RSS
‘Shark Tank’ Investor Daniel Lubetzky Shares Clip of Father Retelling Experience at Dachau Concentration Camp
Daniel Lubetzky, the founder of KIND Snacks and an investor on the ABC series “Shark Tank,” posted on social media an archival video clip of his father discussing his experience as a prisoner in the Dachau concentration camp in honor of International Holocaust Remembrance Day on Monday.
The entrepreneur’s late father, Roman Lubetzky, along with Daniel’s uncle and grandmother survived the Dachau concentration camp in Germany when it was liberated by soldiers in the US Army. Monday marked the 80th anniversary of the liberation of the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp by Soviet troops on Jan. 27, 1945.
Daniel posted on Instagram a snippet of a two-hour interview in which his father recounted his experiences in Dachau. The Jewish Mexican-American entrepreneur said the clip should “remind us of our duty to prevent something like this from ever happening again.”
“Let’s commit to learning lessons from the past so that the worst parts of history don’t repeat themselves — and so that we may all build a better future together,” Daniel added in the post.
In the video that Daniel shared, which is also available for viewing on YouTube, Roman first talked about how Nazis tried to dehumanize Jews in the streets of Europe during the Holocaust. For example, he said Jews could not walk on the sidewalks and were forced to bow in front of German Nazi soldiers and later go down on their knees in front of German troops.
In 1944, Rom`n and his family were sent in cattle cars to the Dachau concentration camp. In the video clip, Roman detailed inhuman conditions that Jews experienced in the cattle cars and later in the Nazi camp. “People were dying and starving like flies,” he said in part. “They had very effective ways of killing you by the way they fed you, hit you, and the way they treated you. People were dying in very large amounts. Surrounding that was constant harassment and constant, constant moments of fear.”
When it was first announced in September 2024 that Daniel would join the “Shark Tank” team as an investor, he said he hoped his Jewish Mexican mother Sonia was “proud” of him and that his father “is looking from above and seeing not just what I’ve achieved but how I’ve achieved it — by trying my very best to always follow the values he taught me.”
The post ‘Shark Tank’ Investor Daniel Lubetzky Shares Clip of Father Retelling Experience at Dachau Concentration Camp first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
The Gaza-Auschwitz Comparison Is a Moral Failure
The banner proclaiming “Palestine: the victory of the oppressed people over Nazi Zionism,” was prominently displayed behind Hamas terrorists as they forced hostage Naama Levy — whose pants were bloodied at the time of her capture — to smile in an army uniform. The goal of this image is clear: to “Nazify” Israel, whitewash Hamas’ crimes, and invert the roles of victims and oppressors. This is the essence of the Iran-backed terror group’s propaganda.
This is not merely an act of cruelty and humiliation; it is a calculated political message, designed to invert historical roles: Israel as the modern-day Third Reich, and Zionism as its ideology.
But Hamas is not alone in spreading this message. It is part of a long-standing antisemitic propaganda campaign that has gained renewed traction far beyond Gaza.
On American college campuses, in activist circles, and across social media, this rhetoric finds eager amplifiers: “Israelis are Nazis,” “Israel is genocide,” “Hamas is resistance.” Pseudo-human rights organizations, pseudo-anti-racists, and pseudo-feminists echo these slogans. At the same time, these voices remain disturbingly silent about the mass rapes, murders, and kidnappings carried out by Hamas on October 7. Their hypocrisy speaks volumes about their supposed commitment to justice and human rights.
These comparisons are not simply misguided or exaggerated; they have a double-edged effect. On one hand, they trivialize the Nazi atrocities by equating them with a contemporary conflict, tragic as it may be, that differs fundamentally in purpose and scope. On the other, they invert historical roles, casting Jews — victims of an unparalleled genocide — as today’s oppressors. This shift doesn’t necessarily deny the Holocaust outright, but distorts its meaning, drains it of its uniqueness, and repurposes it as a malleable ideological tool. The result is an assault on memory itself — on its ability to prevent the resurgence of hatred and, most urgently, the rising antisemitism witnessed since October 7, 2023.
The accusations of genocide directed at Israel are not new. They trace back to Yasser Arafat and Soviet propaganda in the 1970s, gaining momentum with each flare-up in Gaza. These claims rely on a deliberate distortion of historical facts. The Holocaust was a systematic and industrialized campaign of extermination, carried out in secrecy to annihilate an entire people. Gaza, despite its immense suffering and devastation, is the scene of a conflict between a terrorist group and a sovereign military — not an extermination effort. Comparing Gaza to Auschwitz distorts history and reduces the Holocaust to a vague, manipulable idea, undermining its status as a universal moral anchor.
