Features
We Must Not Be Silent!
By Dr. SOLLY DREMAN (formerly of Winnipeg, now of Jerusalem, where for years he was a Professor of Psychology at Ben Gurion University of the Negev)
The recent scandalous valedictorian speech at the Max Rady College of Medicine by Gem Newman should not be forgotten or forgiven, nor should we as Jews be silent. Newman’s address was a biased, prejudiced condemnation of Israel and, by association, of the Jewish people at large. In labelling Israelis as colonialists he ignored the fact that the Jewish people have been indigeneous to that region of the Middle East for over 3700 years and his claim that the Jews are colonizers and have unjustifiably displaced the Palestinian people and are divesting them of their homeland is false.
There have always been Jews living in that area since Abraham moved his family from Mesopotamia and the First and Second Temples were built, dating back over 3000 years. Arabs began to populate the area only later when economic, industrial, and technological advances occurred and, in 1948, when the State of Israel was declared, five Arab armies invaded the country with the intent to exterminate all Jews and take it over. Numerous conflicts have taken place since with the latest being the barbaric attack on October 7th by Hamas when they invaded the Gaza Envelope brutally raping, killing through decapitating, torturing and burning alive approximately 1200 men, women and children and abducting 252 people including women, children and the elderly with Hamas promising to continue to do so.
The overwhelming negative response by many fellow Jews – both in Israel and in the Diaspora to Newman’s provocative address provides a platform for a firm but essential message: “We must not remain silent.” The protest occurring in academia today and the reluctance of senior academic administrators to react forcefully to curtail the protests either condoning or promoting violence against Jews, nor to condemn the antisemitic nature of these protests, is disturbing. To the best of my knowledge, few senior academic administrators have acted forcefully against such demonstrations nor taken actions against the blatant antisemitic nature of the majority of these protests.
I alerted Ernest Rady recently to Newman’s speech and, to his credit, he immediately wrote a strong letter of objection, which reflected his own pain and disappointment, to both the Dean of the Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, Peter Nickerson, and to the President of the University of Manitoba, Michael Benarroch. Rady pointed out that, paradoxically, the medical school, which is named after his father Max, had had admission quotas for Jews for years.
Dean Nickerson responded immediately to Rady’s letter, with President Benarroch also responding – after being bombarded by numerous responses to Newman’s inciteful remarks.
As a Jew and a former Winnipeger who made Aliyah to Israeli in 1964, I am deeply disturbed by the current situation and the negative reaction of the international community at large. Newman’s address in an academic setting provides a platform for addressing some of my concerns and particularly with the concern that we not remain silent. As a Professor Emeritus of Clinical Psychology and former Brigade Psychologist of the Jerusalem Brigade in the Yom Kippur War I have been intimately involved with some of the mainstreams of Israeli life, such as war and terrorism, death and dying, post traumatic stress, immigration, and family crisis. Israel today is faced with a crisis for its very survival and the maintenance of a home in time of crisis for the Jewish people. If we do not fight for this right and for our homeland there is a danger we will not survive either as a nation nor as a people. Relevant to this concern is what is occurring in academia today internationally and our need to be active and address these concerns. In this light we should be mindful of what occurred in Nazi Germany in the late 1930s when Jews were barred from academic studies and Jewish faculty were fired en masse – a prelude to the Holocaust.
Hence, it is imperative that we as concerned Jews not be silent today and speak out loudly and clearly about events like the Newman valedictorian address. It is my opinion that we should only reconsider future funding of academic institutions if they take firm steps against antisemitism, such as the president of the University of Manitoba suggested , when he wrote of promoting the idea of education for students, faculty and staff regarding antisemitism. As for Gem Newman, who has taken the Hippocratic Oath to devote his life to treating patients regardless of nationality, race or ethnic origin, he and his kind should not be licensed to practice medicine unless an apology is rendered by him for his speech – which he has stubbornly and smugly refused to do to date.
In closing I want to state that my concern is deep and genuine and I pray that the uncertainty that is facing us today as Jews, Israelis, Winnipegers and citizens of the world at large will be surmounted. This will require patience and the willingness of all parties involved not only to speak, but to listen carefully.
Uncategorized
Volatility, Hit Frequency, and RTP: Why the Number Casinos Advertise Is the Least Useful One
The return to player percentage looks clean as a casino data point. It gives players a neat number, usually around 94% to 97% for many online slots, and that number feels easy to compare. A 96.5% game appears better than a 95.2% game. The problem starts when players treat RTP as a forecast for their next 50 spins or one evening.
You may find the RTP listed on slot pages on a leading online casino in Ontario, but the number only tells part of the story. Two games can share the same RTP and create different sessions: one may return small wins often, while the other may drain a balance before one bonus round changes everything.
The RTP Trap
Return to player (RTP) measures the theoretical share of total wagers a game returns across a very large number of rounds. In plain terms, a 96% RTP slot returns about $96 for every $100 wagered in the long run. That does not mean one player who deposits $100 should expect $96 back.
The trap sits in the word “theoretical.” RTP comes from the game’s math model. It works across huge samples, not personal sessions. A player can finish far above that percentage, far below it, or with nothing left after a short run of poor results.
Is it useless then? No, RTP can still help. It gives a baseline cost of play. Lower-RTP games cost more on average than higher-RTP games. Still, once a game passes a reasonable threshold, the next question matters more: how does it distribute that return?
Hit Frequency: The Number That Shapes Session Feel
Hit frequency tells you how often a game produces a winning outcome. This often misleads players because any win can count. A spin that returns $0.10 on a $1 bet may still count as a hit, even though the player lost $0.90 in real terms.
