Connect with us

Features

“Also Here” – a granddaughter tells her grandmother’s story of surviving the Holocaust

By JULIE KIRSH, Former Sun Media News Research Director
(Exclusive to jewishpostandnews.ca)
My youngest daughter, who experiences frequent backaches and headaches, feels that the trauma of her survivor grandparents has been passed down to her. Some third generation Holocaust literature supports this thesis.
Brooke Randel’s recently published “Also Here, Love, Literacy and the Legacy of the Holocaust,” is a biography that feature Randel’s Bubbie and their close, though not always easy relationship.

Brooke Randel & her Bubbie


Bubbie was illiterate and her granddaughter worked for an ad agency as a copywriter. Bubbie wanted her story told. However, she had no way to tell her story. In “Also Here,” Randel has fulfilled her grandmother’s wishes by putting Bubbie’s thoughts to paper.
The reader learns that Bubbie is always on the go. In her Florida condo, she shops, cooks, visits friends, plays cards, and does laps around the pool. “A woman who survives stays surviving.” However, at night when her hands were still, she was surrounded by the memories of the war and her lost family. Bubbie asked herself the eternal question of survivors: “Ehy did she survive when so many didn’t?”
The author’s ancestral family moved to Sighet in Romania which then became part of Hungary. Eli Wiesel, in his acclaimed book, “Night”, paints a vivid picture of the Jews of Sighet, 14,000 mostly religious souls. When Bubbie was six years old, the family suffered a tragedy. Bubbie’s father, the patriarch, died of prostate cancer. Her mother resorted to work as a travelling merchant. The two older siblings went to jobs in Budapest. Everyone had a role to play. Perhaps school was not a part of Bubbie’s upbringing or she had a learning disability, according to the author. In any case, Bubbie was permanently illiterate.
In order to discover Bubbie’s Holocaust story, the author sits with her grandmother and hears the words so that she, the wordsmith, can transcribe them. Providing an historical context, we know that the Nazis formalized their plans at the Wannsee Conference. “Evict, rob, deport, kill” were the words used, buried in obscure bureaucracy. “Words could lead the way to genocide and silence could let it happen.”
In a poignant chapter, the reader hears Bubbie’s words as she relives the road to Auschwitz in her head, telling her granddaughter what happened. In April 1945, 60,000 prisoners, including Bubbie and her sister were held in Bergen-Belsen. They had travelled by foot and boxcar from Auschwitz, covering more than 280 miles to get there. No food, no water, no clothes, no shoes and the winter was particularly bitter that year. In Bergen-Belsen there was typhus, tuberculosis, typhoid fever and dysentery. Anne Frank and her sister Margot were taken and died there.
After the war, Bubbie married at 17 years of age to an older man. This was a typical rushed, survivor’s marriage. My own parents were 20 years apart. They would not have been a match before the war. Bubbie and her husband fought constantly. She was a go-getter with a good job. He was depressed and unsuccessful in his business attempts.
In trying to understand her Bubbie, the author refers to an Israeli study: Female survivors had high levels of avoidance behavior, intrusive thoughts, and an unresolved state of mind. Bubbie grew up in chaos before the war and in the camps. Logic was thrown out the window. She was scattered and impulsive.
From Windsor to Detroit, Bubbie and her family of three children and a sad husband tried to make a better life. However, post-traumatic stress was their constant companion.
In my own Holocaust survivor family, food was all important and came with certain rules set by my father. The chicken soup had to be boiling hot. Onions were to be feared and the plentiful food had to be cooked and served only by my mother’s hands. Restaurant food was considered suspicious, so we didn’t go out to eat very often.
Bubbie also exhibited a survivor’s anxiety around food. It was not to be wasted. She cooked constantly and fed her family delicious food. Without a language of words, Bubbie retained all the recipes in her head. What Bubbie did not have was the ability to read. All efforts to confront her illiteracy came to naught. Her granddaughter learned to see Bubbie differently from other people. In doing so, she unknowingly gained skills that her grandmother had: adaptation, creativity, stealth, and care. Bubbie taught her granddaughter to listen to the chaotic jumble of her memories and eventually the author learned how to write this book.
Being part of the third generation is not the experience of survival but an echo of survival. Bubbie’s journey and her very different American grandchildren emphasized their separateness.
This book could not have been written without the acceptance of that separateness and a willingness to listen to what could not be said.
“Also Here”
by Brooke Randel
published by Tortoise Books, 2024

