Connect with us

RSS

New Year’s Resolution: Jews Should Stop Saying They Are ‘Too Busy’ to Defend Ourselves

The blowing of the shofar, traditionally done on Rosh Hashanah. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

As the Jewish New Year comes and goes, it offers us an opportunity for reflection. This is not merely the kind of reflection where we think about how to be more productive, more efficient, or more “on top of things.”

Too often, when we speak about “resolutions,” they revolve around being more industrious, more organized, and ultimately, more busy. But here is a paradox: perhaps what we truly need is to become less busy.

For the past two years, as Israel has fought for its very survival, and the Diaspora has been challenged with its own war to defend itself, there has been a pattern that repeats itself with stunning consistency. In far too many cases, Jewish people are asked to show up, to speak up, and to fight back– and the most common answer is: “I’m really busy.”

Busy with work. Busy with holidays. Busy with vacations. Busy with their children’s endless schedules. Busy before the holiday, then busy catching up afterward. Busy with social obligations, with dinners, with games, with errands, and social media. Always busy.

This culture of being perpetually busy is not harmless. It is costly. It has created a generation of adults who allow their personal schedules — and even their children’s endless schedules — to overshadow their responsibilities to their people and their communities.

Meanwhile, the world has changed in ways that demand vigilance. Antisemitism has exploded in the United States. Universities, once seen as safe havens for Jewish advancement, now host open hostility. Social media spreads lies and venom about Israel and Jews every single hour.

And through all of this, Jews are still telling each other they are “too busy” to fight back.

This is not simply a matter of personal choice. It is a matter of collective survival.

We cannot keep living as if our time belongs only to ourselves and our families. Every hour of every day is not just “my time.” It is not just “family time.” We have responsibilities beyond that — to our people, our history, and our future. To show up. To push back. To build institutions. To support Israel. To fight.

We are in the beginning stages of the 15 year war for the future of Jewish stability in the Diaspora. This war started two years ago and will continue on long after the last bullet is fired in Gaza.

What we do now on social media, on the streets, and in the court of public opinion will determine the outcome of this war. There is not one way to contribute — there are many. Choose a way, and commit your time to it.

So as this New Year begins, I suggest a resolution that runs against the cultural grain: let us all become less busy, and instead, let us become more purposeful. More deliberate. More willing to carve out time for what truly matters.

If we fail to do this, the cost will not only be personal. It will affect future generations. It will be Jewish history repeating itself in ways we do not want to see.

Our enemies have been fighting for 30 years, and now it is our turn to act.  It is our turn to tell our story, and our turn to get comfortable in our uncomfortability.

Each of us is responsible. Each of us must play our part. If we choose to remain “too busy,” the burden falls on someone else — until there is no one left to carry it. But if we reimagine our lives and reorder our priorities, we will not only strengthen Israel and the Jewish people, but we will strengthen ourselves.

Daniel Rosen is the Co-founder of a Non-profit Technology company called Emissary4all which is an app to organize people on social media by ideology not geography. He is the Co-host of the podcast “Recalibration.” You can reach him at drosen@emissary4all.org

Continue Reading

RSS

Zohran Mamdani Remains Frontrunner in NYC Mayoral Race After Eric Adams Exits, Jewish Vote Up for Grabs

New York City Mayor Eric Adams attends an “October 7: One Year Later” commemoration to mark the anniversary of the Hamas-led attack in Israel at the Summer Stage in Central Park on October 7, 2024, in New York City. Photo: Ron Adar/ SOPA Images via Reuters Connect

In a stunning turn of events just over a month before Election Day, New York City Mayor Eric Adams announced on Sunday that he was withdrawing from his reelection bid, reshaping the dynamics of a race that has drawn international attention while leaving many Jewish voters scrambling for an alternative candidate.

Adams — whose term in office has been marked by legal drama, declining public support, and mounting political pressure — cited fundraising challenges, media scrutiny, and weakening momentum as key reasons for his exit. Though Adams’s name will remain on the ballot since his announcement came after the deadline for printing them, his decision to drop out removes an active campaign that had drawn critical support from center-left and moderate constituencies.

With Adams suspending his candidacy, the mayoral contest is now largely a showdown between Democratic nominee Zohran Mamdani, a far-left democratic socialist with an extensive history of anti-Israel rhetoric, and the independent candidacy of scandal-plagued former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo. Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa is also still in the race, but recent polling and New York City’s overwhelmingly Democratic electorate indicate a likely third-place finish.

The exit of Adams compresses the field and raises the stakes for how his base, particularly moderate Democrats in combination with business-friendly and pro-Israel voters, may realign.