A game can feel active because symbols connect often, sounds play, and the screen keeps celebrating small returns. The balance may still fall. In many modern slots, “win” does not always mean profit on the spin.
Hit frequency answers one practical question: how much silence can you tolerate? Some players dislike long dry spells. Others accept quieter sessions because they chase bonus rounds or larger payouts.
The educational site Get Gambling Facts gives a useful distinction: RTP concerns the percentage of money returned over time, while hit frequency concerns how often a machine stops on a winning combination.
Volatility: The Risk Label Players Need More Often
Volatility, also called variance, describes how unevenly a game pays. Low-volatility games tend to return smaller amounts more often. High-volatility games hold more value in rare events: bonus rounds, premium symbols, multipliers, or jackpots.
Here is where RTP becomes less useful on its own:
- A 96% low-volatility slot may give modest returns and longer play from the same balance.
- A 96% high-volatility slot may burn through funds quickly unless the player hits a strong feature.
- A progressive jackpot game may look exciting, but it often places more value on rare top prizes.
The same RTP can hide very different risk profiles. Players who ignore volatility often blame the casino or the game when the session follows its math design.
Why the Same RTP Can Feel So Different
Picture two slots with 96% RTP. Slot A pays small wins on many spins, has a modest top prize, and rarely creates dramatic balance swings. Slot B pays less often but offers a large max win and volatile bonus rounds. The advertised return matches, but the experience does not.
Slot A may suit a player who wants a slower bankroll drop and more regular feedback. Slot B suits someone who accepts sharper losses in exchange for a shot at a heavier payout.
A Better Way to Read a Slot Page
Most slot pages give players more clues than they notice. The trick is to read the details together rather than chase the highest percentage.
Start with RTP. If two games look similar, the higher number has better long-term value. Then check volatility. If the game uses terms such as high, very high, or extreme variance, lower your bet size or expect shorter sessions. Next, look at the paytable. A huge max win usually means the game saves a lot of its value for rare outcomes.
A sensible pre-play check looks like this:
- RTP: What is the average long-term return?
- Volatility: How rough can the session become?
- Hit frequency: How often will the game show any wins?
- Paytable: Where does most value sit?
To Conclude
Casinos advertise RTP because it looks objective, tidy, and easy to rank. Players should read it, but they should not give it more authority than it deserves. For long sessions, volatility may matter more than a small RTP difference. For comfort, hit frequency may explain the feel better than the payback rate.
Features
They Deserve the Very Best”: The Doctors Bringing Specialist Care to Holocaust Survivors at Home
Features
The Popularity of Simpler Slot Games in 2026: Review From Casino Online CrazyTower Experts
Online casinos now fill their libraries with numerous video slots that have dozens of functions, long bonus rounds, complex mechanics, and so on. Interestingly, despite this huge range of modern options, many Canadian visitors at sites like Casino Online CrazyTower here https://crazytower.com/ca/ no longer want complicated gameplay that requires constant attention and long explanations.
Simpler slots now attract a wider audience because they save time and create faster sessions. So, let’s figure out why this change happened and reasons for the popularity of simpler machines.
Why Many Players Are Returning to Basic Gameplay
Modern websites like Casino Online CrazyTower pushed complex video slots for years, but many people now prefer classic formats again. Simple gameplay has fewer interruptions and is simpler in terms of budgeting, which is important when you gamble for fun.
These are a few potential reasons explain why simpler slots became popular again in 2026:
- Faster rounds. Symbols appear quickly, and rounds continue without long animations or extended bonus sequences.
- Easier controls. Most classic slots have simple menus and familiar layouts that don’t confuse new visitors.
- Smaller feature lists. Simple slots usually have standard wilds, scatters, and multipliers instead of dozens of random mechanics.
- Better session flow. People spend more time on gameplay instead of reading explanations about symbols and special functions.
- Lower visual pressure. Simpler slots use calmer designs and shorter effects that don’t overload attention.
Classic gameplay also suits mobile devices better because shorter rounds work well on smaller screens. Plus, many visitors now prefer games that start instantly and explain their mechanics within seconds.
Features That Make Simpler Slots Appealing
Simple machines at Casino Online CrazyTower and similar websites continue to attract attention because they have a high gameplay speed. Many classic titles also replicate older casino machines that people already know from physical casinos.
However, these aren’t the only factors that attract gamblers. So, check out this list:
- Short bonus rounds. Free spins and multipliers finish quickly instead of interrupting gameplay for several minutes.
- Common and standard paylines. Traditional layouts help people understand payouts without long explanations.
- Faster loading times. Simpler graphics reduce waiting time on phones, tablets, and older computers.
- Stable gameplay pace. Long cutscenes and constant pop-up notifications don’t interrupt the session.
- Traditional themes. Fruit symbols, bars, sevens, and classic casino designs still attract large audiences.
- Smaller menus. Important information appears immediately without complicated tabs or hidden sections.
Modern video slots often contain too many mechanics in a single game. Developers now combine expanding reels, random modifiers, mission systems, tournaments, and multiple bonus levels in one title. Many visitors lose interest because gameplay turns repetitive and overloaded with constant interruptions.
Compare this to a session when you get results immediately and aren’t interrupted. These still have free spins and even mini risk games, but not as loaded as innovative titles.
Conclusion
Simple slots usually create better replay value because people understand the mechanics immediately. Common and standard gameplay doesn’t cause frustration and allows faster decisions during casino sessions.
Many classic slots also function better during short breaks because rounds finish quickly without long bonus interruptions. That’s why simpler slots became popular again at many casinos, including Casino Online CrazyTower and such.
