Connect with us

Uncategorized

Evolving Drone War in Southern Lebanon Increasingly Defines Israel-Hezbollah Fight

A screengrab taken from a video released by Hezbollah says to show an Israeli D9 armored bulldozer moments before being hit by an FPV drone attack, in Bint Jbeil, Lebanon, with the date of the video given as April 15, 2026. Photo: HEZBOLLAH MILITARY MEDIA/Handout via REUTERS

Iran‘s most powerful ally Hezbollah and Israel are stepping up a drone war in Lebanon – on camera – that is increasingly defining the battlefield and complicating the path to peace between the Israeli and Lebanese governments.

In recent weeks, Hezbollah, an internationally designated terrorist group that seeks Israel’s destruction, has used cheap, easy-to-assemble First Person View kamikaze drones to transform the war it has been fighting since it began firing on Israel on March 2, days after the US-Israeli forces began their attacks on Iran.

Controlled with fiber-optic cables, the FPV drones can evade Israel’s high-tech jamming technologies to target its troops occupying southern Lebanon during a shaky ceasefire announced on April 16, a week after the truce in the wider Iran war began.

The Iran-backed Islamist group, which yields significant political and military influence in Lebanon, has published videos of more than 45 FPV attacks, 28 of them in the nearly four weeks since the ceasefire, which had halted Israeli attacks on the Lebanese capital before Israel said it targeted a Hezbollah commander there on Wednesday.

The truce has also left Israeli ground forces occupying a so-called buffer zone up to 10 km (six miles) in from the border, in confined territory, which Hezbollah knows well, and vulnerable to such attacks.

All of the videos before the ceasefire was announced showed UAVs flying at static positions or vehicles including tanks and excavators, with no fatalities reported by Israel. But since the ceasefire was announced, Hezbollah began targeting groups of soldiers, reporting five attacks. Three Israeli soldiers and one contractor were reported by Israel to have been killed.

Israel is firing back, with at least two deadly FPV drone attacks against Hezbollah in April complete with published drone images purporting to show Hezbollah fighters up close.

The widespread use of FPV attack drones began several years ago and thousands of kilometers away in Ukraine, where front lines are covered with netting to defend against Russia’s drones, and where some drone operators are watching Hezbollah.

“They are amateurs, but they are learning,” said Dmytro Putiata, a drone warfare expert serving in Ukraine’s Unmanned Systems Brigades.

WHY DOES THE DRONE WAR IN LEBANON MATTER?

Iran and mediator Pakistan say any US-Iranian peace agreement must include a halt to Israeli strikes in Lebanon to prevent an escalation there restarting the wider Iran war.

US-mediated direct talks between the Lebanese government and Israel are due to resume on Thursday and Friday, but progress has been slow; Israel insists that Lebanon disarm Hezbollah, which risks reigniting conflict in a country that suffered a 1975-1990 civil war.

Hezbollah’s head of media relations, Youssef el-Zein, said the group assessed that continued Israeli troop casualties from FPV drones could force an Israeli withdrawal more effectively than the negotiations with Israel, which Hezbollah opposes.

Israeli troops who have invaded southern Lebanon in the current conflict presented “an opportunity, and not a threat,” as they could be more easily targeted, he said.

“We know the enemy’s supremacy, but we also know their points of weakness. We are taking advantage of the points of weakness to create that balance,” Zein told reporters.

According to a Hezbollah commander, a specialized drone unit works with the organization’s procurement team to purchase parts from various markets.

They are checked for signs of Israeli interference, according to a Lebanese military source briefed on Hezbollah’s drone usage. The group has been on high alert since thousands of its communication devices were booby-trapped and detonated by Israel in 2024.

Hezbollah’s first FPV video shows an attack dated March 22, three weeks into the war. The first footage showing its drone components, including the warhead, is dated April 11.

“The drones shown in the imagery all show systems assembled from parts commonly made by Chinese enterprises and sold freely on the online marketplaces,” said Konrad Iturbe, a drone expert based in Spain with experience flying and modifying commercial quadcopters.

HOW DO THE DRONES WORK?

A basic drone costs less than $400, according to the Hezbollah commander and an Israeli drone expert. Reuters geolocated the attacks to towns running the entire strip of Lebanon’s border area, showing the breadth of their deployment.

