Features
Former Winnipegger Solly Dreman looks back on his life growing up in Winnipeg and living in Israel since 1964
Introduction: Over the years we’ve had many articles about Solly Dreman. Solly comes from a well-known Winnipeg family and, as he explains in the following article, he could have emulated his father Joe and his brother David by fashioning a career as an investment dealer had he stayed in Canada.
Instead, Solly chose to make aliyah to Israel in 1964.
Solly still has a very close connection to the city where he was born – often having returned here – to lecture and to help raise money for various causes, including an organization known as “Ezer Mizion,” for which he organized a very successful dinner here in 2019.
From time to time Solly and his wife Orly have contributed very thoughtful pieces to The Jewish Post & News. What follows is a speech that Solly gave recently on the occasion of Simchat Torah when he was honoured as “Chatan Torah” (the person who recites the last chapter of the Torah):
I was born in Winnipeg Canada to a Zionist family. My parents visited Israel dozens of times before I made Aliyah to Israel. Winnipeg was called the “Jerusalem of Canada” and during the Six Day War in 1967 contributed more per capita than any other city in North America even though the Jewish community was not a wealthy community. My father Joe was a very successful businessman. He was a grain and investment broker and when he passed away at age 90 there was a minute of silence in commodity exchanges all over Canada in commemoration of his life achievements. I was an athlete and was my club Junior golf champion. I also played tennis, hockey, football and, like my father who was city and provincial chess champion, I played chess.
Academically, my first degree was in business administration and I received an Honors Degree in Commerce in 1960. I subsequently worked with my father for a year but the competition was too tough since I was competing not only with my father but with my brother David, who also studied Commerce and today is rated as one of the five most successful investment dealers in the world. For years he wrote a successful column for Forbes as well as several books on the psychology of the stock market.
I realized that the world of finance was not for me and that my major love was people and caring for others, so in 1964 I made Aliyah to Israel to pursue a degree in Clinical Psychology. My doctoral thesis, in fact, was on the subject of altruism and giving to others – something that has characterized much of my personal and professional life.
Today I am the proud father of four children, thirteen grandchildren and married to Orly, who you know has contributed much to our local community. The ten years from 1965 to 1975 were the most productive of my life. I completed my Masters and Doctoral Degrees by 1975 and when the Yom Kippur War broke out in 1973 I was recruited to the Jerusalem Brigade, which was deployed to the Suez Canal.
When it was discovered that I was a doctoral student at the Hebrew University I was appointed as the brigade psychologist of the Jerusalem Brigade, which numbered over 2500 soldiers. I was bestowed officer status and lectured and treated many soldiers suffering from post traumatic stress, depression and other difficulties. I also treated their families on the home front who were suffering, amongst other things, from the “Missing Parent Syndrome,” which many families are suffering from today in our current prolonged and horrific war.
In my professional life as a full professor specializing in clinical psychologiy I have dealt with many of the problems that characterize mainstream life in Israel, such as war and terrorism, post traumatic stress, immigration of Russian and Ethiopian Jews, violence in the family, divorce, and other family crises, including death and dying.
In 1977 I was awarded a Fulbright Scholarship for academic excellence, which allowed me to engage in a post doctorate internship at the University of California Medical School in San Francisco, where I lectured and treated patients. Over the years I have written several books and articles on my clinical work and have also lectured abroad extensively, in Europe and North America.
As for philanthropic endeavours, Orly and I have been extensively involved with two major organizations and have contributed significantly to their efforts to help others. We have supported several golf tournaments for Ezer Mizion, a non profit medical organization in Israel which has saved over 5000 cancer patients internationally through its stem cell registry, which is the largest Jewish stem cell registry in the world.
Ezer Mizion offers both physical and psychological care on both the civilian and military fronts. In addition to its stem cell registry, it has a hotel called Oranit in Petach Tikvah, which hosts – free of charge, cancer patients and their families who live far from treatment facilities in central Israel and who cannot afford to travel on a daily basis for treatment. Ezer Mizion is also intensively involved in the present war effort, caring for and transporting wounded soldiers and their families, and providing meals for them when they are hospitalized.
The Zaka organization identifies bodies of people killed in unnatural deaths caused by terrorism, war, earthquakes and similar incidents. They were intimately involved in identifying corpses following the horrific massacre of October 7th last year in southern Israel.
In closing, I would like to refer to our current war and the prevailing national trauma. My father once said that there were two major principles for life he learned from chess:
- There are no positions so bad that you can’t eventually win.
- There are also no positions so good that you can’t eventually lose.
The first principle is relevant to our present national trauma and so I bring today a message of hope. In spite of the present difficult situation and imminent threats we face, we as a people and nation have survived millenia in the face of overwhelming threats and we shall continue to persist and survive!
