Connect with us
Israel Bonds RRSP

Features

Interview with Cecil Rosner, author of “Manipulating the Message: How Powerful Forces Shape the News”

Cecil Rosner

By MARTIN ZEILIG “In a career that has spanned more than forty-five years, I have worked as a reporter, a researcher, an editor, a television producer, a senior producer, an executive producer, a bureau chief, a managing editor, and a news director,” writes award-winning investigative journalist Cecil Rosner in the Preface of his important and most readable new book, “Manipulating the Message: How Powerful Forces Shape the News.”
“Throughout this time, I have spoken to thousands of people and helped to create thousands of stories. The aim has always been to search out facts and report the truth.”
Mr. Rosner, who lives in Winnipeg, agreed to an email interview with The Jewish Post & News to discuss the book.


JP&N: Why did you feel it necessary to write this book?
CR: I wanted to share my experience with people about how the profession is practiced and how it has evolved. The main point I try to make is that there are powerful, well-funded forces, who are constantly pressuring the media to cover certain stories and cover them in ways that benefit them. Whether it is politicians, corporations, the police, the military, intelligence agencies or others, there is continuous pressure placed on the media to repeat particular narratives. This has always been the case, but it has been getting worse over the years, because the ranks of journalists are shrinking.
One pertinent statistic I note in my book is that Canada, in 1991, had about 13,000 reporters and about 23,000 PR and communication specialists. That’s a ratio of about two to 1. Thirty years later, in 2021, there are 11,000 journalists and nearly 160,000 people working in PR and communications. So for every journalist, there are 14 people trying to massage the message for that person. Because conventional newspapers and broadcast outlets are shrinking, due to the loss of advertising revenue to the likes of Facebook and Google, mainstream journalism is in crisis.
JP&N: Has the internet been a positive force overall in the field of journalism?
CR: Like most things, there are positives and negatives for every new technology or innovation. Overall, the Internet has made it easier for more voices to be heard and for more people to publish their views and opinions for a worldwide audience. For investigative journalists, the Internet presents an opportunity to research deeply into people and institutions. Of course the ease of communication has its downside when bad actors get involved. Similarly, social media has been both good and bad.
It’s now very easy to disseminate fake news and disinformation to a huge audience, but at the same time the Internet affords the tools to debunk fake claims if you are knowledgeable enough to use them. In the era before the Internet, powerful companies and entities served as gatekeepers of news flow, and today this is no longer as strong a force. But it is still the case that people and companies with lots of money can exercise a dominant influence online and manipulate messages in a more powerful way than ever before. The advent of AI will also produce both positive and potentially negative consequences for the same reasons.
JP&N: In your long and distinguished career as a journalist, what are the most significant changes you have seen?
CR: I have mentioned the Internet. The rise of advanced research methods, such as data and computational journalism, is another significant factor. Huge amounts of data can now be analyzed to discern trends and stories in ways that journalists could never do before the advent of computers. The same is true of visual techniques, and geo-locational tools that allow journalists to find stories in places they never could before.
Consider, for instance, satellite imagery and tools like Google Earth. By examining the world from the sky, journalists can now observe topographical changes over time, and draw conclusions about climate change, deforestation and other things. These techniques can also be used to verify competing claims about what happened during conflicts.
On the negative side, I have seen journalists stretched thinner and thinner, having to feed more and more platforms, and therefore not having sufficient time to verify claims and seek the truth. Another disturbing trend, which I discuss in my book, is the rise of so-called Influencer Marketing. This involves paying people with social media followings to propagate a particular message, or sell a product, or boost a policy. It’s one of the ways rich and powerful forces can manipulate ordinary people.
JP&N: What sort of improvements would you like to see in journalism?
CR: In my book I point to many things, but just to mention a couple: I think journalists need to wean themselves off press releases, which manipulate them into covering things others want them to. A press release will always be a necessary tool, but far more attention needs to be paid to investigative journalism, which aims to determine the truth of what happened.
I also think people should pay attention to the new start-up companies that have entered the news digital space over the last few years. These are small but nimble operations that have been doing some good work and breaking important stories. As mainstream outlets shrink, they have the potential to grow and do good stories.
Journalists also need to do a more thorough job of eliminating racist, sexist and colonial attitudes that have infected the industry, and all of society really, and damaged the way they have treated particular communities. I am thinking about racist attitudes that were reflected in the media and directed towards minority communities, Black, Indigenous communities and different peoples of colour. Journalism organizations need to better reflect the communities they serve, both in who they employ and the content they produce.
JP&N: What else would you like to share with our readers?
CR: If journalists are being misled, then the general public is being misled as well. It doesn’t have to be this way.
“Manipulating the Message: How Powerful Forces Shape the News”
by Cecil Rosner
(Dundurn Press 263 pg. $26.99)

