RSS
Iran Says US, Israel Would Be ‘Crazy’ to Attack Its Nuclear Sites, Warns of ‘Decisive Response’
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a new interview that an attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities would be “crazy,” warning Tehran would have “an immediate and decisive response” as questions continued to swirl over whether US President Donald Trump would support such an Israeli strike.
“We have made it clear that any attack to our nuclear facilities would be faced with an immediate and decisive response,” Araghchi told Sky News in Iran in his first interview since Trump’s inauguration. “But I don’t think they will do that crazy thing. This is really crazy. And this would turn the whole region into a very bad disaster.”
Last week, while speaking to reporters, Trump appeared to hint that he could support a preemptive strike on Iranian nuclear facilities, which US, Israeli, and other officials believe are ultimately geared toward building nuclear weapons. Iran has long claimed its nuclear program is meant for peaceful, civilian purposes.
Though Trump did not confirm that he would back an Israeli attack, he suggested that such actions might be necessary if Tehran does not scale back its nuclear ambitions.
“I’m not going to answer that,” Trump said when asked by reporters if he supports Israeli strikes against Iran’s nuclear program. “Hopefully that can be worked out without having to worry about it. It would really be nice if that could be worked out without having to go that further step.”
The Trump administration has indicated that it aims to broker a deal with Tehran to mitigate its nuclear program, hoping to avoid possible military action.
During his 2024 presidential campaign, Trump vocally criticized the Biden administration for outright opposing an Israeli strike against Iran’s nuclear sites as a response to Iran’s ballistic missile attack against Israel in October. Thus, some observers have assumed that Trump would support direct attacks against Tehran.
In his initial term in the Oval Office from 2017-2021, Trump pulled out of a 2015 agreement negotiated between Iran, the Obama administration, and several world powers which placed temporary restrictions on Iran’s nuclear program in exchange for lifting sanctions.
Iran has claimed that its nuclear program is for civilian purposes rather than building weapons. However, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), the UN’s nuclear watchdog, reported last month that Iran had greatly accelerated uranium enrichment to close to weapons grade at its Fordow site dug into a mountain.
The UK, France, and Germany said in a recent statement that there is no “credible civilian justification” for Iran’s recent nuclear activity, arguing it “gives Iran the capability to rapidly produce sufficient fissile material for multiple nuclear weapons.”
In his latest interview, which aired on Tuesday, Araghchi suggested Iran would be open to restarting discussions with the Trump administration regarding its nuclear program. However, he claimed that Washington would need to “buy [Tehran’s] confidence” to secure a successfully renegotiated nuclear deal.
“The situation is different and much more difficult than the previous time,” he said. “Lots of things should be done by the other side to buy our confidence … We haven’t heard anything but the ‘nice’ word, and this is obviously not enough.”
Araghchi also brushed off Trump’s recent suggestion that he would support a “clean out” of civilians from Gaza, instead proposing a forced relocation of Israeli civilians to Greenland.
“My suggestion is something else. Instead of Palestinians, try to expel Israelis, take them to Greenland so they can kill two birds with one stone,” Araghchi said.
Trump recently floated a potential temporary relocation of Gaza civilians to neighboring Arab countries, citing a need to permanently end the conflict with Israel.
The post Iran Says US, Israel Would Be ‘Crazy’ to Attack Its Nuclear Sites, Warns of ‘Decisive Response’ first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
The Gaza-Auschwitz Comparison Is a Moral Failure
The banner proclaiming “Palestine: the victory of the oppressed people over Nazi Zionism,” was prominently displayed behind Hamas terrorists as they forced hostage Naama Levy — whose pants were bloodied at the time of her capture — to smile in an army uniform. The goal of this image is clear: to “Nazify” Israel, whitewash Hamas’ crimes, and invert the roles of victims and oppressors. This is the essence of the Iran-backed terror group’s propaganda.
This is not merely an act of cruelty and humiliation; it is a calculated political message, designed to invert historical roles: Israel as the modern-day Third Reich, and Zionism as its ideology.
But Hamas is not alone in spreading this message. It is part of a long-standing antisemitic propaganda campaign that has gained renewed traction far beyond Gaza.
On American college campuses, in activist circles, and across social media, this rhetoric finds eager amplifiers: “Israelis are Nazis,” “Israel is genocide,” “Hamas is resistance.” Pseudo-human rights organizations, pseudo-anti-racists, and pseudo-feminists echo these slogans. At the same time, these voices remain disturbingly silent about the mass rapes, murders, and kidnappings carried out by Hamas on October 7. Their hypocrisy speaks volumes about their supposed commitment to justice and human rights.
