanding, empathy, dialogue, creative solutions and facing conflicts from a starting point of love and an attempt to listen to and understand each other.”
Adding a measure of protection, he continued: “I wish to be clear. I have many dear friends that are Jewish, and many that are Israeli … The people of Israel are NOT their government.” (But in a democracy, yes, many of them are. And even amongst those critical of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, almost all Israelis support the war against Hamas in Gaza — which is a war for Israel’s survival.)
And then the artistic director let it rip: “Israel is actively annihilating the people of Gaza … The government of Israel needs to be BETTER than HAMAS.”
“They have shockingly pulled the wool over our eyes as they unapologetically destroy families and blindly and recklessly murder and maim innocent civilians.”
“Under Netanyahu, Israel is quickly becoming a … pariah state, and they are undeniably enacting genocidal atrocities upon the entire population of Gaza.”
Yes — he not only falsely accused Israel of genocide, but charged the country with “pulling the wool” over the eyes of the global population — an antisemitic trope that literally goes back hundreds of years.
I’m sure we’ve all seen such posts from people who we might know — or thought we knew — but what happens when these comments come from the person who is your employer or supervisor? What if you yourself happen to be Jewish or Israeli?
And what happens if, suddenly, after working for this institution, you suddenly find yourself demoted, sidelined, or not having your contract renewed?
Unfortunately, that is exactly my situation.
I’ve served this theatre company as the director of new play development and an associate artist for the past four years. My responsibilities as an independent contractor included chairing a five-person jury for a competition to select the best new plays by Quebec playwrights, as well as running a youth playwriting contest, which I initiated, and trust they will let me continue.
The news of my removal from jury duty came via email on October 23.
“There is a long list of folks around town that have very little work and creative outlets at the moment, and I feel it’s the right thing to bring in a fresh new jury for this year’s competition,” it read. (In the past, the other four jury positions were rotated.)
By that logic, shouldn’t the artistic director step aside in order to give other unemployed artistic directors an opportunity?
This isn’t about money. Theatre will never make anyone rich. In fact, I was instrumental in securing a grant from a pro-Israel foundation to fund my position. (Apparently, Israeli money is still acceptable.)
Is it possible that all this is a coincidence? Absolutely. But my issue is hardly an isolated case.
Recently, in Maryland, an Israeli tech worker at Intel was fired after complaining about his boss’ hateful Israel bashing, and is now suing the company. On the other side of the coin, numerous teachers and professors — even some with tenure — have been fired for their anti-Israel hate speech because they can no longer be trusted to remain objective in assessing their Jewish and Israeli students. It’s even happened at the highest levels of power: The Wall Street Journal reported last week that a longtime special advisor on genocide at the United Nations had her contract terminated because she refuted the position that Israel’s campaign in Gaza did not meet the definition of genocide.
It took me less than five minutes to uncover the artistic director’s diatribe. I searched back on his timeline, looking for any other mention of “barbaric” countries, but couldn’t find any. No mention of Russia’s completely unjustified or provoked invasion of Ukraine, or dozens of other wars raging around the globe. Nothing about Canada’s involvement in Afghanistan, Syria, or the present war in Sudan that has seen up to 150,000 civilians killed.
He didn’t even mention the atrocities against Israeli civilians that took place on October 7. In fact, on Oct. 8, he posted an ad for his upcoming play.
I’m not an advocate for censorship, but there’s a larger question here: how can the leader of a company or organization publicly make damning, hateful, inaccurate and out-of-context statements about some of the most complicated matters of the day and remain objective about hiring or firing employees — especially when they’re members of groups that the leader publicly maligns, like myself.
Interestingly, when I brought forward my concerns about the artistic director’s statement to the company’s board of directors, suggesting that he should at least acknowledge that his criticisms of Israel may have gone too far, my request was unanimously rejected.
Montreal was recently rocked by violent protests laden with antisemitic overtones that made headlines around the world.
That hate didn’t arise from nowhere.
Oren Safdie is a playwright and screenwriter.