Features
Hair straightening at Sets on Corydon
Features
Ontario Online Casinos Let Players Set Daily, Weekly and Monthly Deposit Limits
A deposit limit sets a ceiling on how much money someone can add to an online gambling account. In Ontario’s regulated market, players can choose limits covering 24 hours, seven days and one month, with the website’s system enforcing the amounts they select.
The settings are straightforward, but the timing deserves attention. A daily allowance may sit within weekly and monthly caps, while an increase can involve a waiting period. For adults using Chrome on a Chromebook, understanding these account rules starts with knowing where to find them.
Finding the Settings and Choosing a Period
Deposit controls sit within the gambling website’s account menus. The Tooniebet Ontario responsible gaming page is an operator-specific resource readers can consult alongside their account settings. ToonieBet is operated by Canadix Limited and regulated by the AGCO under an agreement with iGaming Ontario.
Ontario’s standards require an easy and obvious way to set financial and time limits during registration and afterward. Players must be offered deposit and loss limits when signing up, and the controls must remain easy to reach and change once an account is open.
Menu names differ between sites. Published examples place deposit limits under account settings or responsible-gaming tools, where players can select an amount and a period.
Each type of limit measures something different. Deposit limits cap money added to the account. Loss limits restrict net losses after winnings are taken into account, while time limits govern playing time. iGaming Ontario’s player guidance explains all three.
For Chromebook users, these settings are managed through the website’s account interface. Chrome’s own permissions handle separate browser functions, such as access to location information.
How Several Limits Apply to One Deposit
Players can have daily, weekly and monthly limits running together. A deposit must fit within every active cap.
Take a hypothetical account with limits of CAD $40 daily, CAD $100 weekly and CAD $250 monthly. These figures illustrate the process.
If someone has already deposited CAD $90 during the weekly period, the remaining weekly allowance is CAD $10. That becomes the most they can add, even when the daily limit has more room. Reaching the monthly cap would likewise block another deposit until some monthly allowance becomes available.
This is why checking all active limits matters. A new day may bring fresh daily capacity while the weekly or monthly total remains close to its ceiling. The longer periods continue to apply as the shorter one refreshes.
When Money Drops Out of a Rolling Window
The next question is when previous deposits stop counting toward a cap. Some sites use rolling periods, which track elapsed time from individual deposits.
Published Ontario policies include daily windows of 24 hours, weekly windows of 168 hours and monthly windows of 720 hours, equivalent to 30 days. Under that approach, each deposit frees up its corresponding allowance once it falls outside the window.
Suppose someone has a CAD $100 rolling weekly limit and deposits CAD $25 on Friday, followed by CAD $75 on Saturday. Seven days after Friday’s deposit, CAD $25 becomes available again. The other CAD $75 returns seven days after Saturday’s deposit.
Leaving the restored Friday allowance unused means it combines with Saturday’s restored amount. At that point, the full CAD $100 is available. Reviewing deposit dates and times helps explain how much room remains within a rolling period.
Changing a Cap Takes a Separate Step
A limit refreshing follows the schedule already attached to the account. Raising that limit requires a request and a wait.
Ontario’s standards require at least 24 hours before a player’s request to relax or remove an established limit can take effect. The existing limit remains enforceable during the cooling-off period.
Operators publish their own timings. Documented examples include a seven-day wait for deposit-limit increases or removals. Another published schedule allows increases after one day for a daily cap, seven days for a weekly cap and 30 days for a monthly cap.
Lower limits take effect immediately under these published policies. Some policies also restart the waiting period when a player requests another increase while an earlier change is pending. The effective date shows which amount currently applies.
Other Controls and Support
Deposit limits work alongside loss limits, time limits, short breaks and self-exclusion. Together, these give players ways to restrict account funding, gambling activity or access.
Ontario-regulated online casino play is restricted to adults aged 19 and older who are physically in Ontario. Gambling involves financial risk.
For concerns about your gambling or someone else’s, ConnexOntario offers free, confidential information and referral support around the clock. Call 1-866-531-2600 or text CONNEX to 247247. Standard message and data rates may apply.
Features
What “Best Odds” Really Means When Comparing Gambling Review Websites
The phrase best odds appears frequently in gambling discussions, but it is surprisingly easy to use imprecisely. MonsterBetList is primarily a casino review and rankings website, not a dedicated live sportsbook odds comparison terminal. That difference is central to evaluating what its reviews can and cannot establish. A casino rating may explain payout conditions, licence information and bonus restrictions, while a claim about the best available price on a sporting outcome requires a different kind of evidence altogether.
