RSS
Pager Attack: How the Media Whitewashed Hezbollah Terrorists and Slandered Israel
People gather as smoke rises from a mobile shop in Sidon, Lebanon as Hezbollah communication devices explode across the country on Sept. 18, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Hassan Hankir
The pager attack targeting thousands of Hezbollah terrorists — which Israel is believed to be behind — stands as one of the most precise, large-scale counterterrorism operations ever conducted.
CCTV footage from Beirut and its suburbs reveals the meticulous coordination of the blasts, showing members of the Iranian-backed Lebanese group struck by explosions from booby-trapped devices they were carrying.
While Israel has not officially commented or acknowledged any responsibility, a former Israeli official, quoted by Axios, stated that Israeli intelligence planted explosives in devices Hezbollah had imported for a future operation. The attack was expedited to prevent Hezbollah from uncovering the trap.
Though some details of Tuesday’s events remain unclear — like the devices’ origin and how they were rigged — one fact is indisputable, confirmed even by Hezbollah: this was a precision strike targeting their militants within a globally recognized terrorist organization.
Even if we put aside @DailyMailUK‘s erroneous reference to Tel Aviv, why is it Israel that is held responsible for putting the “Middle East on the brink” by allegedly responding to a terrorist org that has been launching attacks since Oct. 8?
Here’s some more poor coverage. pic.twitter.com/wfwsE7F9Lu
— HonestReporting (@HonestReporting) September 18, 2024
This truth was largely obscured by international media outlets in their early coverage of the attack.
Several outlets, including The Guardian, BBC, and the UK’s Daily Mirror, found creative ways to sidestep mentioning Hezbollah altogether in headlines, referring to it instead as an “exploding pager attack in Lebanon.”
The Mirror went a step further, calling it a “bizarre” incident, suggesting that thousands of random people — and their pagers — were the targets, rather than Hezbollah militants.
Meanwhile, ABC News framed the event as “wireless devices” mysteriously exploding “in the hands of their owners,” despite quoting a Hezbollah-owned media outlet as its source.
A “Major Escalation”?
Another glaring issue in Tuesday’s coverage was how the media framed the attack as pushing the Middle East to the brink of major escalation.
This narrative dominated reports from journalists, security analysts, and defense experts filing from the comfort of their offices in London and New York. The Daily Mail’s front page, for example, breathlessly warned of the “Middle East on the Brink,” while also managing to misidentify Tel Aviv as Israel’s capital in a confused splash.
It’s telling to compare this headline with the Daily Mail’s coverage of Hezbollah’s rocket strike on Majdal Shams, which killed 12 Druze children.
Not once did the outlet accuse Hezbollah of destabilizing the region, despite the direct hit on a soccer field full of kids.
Indeed, a July article by the Daily Mail about the Majdal Shams tragedy flipped the narrative entirely, claiming Israel would “expand [the] war on new fronts” after responding to the attack with a targeted drone strike on top Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr.
While The Guardian quietly amended a headline on a piece by its defense and security editor Dan Sabbagh after being called out by HonestReporting for blaming Israel for escalating the conflict, the outlet’s global affairs correspondent, Andrew Roth, still described the “exploding pager attack” as “another blow for US peace hopes.”
Apparently, Roth doesn’t think Hezbollah’s frequent, indiscriminate attacks on Israel have done anything to hinder peace efforts.
Meanwhile, an article in The Washington Post — which was passed off as “analysis” — argued that Israel targeting terrorists was proof of its “hunger for war” and a desire to “escalate” tensions in the region.
At the same time, the piece commended Iran and Hezbollah — who have repeatedly vowed to wipe Israel off the map — for their “great deal of restraint.”
Every headline from any reputable news outlet should have been simple: “Israel Targets Hezbollah Terrorists in Precision Pager Attack.”
That’s it. That’s what we know happened.
The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.
The post Pager Attack: How the Media Whitewashed Hezbollah Terrorists and Slandered Israel first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Ritchie Torres Defends John Fetterman, Says Israel Support Cause of Attacks Over Senator’s Mental Health
US Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) gives an interview in his office in the Russell Senate Office Building in Washington, DC, Jan. 18, 2024. Photo: Rod Lamkey / CNP/Sipa USA for NY Post via Reuters Connect
Rep. Ritchie Torres (D-NY) defended Sen. John Fetterman (D-PA) amid an onslaught of attacks regarding the latter’s mental acuity, claiming that the mounting criticism against the US senator stems from his support for Israel.
“I know a hit piece when I see one. The only reason for the coordinated campaign against Senator John Fetterman is his unapologetic pro-Israel politics. Let’s call it what it is,” Torres posted on social media on Friday. “As someone who has struggled with depression my whole adult life, I can tell you that if you truly care about someone’s mental health, leaking hit pieces against them is a strange way of showing it.”
Fetterman, one of the most strident supporters of Israel in the US Congress, has been the subject of a series of articles which have called into question his mental stability. An article published in New York Magazine depicted the senator as moody, irrational, and conspiratorial. Additionally, the article took a series of swipes at Fetterman’s stance on Israel, suggesting that the senator’s vocal advocacy of the Jewish state stems from his supposedly deteriorating mental health. It also portrayed Fetterman as racially biased against Palestinians, claiming that in conversations he compared Gaza civilians to “a carton of sour milk.”