A Russian PG-7L highly explosive anti-tank warhead was fitted on the drone in the April 11 footage, according to a drone operator in Ukraine who declined to be named for security reasons and a foreign security official tracking Hezbollah’s drones.

Hezbollah’s arsenal already included those warheads, the foreign official said, but fitting them onto a drone made them a longer-range, precision weapon.

Asked whether Hezbollah was relying on Russian drone expertise, Zein said the group had in-house experts.

Founded in 1982 with help from Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps, Hezbollah, which has tens of thousands of rockets and precision missiles, began developing drone capabilities in 2004 and used them in 2006 and 2024 wars.

The drone operator in Ukraine said the Hezbollah pilots appeared to have had a few weeks of training. He said the spool in the April 11 footage was consistent with a canister holding about 10 km (six miles) of fiber-optic wiring to link drone and pilot – a link that the Hezbollah commander said was key.

“The objective is that Israeli radar systems cannot detect them, effectively blinding the enemy,” he said.

WHAT IS ISRAEL DOING ABOUT THEM?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has acknowledged the drones are a problem. “A few weeks ago, I ordered the establishment of a special project to thwart the drone threat … It will take time, but we are on it,” he said on May 3.

The Israeli military has reported near-daily explosive drones launched at its forces in southern Lebanon. Israel’s Army Radio says they have hurt as many as 40 troops.

An Israeli defense official said that the drones were harder to detect and neutralize because they are small, and are flown “low and slow” by Hezbollah crews who know the topography well.

ALMA, an Israeli think tank, said Hezbollah’s attacks during the ceasefire predominantly used drones and the dissemination of footage created “significant psychological impact.”

Israeli critics say solutions should have already been found. The defense official, who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive matters, said there was no quick fix.

Israel’s defense establishment has been looking at Ukraine and studying the drone threat for over a year, he said. New defense measures could be deployed within weeks to months.

While high-tech solutions are being developed, low-tech solutions, like nets, will be deployed and enhancements to soldiers’ rifles were expected to help take down the drones too, the defense official said.

The Israeli military has also been using its Iron Dome missile interceptor system and has boosted radar detection, a senior Israeli military official said. A newly developed drone interception system was tested by the Air Force in April, the official said, but it failed.

Both the officials said that the best defense is striking the Hezbollah crews operating the drones. Israel published a video on April 13 of a target covering his face as a drone approaches and another on April 29 targeting a fighter on a motorbike. Israel has not published images of its own drones.

Iturbe said some Hezbollah pilots seemed to have moved from easier but less effective fixed-angle flying to pitching down, speeding up and hitting vehicles from above.

“Lesson clearly learned here,” he said.

Still, Hezbollah’s videos show drones mostly targeting armored vehicles, not soldiers, with few consecutive attacks on a target, or shots from a second drone or surveillance position.

“Individual clips of vehicles being struck are great for political videos, but do not necessarily translate into military effect,” forensic imagery analyst William Goodhind said.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

‘Brazen Attacks’: Antisemitism Turns Increasingly Violent in the West

CCTV footage of a Jewish man getting stabbed by an attacker in Golders Green area, which is home to a large Jewish population, in London, Britain, April 29, 2026, in this screengrab taken from a social media video. Photo: Social Media/via REUTERS

Across North America and Europe, antisemitism appears to be entering a new, more dangerous phase, with Jewish communities facing a growing wave of shootings, assaults, arson attacks, and violent intimidation even as overall incident totals in some countries begin to dip after the surge that followed Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, atrocities in Israel.

In Canada, early 2026 data already indicate the country is on track to see its most violent year against the Jewish community in recent memory, with more violent antisemitic attacks recorded so far this year than during all of 2025, according to the Jewish advocacy group B’nai Brith Canada.

In total, 11 violent antisemitic attacks have already been recorded across the country since the start of 2026, surpassing the 10 violent incidents documented during all of last year, when more than 6,800 antisemitic cases were reported nationwide.

“These brazen attacks on Jewish Canadians are a sign of a crisis of antisemitism that has spiraled out of control,” Simon Wolle, chief executive officer of B’nai Brith Canada, said in a statement.

“Violence such as this, which has escalated from targeting synagogues to targeting Jewish people directly, does not occur in a vacuum. It is what happens when governments fail to act despite mounting evidence that antisemitism is becoming more normalized and dangerous,” Wolle continued.