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Features

As the U.S. General Election Looms, How Will American Jews Vote?

By HENRY SREBRNIK First of all, before I go any further, we should get something straight: this whole so-called debate about anti-Zionism vs antisemitism is nonsense on stilts. 

Sure, especially before the Holocaust and the establishment of the State of Israel, many Jews were dubious about or even ideologically or theologically opposed to the Zionist project of recreating a Jewish state in the land of Israel. These groups ranged from various socialists on the left, such as the supporters of the Jewish Labour Bund, to haredim like the Satmar Hasidim. The latter still are, but no one thinks of them as “antisemites.”

All of this has virtually nothing to do with today’s so-called “anti-Zionists,” almost all of whom are non-Jewish antisemites making use of a word to confuse people about their desire to destroy a modern sovereign Jewish state, now more than 75 years old. (Yes, there are some misguided Jewish students involved, and the media loves them, but this is mainly a matter of ignorance and “Stockholm Syndrome.”)

Do you remember, not so long ago, that when right-wing Republicans and/or supporters of Donald Trump, made even mild criticisms of one or another Jewish politician or Jewish organization, leftwingers immediately said these were “dog whistles,” implying that this was code for antisemitism.  

Now, though, when protestors parade around proudly with placards reading “F—k Zionism,” or ask Jewish students whether they are “Zionists,” this has nothing to do with wondering whether they are a member of a Zionist organization or a person who subscribes to the Jewish nationalist ideology centered on the Land of Israel. They are asking whether these people are Jewish, pure and simple. 

“Zionist” has simply become a derogatory slur or abusive term for “Jew,” used by Jew-haters as a synonym, and not all that different from earlier, now archaic, versions such as “kike,” “sheeny,” or “Yid.” The animus is also directed at Hillels, synagogues, and other institutions which are Jewish, not technically “Zionist” as such. Is this really that hard to understand? And we Jews should not play their games by arguing the point.

After all, the word “antisemitism” is itself a euphemism, coined by a German Jew-hater in the 19th century, so as to appear a more “scientific” word for hating Jews. It’s not even accurate – as we know, Arabs and other peoples are also Semites, and no one who hates Jews has them in mind. Judeophobia would be a more accurate term, and we should make more use of it.

Anyhow, we also must stop trying to be “even handed” by trying to equate old-style Jew-hatred on the right with today’s versions, which are coming overwhelmingly from the left, under the rubric of “anti-Zionism.” Remember, anti-Israel demonstrations began the very next days after the Oct.7 massacres, and almost three weeks before Israel even launched its counterattack.

All this is by way of a segue to a very important matter coming our way this November: For whom will American Jews turn out in the forthcoming presidential election? We all know the statistics: For almost a century, a large majority of Jews have voted for the Democratic candidate, beginning with Franklin Delano Roosevelt in 1932. No Republican, including those who were victorious, came even close to capturing a majority of Jewish voters. Over the past several decades, according to data from the Pew Research Center, an average of 70 per cent of Jewish Americans consistently voted for the Democratic Party.

But October 7 has been a genuine zeitgeist shift. Even Jews blinded by an almost-religious loyalty to the party understand that it is being quite quickly captured by its far-left wing. Joe Biden may even be the last “pro-Israel” Democratic president (and he hasn’t exactly shone in that regard of late). The president himself has been unable to really condemn unequivocally and without moral relativism the outrages taking place on campuses.

