Demonstrators take part in an “Emergency Rally: Stand With Palestinians Under Siege in Gaza,” amid the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, Oct. 14, 2023. Photo: REUTERS/Brian Snyder
Harvard University remains under investigation over its handling of campus antisemitism, the US House Committee on Education and the Workforce wrote to school president Alan Garber on Monday, and as such must continue to comply with requests for internal communications regarding discrimination complaints filed by Jewish students.
The committee said it is especially interested in documents related to an October 2023 incident in which two anti-Zionists activists, joined by a mob, assaulted a Jewish graduate student while screaming “Shame!” at him as he struggled to free himself.
“Obtaining the documents will aid the committee in considering whether potential legislative changes, including legislation to specifically address antisemitic discrimination, are needed,” said the letter, authored by the committee’s chairman, Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI), and Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-NY). “Harvard does not appear to have disciplined — and instead has rewarded — two students who assaulted an Israeli Jewish student who was filming a ‘die-in’ protest on Oct. 18, 2023.”
It continued, “Following the attack, Harvard said that it would ‘address the incident through its student disciplinary procedures’ after law enforcement completed its investigations. However, Harvard is alleged to have obstructed the district attorney’s investigation into the attack.”
Walberg and Stefanik went on to describe the rising fortunes of the attackers, Ibrahim Bharmal, former editor of the prestigious Harvard Law Review, and Elom Tettey-Tamaklo. As previously reported by The Algemeiner, Bharmal was not removed from the presidency of the Harvard Law Review, a coveted post once held by former US President Barack Obama. As of last year, he was awarded a law clerkship with the Public Defender for the District of Columbia, a government-funded agency which provides free legal counsel to “individuals … who are charged with committing serious criminal acts.”
Bharmal has also been awarded a $65,000 fellowship from Harvard Law School to work at the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), an Islamic group whose leaders have defended the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas’s atrocities against Israelis, TheEditors.com reported earlier this year.
Tettey-Tamaklo walked away from Harvard Divinity School with honors. For the Spring 2025 semester, he was voted class marshal by the Class Committee, a role which awarded conferred to him the right to lead the graduation procession through Harvard Yard alongside the institution’s most accomplished scholars and faculty.
After being charged with assault and battery, Bharmal and Tettey-Tamaklo were ordered in April by Boston Municipal Court Judge Stephen McClenon to attend “pre-trial diversion” anger management courses and perform 80 hours of community service each. The decision did not require their apologizing to the Jewish student against whom they allegedly perpetrated what local Assistant District Attorney Ursula Knight described as “hands on assault and battery,” allowing them to avoid a trial and jail time for behavior that was filmed and widely viewed online.
Walberg and Stefanik also demanded confirmation of Harvard’s decision to pause a partnership with Birzeit University in the West Bank. The Harvard-Birzeit partnership was put into abeyance following an internal investigation of Harvard’s François-Xavier Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights (FXB), the institution directly affiliated with Birzeit. It is not clear what ultimately caused Harvard to discontinue the arrangement, but it is a move for which prominent members of the Harvard community and federal lawmakers have clamored before, as previously reported by The Harvard Crimson.
“The committee is concerned that Harvard has not made its decision, if any, public,” they wrote. “Refusing to partner with a university that explicitly endorses a US-designated terrorist organization is entirely different than the BDS movement, which boycotts the only democracy in the Middle East because it is Jewish.”
The letter comes three weeks after a US federal judge ruled that US President Donald Trump acted unconstitutionally when he confiscated about $2.2 billion in Harvard University’s federal research grants as punishment for the institution’s alleged failing to address antisemitic harassment and discrimination on campus.
In her ruling, US District Judge Allison Burroughs, who was appointed to her position in 2014 by then-President Barack Obama, said that the Trump administration “used antisemitism as a smokescreen for a targeted, ideologically motivated assault on this country’s premier universities.”
Burroughs went on to argue that the federal government violated Harvard’s free speech rights under the US Constitution’s First Amendment and that it was the job of courts to “ensure that important research is not improperly subjected to arbitrary and procedurally infirm grant terminations.”
Burroughs’s ruling restored Harvard’s access to some of the billions of dollars in funds paid for by the American taxpayer, preventing a fiscal crisis which has already caused draconian budget cuts at other institutions facing similar financial penalties imposed by the Trump administration.
The decision also awarded Garber a major political victory, as he has in recent weeks endured growing criticism from faculty and Democratic lawmakers for entertaining a settlement with the Trump administration which would have included concessions to the conservative movement on issues ranging from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) to viewpoint diversity on campus. Such a deal would risk inciting a mutiny at Harvard, where 94 percent of faculty donated to Democratic candidates in 2024.
The White House has vowed to continue fighting Harvard in court — which may include requesting emergency proceedings at the conservative-leaning US Supreme Court — accusing Burroughs of being compromised by partisanship.
“This activist Obama-appointed judge was always going to rule in Harvard’s favor, regardless of the facts,” Liz Huston, spokesperson for the White House, said in a statement following the ruling. “We will immediately move to appeal this egregious decision, and we are confident we will ultimately prevail in our efforts to hold Harvard accountable.”
In the interim, Harvard University is in no rush to strike a deal with the federal government that would conclude its investigations of antisemitism in exchange for a payment of what Trump stipulated as “nothing less” than $500 million. According to a Monday report by The Harvard Crimson, Penny Pritzker, a Harvard Corporation senior fellow — and sibling of Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker (D) — said in her first public comments on the controversy, “I have absolutely no idea how this is going to play out.” Another official, asked about the status of the talks by a Crimson reporter, flashed “a tight smile before walking away.”
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
Post Views: 15
