Connect with us

RSS

Anti-Israel Hate, Iranian Influence Take Center Stage at Olympic Games

Soldiers patrol on a street in front of the Eiffel Tower ahead of the Olympics on July 21, 2024. Photo: Reuters/Stefan Wermuth

The 2024 Olympic Games have come at a time of enormous global tensions. Conflicts between countries are raging, Paris is on edge, and security concerns are grave. Despite this, geopolitical tensions and conflicts should not lead to athletes being targeted for their national identity.
Unfortunately, no country’s athletes are at a greater risk than Israel’s. Since the start of Olympics season, Israeli athletes have had their lives threatened anonymously, been specifically targeted by the Iranian government, and have been under heavy armed security as anti-Israel zealots and the Iranian regime remain hellbent on disrupting Israeli participation in the games.
Israel’s critics keep repeating that anti-Zionism is not antisemitism, yet Israeli athletes are uniquely vilified and threatened for their identities. Certainly, the global community does not approve of the governments of China or Iran, and yet their athletes are never in the crosshairs of abuse, terror plots, and harassment.
The Olympic Games are bittersweet for the nation of Israel. Each time the games are held, Israelis are forced to recall harrowing memories of the 1972 Munich games, in which Palestinian terrorists kidnapped, held hostage, and ultimately violently murdered 11 Israeli athletes.

This year, Israel has sent 88 athletes to Paris to participate in the Olympic Games, under heavy security and guarded by Israeli and French officers. In the opening ceremony, the alphabetical order of the countries had to be slightly adjusted to separate Israeli athletes from the Iranian delegation.

On Friday, Israeli athletes had to be escorted by armed French security to the Olympic Village, as anti-Israel protests erupted across France’s capital, some of them becoming violent, with calls for the blood of Israel’s athletes. 

When Israel faced off with Mali on Wednesday, in their first soccer match of the Olympics, the Israeli anthem was drowned out by jeers and abuse, and Israeli players were faced with constant insults hurled from fans in the bleachers.

Earlier this week, Israel’s foreign minister warned France of an Iranian-backed plot to carry out terrorist attacks against Israeli athletes in Paris. And on Sunday, Israeli athletes had their personal information hacked and leaked publicly by cyber criminals, who are believed to be affiliated with Iran. Two men have already been arrested in Paris for plotting terror attacks during the games, likely targeting Israeli athletes. Israel’s athletes have remained under 24 hour security by French and Israeli forces since arriving in France. 

The specific targeting of Israeli athletes is an example of textbook xenophobia. Because of the Israeli government’s military campaign in Gaza, Israeli athletes, who simply want to participate in the Olympics and compete for gold medals, are targeted and threatened violently because of their national identity. One would think that people learned their lesson from the horrifying 1972 Munich tragedy, but it seems that for some, that wasn’t enough. And for the Iranian regime, all attacks, protests, and threats against Israeli athletes serve the government’s agenda of denormalizing and destabilizing Israel’s standing on the world stage, and attempting to alienate Israel, turning it into a pariah state.

Earlier this month, Adidas announced that it was bringing back its 1972 Munich Olympic shoes, and that they would be modeled by Palestinian supermodel Bella Hadid, one of the Internet’s leading anti-Israel propagandists, who constantly maligns and libels the Jewish State to her millions of followers on social media. Adidas has since walked back its Hadid sneaker campaign, and issued vague apologies for insensitivity and to Hadid herself.

As a Western society that is quick to condemn any form of discrimination based on identity, it is imperative that we condemn this discrimination against Jews and Israelis emphatically.

It is acceptable to criticize Israeli’s government, but completely unacceptable to target, harass, and threaten Israeli athletes because of the Israeli government’s perceived wrongdoings. Iran and its terrorist allies want nothing more than to destabilize, intimidate, and alienate Israel and its citizens on the world stage. We are constantly told not to accuse “anti-Zionists” of being antisemitic, and yet, we see these same “anti-Zionists,” targeting Israeli athletes alone, regardless of their individual views — and for no other reason than their national identity. In keeping with the 2024 Olympics motto of “Games Wide Open,” it is crucial that the athletes from each country be treated with fairness, respect, and equality, and that the spirit of the Olympic Games is preserved.

