Features
Anti-Semitic incidents on the rise in Toronto
Introduction: We have been following, with dismay, the steady reporting on anti-Semitic incidents in Toronto as reported in the CJN newsletter (which is the latest incarnation of what used to be Canada’s flagship Jewish newspaper). A little while ago we were contacted by a Toronto freelance writer by the name of Ori Belmont, who asked us whether he might be able to begin contributing articles to this paper.
We asked Ori to write something about the shocking rise in incidents of anti-Semitism in Toronto within the past couple of years – that seem to have risen with the advent of Covid.
Here is what Ori sent us:
The city of Toronto has long suffered through a shameful and sordid history of both violent and subtle forms of anti-Semitic activity. From incidents such as the barbaric Christie Pits riots which occurred during the depths of the Great Depression and Hitler’s rise to power, to the despicable diatribes and revisionist views and works of Ernst Zundel, the shine on the seemingly opulent city by the lake has long ago grown dull.
The recent spate of anti-Semitic attacks in Toronto has once again emboldened those who wish to isolate the city’s Jewish population. However, the response by the city’s Jewish community – compelled by, and fuelled with anger and the desire to educate the perpetrators of such heinous acts with information of an evidentiary basis – has galvanized us.
Jews in Toronto, according to the 2018 Annual Hate Crime Statistical Report commissioned by Toronto Police Services, continued to be victimized at a level that exceeded hate crimes which targeted other groups.
The report noted that of the all hate-motivated crimes in the city during 2018, 36% of them directly targeted the Jewish community. There were 50 such examples during the year.
On Wednesday, March 2, anti-Semitic graffiti that appears to be from the same perpetrator was discovered at three Toronto schools – Central Technical School, Rosedale Heights School of the Arts and Malvern Collegiate Institute.
The recent spate of anti-Semitism in Toronto has surged over the past few months. On February 8, a misguided group of students at Charles H. Best Middle School used construction paper to draw a swastika, apparently unable to grasp the gravity of the message that it conveys. Prior to this, students at the same school cornered a Jewish student and performed the Nazi salute. The Toronto District School Board (TDSB) no longer places an emphasis on teaching the significance of hate crimes on a mass scale as a part of its curriculum. These sordid and despicable acts are the result.
The TDSB is aware of a third anti-Semitic incident in February which involved a Jewish teacher. On February 17, a teacher at Valley Park Middle School in North York was surrounded by students who allegedly gave her the Nazi salute. She is a child of parents who survived the Holocaust.
In yet another act of anti-Semitism which occurred during the month of February, Pleasant Public School – located in the Bathurst and Steeles area, a pocket with a high concentration of Jewish residents – two students appeared to give a Nazi salute to a teacher. A letter was subsequently sent home with the school’s students that described this episode of hatred.
The school’s principal, Brian Fong, has said that the students in Grade 6 will take part in a session with an educator who speaks about anti-Semitism and the importance of heeding the lessons learned from the Holocaust.
“In terms of immediate action, we are in the process of arranging a program with Michelle Glied- Goldstein, a well-known and respected educator from “Carrying Holocaust Testimony” for all our Grade Six students.”
The ascending wave in anti-Semitic incidents at Toronto schools began in 2017. At Upper Canada College (UCC), two parallel investigations – internal, and involving the police – were launched from an incident that occurred on April 26, 2017. A student in Grade 7 observed that his locker was covered with anti-Semitic symbols. This is a systemic issue that must be addressed by adjusting the curriculum to ensure that children and teenagers fully comprehend the magnitude and implications anti-Semitism specifically, and of hate in general. B’nai Brith Canada, The Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Centre for Holocaust Studies, and other prominent Jewish groups have made it abundantly clear that commonly used myths and tropes play a significant part in understanding why these acts take place.
It is not only public schools in Toronto that have seen an increase in anti-Semitism. For example, Eitz Chaim Hebrew Day School experienced at least three incidents in the spring of 2017. In addition to the usual array of vandalism with Nazi imagery adorning the property, astonishingly, a group of students threw stones at children who were doing nothing more than what we expect them to do at recess – enjoying themselves in the playground.
Ori Belmont is a freelance writer based in Toronto, Canada
Uncategorized
Volatility, Hit Frequency, and RTP: Why the Number Casinos Advertise Is the Least Useful One
The return to player percentage looks clean as a casino data point. It gives players a neat number, usually around 94% to 97% for many online slots, and that number feels easy to compare. A 96.5% game appears better than a 95.2% game. The problem starts when players treat RTP as a forecast for their next 50 spins or one evening.
You may find the RTP listed on slot pages on a leading online casino in Ontario, but the number only tells part of the story. Two games can share the same RTP and create different sessions: one may return small wins often, while the other may drain a balance before one bonus round changes everything.
The RTP Trap
Return to player (RTP) measures the theoretical share of total wagers a game returns across a very large number of rounds. In plain terms, a 96% RTP slot returns about $96 for every $100 wagered in the long run. That does not mean one player who deposits $100 should expect $96 back.
The trap sits in the word “theoretical.” RTP comes from the game’s math model. It works across huge samples, not personal sessions. A player can finish far above that percentage, far below it, or with nothing left after a short run of poor results.
Is it useless then? No, RTP can still help. It gives a baseline cost of play. Lower-RTP games cost more on average than higher-RTP games. Still, once a game passes a reasonable threshold, the next question matters more: how does it distribute that return?
Hit Frequency: The Number That Shapes Session Feel
Hit frequency tells you how often a game produces a winning outcome. This often misleads players because any win can count. A spin that returns $0.10 on a $1 bet may still count as a hit, even though the player lost $0.90 in real terms.
