RSS
Antisemitic Discrimination Is a Painful Daily Reality for Jews in France, Newspaper Investigation Reveals
Pro-Hamas protesters outside the French National Assembly in Paris. Photo: Reuters/Xose Bouzas
The current wave of antisemitism sweeping France is compelling many Jews to hide their identities as they face discrimination, threats, and violence in going about their day-to-day routines.
An investigation published on Wednesday by leading news outlet Le Figaro reported several episodes of antisemitic behavior in daily life, from hair salons to taxi cabs to food deliveries and even the post office, where packages and letters being sent to and from Israel risk being vandalized by the postal workers handling them.
While antisemitism has exploded in France since the Oct. 7 pogrom waged by Hamas terrorists in southern Israel, with more than 1,500 outrages recorded over the last seven weeks, the present climate has worsened what was already a precarious situation. According to a Jan. 2022 survey conducted by Fondapol, a think tank, a full 74 percent of French Jews, who number approximately 500,000, revealed that they had experienced antisemitism, from verbal abuse to physical assault.
The report in Le Figaro included interviews with several Jews who have been confronted with antisemitic discrimination since the Oct. 7 atrocities, some of it comparatively subtle, much of it blatant.
Several cases involved Jews being denied commercial services. A 60-year-old rabbi who gave his name as Elie said that he had received a message from Uber warning him that his account faced suspension because of the consistently low ratings given to him by the firm’s drivers. “I automatically give five stars to all the drivers,” he said, adding that he was unaware that drivers rated their passengers until six months ago, when a Muslim driver told him that the fact he is Jewish lay behind his poor rating. “I’m afraid it’s because of your yarmulke and your beard that some of my colleagues rate you poorly,” the driver explained.
Other respondents reported similar experiences, among them Samuel Lejoyeux, the head of the Union of French Jewish Students (UEJF). Speaking about antisemitism on campus on his cellphone while traveling in an Uber, Lejoyeux was summarily ejected from the vehicle by a furious driver who objected to his conversation.
Even more seriously, Le Figaro reported that it had learned of a taxi driver who was accused of kidnapping and then beating at least two Jewish passengers. The paper added that it was not publishing details of the assaults at the request of the “traumatized victims” who fear reprisals. It noted as well that a similar reticence to report an antisemitic offense was on display in an incident that occurred four days after the Hamas pogrom, when an Arab taxi driver at Orly Airport in Paris refused to collect a Jewish family who had just flown in from Tel Aviv, telling the father, “I am not taking you, dirty Jew!” The case only came to light after the police decided to pursue the driver independently, as the family refused to file a complaint for fear of retribution.
Despite these reports, a spokesperson for Uber told Le Figaro that the company had not “observed any significant change in the number of incidents” related to antisemitism. “Any verbal or physical violence reported while using our platform results in immediate suspension of the account which can be permanent,” the spokesperson emphasized.
The discrimination confronted by Jews has manifested in other encounters that once would have been unremarkable. A 31-year-old woman who gave her name as Yael said she was taking legal action against a Paris salon that refused her an appointment on the grounds that she is Jewish. “I’m not going to be able to do your hair, because I support Palestine, and you’re Jewish!” a hairdresser at the salon, which she has been visiting for the last three years, told her when she arrived for an appointment on Nov. 9.
Several of those interviewed by Le Figaro pointed out that the La Poste national mail service company has long been a source of antisemitic agitation. Packages sent to Israel are frequently delivered late, “sometimes in poor condition, with ‘Israel’ crossed out and replaced by ‘Palestine,’” a 50-year-old woman who gave her name as Rebecca said.
“A friend of mine’s son was married three years ago,” she continued. “None of the invitations she sent to Israel reached their destination … We never had a response to the complaints about these lost letters. It’s terrible, but we have the impression that no one is going to listen to us anyway!”
Another interviewee, who gave his name as Michel, recalled that in Oct. 2020, he had sent a message to La Poste on Twitter urging the company to “tell your postmen to refrain from posting anti-Zionist messages when you have packages to deliver to Israel.” The tweet included a photograph of a package Michel sent to Israel, with the address crossed out and replaced with the words, “Palestine — Israel does not exist.”
Many Jews are hiding visibly Jewish names on mailboxes and on apps that contain personal data. “When your name is Lévy or Cohen, at the moment, it is better to take a nickname,” one woman, who declined to identify herself, reported.