Last week, a group of Jewish worshippers standing outside the Congregation Chasidei Bobov synagogue in Montreal was targeted in a drive-by shooting, leaving one person with minor injuries.

A week earlier, three visibly Jewish residents were targeted in a separate antisemitic attack when suspects opened fire with a gel-pellet gun, causing minor injuries.

In the United States, overall antisemitic incidents declined in 2025, but violent attacks against American Jews remained at alarmingly elevated levels, according to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL).

In total, 6,274 antisemitic incidents — including assaults, harassment, and vandalism — were recorded across the country last year, averaging roughly 17 incidents every day.

While antisemitic assaults rose modestly by 4 percent to 203 incidents in 2025, attackers increasingly wielded deadly weapons, with such cases surging nearly 40 percent compared to the previous year.

According to the ADL’s recent report, this broader escalation was marked by the return of fatal antisemitic violence in the US, with Jewish victims killed in such attacks for the first time since 2019.

Last May, two Israeli embassy staffers were shot dead in Washington, DC, followed weeks later by a firebombing in Colorado that killed one person and left 13 others injured.

In Spain, an anonymous group has launched an interactive online map called “BarcelonaZ,” which its creators describe as a mapping of “Zionism” across Barcelona, prompting growing concern within the local Jewish community over an increase in targeted attacks and violence.

The interactive tool functions as a geolocated blacklist of Jewish, Israeli, or allegedly Israel-linked businesses and organizations, which its creators accuse of complicity in what they describe as a “genocide” in Gaza.

On the platform, each entry includes a business name, address, category, links, contact details, and political accusations, which Jewish leaders have denounced as resembling a modern-day “Nazi list.”

The map has intensified an already hostile climate in Spain, where reports of antisemitic harassment and violence have surged in recent months. In one of the latest incidents, an unknown individual attempted to set fire to a Jewish-owned pizzeria in Madrid while customers were still dining inside.

In the United Kingdom, Jewish communities have also faced a mounting wave of antisemitic violence, intimidation, and street-level harassment amid growing fears over public safety.

Recently, an increasingly popular antisemitic TikTok trend in London has led to arrests and convictions after young men filmed themselves using cash to mock and harass members of Orthodox Jewish communities.

Videos circulating on social media show young men walking through heavily Jewish areas of London carrying fishing rods with money attached to the line in an apparent attempt to “fish for Jews.”

In a separate incident over the weekend in Stamford Hill, north London, a man allegedly whipped several Haredi Jewish women with a belt before spitting at volunteer responders who arrived at the scene. Witnesses said he also shouted racist insults, antisemitic slurs, and threats at both the victims and the volunteers.

Hours later, in nearby Amhurst Park in north London, a Jewish child was allegedly assaulted outside a school after a woman screamed antisemitic insults and punched the minor.

These latest incidents come amid a wider surge in antisemitic violence in London, including the stabbing of two Jewish men in Golders Green — an attack that prompted the British government to raise the national terrorism threat level from “substantial” to “severe” for the first time in over four years.

Across the English Channel, three teenage boys assaulted a 14-year-old Jewish girl and threatened to kill her in the Parisian suburb of Sarcelles in March. The attack occurred weeks after a 13-year-old boy on his way to synagogue in Paris was brutally beaten by a knife-wielding assailant. France has seen several high-profile antisemitic attacks over the past year.

Meanwhile, the commissioner to combat antisemitism in the German state of Hesse sounded the alarm in January after an arson attack on a local synagogue in the town of Giessen, warning that it reflected a “growing pogrom-like atmosphere” threatening Jewish life across Germany. The environment has become so hostile that the Jewish community in Potsdam, a city just outside Berlin, fears it may not be safe to open a new Jewish daycare center amid growing security concerns.

In Ireland, the Jewish community has also reported a sharp rise in antisemitic incidents since the Hamas-led invasion of and massacre across southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, with community leaders warning that violent threats and intimidation are becoming increasingly commonplace.

One Irish Jew said he and his wife no longer attend community events together out of fear that a mass-casualty antisemitic attack could leave their young son orphaned — a stark reflection of the deepening sense of insecurity gripping parts of Ireland’s Jewish community.

“If there were another community that felt that sense of siege and that they had to take steps to protect themselves in moments where they’re visible, I think there would be a sense of moral outrage about it,” Sunday Times journalist Jon Ihle told “The Claire Byrne Show.”