I have for a long time thought that Israel shouldn’t have put all its defence needs in the U.S. basket. America is changing, demographically and ideologically, in a manner detrimental to Israel. The Democratic Party post-Biden will sooner or later be in the hands of the left-wing Congressional representatives known as the “Squad.” The protesters on the American university campuses should be called “Young Squadniks!”

The Hamas onslaught has left a mark on how Diaspora Jews look at their identity, especially in the United States. A recent survey conducted by the American Jewish Committee found that 78 per cent feel less safe since Hamas attacked Israel. “We are seeing an awakening, a heightened sense of consciousness among Jewish Americans,” asserted Steven Windmueller, professor emeritus of Jewish Communal Studies at the Hebrew Union College in Los Angeles.

They now have seen how elite university campuses like Harvard, Columbia and the University of Pennsylvania, many of which are heavily funded by Jewish donors, have been breeding and spreading a climate of antisemitic hate.

As apparently some 100 university campuses across the United States are aflame with anti-Israel and “anti-Zionist” fervor, and Jew-hatred has now become mainstream in Democratic politics, Jews are reconsidering many of their basic assumptions about their position in America generally and the Democratic Party specifically.

Many liberal Jewish Americans also feel betrayed by some of their alleged allies, those whose causes they had supported throughout the years, from the Civil Rights movement to Black Lives Matter activists. The left doesn’t care about antisemitism if they deem it inconvenient to their cause. They just call it “anti-Zionism” and carry on.

A few weeks ago, a sermon by Reform Rabbi Ammiel Hirsch, the senior rabbi at the Steven Wise Free Synagogue in New York delivered a stern warning to the Democrats. “Do not take American Jews for granted.”

Hirsch explained, “I have spoken to many American Jews in the past few months who have surprised me with their anxiety about developments in the Democratic Party, and their perception that it is becoming increasingly hostile to Israel, and tolerant of anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism in its own ranks.”

Jewish Democratic voters who never considered voting for Republicans have been announcing that they are voting for Trump, or will stay home or vote for independent candidate Robert Kennedy Jr., but will never vote for Biden.

It is true that New York and California have the largest Jewish communities, and they remain firmly in the Democratic column, even if not a single Jew were to vote for them. The Jewish vote for Biden will decrease, and in the very blue states where Jews live, like California and New York, it doesn’t really matter. But four swing states –Pennsylvania, Georgia, Nevada and Arizona — may well be decided by their large Jewish communities. Nowhere is that more apparent than in Pennsylvania, the swing state with the largest Jewish population – about 300,000 voting-age Jews — in a state President Joe Biden won by roughly 80,000 votes in 2020. (We are U.S. citizens who vote absentee ballot in Pennsylvania.)

I’m guessing that many Jews will sit it out. Of those voting, it will be hard for a lot of them to vote for Trump, constantly vilified day after day, but it may still reach 40 per cent. Still others who do vote may just leave the presidential line blank, and vote for Republicans for House and Senate seats.

I think there will be an almost perfect correlation between Jews who feel a deep attachment to the Jewish people — be it religiously, culturally, ethnically, or whatever –and voting Republican this year. For those who are Jewish mainly by “biology and genealogy” and for whom being Jewish is relatively unimportant, they are far more concerned with universal matters that now come under the rubric of terms like social justice, liberalism, diversity, inclusion, and so forth. They will come in at about 85 per cent for the Democrats. But as we don’t know the relative percentages of these two groups of Jews, predicting the overall Jewish vote for each of the two parties is difficult.

Henry Srebrnik is a professor of political science at the University of Prince Edward Island.

Continue Reading

Features

Winnipeg-born writer Sidura Ludwig turns newfound passion for baking challah into new picture book

By MYRON LOVE With her latest book, “Rising” (published by Candlewick Press in the United States), acclaimed Winnipeg-born author Sidura Ludwig has taken her career in a slightly different direction. 