These comparisons are not simply misguided or exaggerated; they have a double-edged effect. On one hand, they trivialize the Nazi atrocities by equating them with a contemporary conflict, tragic as it may be, that differs fundamentally in purpose and scope. On the other, they invert historical roles, casting Jews — victims of an unparalleled genocide — as today’s oppressors. This shift doesn’t necessarily deny the Holocaust outright, but distorts its meaning, drains it of its uniqueness, and repurposes it as a malleable ideological tool. The result is an assault on memory itself — on its ability to prevent the resurgence of hatred and, most urgently, the rising antisemitism witnessed since October 7, 2023.
The accusations of genocide directed at Israel are not new. They trace back to Yasser Arafat and Soviet propaganda in the 1970s, gaining momentum with each flare-up in Gaza. These claims rely on a deliberate distortion of historical facts. The Holocaust was a systematic and industrialized campaign of extermination, carried out in secrecy to annihilate an entire people. Gaza, despite its immense suffering and devastation, is the scene of a conflict between a terrorist group and a sovereign military — not an extermination effort. Comparing Gaza to Auschwitz distorts history and reduces the Holocaust to a vague, manipulable idea, undermining its status as a universal moral anchor.
This confusion does more than undermine the past; it undermines the present. The legal mechanisms designed to prevent genocide lose their potency when misused in this way. Raphaël Lemkin, who coined the term “genocide,” emphasized its specificity: the deliberate, systematic destruction of a group. By conflating the horrors of asymmetrical warfare with organized genocide, we blur the critical distinction between war and extermination. This misapplication of language is not just a semantic issue; it is a moral failure.
The issue doesn’t end with hashtags or protest slogans. It reaches the highest levels of political discourse. In 2014, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan accused Israel of “surpassing the Nazis in its barbarity” during Operation Protective Edge. In 2022, Mahmoud Abbas claimed Israel had committed “fifty holocausts,” and made these remarks in Berlin — the very city where the Holocaust was meticulously planned.
These statements are more than rhetorical flourishes; they trivialize the Holocaust and weaponize its memory against Israel — and, by extension, against Jews worldwide.
Why this fixation? Part of the answer lies in a broader effort to reshape the moral foundations of the postwar order. For decades, the Holocaust served as a cornerstone of postwar ethics, justifying the establishment of Israel and supporting universal human rights. Yet some now seek to replace this foundation with a new paradigm: decolonization. In this narrative, Israel is no longer the homeland of a persecuted people but the final vestige of colonialism. This reframing severs the historical connection between the Holocaust and Zionism, presenting Israel not as a resolution to Jewish history, but as a historical anomaly to be rectified.
Replacing the memory of the Holocaust with that of other struggles — even legitimate ones — poses a grave threat and betrays the spirit of “Never again,” which was meant as a universal call for vigilance, not as a pretext for contemporary hostility toward Jews. The danger of succumbing to this propaganda is not just the betrayal of historical memory, but its devastating real-world impact. The rise of antisemitism under the guise of political activism threatens the safety of Jewish communities worldwide, and chips away at the universal principles of justice and human rights.
If there is one lesson to be learned from the last 80 years, it is that antisemitism remains rife, though it now takes new forms. The latest version today hides behind the rhetoric of human rights and anti-colonialism. Israel is not the only target; Jews across the globe are under attack. Unless we confront this reality with clarity and determination, we risk allowing history to repeat itself.
Simone Rodan-Benzaquen is the Director of AJC Europe.
The post The Gaza-Auschwitz Comparison Is a Moral Failure first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Behind the Mask of ‘Pro-Peace’ Groups in Israel
Rula Daood and Alon-Lee Green, the Israeli national directors of the Standing Together movement, were included in the Time 100 Next list for 2024 due to their extensive pacifist activities, such as the national campaign “The North Demands Peace – Deal Now.” As part of this campaign, the organization’s activists hung billboards in northern Israel with the statement “The North Demands Peace” in Arabic and Hebrew. Ironically, or perhaps tragically, one of the billboards placed at the Maxim intersection in Haifa was near a site damaged by a Hezbollah rocket last October. This area also witnessed the horrific terror suicide bombing at Maxim restaurant, co-owned by Arabs and Jews, in 2003, which killed 21 Jews and Arabs and injured 51 others.
The push for a diplomatic solution with Hezbollah for a ceasefire at any cost, without restrictions or the possibility of Israeli action for violations, indicates a lack of security awareness among Standing Together activists. Last November, northern residents, local authorities, and community forums expressed firm opposition to the proposed ceasefire agreement with Lebanon, fearing future violations by Hezbollah and the potential for a terrible massacre. This fear was reinforced when an IDF spokesman revealed Hezbollah’s plans to conquer the Galilee. Although the ceasefire was eventually signed, Hezbollah violated it within five days.