The post The Artistic Director of a Theatre Posted Hateful Comments About Israel — And I Lost My Position first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Yale Adopts IHRA Definition, Brown Launches New Training Program Amid Trump Campus Antisemitism Crackdown
People protest the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Islamist group Hamas, across the entrance to Yale, prior to commencement at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, US, May 20, 2024. Photo: Michelle McLoughlin via Reuters Connect.
Yale University has quietly adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, according to a new investigative report by the Yale Daily News, the school’s official campus newspaper.
IHRA — an intergovernmental organization comprising dozens of countries including the US — adopted a “working definition” of antisemitism in 2016. Since then, the definition has been widely accepted by Jewish groups and lawmakers across the political spectrum as a reference tool which helps policymakers determine what constitutes an incident of antisemitism, and it is now used by hundreds of governing institutions, including the US State Department, European Union, and United Nations.
According to the definition, antisemitism “is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.” It provides 11 specific, contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere. Beyond classic antisemitic behavior associated with the likes of the medieval period and Nazi Germany, the examples include denial of the Holocaust and newer forms of antisemitism targeting Israel such as demonizing the Jewish state, denying its right to exist, and holding it to standards not expected of any other democratic state.
Yale University apparently enacted the policy change following the inauguration of US President Donald Trump, the News said, noting that an archived webpage containing the section of the disciplinary code to which the definition was added shows a revision date of March 28. The paper added that the university never formally announced its adoption of what would have been a highly acclaimed move in some circles and a deplored one in others. Jewish civil rights groups such as the Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM) and Anti-Defamation League (ADL) encourage the definition’s adoption, as well as codification in law, while others argue it weaponizes the American people’s abhorrence of antisemitism to censor criticism of Israel — an accusation its advocates regard as a slander.
Writing to the Yale Daily News, Yale University officials downplayed the significance of the measure, saying it is “not intended to infringe free speech or the free expression of ideas” and even denying that the school holds “a separate definition” of antisemitism.” The Algemeiner has asked the university to clear up the matter. This article will be updated accordingly.
Yale became a hub of anti-Israel activism last academic year, with protesters demanding that the school boycott the Jewish state.
In other higher education news, Brown University recently reconstituted its anti-discrimination trainings to comply with a July 2024 settlement negotiated with the US Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights, The Brown Daily Herald reported on Tuesday. “Brown’s response to reports of discrimination and harassment” will be upgraded by the new trainings, the university’s executive vice president for planning and policy, Russell Carey, told the paper. Spokesperson Brian Clark, volunteering information Carey declined to disclose, confirmed that they will address “antisemitism.”
Brown was accused in 2023 of responding inadequately to a number of antisemitic incidents, including a Jewish student being called a “Zionist pig Jew” in a complaint filed by the editorial board of the conservative higher education news outlet Campus Reform. Following its agreement with OCR, the university denied violating civil rights laws, stressing that the allegations which prompted the federal government to investigate it were lodged by an organization “who has no affiliation with Brown or presence on its campus.”
Writing in a press release, it continued: “Many of the required actions outlined in the resolution agreement are underway and previously announced by the university … In some cases, the university agreed to further enhance and clarify its existing policies and procedures. In other cases, the university agreed to expand previously announced efforts, such as broadening the scope of training on nondiscrimination and harassment.”
The reforms may have come too late. As previously reported by The Algemeiner, the Trump administration plans to terminate $510 million worth of federal contracts and grants awarded to Brown University — an institution that is already struggling to cover a $46 million budget shortfall.
The university’s alleged failure to mount a response to the campus antisemitism crisis, as well as its embrace of the diversity, equity, and, inclusion (DEI) movement — perceived by many across the political spectrum as an assault on merit-based upward mobility and causing incidents of anti-White and anti-Asian discrimination — prompted the alleged pending action by the federal government, according to the right-leaning outlet The Daily Caller, which first reported the news last week.
Brown’s Jewish community has since come to the university’s defense, issuing a joint statement with the Brown Corporation which said that the campus is “peaceful and supportive campus for its Jewish community.”
