RSS
Donald Trump in Court for Second Defamation Trial After Iowa Victory
Fresh off a campaign victory in Iowa, former US President Donald Trump sat in a New York courtroom on Tuesday to defend himself for a second time against charges that he defamed writer E. Jean Carroll after she accused him of raping her decades ago.
Trump watched from the defendant’s table as a nine-person jury was chosen for a civil case that will put allegations of misconduct back in the headlines while he pursues the 2024 Republican presidential nomination. Opening arguments were expected later in the afternoon.
Trump sat two tables behind Carroll, who is accusing Trump of defaming her in 2019 by denying he had attacked her in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan. Carroll, 80, is seeking at least $10 million in damages.
US District Judge Lewis Kaplan told prospective jurors they would only have to consider how much Trump should pay Carroll in damages, not whether the alleged assault took place or whether Trump lied about it afterward. He said the trial is expected to last three to five days.
Trump, 77, has said he wants to testify at the civil trial.
He could spend much of this year shuttling between campaign rallies and courtrooms, as he seeks to win the Republican presidential nomination for 2024.
He won the first state contest in Iowa on Monday by a wide margin, and opinion polls show him leading in the next contest in New Hampshire a week from today.
Trump has pleaded not guilty in four criminal cases that could potentially land him in prison before the November presidential election, including two that accuse him of trying to overturn his 2020 loss to Democrat Joe Biden. He also is a defendant in at least two other civil cases.
Trump has cast himself as the victim of political persecution. On Tuesday, he said Kaplan should dismiss the case.
“Judge Kaplan should put this whole corrupt, Crooked Joe Biden-directed Election Interference attack on me immediately to rest,” he posted on social media. “He should do it for America.”
Trump‘s high profile was apparent as prospective jurors were screened for the case. Many acknowledged they were familiar with Trump‘s various legal troubles, though none said they knew the details of the first defamation trial.
Many said they had backed Democratic candidates in previous elections, reflecting the New York City area’s left-leaning tilt, and one said she had volunteered for Biden’s 2020 campaign.
Two others said they believed Trump‘s false claims that the election had been stolen from him. One said she used to work for his daughter Ivanka. They were not chosen for the jury.
Jurors’ identities are being kept confidential.
Trump has already lost one defamation case against Carroll.
A jury last May ordered Trump to pay the former Elle magazine columnist $5 million for having sexually abused her during the encounter, and defaming her in 2022 by denying that it happened. Trump skipped that trial.
Kaplan, who has overseen both cases, has barred Trump from arguing that he did not defame or sexually assault Carroll or that she made up her account.
In both cases, Trump has said he did not know Carroll and that she invented their encounter to sell her memoir.
Trump is appealing the $5 million award, and could appeal any award at the second trial. Appeals could take years.
In recent weeks, Trump has escalated his attacks on Carroll, including a false accusation on social media this weekend that she did not know the decade of their encounter.
He also called Kaplan “terrible, biased, irrationally angry,” echoing attacks he has made on judges overseeing some of his other cases.
Trump may face an uphill fight to escape significant additional damages because of Kaplan’s pre-trial rulings.
These include banning Trump from suggesting he did not rape Carroll, as New York’s penal law defines the term, because the first jury did not find that Trump committed rape.
Kaplan has ruled that because Trump used his fingers in the assault, Carroll’s rape claim was “substantially true.”
Trump also cannot discuss DNA evidence or Carroll’s sexual activities, or suggest that Democrats are bankrolling her case. Carroll is a Democrat.
And as at the first trial, jurors will be able to see the 2005 “Access Hollywood” video where Trump graphically described the ability of famous people like himself to have sexual relations with beautiful women.
Trump did not retract his comments when asked about them in a 2022 deposition. Kaplan has said the video could offer “useful insight into Mr. Trump‘s state of mind” toward Carroll.
Trump lawyer Alina Habba on Sunday assured Kaplan that he was “well aware” of the court’s rulings “and the strict confines placed on his testimony.”
The post Donald Trump in Court for Second Defamation Trial After Iowa Victory first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Netanyahu Holds Emergency Meeting on Hostage Deal
JNS.org — Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu convened an emergency meeting at Israel Defense Forces headquarters in Tel Aviv on Sunday evening to discuss efforts to free the captives still being held by Hamas in the Gaza Strip.
The meeting was convened in response to the rejection by Hamas of all proposals currently on the table, a senior security source told Israel;s Channel 13.
The terrorist group has continued to insist on its key demands that the war end and Israeli troops withdraw from the Gaza Strip.
Mossad chief David Barnea was to have presented a new proposal to a select group of ministers and senior security officials at the meeting, including Defense Minister Israel Katz and Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer, according to the report.