Odds and ratings answer different questions
Sports betting odds represent a price offered on a specified outcome. A review rating is an editorial judgement built from multiple criteria. These two numerical systems cannot be substituted for one another. A bookmaker rated highly for service may offer a less competitive price on a particular match, while a service with a more attractive price may impose different limits or verification rules.
Similarly, a casino review can discuss return-to-player statistics, but RTP is not the same as sportsbook odds. RTP describes a theoretical long-run percentage built into a game model. It does not tell a reader what will happen in one session and it is not an individually negotiable market quotation.
What makes sports odds comparable?
A fair odds comparison starts with identical selections: the same event, outcome, market rules and settlement conditions. Comparing a three-way football result with a draw-no-bet price is invalid because the products pay under different circumstances. The observation time also matters; displayed prices can change quickly as market information or trading decisions evolve.
The numerical format should be standardised. Decimal odds provide one convenient representation, but American and fractional formats express the same underlying idea differently. Converting these formats is straightforward. What matters is the net price, the operator’s rules and whether the quoted offer remains available when reviewed.
Overround explains the hidden cost of many markets
In a simplified two-outcome market, dividing one by each decimal price produces an implied probability. If the implied probabilities add to more than 100%, the excess is commonly described as the bookmaker’s overround. It is one way of understanding the margin embedded in prices, although individual market structure and adjustments can complicate the interpretation.
This concept explains why the word best should not be attached to a price without context. A strong headline may look appealing yet represent an ordinary margin after calculation. More importantly, any single quote is time-dependent. Genuine comparison requires a dated observation and equivalent market rules; broad editorial praise is not enough.
What casino rankings can establish instead
MonsterBetList publishes casino reviews and guides addressing licences, bonuses, payout experiences and responsible gambling. Those topics are relevant to evaluating consumer risk and service quality. A report about the length of a withdrawal process, for example, can be useful if its methodology is transparent. A bonus review can help identify restrictive wagering requirements that marketing headlines omit.
However, a casino ranking should not be presented as evidence that its highest-rated operator consistently offers the best sports prices. Unless a site publishes repeated market-by-market comparisons, that conclusion is not supported. Readers benefit when publishers clearly distinguish what was measured from what readers might assume was measured.
Bonuses can complicate comparisons
A sportsbook may offer free-bet tokens, cashback or other promotions. Their effective value depends on conditions rather than the largest number printed in a banner. Some credits are not withdrawable as cash; others require qualifying selections, minimum odds or a deadline. Casino welcome bonuses often introduce wagering requirements, game-contribution rules and limits on withdrawals. Combining these products under one generic promotional score can hide important differences.
For instance, a large matched deposit might require extensive play before bonus-related funds become eligible for withdrawal. The required betting volume is not a promise of profit. The presence of a promotion may therefore make comparisons more complex instead of simpler. Clear disclosures should precede any judgement about value.
Editorial independence and methods
Review sites sometimes state that rankings are editorially independent. Such a statement is relevant but does not replace evidence of consistent testing. Readers should look for the criteria used, the date of each review, whether real transactions were examined and how negative findings are treated. If one platform receives detailed testing while another is scored on marketing copy, the ranking loses comparability.
Commercial incentives should also be visible. Referral relationships or sponsorships do not automatically make every observation inaccurate, but they create reasons to ask how rankings are insulated from revenue. A publication that explains its methodology and corrections process gives readers a stronger basis for trust than one that simply declares its winners.
Licensing and dispute rights before price claims
A marginally attractive price is of limited value when the operator is not legally available to the reader or does not provide meaningful avenues for redress. Regulations vary by jurisdiction, and a licence in one country may not authorise service in another. It is prudent to verify the legal entity behind a brand and the current status of any licence through official records.
Consumers should also review identity verification, account restrictions and dispute resolution procedures. These operational conditions influence the actual experience of using a gambling service. A sensible evaluation includes them before discussing promotions or theoretical market advantages.
Why guaranteed-profit language is a warning sign
No ordinary review or odds list can guarantee that an individual will win money from gambling. Claims of certain returns often omit the fact that results are uncertain, prices move and transactions are subject to restrictions. Casino games generally incorporate a house advantage, and sports outcomes remain uncertain regardless of a persuasive analysis. The safest response to absolute promises is scepticism.
Readers should also avoid treating gambling as a means of addressing financial problems. Chasing previous losses and increasing stakes to recover money can deepen harm. Consumer-oriented coverage is more valuable when it explains risk and offers realistic options for stepping away.
Conclusion: define the claim before ranking the service
“Best odds” is a specific comparative proposition, not a synonym for a high casino rating. MonsterBetList can be examined for its published casino research, review structure and risk disclosures, but those materials should not be stretched into claims they have not tested. Clear definitions, dated evidence and honest limitations are the foundations of trustworthy comparison journalism.