Another article published in Politico called Fetterman “increasingly alone,” noting that “few fellow Democrats have rushed to Fetterman’s defense” following the publication of the bombshell article in New York Magazine. The publication asserted that “private chatter about primary challenges” against Fetterman have started and that some Pennsylvania Democrats are suggesting he step down.
Though Fetterman campaigned as a progressive, he has surprisingly emerged as a staunch ally of Israel in the months following Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, terrorist attacks across southern Israel. Fetterman has repeatedly condemned anti-Israel voices within his own party in the US Congress, as well as elite universities for tolerating what he has characterized as antisemitic and anti-Israel hate speech on their campuses.
Fetterman’s staunch support of Israel has incensed progressives and sparked an exodus of staffers from his Senate office. Last year, 16 former campaign staffers penned a letter urging the senator to “join the right side of history” by supporting a “ceasefire” between Israel and Hamas. Several of his top communications staffers have fled to join anti-Israel operations such as the Working Families Party or the office of Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson.
Three Republican senators — Dave McCormick (D-PA), Tom Cotton (R-AK), and Chuck Grassley (R-IA) — publicly defended Fetterman, arguing that the Pennsylvania lawmaker has been subjected to unfair political hit-pieces.
“It’s time to put politics aside and stop these vicious, personal attacks against Senator Fetterman, his wife, and his health,” McCormick wrote. “While we have many differences, we are both committed to working together to achieve results for the people of Pennsylvania and make their lives better.”
“John Fetterman and I have our differences, but he’s a decent and genuine guy,” he added.
“The radical left is smearing him [Fetterman] with dishonest, vicious attacks because h’’s pro-Israel and they only want reliable anti-Israel politicians. Disgraceful,” Cotton posted on X/Twitter.
“The media ought to lay off Senator Fetterman,” Grassley added.
Democratic Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (NY) also gave a vote of confidence to Fetterman, claiming the Pennsylvania lawmaker is “doing a good job, and he’s a good legislator.”
The post Ritchie Torres Defends John Fetterman, Says Israel Support Cause of Attacks Over Senator’s Mental Health first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Iran Warns Europeans That Reimposing Sanctions Could Have Irreversible Consequences
Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi attends a press conference following a meeting with Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov in Moscow, Russia, April 18, 2025. Photo: Tatyana Makeyeva/Pool via REUTERS
Iran‘s foreign minister warned Britain, France, and Germany on Monday that a decision to trigger a UN mechanism reimposing sanctions on Tehran could lead to an irreversible escalation of tensions.
Under the terms of a UN resolution ratifying a 2015 nuclear pact, the three European powers could reimpose United Nations sanctions against Tehran before Oct. 18, known in diplomatic circles as the “snapback mechanism.”
“Iran has made its position clear. We have officially warned all JCPOA [nuclear pact] signatories that abuse of the snapback mechanism will lead to consequences — not only the end of Europe’s role in the agreement, but also an escalation of tensions that could become irreversible,” Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi wrote in a column in French weekly magazine Le Point.
US President Donald Trump exited Tehran’s 2015 nuclear accord with six world powers in 2018 during his first term and reimposed tough sanctions that have devastated Iran‘s economy.
The European powers are not part of current negotiations between Iran and the United States, the fourth round of which ended in Oman on Sunday.
But the three powers have sought to coordinate closely with Washington with a view to whether and when they should use the snapback mechanism to raise pressure on Iran over its nuclear program.
Trump said on Monday that Iran was “talking intelligently.”
“We want Iran to be wealthy and wonderful and happy and great, but they can’t have a nuclear weapon, it’s very simple. So, I think they understand that I mean business and I think they’re being very reasonable thus far,” he told reporters.
Talks between the so-called E3 and Iran in Rome earlier in May were postponed. Araqchi said that a meeting between Iran‘s deputy foreign minister and E3 counterparts had since taken place, describing them as a “promising, but fragile start.”
France’s foreign ministry declined to comment. The British and German foreign ministries were not immediately available to comment.
According to diplomats and a document seen by Reuters, the E3 countries may trigger a snapback by August if no substantial deal can be found by then. The window closes on Oct. 18.
Relations between the E3 and Iran have worsened over the last year despite sporadic meetings, against a backdrop of new sanctions imposed on Tehran over its ballistic missile program, its detention of foreign citizens, and support for Russia in its war against Ukraine.
Iran, which has long said its nuclear program is peaceful, has breached the 2015 pact’s nuclear curbs since 2019, including “dramatically” accelerating its enrichment of uranium to up to 60 percent purity, close to the roughly 90 percent level that is weapons-grade, according to the UN nuclear watchdog.
It denies it is seeking nuclear weapons.
The post Iran Warns Europeans That Reimposing Sanctions Could Have Irreversible Consequences first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Palestinian Authority President Lifts Ban on Operations of Qatar’s Al Jazeera TV
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas holds a leadership meeting in Ramallah, in the West Bank, April 23, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Mohammed Torokman
Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has lifted on Monday a ban imposed on operations of Qatar’s Al Jazeera television in the territory, with the broadcaster set to resume operations on Tuesday, the network’s bureau chief in Palestine Walid Omary said.
The decision comes months after Al Jazeera‘s operations were halted in the Palestinian territories in January over the network’s dissemination of “inciting material.”
The post Palestinian Authority President Lifts Ban on Operations of Qatar’s Al Jazeera TV first appeared on Algemeiner.com.