Besides calling for a ceasefire in the north, Standing Together does not address the circumstances that led to the Sword of Iron war. While they importantly call for the return of hostages to Israel, they mislead the public by claiming that “the government and media in Israel are ignoring war crimes in Gaza and claiming everything is fine.” They assert that Israel is waging a war of extermination in Gaza and that “we must not get used to killing and starving innocent Palestinians in Gaza, hundreds of rocket launches daily, or abandoning cities in the north and south.”
At a demonstration, one of the national directors held signs showing Israeli and Palestinian death tolls since the war’s beginning, citing 44,249 Palestinian deaths without specifying how many were Hamas terrorists. This figure, from the Hamas-run Gaza Health Ministry, is unsupported. According to UN data from last May, a third of those killed in Gaza were women and children. A University of Pennsylvania expert’s study suggests the ratio of killed militants to civilians is around 1:1, according to the UN’s assessment. The ratio in urban combat zones around the world is 1:9, meaning nine civilians killed for every combatant killed — and that Israel is doing far more than any other military to avoid and reduce civilian deaths.
Regarding claims of starvation in Gaza, COGAT has facilitated the entry of over a million tons of aid on 57,545 trucks since the war began. From January to July 2024, the average daily food consumption in Gaza was about 3,004 calories per person, compared to 3,540 in Europe and North America, and 2,600 in African countries. Standing Together fails to blame Hamas for systematically stealing humanitarian aid from the residents of Gaza.
Originally supported by a German organization that backs the BDS movement and opposes the IHRA‘s working definition of antisemitism, Standing Together now promotes efforts embraced by the international delegitimization campaigns against Israel. They claim the destruction of Jabalia was for revenge and ethnic cleansing, ignoring the IDF’s continued discovery of weapons and terrorists since the military campaign renewed there on October 5, 2024.
The widespread recognition of organizations like Standing Together in Israel and internationally is concerning. While supposedly promoting coexistence and peace, they spread disinformation that could lead to sanctions harming both Israeli Arabs and Palestinians in the West Bank. Their focus on blaming Israel while neglecting to name Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran as the real culprits blurs the line between victim and attacker, undermining their legitimacy as a coexistence organization.
Tom Yohay is the manager of CAMERA on Campus Israel.
The post Behind the Mask of ‘Pro-Peace’ Groups in Israel first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Palestinian TV: In Gaza, Robbers Ambush Humanitarian Aid Trucks, Exploit Sale of Food
While the International Criminal Court falsely accused Israel of causing “starvation as a method of war and the denial of humanitarian relief,” official Palestinian Authority (PA) TV reported who the real criminals were.
Even before the current ceasefire deal, Israel had been generously letting humanitarian aid into the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.
Reporting from Gaza, official PA TV explained that “robbers ambush the aid trucks” and demand “transit fees,” so that by the time the aid reaches the merchants, the prices have increased more than 10 times:
Official PA TV reporter in Deir Al-Balah, Gaza: “From the moment the traders’ trucks or the humanitarian aid trucks set out from the gate of the Kerem Shalom Crossing until they arrive at Saladin Road, they encounter several ambushes by [Palestinian] robbers.
Some pay transit fees, large sums to pass from Saladin Road to the central [Gaza Strip] … When the trucks, aid, food stamps, and food packages reach the small merchants, the citizen must cover everything that was paid from when the truck sets out until it reaches the citizen. For example, one bag of milk that was sold for 5 shekels is now sold for 55 — you know where the 45 or 50 shekels went.” [emphasis added]
[Official PA TV, Jan. 7, 2025]
Similarly, meat prices are “exorbitant,” leaving citizens unable to afford it, and instead of feeding the hungry, the food was left to spoil:
Official PA TV reporter in Deir Al-Balah, Gaza: “Certain amounts of meat have begun to enter the [Gazan] markets at exorbitant prices, which thousands may be unable to purchase, and it is likely that some of the food and meat will spoil.”
[Official PA TV, Jan. 5, 2025]
Even PA Prime Minister Muhammad Mustafa has mentioned the “unfair distribution” of the humanitarian aid in Gaza:
PA Prime Minister Muhammad Mustafa: “We are monitoring the reports regarding the involvement of several parties in the Gaza Strip in exploiting the [humanitarian] provisions and aid, and their unfair distribution.”
[Official PA TV, Jan. 10, 2025]
Throughout the war, the Hamas terror organization has neglected Gazan civilians and looked out for its own interests only.
Palestinian Media Watch has exposed that Hamas has been using civilians as human shields, stole 28% of Gazans’ salaries, and stole the aid in order to give it to its terrorists.
The author is a senior analyst at Palestinian Media Watch, where a version of this article was originally published.
The post Palestinian TV: In Gaza, Robbers Ambush Humanitarian Aid Trucks, Exploit Sale of Food first appeared on Algemeiner.com.