According to publicist Evan Munday (who works for Penguin Random House Canada, the Canadian distributor of the book), “Rising” is  “a quiet, joyful story celebrating a Jewish mother’s tradition of making challah with her child. A child and a mother measure, mix, knead, shape, and tuck their dough under a towel like a sleeping baby, then wait while their dough rises, soon to be baked and gratefully shared at a Shabbat gathering with loved ones.”
In “Rising,” he continues, “Sidura turns a Jewish family’s gathering into a lesson in patience, slowing down, faith, and love.”
He adds that there is an easy-to-follow recipe for challah at the end of the book –  along with a glossary and an author’s note describing the personal meaning of her family’s weekly ritual.
He describes “Rising” as “a much needed picture book that acts as both an exultation and balm in this time of exploding antisemitism in North America.” 
 As was reported in earlier stories about Sidura Ludwig in the pages of The Jewish Post & News,  the daughter of Israel and Maylene Ludwig has been writing seriously since she was a teenager.  She left Winnipeg originally in 1994 to study at York University.  After graduation, she was back here for a year working as a teacher’s assistant, then went back east to study journalism at Carleton.  In between, she married and she and her husband eventually settled in Thornhill in 2004. 

Sidura noted in an earlier story that she worked for a time as a journalist and in communications – largely on a freelance basis before starting a family.  Her first book, a novel, “Holding My Breath,” was published in 2007. 
She pointed out that, as a young mother, she didn’t have a lot of time to read novels and, as a result, gravitated to short stories – which was always her first love.
 “I had started on a second novel,” she notes, “but it just wasn’t working for me.  I began to focus on the individual characters and develop each as a short story.”
She noted that she set herself a goal of trying to send out five submissions a week and, after a year, had nine short stories published in different media.  That gave her the confidence that there was enough interest in the stories to approach a publisher.  The result was her second book , “You Are Not What We Expected” (published in 2020), which recounts the lives of the multi-generational Levine family and their neighbours over a period of 15 years, capturing the celebration, transitions and drama in their lives.
 
In November 2021,Sidura was presented with the Vine Award for fiction for “You Are Not What We Expected.”  You could rightly say that Sidura Ludwig was “over the moon” about being named the winner of that award for her first collection of short stories. (The Vine Awards for Canadian Jewish Literature “honour both the best Canadian Jewish writers and non-Jewish Canadian authors who deal with Jewish subjects in Fiction, History, Non-Fiction, Young Adult/Children’s literature, and Poetry”. Each winning author receives a prize of $10,000. The 2021 three-person jury reviewed 42 entries to the Fiction, History, Non-Fiction and Young Adult/Children’s categories.) 
 Earlier that year,  Ludwig graduated from  a Masters Degree program in Fine Arts, specializing in writing books for children and young adults at the Vermont College of Fine Arts.   “Rising” is in that genre.
Ludwig’s first children’s book was inspired by her own new-found love of baking challah four years ago when Covid lockdowns were in place.
“With everything turned upside down, I was looking for a way to reintroduce some consistency, something familiar into our lives,” the mother of three teenagers recalls.  “As I was stuck at home, I began waking up early on Friday mornings, mixing the dough and baking challah following a recipe.  It became my anchor. It was something quiet and peaceful I could do on a regular basis.  As well as showing my love for my family, I felt a spiritual connection.”
 
“Rising” was illustrated by Tel Aviv-based expatriate Canadian illustrator Sophie Vincent Guy.who now lives in Tel Aviv. “Rising” is scheduled to be arriving in book stores in a couple of weeks with a launch in Winnipeg set for Thursday, June 6, at McNally Robinson.  
Sidura is currently working on some picture books for younger children and a novel intended for middle grade students.   The latter is entitled “Swan” and is based on the life of 19th century Nova Scotian Anna Swan, who grew to be 8’ tall.  The book, published by Nimbus Publishing is due out in September.
.

Continue Reading

Features

Message from a Palestinian in Gaza to protesters: “You’re hurting the Palestinian cause”

Protesters at McGill University

A very brave Palestinian who was willing to put his name to paper and write an article for Newsweek Magazine has exposed the utter hypocrisy of all those students – and others, who have been setting up encampments across the U.S. – and now Canada, too.

You can read the article at https://www.newsweek.com/message-gazan-campus-protesters-youre-hurting-palestinian-cause-opinion-1894313

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News