Mamdani, the 33‑year‑old member of the New York State Assembly, defeated Cuomo and other candidates in a lopsided first‑round win in the city’s Democratic primary for mayor, notching approximately 43.5 percent of first‑choice votes compared to Cuomo’s 36.4 percent.

Some observers believe Adams’s withdrawal could help consolidate anti-Mamdani votes behind Cuomo. However, many others suggest that Mamdani has gained too much momentum to be thwarted by last-ditch efforts before the November election.

Earlier this month, a Quinnipiac University poll showed Mamdani taking 45 percent in a four-way matchup, well ahead of Cuomo at 23 percent, Sliwa at 15 percent, and Adams at just 12 percent. If Adams were to exit the race, according to the data, Mamdani’s margin would narrow, with 46 percent support compared to Cuomo’s 30 percent. Sliwa would hold 17 percent of the electorate.

The results came days after another poll showed similar results.

Mamdani held a commanding 22-point advantage over his chief rival in the mayoral race, Cuomo, 46 percent to 24 percent, according to the poll by the New York Times and Siena College. Sliwa polled at 15 percent, and Adams polled at 9 percent among likely New York City voters.

Perhaps most striking, the survey found that Mamdani would still beat Cuomo in November’s election, 48 percent to 44 percent, if the other candidates dropped out and it was a one-on-one matchup.

In immediate reactions to Adams’s decision to drop out, Mamdani downplayed the significance to his campaign’s status. “It’s a race between us and the failed politics of the past,” he said, reiterating his calls to move beyond entrenched donor power.

Some prominent voices, such as billionaire hedge fund investor Bill Ackman, called on Sliwa to follow Adams’s lead and drop out to consolidate as much support against Mamdani as possible. However, Sliwa does not seem keen on the idea. “Curtis Sliwa is the only candidate who can defeat Mamdani,” the Republican nominee’s campaign said in a statement on Sunday.

Adams’s withdrawal also removes a figure long seen as reliably supportive of pro-Israel positions and Jewish communal priorities. During his tenure, the mayor repeatedly vowed to defend the city’s Jewish community and delivered a forceful condemnation of the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, attacks in Israel. His departure leaves advocacy groups, synagogues, and institutions reconsidering their strategies, particularly around municipal support for security, interfaith partnerships, and cultural funding.

The recent Quinnipiac poll underscored Adams’s strong standing among certain demographics, particularly Jewish voters, who make up a crucial bloc in several boroughs. Among Jewish voters, Adams received 42 percent support, while Mamdani and Cuomo were tied at 21 percent each. Moreover, 75 percent of Jewish voters view Mamdani unfavorably, according to the poll, highlighting a key vulnerability for the progressive candidate.

A Siena College poll from August similarly found that Mamdani has been remarkably unpopular with Jewish New Yorkers. According to the results, a staggering 75 percent held an unfavorable opinion of the Queens Democrat and just 15 percent viewed him favorably. His unfavorable rating among Jewish voters was more than 38 points higher than his standing with the general electorate, where 37 percent viewed him negatively compared to 28 percent favorably.

A little-known politician before this year’s primary campaign, Mamdani is an outspoken supporter of the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement, which seeks to isolate Israel from the international community as a step toward its eventual elimination. Mamdani also defended the phrase “globalize the intifada” — which references previous periods of sustained Palestinian terrorism against Jews and Israelis and has been widely interpreted as a call to expand political violence — by invoking the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising during World War II. In response, the US Holocaust Memorial Museum repudiated the mayoral candidate, calling his comments “outrageous and especially offensive to [Holocaust] survivors.”

Mamdani sparked outrage again on Sunday when he seemingly sidestepped a direct question on whether Hamas is a terrorist organization, instead condemning Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and calling for an end to the war in Gaza.

Continue Reading

RSS

Northwestern University Imposes Registration Hold on Students Who Protested Antisemitism Training

Illustrative: Pro-Palestinian protesters gather at Deering Meadow on the grounds of Northwestern University in Evanston, Illinois, US, on April 25, 2024. Photo: Kyle Mazza/NurPhoto via Reuters Connect

Northwestern University has paused course enrollment for an unspecified number of students who refused to participate in anti-discrimination seminars which emphasized antisemitism prevention.

According to a statement the university shared with The Algemeiner, the students had advanced notice that their declining to complete the course, as well as other “mandatory student trainings,” in a manner consistent with “the policy on Discrimination, Harassment, and Sexual Misconduct,” would precipitate “action, including a registration hold.”

It added, “Students are not required to agree with the training modules but must attest that they will abide by the Student Code of Conduct … Students have received regular reminders of this requirement over the last several months.” Northwestern also said that it is “committed to maintaining education, work, and living environments in which people are treated with dignity and respect.”