Uncategorized

Volatility, Hit Frequency, and RTP: Why the Number Casinos Advertise Is the Least Useful One

The return to player percentage looks clean as a casino data point. It gives players a neat number, usually around 94% to 97% for many online slots, and that number feels easy to compare. A 96.5% game appears better than a 95.2% game. The problem starts when players treat RTP as a forecast for their next 50 spins or one evening.

You may find the RTP listed on slot pages on a leading online casino in Ontario, but the number only tells part of the story. Two games can share the same RTP and create different sessions: one may return small wins often, while the other may drain a balance before one bonus round changes everything.

The RTP Trap

Return to player (RTP) measures the theoretical share of total wagers a game returns across a very large number of rounds. In plain terms, a 96% RTP slot returns about $96 for every $100 wagered in the long run. That does not mean one player who deposits $100 should expect $96 back.

The trap sits in the word “theoretical.” RTP comes from the game’s math model. It works across huge samples, not personal sessions. A player can finish far above that percentage, far below it, or with nothing left after a short run of poor results.

Is it useless then? No, RTP can still help. It gives a baseline cost of play. Lower-RTP games cost more on average than higher-RTP games. Still, once a game passes a reasonable threshold, the next question matters more: how does it distribute that return?

Hit Frequency: The Number That Shapes Session Feel

Hit frequency tells you how often a game produces a winning outcome. This often misleads players because any win can count. A spin that returns $0.10 on a $1 bet may still count as a hit, even though the player lost $0.90 in real terms.

A game can feel active because symbols connect often, sounds play, and the screen keeps celebrating small returns. The balance may still fall. In many modern slots, “win” does not always mean profit on the spin.

Hit frequency answers one practical question: how much silence can you tolerate? Some players dislike long dry spells. Others accept quieter sessions because they chase bonus rounds or larger payouts.

The educational site Get Gambling Facts gives a useful distinction: RTP concerns the percentage of money returned over time, while hit frequency concerns how often a machine stops on a winning combination.

Volatility: The Risk Label Players Need More Often

Volatility, also called variance, describes how unevenly a game pays. Low-volatility games tend to return smaller amounts more often. High-volatility games hold more value in rare events: bonus rounds, premium symbols, multipliers, or jackpots.

Here is where RTP becomes less useful on its own:

  • A 96% low-volatility slot may give modest returns and longer play from the same balance.
  • A 96% high-volatility slot may burn through funds quickly unless the player hits a strong feature.
  • A progressive jackpot game may look exciting, but it often places more value on rare top prizes.

The same RTP can hide very different risk profiles. Players who ignore volatility often blame the casino or the game when the session follows its math design.

Why the Same RTP Can Feel So Different

Picture two slots with 96% RTP. Slot A pays small wins on many spins, has a modest top prize, and rarely creates dramatic balance swings. Slot B pays less often but offers a large max win and volatile bonus rounds. The advertised return matches, but the experience does not.

Slot A may suit a player who wants a slower bankroll drop and more regular feedback. Slot B suits someone who accepts sharper losses in exchange for a shot at a heavier payout.

A Better Way to Read a Slot Page

Most slot pages give players more clues than they notice. The trick is to read the details together rather than chase the highest percentage.