Katz, who took over the defense portfolio from Yoav Gallant on Nov. 8, reiterated on Sunday that the hostages’ return was Jerusalem’s “most important value goal.”
“As I defined from my first day in the role, returning the hostages home is our most important value goal,” he said. “There have never been, and never will be, political considerations on the matter,” he added.
“Every meeting with the families of the hostages and those involved in the mission to return them fills me with more motivation, and I pledge to work together with the defense establishment in every possible way to return them home.”
Kan News reported on Sunday that Hamas’s senior leadership has relocated from Qatar to Turkey. The report cited unnamed Israeli sources as confirming the move, which was said to have taken place in “recent days.”
According to the broadcaster, the development could have “dramatic” consequences for the ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas, which have been mediated by the United States, Qatar, and Egypt.
During a recent meeting in Washington between hostages’ families and senior Qatari officials, the relatives were told that Doha is “not giving up on the negotiations,” according to an earlier report by Kan. The Qataris also told the families that they had “paused the negotiations to apply pressure on both sides,” according to the report.
Hostage families met on Nov. 13 with outgoing President Joe Biden at the White House, and with president-elect Donald Trump’s State Department nominee Marco Rubio.
According to Jonathan Dekel-Chen, whose son Sagie was abducted to Gaza from Kibbutz Nir Oz on Oct. 7, 2023, the families asked Biden to collaborate with Trump’s team to secure the release of the hostages, to which Biden agreed.
“Biden reaffirmed his administration’s commitment to bringing all the hostages back. The administration has worked tirelessly to achieve a deal as soon as possible, and the President assured the families that these efforts will continue,” according to a White House statement.
Also on Nov. 13, Palestinian Islamic Jihad released a proof-of-life video of Russian-Israeli hostage Alexander (“Sasha”) Troufanov, who was abducted from his family home during the Hamas terrorist attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.
In the undated video, the third of Troufanov released by Hamas, he says his age is 28, although he turned 29 on Nov. 11.
The two previous PIJ videos of Troufanov were released in May.
The post Netanyahu Holds Emergency Meeting on Hostage Deal first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Why Does Bernie Sanders Feed Antisemitic Stereotypes?
Shortly after the presidential election, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders released a scathing statement blaming the Democrats for Trump’s victory.
Alongside a slew of criticisms of Democratic policies on healthcare and labor, Sanders tore into the party for their stance on the Israel-Hamas war, writing that “despite strong opposition from a majority of Americans, we continue to spend billions funding the extremist Netanyahu government’s all-out war against the Palestinian people which has led to the horrific humanitarian disaster of mass malnutrition and the starvation of thousands of children.”
As usual, Sanders’ statement is deeply off base — both about the situation in Israel, and about the impact of the war on the 2024 election.
Exit polls and voter surveys have painted a clear picture of American priorities in the 2024 election, and the war in Gaza was nowhere near the top of the list.
Instead, the leading issues were the state of democracy, which 34% of voters cited as their main concern, followed by 31% for the economy, abortion for 14%, and immigration at 11%. By contrast, only 4% of voters were most concerned with foreign policy.
Americans also reported notably deep concerns about their leading priorities, with 3 in 4 people saying that they think democracy is threatened and 2 in 3 voters saying that they think the economy is either not good or poor. And nearly half of voters said that they are financially worse off now than they were four years ago — a rate of dissatisfaction higher than any presidential election since 2008.
In other words, American motives for voting the way they did this year are incredibly clear, and they center around the issues that have always mattered the most to everyday citizens. To quote Bill Clinton’s former adviser James Carville: “It’s the economy, stupid.”
Americans had deep, pervasive worries about their financial and domestic standing this year, and many of them felt alienated by a Democratic Party that spent the last few years more worried about “woke” political issues — and championing terror supporters like Hamas instead of our allies like Israel — than the well-being and financial stability of hardworking American citizens.
This is why Trump beat Harris in every swing state, not just states like Michigan with a high population of Muslim voters. While it may be possible Harris did worse in Dearborn, Michigan, thanks to protest voters from Arab Americans, her underperformance among many other traditionally blue constituencies, like Latinos and Black men, suggest a much wider policy failure from the Democratic Party.
Furthermore, even though Harris was decisively beaten in the state, Michigan elected a pro-Israel Democratic senator.
Sanders’ statement feeds into antisemitic stereotypes, and it is especially noxious given his insistent weaponization of his Jewish identity to viciously criticize the Jewish State.
Sanders has spent the months since October 7, 2023, behaving as a token Jew for some of the most virulently anti-Israel segments of the left, highlighting his own Jewish heritage only insofar as it helps him slander Israel and Zionism, and refusing to condemn the dog-whistling antisemites in his corner of the party.