The letter, signed by members of the local Hillel International chapter and Chabad on College Hill, continued: “Brown University is a place where Jewish life not only exists but thrives. While there is more work to be done, Brown, through the dedicated efforts of its administration, leadership, and resilient spirit of its Jewish community, continues to uphold the principles of inclusion, tolerance, and intellectual freedom that have been central to its identity since 1764.”
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
The post Yale Adopts IHRA Definition, Brown Launches New Training Program Amid Trump Campus Antisemitism Crackdown first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Israeli, French Jewish Leaders Slam Macron for Saying France Could Recognize Palestinian State in June
French President Emmanuel Macron speaks during a press conference in Paris, France, June 12, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Stephane Mahe
Israeli and French Jewish leaders sharply criticized French President Emmanuel Macron for saying that France is making plans to recognize a Palestinian state and could do so as early as June.
Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar condemned France’s announcement, stating that such a move would only reward terrorism.
“A ‘unilateral recognition’ of a fictional Palestinian state, by any country, in the reality that we all know, will be a prize for terror and a boost for Hamas,” Saar wrote in a post on X, referring to the Palestinian terrorist group that has ruled Gaza for nearly two decades.
“These kinds of actions will not bring peace, security, and stability in our region closer — but the opposite: they only push them further away,” Israel’s top diplomat added.
A “unilateral recognition” of a fictional Palestinian state, by any country, in the reality that we all know, will be a prize for terror and a boost for Hamas.
These kind of actions will not bring peace, security and stability in our region closer – but the opposite: they only…— Gideon Sa’ar | גדעון סער (@gidonsaar) April 9, 2025
On Wednesday, Macron revealed that France could recognize a Palestinian state within the next two months at a United Nations conference in June, co-hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, focused on a two-state solution for the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, while suggesting that other nations may join the effort.
“We must take the path of recognition [of the Palestinian state],” Macron told France 5 television. “So that’s what we’re gonna do in the coming months.”
He continued, “Our aim is to chair this conference with Saudi Arabia in June, where we could finalize this movement of mutual recognition [of a Palestinian state] by several parties.”
During the interview, Macron stated that recognizing a Palestinian state would allow France “to be clear in our fight against those who deny Israel’s right to exist — which is the case with Iran — and to commit ourselves to collective security in the region.”
“I won’t do it for unity or in order to please someone. I’ll do it because I think that at some point it would be fair,” the French leader said. “And also, because I want to take part in a collective dynamic, one that allows everyone who defends Palestine to also recognize Israel.”
Macron’s comments came after he traveled earlier this week to Cairo for talks with Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sissi and Jordan’s King Abdullah II at a trilateral summit focused on the situation in Gaza and other regional developments.
Beyond Israel, the Jewish community in France also lambasted Macron for his comments.
The Representative Council of Jewish Institutions of France (CRIF), the main representative body of French Jews, also condemned Macron’s decision, stating that “the path to a just and lasting peace begins with the unconditional release of hostages and the surrender of Hamas.”
“Announcing today that France will soon recognize a Palestinian state while 59 hostages are still held in Gaza allows Hamas to claim an unacceptable political victory,” CRIF wrote in a post on X.
“How can we consider recognizing a state when part of its territory is controlled by a terrorist organization? The current war began with the massacre of over 1,200 people, including 50 French citizens, on Oct. 7, 2023, which you [President Macron] described as ‘the largest antisemitic massacre of the 21st century,’” the post read.
“Supporting the Palestinian people means, first and foremost, freeing them from Hamas, which has led the civilian population into the tragic misery of war,” CRIF continued. “The conditions are not yet in place to recognize a Palestinian state.”
Monsieur le Président de la République,
Annoncer aujourd’hui que la France reconnaîtra prochainement un Etat palestinien alors que 59 otages sont encore retenus à Gaza, c’est permettre au Hamas de clamer une inacceptable victoire politique.
Comment peut-on envisager reconnaître…
— CRIF (@Le_CRIF) April 10, 2025
Hamas welcomed Macron’s comments as a positive development.