A game can feel active because symbols connect often, sounds play, and the screen keeps celebrating small returns. The balance may still fall. In many modern slots, “win” does not always mean profit on the spin.
Hit frequency answers one practical question: how much silence can you tolerate? Some players dislike long dry spells. Others accept quieter sessions because they chase bonus rounds or larger payouts.
The educational site Get Gambling Facts gives a useful distinction: RTP concerns the percentage of money returned over time, while hit frequency concerns how often a machine stops on a winning combination.
Volatility: The Risk Label Players Need More Often
Volatility, also called variance, describes how unevenly a game pays. Low-volatility games tend to return smaller amounts more often. High-volatility games hold more value in rare events: bonus rounds, premium symbols, multipliers, or jackpots.
Here is where RTP becomes less useful on its own:
- A 96% low-volatility slot may give modest returns and longer play from the same balance.
- A 96% high-volatility slot may burn through funds quickly unless the player hits a strong feature.
- A progressive jackpot game may look exciting, but it often places more value on rare top prizes.
The same RTP can hide very different risk profiles. Players who ignore volatility often blame the casino or the game when the session follows its math design.
Why the Same RTP Can Feel So Different
Picture two slots with 96% RTP. Slot A pays small wins on many spins, has a modest top prize, and rarely creates dramatic balance swings. Slot B pays less often but offers a large max win and volatile bonus rounds. The advertised return matches, but the experience does not.
Slot A may suit a player who wants a slower bankroll drop and more regular feedback. Slot B suits someone who accepts sharper losses in exchange for a shot at a heavier payout.
A Better Way to Read a Slot Page
Most slot pages give players more clues than they notice. The trick is to read the details together rather than chase the highest percentage.
Start with RTP. If two games look similar, the higher number has better long-term value. Then check volatility. If the game uses terms such as high, very high, or extreme variance, lower your bet size or expect shorter sessions. Next, look at the paytable. A huge max win usually means the game saves a lot of its value for rare outcomes.
A sensible pre-play check looks like this:
- RTP: What is the average long-term return?
- Volatility: How rough can the session become?
- Hit frequency: How often will the game show any wins?
- Paytable: Where does most value sit?
To Conclude
Casinos advertise RTP because it looks objective, tidy, and easy to rank. Players should read it, but they should not give it more authority than it deserves. For long sessions, volatility may matter more than a small RTP difference. For comfort, hit frequency may explain the feel better than the payback rate.
Features
They Deserve the Very Best”: The Doctors Bringing Specialist Care to Holocaust Survivors at Home
Features
The Popularity of Simpler Slot Games in 2026: Review From Casino Online CrazyTower Experts
Online casinos now fill their libraries with numerous video slots that have dozens of functions, long bonus rounds, complex mechanics, and so on. Interestingly, despite this huge range of modern options, many Canadian visitors at sites like Casino Online CrazyTower here https://crazytower.com/ca/ no longer want complicated gameplay that requires constant attention and long explanations.
Simpler slots now attract a wider audience because they save time and create faster sessions. So, let’s figure out why this change happened and reasons for the popularity of simpler machines.
Why Many Players Are Returning to Basic Gameplay
Modern websites like Casino Online CrazyTower pushed complex video slots for years, but many people now prefer classic formats again. Simple gameplay has fewer interruptions and is simpler in terms of budgeting, which is important when you gamble for fun.
These are a few potential reasons explain why simpler slots became popular again in 2026:
- Faster rounds. Symbols appear quickly, and rounds continue without long animations or extended bonus sequences.
- Easier controls. Most classic slots have simple menus and familiar layouts that don’t confuse new visitors.
- Smaller feature lists. Simple slots usually have standard wilds, scatters, and multipliers instead of dozens of random mechanics.
- Better session flow. People spend more time on gameplay instead of reading explanations about symbols and special functions.
- Lower visual pressure. Simpler slots use calmer designs and shorter effects that don’t overload attention.
Classic gameplay also suits mobile devices better because shorter rounds work well on smaller screens. Plus, many visitors now prefer games that start instantly and explain their mechanics within seconds.
Features That Make Simpler Slots Appealing
Simple machines at Casino Online CrazyTower and similar websites continue to attract attention because they have a high gameplay speed. Many classic titles also replicate older casino machines that people already know from physical casinos.
However, these aren’t the only factors that attract gamblers. So, check out this list:
- Short bonus rounds. Free spins and multipliers finish quickly instead of interrupting gameplay for several minutes.
- Common and standard paylines. Traditional layouts help people understand payouts without long explanations.
- Faster loading times. Simpler graphics reduce waiting time on phones, tablets, and older computers.
- Stable gameplay pace. Long cutscenes and constant pop-up notifications don’t interrupt the session.
- Traditional themes. Fruit symbols, bars, sevens, and classic casino designs still attract large audiences.
- Smaller menus. Important information appears immediately without complicated tabs or hidden sections.
Modern video slots often contain too many mechanics in a single game. Developers now combine expanding reels, random modifiers, mission systems, tournaments, and multiple bonus levels in one title. Many visitors lose interest because gameplay turns repetitive and overloaded with constant interruptions.
Compare this to a session when you get results immediately and aren’t interrupted. These still have free spins and even mini risk games, but not as loaded as innovative titles.
Conclusion
Simple slots usually create better replay value because people understand the mechanics immediately. Common and standard gameplay doesn’t cause frustration and allows faster decisions during casino sessions.
Many classic slots also function better during short breaks because rounds finish quickly without long bonus interruptions. That’s why simpler slots became popular again at many casinos, including Casino Online CrazyTower and such.
