A superior court judge granted the University of California system injunctive relief in a lawsuit filed to stop its employees from striking in violation of their contracts as part of a demonstration that, according to university lawyers, has been about politics and not labor issues.

Beginning on May 20, University of California (UC) faculty and staff abandoned their duties to protest what they claim was the unfair treatment of pro-Hamas protesters who had occupied sections of campus and refused to leave unless administrators agreed to adopt the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel. Among other things, the employees, represented by the United Auto Workers (UAW) union, alleged that squelching the demonstrations, which necessitated arresting protesters, chilled free speech and fostered a hostile work environment.

The professors and staff refused to teach and perform other duties for which they are paid a salary.

The judge’s ruling is the first by an outside party to come down in favor of the UC system. Before it was rendered, the state Public Employment Relations Board (PERB) twice refused to stop the strike, arguing that the UC lacked legal standing. UC pressed on, suing UAW while charging that the strike stood to cause “substantial monetary” damages and derail students’ academic year.

“From the beginning, we have stated this strike was illegal and a violation of our contracts’ mutually agreed upon no-strike clauses,” Melissa Matella, UC associate vice president of labor relations, said in a statement on Friday, when Orange County Superior Court Judge Randall J. Sherman granted the temporary restraining order against the union. “We respect the advocacy and progressive action towards issues that matter to our community and our community’s right to engage in lawful free speech activities — activities that continue across the UC system. However, UAW’s strike is unrelated to employment terms, violates the parties’ agreements, and runs contrary to established labor principles.”

Matella also stressed the ruling’s importance to the well-being of students, saying a prolonging of the strike would have “caused irreversible setbacks to students’ academic achievements and may have stalled critical research projects in the final quarter.”

In a statement, the local UAW chapter leading the strike accused UC of “subverting labor law” and assailed the judge’s intelligence, suggesting that he is unqualified to preside over a labor law case.

“UC academic workers are facing down an attack on our whole movement,” UAW 4811 president Rafael Jaime said in a press release. “PERB, the regulatory body with the expertise to rule on labor law, has twice found no grounds to halt our strike. I want to make clear that this struggle is far from over. In the courtroom, the law is on our side and we’re prepared to keep defending our rights — and outside, 48,000 workers are ready for a long fight.”

The University of California has noted that the strikers are pressuring the university to condemn Israel and adopt the BDS movement, which aims to isolate the Jewish state from the international community as the first step towards its elimination. The school explained in a previous statement that professors have proclaimed that voting for a strike was “about divestment and Palestine” and that their “top demand that matters here is divestment.”

Professors have been attaching themselves to anti-Israel, pro-Hamas demonstrations for most of spring semester.

In some instances, faculty attempted to prevent police from dispersing unauthorized demonstrations and detaining lawbreakers, resulting in their arrest. That happened, for example, at Emory University in Atlanta, where economics professor Caroline Fohlin intervened to stop the arrest of a student. In response, officers tackled her to the ground while she said repeatedly, “I’m a professor!”

At Northeastern University in Boston, professors formed a human barrier around a student encampment to stop its dismantling by officers, and at University of Texas at Austin, members of the group Faculty and Staff for Justice in Palestine (FJP) openly called for the resignation of their president, Jay Hartzell, because he asked for police assistance in restoring order.

At Columbia University, anti-Zionist faculty at the school, as well its affiliate Barnard College, staged a walkout in support of the demonstrations and demanded the abeyance of disciplinary sanctions against anti-Zionist students — dozens of whom cheered Hamas and threatened more massacres of Jews similar to Oct. 7 — who violated school rules.

Scrutiny of faculty participation in the pro-Hamas demonstrations and efforts to change university leadership is necessary but has been lacking in public discourse about the protests, according to experts who have spoken with The Algemeiner since the unrest began.

“This situation is not sustainable, and we have to focus specifically on the faculty. Take away their shared governance. Take away their tenure,” Tammi Rossman-Benjamin, founder of campus antisemitism watchdog AMCHA Initiative, told The Algemeiner in April. “You have to get rid of tenure because it has protected faculty whose goal is to upend and undermine the university itself. It’s not just about social justice — their aim for decades has been to destroy the university as we know it and to use the university as a tool for revolutionizing society. If you can’t recognize how illegitimate that is, then the universities are lost. We will lose if we do not have the will to take them on.”

Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.

The post California Academic Workers Ordered to Halt Strike Protesting Response to Anti-Israel Demonstrations first appeared on Algemeiner.com.