“Removing the mezuzah from the door, hiding kippot under caps, removing Jewish names from mailboxes or mobile applications could lead us to a great erasure,” Yonathan Arfi — president of the Jewish representative body Crif — told Le Figaro.
Emmanuel Abramowicz — secretary general of the National Bureau for Vigilance Against Antisemitism (BNVCA) — observed that developments in technology have enabled antisemites to pursue their own personal campaigns against Jews.
“The new antisemite is a civil servant or an employee who uses his company to carry out his little personal jihad against the Jew of his choice,” Abramowicz said. “In addition to our contact details, the delivery people have the codes to enter our buildings … They have all the elements, if they wanted to, to take action.”
The post Antisemitic Discrimination Is a Painful Daily Reality for Jews in France, Newspaper Investigation Reveals first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
New Poll: Majority of NYC Voters ‘Less Likely’ to Support Mamdani Over His Refusal to Condemn ‘Globalize the Intifada’
Zohran Mamdani. Photo: Ron Adar / SOPA Images via Reuters Connect
In a warning sign for the campaign of Democratic nominee for mayor of New York Zohran Mamdani, a majority of city voters in a new poll say the candidate’s hardline anti-Israel stance makes them less likely to vote for him.
In the survey of likely city voters conducted by American Pulse, 52.5 percent said Mamdani’s refusal to condemn the slogan “globalize the intifada” coupled with his backing of the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions (BDS) movement made them less likely to vote for him in November. Just 31% of city voters polled were more likely to support him because of these positions.
At the same time, a significant share of young New York City voters support Mamdani’s anti-Israel positioning, a striking sign of shifting generational views on Israel and the Palestinian cause.
Nearly half of voters aged 18 to 44 (46 percent) said the State Assembly member’s backing for BDS and “refusal to condemn the phrase ‘globalize the intifada’” made them more likely to support him.
Mamdani, a democratic socialist from Queens, has been under fire for defending “globalize the intifada,” a slogan many Jewish groups associate with incitement to violence against Israel and Jews. While critics argue it glorifies terrorism, supporters claim it’s a call for international solidarity with oppressed peoples, especially Palestinians. Mamdani has also voiced support for BDS, a movement widely condemned by mainstream Jewish organizations as antisemitic for singling out Israel.
The generational divide exposed by the poll comes amid a broader political realignment. Younger progressives across the country are increasingly critical of Israeli policies, especially in the wake of the Gaza war, and more receptive to Palestinian activism. But to many Jewish leaders, Mamdani’s rising support is alarming.
Rabbi David Wolpe, visiting scholar at Harvard University, condemned the phrase with a sarcastic analogy.
“‘Globalize the intifada’ is just a political slogan,” he said. “Like ‘The cockroaches must be exterminated’ was just a housing authority slogan in Rwanda.”
Jewish organizations have reported a surge in antisemitic incidents in New York and across the U.S. since the outbreak of the Israel-Hamas war last fall. The blending of anti-Zionist slogans with calls for “intifada,” historically linked to violent uprisings, has deepened fears among Jewish communities that traditional red lines are being crossed.
Whether this emerging coalition reshapes New York politics remains to be seen. However, the poll indicates that among younger voters, views that were once considered fringe are quickly moving into the mainstream.
The post New Poll: Majority of NYC Voters ‘Less Likely’ to Support Mamdani Over His Refusal to Condemn ‘Globalize the Intifada’ first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Report: Jews Targeted at June’s Pride Month Events
A Jewish gay pride flag. Photo: Twitter.
The research division of the Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM) released a report on Wednesday detailing incidents of hate against Jews which took place last month during demonstrations in celebration of LGBTQ rights and identity.
Incidents reported by the group include:
- At a Pride march in Wales, the activists Cymru Queers for Palestine chose to block the path and show a sign that said “Profiting from genocide,” an attempt to link the event’s sponsors — such as Amazon — to the war in Gaza.
- A Dublin Pride march saw the participation of the Ireland-Palestine Solidarity Campaign, which labeled Israel a “genocidal entity.”
- In Toronto at a late June Pride march, demonstrators again attacked organizers with a sign declaring, “Pride partners with genocide.”