“We welcome the statements made by French President Emmanuel Macron regarding his country’s readiness to recognize the State of Palestine,” Hamas official Mahmud Mardawi told AFP. He added that the announcement was “an important step that, if implemented, would constitute a positive shift in the international position towards the legitimate national rights of our Palestinian people.”
Last year, Spain, Norway, Ireland, and Slovenia recognized a Palestinian state, claiming that such a move would contribute to fostering a two-state solution and promote lasting peace in the region.
At the time, Israel condemned the decision as an “incitement to genocide” against the Jewish people. France said that “the conditions have yet been met for this decision to have a real impact on this process,” indicating support for such a move at a later date.
Out of the 27 total European Union member states, Bulgaria, Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, and Sweden have also recognized a Palestinian state.
Meanwhile, Germany, Portugal, and the UK have all stated that the time is not right for recognizing a Palestinian state.
The post Israeli, French Jewish Leaders Slam Macron for Saying France Could Recognize Palestinian State in June first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
US Congress Advances Legislation to Punish Iran, Collaborators as Trump Admin Gears Up for Nuclear Talks
US President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office, on the day he signs executive orders, at the White House in Washington, DC, March 6, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
As the Trump administration prepares for negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program this weekend, the US House Foreign Affairs Committee on Wednesday moved forward legislation that would impose more sanctions on those who collaborate with Tehran and its terrorist proxy groups.
The committee approved by a voice vote the Enhanced Iran Sanctions Act, legislation spearheaded by Reps. Mike Lawler (R-NY) and Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick (D-FL) that would impose penalties on those who export, sell, or process Iranian petrochemical products.
“My bill before us today … will give the Trump administration the tools it needs to end the Iranian oil trade once and for all,” Lawler said. “Without these enablers, the regime’s oil operation will collapse, and that’s what we’re counting on.”
Meanwhile, the Foreign Affairs Committee, by a 45-6 margin, also voted to advance the No Paydays for Hostage-Takers Act, bipartisan legislation which seeks to issue penalties toward individuals who assist Iran in taking Americans hostage. The legislation, if passed, would prohibit those who have received federal terrorism and weapons of mass destruction sanctions from entering the United States.
Additionally, the legislation would mandate that the administration investigate and perhaps sanction any individual involved in the kidnapping and detention of American citizens.
Moreover, the bill would direct the secretary of state to decide whether to prohibit US passport holders from traveling to Iran due to the kidnappings of certain American nationals there.
The Sanction Sea Pirates Act, led by Rep. Jonathan Jackson (D-IL), was approved alongside the other bills in a bipartisan package. The legislation would penalize any person who “knowingly engages in piracy” with consequences, which include freezing their assets and banning them from traveling to the US. The bill was primarily advanced to target the Iran-backed Houthis, a US-designated terrorist organization that has disrupted international shipping from Yemen.
The movement in Congress comes as negotiations between the United States and Iran are scheduled to commence this Saturday in Oman. The Trump administration is attempting to curb Iran’s nuclear program, which Western countries believe is ultimately geared toward developing nuclear weapons, and has threatened “great danger” if an agreement cannot be reached. Tehran claims its nuclear program is only meant for civilian energy purposes.
Trump did not elaborate on the specifics of the schedule, but he did tell reporters from the Oval Office on Wednesday that he had a deadline in mind for when the negotiations must result in a solution that is acceptable.
“We have a little time, but we don’t have much time, because we’re not going to let them have a nuclear weapon. We can’t let them have a nuclear weapon,” Trump said of Iran. “I’m not asking for much. I just — I don’t — they can’t have a nuclear weapon.”
Iran’s leaders have challenged Trump’s claim that the discussions will be “direct” negotiations, calling them “indirect.”
Trump said that he “absolutely” would support military operations targeting Iran’s nuclear program if the US cannot strike an agreement with Tehran. The US president added that Israel would “obviously be very much involved” in any military efforts to dismantle Iran’s nuclear sites.
“If it requires military, we’re going to have military,” the president said. “Israel will obviously be very much involved in that.”
The post US Congress Advances Legislation to Punish Iran, Collaborators as Trump Admin Gears Up for Nuclear Talks first appeared on Algemeiner.com.