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Debating Zionism is fair. Protesting Israel’s president at commencement crosses the line

I am grateful for Noam Pianko’s recent essay, “Debating Zionism is good for Jews, actually.” Pianko argued that criticism of a small group of graduating seniors at the Jewish Theological Seminary who objected to JTS’s invitation to Israeli President Isaac Herzog to serve as this year’s commencement speaker was misguided, citing JTS’s long history of internal debates over Zionism.

I was among those critics. In a May 3 blog post for The Times of Israel I argued that even six students publicly opposing Herzog’s presence was six too many — not because Jewish institutions should avoid debate, but because there is a difference between debate premised on a shared commitment to Jewish peoplehood, and debate that rejects of one of Jewish peoplehood’s central expressions.

Pianko rightly reminds readers that JTS has never been ideologically monolithic. Its history includes tensions between tradition and change, particularism and universalism, theology and modernity. Those tensions are part of what has made JTS so influential in American Jewish life for nearly 140 years.

The history of debate over Zionism within the seminary’s intellectual culture does not weaken my concern. It sharpens it.

The crucial issue is conceptual precision. Expressions of skepticism about Zionism in earlier periods of JTS history were often very different from today’s anti-Zionism.

In some cases, they reflected a classical religious view that Jewish return and sovereignty would come through a messianic process rather than through human political action. That position was a theological claim about timing and agency, not a negation of Jewish national aspiration. In others, like Ahad Ha’am’s cultural Zionism, for example, an emphasis was put on Jewish renewal through language, spirit and civilization, while questioning whether political statehood should be the immediate or primary goal. That was an internal argument about how Jewish national life should unfold — not over whether such a life was valid.

Contemporary anti-Zionism, in contrast, frequently challenges the legitimacy of Jewish sovereignty itself. That is not simply another version of an older seminary debate. It is a different claim with different consequences.

To be clear, the students’ letter is not a simple declaration of anti Zionism, and it should not be caricatured as such. Their stated concerns include the devastation of the war in Gaza, the moral responsibilities of Jewish leadership, and the fear that honoring Herzog without sufficient public reckoning sends the wrong message about Palestinian suffering.

Those concerns deserve serious engagement. But seriousness also requires asking what this protest communicates in institutional context. At a moment when the Jewish people and Israel’s legitimacy are under intense assault, opposing the presence of Israel’s president at a flagship Jewish seminary risks turning anguish over Israeli policy into a symbolic rejection of Israel’s legitimacy as a central part of Jewish life. That is the line I believe JTS must be careful not to blur.

So while Pianko is right to highlight ideological range in JTS’s past, we should not flatten the past into the present.

Zionism did not become central to Jewish life by accident. It emerged as the primary vehicle through which the Jewish people reclaimed agency, safety and a collective future after centuries of vulnerability. The establishment of the state of Israel transformed Jewish existence. That fact does not erase earlier debates, but it does change the center of gravity.

Institutions like JTS have a responsibility to teach that complexity honestly — which Herzog’s presence at commencement, and thoughtful, well-informed debates around it, will help to do. Seminaries should expose students to the range of Jewish thought, including theological reservations, cultural critiques and internal disagreements about Zionism.

At issue is not whether the varieties and history of Zionism should be debated at JTS. Of course they should. Instead, this incident is a reminder that a flagship institution of Jewish learning can and should remain clear that Jewish peoplehood, Jewish sovereignty and the state of Israel are not peripheral to contemporary Jewish identity. They are central.

The post Debating Zionism is fair. Protesting Israel’s president at commencement crosses the line appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

UK Man in Court Charged With Arson at Former London Synagogue

Orthodox Jews stand by a police cordon, after a man was arrested following a stabbing incident in the Golders Green area, which is home to a large Jewish population, in London, Britain, April 29, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Hannah McKay

A British man charged over an arson attack at a former synagogue in east London last week was in contact with someone using an Iraqi phone number shortly before the fire, prosecutors told a London court on Tuesday.

Moses Edwards, 45, appeared in the dock at Westminster Magistrates’ Court and was remanded in custody until a further hearing next month. He gave no indication of any plea.

The fire at the former East London Central Synagogue was caused by wine bottles filled with an accelerant, which exploded damaging the outside of the building, prosecutors said.

The incident followed a series of arson attacks on Jewish targets in previous weeks, with police saying they were investigating possible Iran links to some of the fires.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News