Nathaniel Miller is a Tulane University student, where he is the president of the Tulane Israel Public Affairs Committee, and is a CAMERA fellow.

The post Anti-Israel Hate, Iranian Influence Take Center Stage at Olympic Games first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Iranian nuclear program degraded by up to two years, Pentagon says

A satellite image of Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility. Photo: File.

The Pentagon said on Wednesday that US strikes 10 days ago had degraded Iran’s nuclear program by up to two years, suggesting the U.S. military operation likely achieved its goals despite a far more cautious initial assessment that leaked to the public.

Sean Parnell, a Pentagon spokesman, offered the figure at a briefing to reporters, adding that the official estimate was “probably closer to two years.” Parnell did not provide evidence to back up his assessment.

“We have degraded their program by one to two years, at least intel assessments inside the Department [of Defense] assess that,” Parnell told a news briefing.

U.S. military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities on June 22 using more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs and more than two dozen Tomahawk land attack cruise missiles.

The evolving U.S. intelligence about the impact of the strikes is being closely watched, after President Donald Trump said almost immediately after they took place that Iran’s program had been obliterated, language echoed by Parnell at Wednesday’s briefing.

Such conclusions often take the U.S. intelligence community weeks or more to determine.

“All of the intelligence that we’ve seen [has] led us to believe that Iran’s — those facilities especially, have been completely obliterated,” Parnell said.

Over the weekend, the head of the UN nuclear watchdog, Rafael Grossi, said that Iran could be producing enriched uranium in a few months, raising doubts about how effective US strikes to destroy Tehran’s nuclear program have been.

Several experts have also cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of the deeply buried Fordow site before the strikes and could be hiding it.

But US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said last week he was unaware of intelligence suggesting Iran had moved its highly enriched uranium to shield it from US strikes.

A preliminary assessment last week from the Defense Intelligence Agency suggested that the strikes may have only set back Iran’s nuclear program by months. But Trump administration officials said that assessment was low confidence and had been overtaken by intelligence showing Iran’s nuclear program was severely damaged.

According to Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, the strikes on the Fordow nuclear site caused severe damage.

“No one exactly knows what has transpired in Fordow. That being said, what we know so far is that the facilities have been seriously and heavily damaged,” Araqchi said in the interview broadcast by CBS News on Tuesday.

The post Iranian nuclear program degraded by up to two years, Pentagon says first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Switzerland Moves to Close Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s Geneva Office Over Legal Irregularities

Palestinians carry aid supplies received from the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation in the central Gaza Strip, May 29, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ramadan Abed/File Photo

Switzerland has moved to shut down the Geneva office of the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US- and Israeli-backed aid group, citing legal irregularities in its establishment.

The GHF began distributing food packages in Gaza in late May, implementing a new aid delivery model aimed at preventing the diversion of supplies by Hamas, as Israel continues its defensive military campaign against the Palestinian terrorist group.

The initiative has drawn criticism from the UN and international organizations, some of which have claimed that Jerusalem is causing starvation in the war-torn enclave.

Israel has vehemently denied such accusations, noting that, until its recently imposed blockade, it had provided significant humanitarian aid in the enclave throughout the war.

Israeli officials have also said much of the aid that flows into Gaza is stolen by Hamas, which uses it for terrorist operations and sells the rest at high prices to Gazan civilians.

With a subsidiary registered in Geneva, the GHF — headquartered in Delaware — reports having delivered over 56 million meals to Palestinians in just one month.

According to a regulatory announcement published Wednesday in the Swiss Official Gazette of Commerce, the Federal Supervisory Authority for Foundations (ESA) may order the dissolution of the GHF if no creditors come forward within the legal 30-day period.

The Trump administration did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the Swiss decision to shut down its Geneva office.

“The GHF confirmed to the ESA that it had never carried out activities in Switzerland … and that it intends to dissolve the Geneva-registered branch,” the ESA said in a statement.

Last week, Geneva authorities gave the GHF a 30-day deadline to address legal shortcomings or risk facing enforcement measures.