Protesting the seminar appears to have followed a premeditated plan involving older adults, including alumni and professors. Following the acts of defiance, the administration received a letter signed by over 200 anti-Israel activists which fired a volley of political attacks against the antisemitism training — lamenting that it does not delegitimize Zionism and the struggle for Jewish self-determination in Israel.

“As a group of students and graduate workers who stand united against racist, antisemitic, anti-Arab, and anti-Palestinian discrimination, we cannot abide by these trainings which reinforce, rather than reduce, the proliferation of discriminatory bias in our communities,” the letter said. “Furthermore, the severe consequences imposed for disagreement with this morally and intellectually objectionable content presents an extremely dangerous and unethical threat to the academic freedom of our scholarly community that may itself give rise to illegal discrimination.”

Registration holds pose grave risks to the students on which they are imposed, including academic backsliding, restricted access to important documents, and the potential squandering of tens of thousands of dollars in tuition fees. It is not clear how long the students Northwestern punished plan to continue their demonstration. As of Monday, the anti-Israel letter to the administration is being circulated as a petition, although it seems unlikely to change the university’s policy regarding the seminar.

As previously reported by The Algemeiner, Northwestern University’s handling of antisemitism after Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel is being investigated by the federal government, which recently impounded $790 million worth of taxpayer funds previously appropriated to it, for potential civil rights violations. The issue is also being closely watched by concerned Jewish parents and advocacy groups. Withdrawing the university’s support for the seminar could prompt catastrophic legal and political consequences.

Earlier this year, after months of opprobrium, Northwestern University issued a report on its enactment of a checklist of policies it said has meaningfully addressed campus antisemitism.

“The university administration took this criticism to heart and spent much of last summer revising our rules and policies to make our university safe for all of our students, regardless of their religion, race, national origin, sexual orientation, or political viewpoint,” the university said. “Among the updated policies is our Demonstration Policy, which includes new requirements and guidance on how, when, and where members of the community may protest or otherwise engage in expressive activity.”

Northwestern added that it adopted the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, a reference tool which aids officials in determining what constitutes antisemitism, and begun holding “mandatory antisemitism training” sessions which “all students, faculty, and staff” must attend.

Parents of students attending Northwestern University rejected the report as an attempt to manufacture positive headlines and mislead the public, most of all the Jewish community.

“The problems at Northwestern are deep. Deep and institutional,” Lisa Fields, founder of Coalition Against Antisemitism at Northwestern (CAAN), told The Algemeiner during an interview in May.

Earlier this month, Michael Schill resigned as president of Northwestern, just days before the start of fall semester.

The embattled former executive testified last May before the US House Committee on Education and Workforce, where he faced a firing line of conservative lawmakers, such as Reps. Elise Stefanik (R-NY) and Burgess Owens (R-UT), who placed him in their crosshairs after identifying him as one of the dozens of college presidents who allegedly did far too little to combat the nationwide surge in campus antisemitism following Hamas’s Oct. 7 atrocities.

Schill’s gravest transgression, lawmakers charged, was the Deering Meadow Agreement, reached after a pro-Hamas group commandeered a section of campus and established what they called the “Northwestern Liberated Zone” on April 25, 2024. For five days, over 1,000 students, professors, and non-Northwestern-affiliated persons fulminated against the world’s lone Jewish state, trafficked antisemitic tropes, and intimidated Jewish students.

By the morning of April 29, Schill and the group finalized the infamous deal — a first of its kind accord which became a model for 42 other schools who emulated it. It committed Northwestern University to establishing a scholarship for Palestinian undergraduates, contacting potential employers of students who caused recent campus disruptions to insist on their being hired, hiring two Palestinian professors, and creating a segregated dormitory hall to be occupied exclusively by Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) and Muslim students. The university — after days of hearing the activists shout phrases such as “Kill the Jews!” — also agreed to form a new investment committee in which anti-Zionist students and faculty wield an outsized voice.

Fields told The Algemeiner that Schill’s resignation should be the first of a series of major changes at the university.

“As both a parent and CAAN’s national chair, I know the fear and frustration Jewish families have felt watching Northwestern fail to protect its students,” Fields said. “President Schill’s resignation is a necessary first step, but it cannot be the last. The board’s catastrophic governance shows how far Northwestern has drifted. Chair Barris should step aside, and the board must be restructured. Only sustained federal oversight, dedicated civil rights enforcement, structural reform, and a president with integrity and vision will restore accountability and integrity at Northwestern.”

Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.