This confusion does more than undermine the past; it undermines the present. The legal mechanisms designed to prevent genocide lose their potency when misused in this way. Raphaël Lemkin, who coined the term “genocide,” emphasized its specificity: the deliberate, systematic destruction of a group. By conflating the horrors of asymmetrical warfare with organized genocide, we blur the critical distinction between war and extermination. This misapplication of language is not just a semantic issue; it is a moral failure.
The issue doesn’t end with hashtags or protest slogans. It reaches the highest levels of political discourse. In 2014, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan accused Israel of “surpassing the Nazis in its barbarity” during Operation Protective Edge. In 2022, Mahmoud Abbas claimed Israel had committed “fifty holocausts,” and made these remarks in Berlin — the very city where the Holocaust was meticulously planned.
These statements are more than rhetorical flourishes; they trivialize the Holocaust and weaponize its memory against Israel — and, by extension, against Jews worldwide.
Why this fixation? Part of the answer lies in a broader effort to reshape the moral foundations of the postwar order. For decades, the Holocaust served as a cornerstone of postwar ethics, justifying the establishment of Israel and supporting universal human rights. Yet some now seek to replace this foundation with a new paradigm: decolonization. In this narrative, Israel is no longer the homeland of a persecuted people but the final vestige of colonialism. This reframing severs the historical connection between the Holocaust and Zionism, presenting Israel not as a resolution to Jewish history, but as a historical anomaly to be rectified.
Replacing the memory of the Holocaust with that of other struggles — even legitimate ones — poses a grave threat and betrays the spirit of “Never again,” which was meant as a universal call for vigilance, not as a pretext for contemporary hostility toward Jews. The danger of succumbing to this propaganda is not just the betrayal of historical memory, but its devastating real-world impact. The rise of antisemitism under the guise of political activism threatens the safety of Jewish communities worldwide, and chips away at the universal principles of justice and human rights.
If there is one lesson to be learned from the last 80 years, it is that antisemitism remains rife, though it now takes new forms. The latest version today hides behind the rhetoric of human rights and anti-colonialism. Israel is not the only target; Jews across the globe are under attack. Unless we confront this reality with clarity and determination, we risk allowing history to repeat itself.
Simone Rodan-Benzaquen is the Director of AJC Europe.
The post The Gaza-Auschwitz Comparison Is a Moral Failure first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Behind the Mask of ‘Pro-Peace’ Groups in Israel
Rula Daood and Alon-Lee Green, the Israeli national directors of the Standing Together movement, were included in the Time 100 Next list for 2024 due to their extensive pacifist activities, such as the national campaign “The North Demands Peace – Deal Now.” As part of this campaign, the organization’s activists hung billboards in northern Israel with the statement “The North Demands Peace” in Arabic and Hebrew. Ironically, or perhaps tragically, one of the billboards placed at the Maxim intersection in Haifa was near a site damaged by a Hezbollah rocket last October. This area also witnessed the horrific terror suicide bombing at Maxim restaurant, co-owned by Arabs and Jews, in 2003, which killed 21 Jews and Arabs and injured 51 others.
The push for a diplomatic solution with Hezbollah for a ceasefire at any cost, without restrictions or the possibility of Israeli action for violations, indicates a lack of security awareness among Standing Together activists. Last November, northern residents, local authorities, and community forums expressed firm opposition to the proposed ceasefire agreement with Lebanon, fearing future violations by Hezbollah and the potential for a terrible massacre. This fear was reinforced when an IDF spokesman revealed Hezbollah’s plans to conquer the Galilee. Although the ceasefire was eventually signed, Hezbollah violated it within five days.
Besides calling for a ceasefire in the north, Standing Together does not address the circumstances that led to the Sword of Iron war. While they importantly call for the return of hostages to Israel, they mislead the public by claiming that “the government and media in Israel are ignoring war crimes in Gaza and claiming everything is fine.” They assert that Israel is waging a war of extermination in Gaza and that “we must not get used to killing and starving innocent Palestinians in Gaza, hundreds of rocket launches daily, or abandoning cities in the north and south.”