Under local laws and regulations, the foundation failed to meet several requirements: it did not appoint a board member authorized to sign documents domiciled in Switzerland, did not have the minimum three board members, lacked a Swiss bank account and valid address, and operated without an auditing body.

The GHF operates independently from UN-backed mechanisms, which Hamas has sought to reinstate, arguing that these vehicles are more neutral.

Israeli and American officials have rejected those calls, saying Hamas previously exploited UN-run systems to siphon aid for its war effort.

The UN has denied those allegations while expressing concerns that the GHF’s approach forces civilians to risk their safety by traveling long distances across active conflict zones to reach food distribution points.

The post Switzerland Moves to Close Gaza Humanitarian Foundation’s Geneva Office Over Legal Irregularities first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Key US Lawmaker Warns Ireland of Potential Economic Consequences for ‘Antisemitic Path’ Against Israel

US Sen. James Risch (R-ID) speaks during a Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing, Washington, DC, May 21, 2024. Photo: Graeme Sloan/Sipa USA via Reuters Connect

Senate Foreign Relations Committee Chairman James Risch (R-ID) issued a sharp warning Tuesday, accusing Ireland of embracing antisemitism and threatening potential economic consequences if the Irish government proceeds with new legislation targeting Israeli trade.

“Ireland, while often a valuable U.S. partner, is on a hateful, antisemitic path that will only lead to self-inflicted economic suffering,” Risch wrote in a post on X. “If this legislation is implemented, America will have to seriously reconsider its deep and ongoing economic ties. We will always stand up to blatant antisemitism.”

Marking a striking escalation in rhetoric from a senior US lawmaker, Risch’s comments came amid growing tensions between Ireland and Israel, which have intensified dramatically since the Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel on October 7, 2023. Those attacks, in which roughly 1,200 Israelis were killed and more than 200 taken hostage, prompted a months-long Israeli military campaign in Gaza that has drawn widespread international scrutiny. Ireland has positioned itself as one of the most vocal critics of Israel’s response, accusing the Israeli government of disproportionate use of force and calling for immediate humanitarian relief and accountability for the elevated number of Palestinian civilian casualties.

Dublin’s stance has included tangible policy shifts. In May 2024, Ireland formally recognized a Palestinian state, becoming one of the first European Union members to do so following the outbreak of the war in Gaza. The move was condemned by Israeli officials, who recalled their ambassador to Ireland and accused the Irish government of legitimizing terrorism. Since then, Irish lawmakers have proposed further measures, including legislation aimed at restricting imports from Israeli settlements in the West Bank, policies viewed in Israel and among many American lawmakers as aligning with the controversial Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement.

While Irish leaders have defended their approach as grounded in international law and human rights, critics in Washington, including Risch, have portrayed it as part of a broader pattern of hostility toward Israel. Some US lawmakers have begun raising the possibility of reevaluating trade and diplomatic ties with Ireland in response.

Risch’s warning is one of the clearest indications yet that Ireland’s policies toward Israel could carry economic consequences. The United States is one of Ireland’s largest trading partners, and American companies such as Apple, Google, Meta and Pfizer maintain substantial operations in the country, drawn by Ireland’s favorable tax regime and access to the EU market.

Though the Trump administration has not echoed Risch’s warning, the remarks reflect growing unease in Washington about the trajectory of Ireland’s foreign policy. The State Department has maintained a careful balancing act, expressing strong support for Israel’s security while calling for increased humanitarian access in Gaza. Officials have stopped short of condemning Ireland’s actions directly but have expressed concern about efforts they see as isolating Israel on the international stage.

Ireland’s stance is emblematic of a growing international divide over the war. While the US continues to provide military and diplomatic backing to Israel, many European countries have called for an immediate ceasefire and investigations into alleged war crimes.

Irish public opinion has long leaned pro-Palestinian, and Irish lawmakers have repeatedly voiced concern over the scale of destruction in Gaza and the dire humanitarian situation.

Irish officials have not yet responded to The Algemeiner’s request for comment.

The post Key US Lawmaker Warns Ireland of Potential Economic Consequences for ‘Antisemitic Path’ Against Israel first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News