Continue Reading

RSS

Israeli Cycling Team Banned From Italy Race Over ‘Public Safety’ Concerns, Expected Pro-Palestinian Protests

Giro dell’Emilia 2024 – 10t th Edition- Vignola- San luca, 216 km- Italy- 05-10-2024 in San Luca, Italy, October 05 2024. Photo: IPA/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect

An Israeli cycling team has been excluded from an upcoming race in Bologna, Italy, because of security concerns regarding pro-Palestinian protests that might disrupt the competition if the team participates, organizers announced on Saturday.

Organizers of the Giro dell’Emilia street cycling race made the decision about the team Israel-Premier Tech after thousands of anti-Israel demonstrators repeatedly disrupted the final stage of the recent Vuelta a Espana race in Madrid, Spain, in protest of the team’s participation. Thousands of protesters clashed with police in Madrid and caused such widespread disruption to several parts of the race that organizers were forced to cut the race short and without a podium ceremony. The demonstrators saod they targeted the Israeli team because of Israel’s military actions in the Gaza Strip targeting Hamas terrorists who orchestrated the deadly attack in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.

Giro dell’Emilia is a one-day men’s race, held annually in the Bologna region of northern Italy, that is scheduled for Oct. 4. Israel-Premier Tech said in a released statement, obtained by The Algemeiner, that the team was told their invitation to join the race “has been withdrawn.”

“The organizers have cited security concerns linked to planned protests that threatened to disrupt the race,” the cycling team said. “We find it extremely regrettable that threats of violence have disrupted our sport. We wish the organizers a successful race.”

The move comes after pro-Palestinian protesters clashed with police in Milan on Monday during a nationwide strike organized by trade unions in protest of Palestinians killed in Gaza during the ongoing Israel-Hamas war.

Adriano Amici, president of the Giro dell’Emilia race, told AFP on Saturday that the Israeli team “will unfortunately not be present at our race” and that organizers made the decision “for reasons of public security.”

“The atmosphere is very tense. There’s too much danger for both the Israel Tech riders and others. The race’s final circuit is run five times, so the possibility of the race being disrupted is very high,” Amici explained. “It’s a decision I regret having to make from a sporting perspective, but I had no other choice for public safety.”

Bologna’s councilor for sport Roberta Li Calzi welcomed the decision. “We believe that sport is a vehicle of universal values ​​of sharing, fair competition, solidarity between people,” he said on Saturday. “We are satisfied to learn that this opinion is shared by the organization of the race, which today officially confirmed to us that the Israeli team will not take part in the Giro dell’Emilia. I thank them for this sensitivity, which I believe is shared by a large part of our community.”

The councilor previously called for Israel-Premier Tech to be excluded from the race because of what he described as Israel’s “serious crimes against the civilian population in the Gaza Strip.”

The Israeli cycling team is co-owned by Israeli Canadian billionaire Sylvan Adams and its main sponsor, Premier Tech, is a Quebec-based company. The team is registered in Israel and features the name of the country in their branding. Premier Tech announced recently that it expects the cycling team to change its name to exclude “Israel,” leading “to a new identity and branding for the team.” The team took part in the Giro dell’Emilia last year and their best-placed finisher was Canada’s Mike Woods in fourth place.

Earlier this month, organizers of the Spanish stage race O Gran Camiño said they will not invite Israel-Premier Tech to participate in its race next year. Local councils in Spain have already called for Israel-Premier Tech to be boycotted from next year’s Vuelta a España race in Gran Canaria as well as Tour de France’s Grand Depart in Barcelona. The president of the Gran Canaria council even threatened that the Spanish island will not host the final stages of the 2026 Vuelta if Israel participates in the race.

The president of the Union Cycliste Internationale (UCI), the world governing body of cycling, insisted on Friday that the UCI will continue to allow Israeli athletes at its competitions despite pressure to exclude the Jewish state. David Lappartient was re-elected for his third, four-year term as UCI president at the UCI Congress on Thursday and made the comments about Israel while speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the World Championships in Kigali, Rwanda, according to Reuters.

“It is perfectly normal for them to be here, because we believe — and I am speaking on behalf of the UCI, but I could almost say that these are also Olympic values — that sport is not a tool for punishment,” said Lappartient, who is also a member of the International Olympic Committee (IOC).

“The IOC has confirmed our position,” he noted. “We are not a tool for sanctions, we are a tool in the service of an ideal of bringing people together with the unifying power of sport, with the aim of promoting peace. And peace does not come through exclusion. So yes, Israeli athletes are welcome, just as Palestinian athletes are welcome when we host them at our competitions, just like all athletes from around the world. That is truly the power of the Olympic movement.”

He added: “We believe that no athlete should be deprived of the opportunity to participate in a competition.”

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News