At a demonstration, one of the national directors held signs showing Israeli and Palestinian death tolls since the war’s beginning, citing 44,249 Palestinian deaths without specifying how many were Hamas terrorists. This figure, from the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry, is unsupported. According to UN data from last May, a third of those killed in Gaza were women and children. A University of Pennsylvania expert’s study suggests the ratio of killed militants to civilians is around 1:1, according to the UN’s assessment. The ratio in urban combat zones around the world is 1:9, meaning nine civilians killed for every combatant killed — and that Israel is doing far more than any other military to avoid and reduce civilian deaths.
Regarding claims of starvation in Gaza, COGAT has facilitated the entry of over a million tons of aid on 57,545 trucks since the war began. From January to July 2024, the average daily food consumption in Gaza was about 3,004 calories per person, compared to 3,540 in Europe and North America, and 2,600 in African countries. Standing Together fails to blame Hamas for systematically stealing humanitarian aid from the residents of Gaza.
Originally supported by a German organization that backs the BDS movement and opposes the IHRA‘s working definition of antisemitism, Standing Together now promotes efforts embraced by the international delegitimization campaigns against Israel. They claim the destruction of Jabalia was for revenge and ethnic cleansing, ignoring the IDF’s continued discovery of weapons and terrorists since the military campaign renewed there on October 5, 2024.
The widespread recognition of organizations like Standing Together in Israel and internationally is concerning. While supposedly promoting coexistence and peace, they spread disinformation that could lead to sanctions harming both Israeli Arabs and Palestinians in the West Bank. Their focus on blaming Israel while neglecting to name Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran as the real culprits blurs the line between victim and attacker, undermining their legitimacy as a coexistence organization.
Tom Yohay is the manager of CAMERA on Campus Israel.
The post Behind the Mask of ‘Pro-Peace’ Groups in Israel first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Palestinian TV: In Gaza, Robbers Ambush Humanitarian Aid Trucks, Exploit Sale of Food
While the International Criminal Court falsely accused Israel of causing “starvation as a method of war and the denial of humanitarian relief,” official Palestinian Authority (PA) TV reported who the real criminals were.
Even before the current ceasefire deal, Israel had been generously letting humanitarian aid into the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.
Reporting from Gaza, official PA TV explained that “robbers ambush the aid trucks” and demand “transit fees,” so that by the time the aid reaches the merchants, the prices have increased more than 10 times:
Official PA TV reporter in Deir Al-Balah, Gaza: “From the moment the traders’ trucks or the humanitarian aid trucks set out from the gate of the Kerem Shalom Crossing until they arrive at Saladin Road, they encounter several ambushes by [Palestinian] robbers.
Some pay transit fees, large sums to pass from Saladin Road to the central [Gaza Strip] … When the trucks, aid, food stamps, and food packages reach the small merchants, the citizen must cover everything that was paid from when the truck sets out until it reaches the citizen. For example, one bag of milk that was sold for 5 shekels is now sold for 55 — you know where the 45 or 50 shekels went.” [emphasis added]
[Official PA TV, Jan. 7, 2025]
Similarly, meat prices are “exorbitant,” leaving citizens unable to afford it, and instead of feeding the hungry, the food was left to spoil:
Official PA TV reporter in Deir Al-Balah, Gaza: “Certain amounts of meat have begun to enter the [Gazan] markets at exorbitant prices, which thousands may be unable to purchase, and it is likely that some of the food and meat will spoil.”
[Official PA TV, Jan. 5, 2025]
Even PA Prime Minister Muhammad Mustafa has mentioned the “unfair distribution” of the humanitarian aid in Gaza:
PA Prime Minister Muhammad Mustafa: “We are monitoring the reports regarding the involvement of several parties in the Gaza Strip in exploiting the [humanitarian] provisions and aid, and their unfair distribution.”
[Official PA TV, Jan. 10, 2025]
Throughout the war, the Hamas terror organization has neglected Gazan civilians and looked out for its own interests only.
Palestinian Media Watch has exposed that Hamas has been using civilians as human shields, stole 28% of Gazans’ salaries, and stole the aid in order to give it to its terrorists.
The author is a senior analyst at Palestinian Media Watch, where a version of this article was originally published.
The post Palestinian TV: In Gaza, Robbers Ambush Humanitarian Aid Trucks, Exploit Sale of Food first appeared on Algemeiner.com.