CAM also identified a recurring narrative deployed against Israel by some far-left activists: so-called “pinkwashing,” a term which the Boycott, Divest, Sanctions (BDS) movement calls “an Israeli government propaganda strategy that cynically exploits LGBTQIA+ rights to project a progressive image while concealing Israel’s occupation and apartheid policies oppressing Palestinians.”
The report notes that at a Washington DC Pride event in early June Medea Benjamin, cofounder of activist group Code Pink and a regular of anti-war protests, wore a pair of goofy, oversized sunglasses and a shirt in her signature pink with the phrase “you can’t pinkwash genocide.”
Other incidents CAM recorded showed the injection of anti-Israel sentiment into Pride events.
A musical group canceled a performance at an interfaith service in Brooklyn, claiming the hosting synagogue had a “public alignment with pro-Israel political positions.” In San Francisco before the yearly Trans March, a Palestine group said in its announcement of its participation, “Stop the war on Iran and the genocide of Palestine, stop the war on immigrants and attacks on trans people.”
CAM notes that this “queers for Palestine” sentiment is not new, pointing to a 2017 event wherein “organizers of the Chicago Dyke March infamously removed participants who were waving a Pride flag adorned with a Star of David on the grounds that the symbol ‘made people feel unsafe.’”
In February, the Israel Defense Forces shared with the New York Post documents it had recovered demonstrating that Hamas had tortured and executed members it suspected of homosexuality and other moral offenses in conflict with Islamist ideology.
Amit Benjamin, who is gay and a first sergeant major in the IDF, said during a visit to New York City for Pride month that “All the ‘queers for Gaza’ need to open their eyes. Hamas kills gays … kills lesbians … queers cannot exist in Gaza.”
The post Report: Jews Targeted at June’s Pride Month Events first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
IAEA pulls inspectors from Iran as standoff over access drags on
IAEA chief Rafael Grossi at the agency’s headquarters in Vienna, Austria, June 23, 2025. REUTERS/Elisabeth Mandl/File Photo
The UN nuclear watchdog said on Friday it had pulled its last remaining inspectors from Iran as a standoff over their return to the country’s nuclear facilities bombed by the United States and Israel deepens.
Israel launched its first military strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites in a 12-day war with the Islamic Republic three weeks ago. The International Atomic Energy Agency’s inspectors have not been able to inspect Iran’s facilities since then, even though IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said that is his top priority.
Iran’s parliament has now passed a law to suspend cooperation with the IAEA until the safety of its nuclear facilities can be guaranteed. While the IAEA says Iran has not yet formally informed it of any suspension, it is unclear when the agency’s inspectors will be able to return to Iran.
“An IAEA team of inspectors today safely departed from Iran to return to the Agency headquarters in Vienna, after staying in Tehran throughout the recent military conflict,” the IAEA said on X.
Diplomats said the number of IAEA inspectors in Iran was reduced to a handful after the June 13 start of the war. Some have also expressed concern about the inspectors’ safety since the end of the conflict, given fierce criticism of the agency by Iranian officials and Iranian media.
Iran has accused the agency of effectively paving the way for the bombings by issuing a damning report on May 31 that led to a resolution by the IAEA’s 35-nation Board of Governors declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations.
IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said he stands by the report. He has denied it provided diplomatic cover for military action.
Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said on Thursday Iran remained committed to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
“[Grossi] reiterated the crucial importance of the IAEA discussing with Iran modalities for resuming its indispensable monitoring and verification activities in Iran as soon as possible,” the IAEA said.
The US and Israeli military strikes either destroyed or badly damaged Iran’s three uranium enrichment sites. But it was less clear what has happened to much of Iran’s nine tonnes of enriched uranium, especially the more than 400 kg enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade.
That is enough, if enriched further, for nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick. Iran says its aims are entirely peaceful, but Western powers say there is no civil justification for enriching to such a high level, and the IAEA says no country has done so without developing the atom bomb.
As a party to the NPT, Iran must account for its enriched uranium, which normally is closely monitored by the IAEA, the body that enforces the NPT and verifies countries’ declarations. But the bombing of Iran’s facilities has now muddied the waters.
“We cannot afford that … the inspection regime is interrupted,” Grossi told a press conference in Vienna last week.
The post IAEA pulls inspectors from Iran as standoff over access drags on first appeared on Algemeiner.com.