Start with RTP. If two games look similar, the higher number has better long-term value. Then check volatility. If the game uses terms such as high, very high, or extreme variance, lower your bet size or expect shorter sessions. Next, look at the paytable. A huge max win usually means the game saves a lot of its value for rare outcomes.

A sensible pre-play check looks like this:

  • RTP: What is the average long-term return?
  • Volatility: How rough can the session become?
  • Hit frequency: How often will the game show any wins?
  • Paytable: Where does most value sit?

To Conclude

Casinos advertise RTP because it looks objective, tidy, and easy to rank. Players should read it, but they should not give it more authority than it deserves. For long sessions, volatility may matter more than a small RTP difference. For comfort, hit frequency may explain the feel better than the payback rate.

Continue Reading

Features

They Deserve the Very Best”: The Doctors Bringing Specialist Care to Holocaust Survivors at Home

Continue Reading

Features

The Popularity of Simpler Slot Games in 2026: Review From Casino Online CrazyTower Experts

Online casinos now fill their libraries with numerous video slots that have dozens of functions, long bonus rounds, complex mechanics, and so on. Interestingly, despite this huge range of modern options, many Canadian visitors at sites like Casino Online CrazyTower here https://crazytower.com/ca/ no longer want complicated gameplay that requires constant attention and long explanations.

Simpler slots now attract a wider audience because they save time and create faster sessions. So, let’s figure out why this change happened and reasons for the popularity of simpler machines.

Why Many Players Are Returning to Basic Gameplay

Modern websites like Casino Online CrazyTower pushed complex video slots for years, but many people now prefer classic formats again. Simple gameplay has fewer interruptions and is simpler in terms of budgeting, which is important when you gamble for fun.

These are a few potential reasons explain why simpler slots became popular again in 2026:

  • Faster rounds. Symbols appear quickly, and rounds continue without long animations or extended bonus sequences.
  • Easier controls. Most classic slots have simple menus and familiar layouts that don’t confuse new visitors.
  • Smaller feature lists. Simple slots usually have standard wilds, scatters, and multipliers instead of dozens of random mechanics.
  • Better session flow. People spend more time on gameplay instead of reading explanations about symbols and special functions.
  • Lower visual pressure. Simpler slots use calmer designs and shorter effects that don’t overload attention.

Classic gameplay also suits mobile devices better because shorter rounds work well on smaller screens. Plus, many visitors now prefer games that start instantly and explain their mechanics within seconds.

Features That Make Simpler Slots Appealing

Simple machines at Casino Online CrazyTower and similar websites continue to attract attention because they have a high gameplay speed. Many classic titles also replicate older casino machines that people already know from physical casinos.

However, these aren’t the only factors that attract gamblers. So, check out this list:

  • Short bonus rounds. Free spins and multipliers finish quickly instead of interrupting gameplay for several minutes.
  • Common and standard paylines. Traditional layouts help people understand payouts without long explanations.
  • Faster loading times. Simpler graphics reduce waiting time on phones, tablets, and older computers.
  • Stable gameplay pace. Long cutscenes and constant pop-up notifications don’t interrupt the session.
  • Traditional themes. Fruit symbols, bars, sevens, and classic casino designs still attract large audiences.
  • Smaller menus. Important information appears immediately without complicated tabs or hidden sections.

Modern video slots often contain too many mechanics in a single game. Developers now combine expanding reels, random modifiers, mission systems, tournaments, and multiple bonus levels in one title. Many visitors lose interest because gameplay turns repetitive and overloaded with constant interruptions.

Compare this to a session when you get results immediately and aren’t interrupted. These still have free spins and even mini risk games, but not as loaded as innovative titles.

Conclusion

Simple slots usually create better replay value because people understand the mechanics immediately. Common and standard gameplay doesn’t cause frustration and allows faster decisions during casino sessions.

Many classic slots also function better during short breaks because rounds finish quickly without long bonus interruptions. That’s why simpler slots became popular again at many casinos, including Casino Online CrazyTower and such.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News