Charging Israel with the Democrats’ humiliating defeat this year is just the latest example of this tendency, which feeds into the time-honored antisemitic strategy of blaming Jews for self-inflicted issues.
American voters did not come to the ballot box concerned with Benjamin Netanyahu — they voted with their own country and personal interests in mind.
Sanders’ insistence on overlooking this obvious reality, and accusing the “Zionists” for the loss, reflects a concerning level of ignorance and a willingness to throw his own people under the bus for cheap political capital.
Rather than fanning the flames of Jew hate, the senator would do well to turn his concerns inward towards his own party and the myriad ways they have failed the American people. Otherwise, if they don’t learn to speak to everyday American voters, the Democrats will keep losing, and Bernie Sanders will shout his brainless lies into the void.
Sheila Nazarian is a Los Angeles physician and star of the Emmy-nominated Netflix series Skin Decision: Before and After. Follow her on Instagram.
The post Why Does Bernie Sanders Feed Antisemitic Stereotypes? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Is the Government of Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Celebrating Anti-Israel ‘Resistance’?
Chapel Hill Community Arts & Culture — a division of the town of Chapel Hill, North Carolina — has proudly announced a new banner that praises student-led and often violent campus protests against Israel.
The banner is on display at the Peace & Justice Plaza, which sits in the heart of the downtown shopping district, in front of the local courthouse, just steps away from the campus of the University of North Carolina (UNC). The banner features a pro-Palestinian UNC protestor wearing a keffiyeh with the message “#GOODTROUBLE.”
The keffiyeh has become a controversial symbol, particularly since the terrorist attack by Hamas on Oct. 7, 2023, that slaughtered more than 1,200 people in Israel, including 46 Americans, the largest massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. Reuters has referred to the keffiyeh as “an emblem of solidarity with the Palestinian cause.” While the keffiyeh is viewed as a sign of Palestinian nationalism by many Palestinians, it is also viewed by Jews worldwide as an incitement to violence and a symbol of backing mass bloodshed against Israel.
When a protester at UNC yelled, “All of us Hamas,” she was surrounded by fellow protestors wearing keffiyehs, a clear message of intimidation to those in the community who might have different views.
According to their website, Chapel Hill Community Arts & Culture promotes inclusiveness and respect as their top values. Yet, in their announcement of the “artistic banners,” they abandoned any semblance of neutrality by ignoring Hamas’ pogrom and the more than 100 hostages that have remained in captivity or been murdered over the past 13 months.
In the town’s announcement, the artist of the banners is quoted as saying that the banners “evoke the essence of the ongoing struggle for racial justice … they echo the timeless words of the late John Lewis, urging us to stir up ‘Good Trouble’ in pursuit of a more equitable world.”
Chapel Hill wrote, “We invite you to visit the plaza to see this new art and recognize the ongoing fight for justice.”
In a recent letter to Chapel Hill officials, former Raleigh City Council member Stefanie Mendell wrote:
It is appalling to think that anyone would consider that “good trouble” would celebrate the murder, rape, and kidnapping of thousands of innocent Israelis, especially when two of the kidnap victims are Chapel Hill residents, one of whom remains in captivity after more than a year.
The Jewish community around the world, and right here in the “enlightened” Triangle is experiencing an unprecedented increase in anti-semitism. This banner does nothing to unite or heal the community; quite the opposite.
This issue is being widely discussed across local social media, with many outraged community members — both Jewish and non-Jewish — contacting local officials.
On Instagram, one user wrote, “This does little more than make me feel that Chapel Hill is not a safe space for the Jewish people.”
Deborah R. Gerhardt, Distinguished Professor of Law at UNC, wrote to town officials:
I just saw that a banner with a keffiyeh wearing student indicating “good trouble” is hanging on Franklin street. What message are you trying to send? That it is good to make trouble against fellow Jewish citizens? That it is good to make them feel unwelcome? That John Lewis would have supported this kind of divisiveness? A Chapel Hill native is currently being held hostage by Palestinians. Does that mean nothing to you? We have no control of Israel policy, but we can certainly show compassion for our Jewish community.
Chapel Hill Jewish resident Kathy Kaufman wrote to town officials:
The protestors chanted slogans such as “Globalize the Intifada”, “From the River to the Sea”, and “By Any Means Necessary”. These chants signify erasure of Jewish identity, ethnicity, and history. The student protestors have explicitly endorsed violence against Jews, including, in particular, the October 7 massacre, and also continuing antisemitic violence (such as currently in Amsterdam and Paris).
This banner, supporting the student protests, is essentially equating Good Trouble with support for Hamas terrorists going on a murderous rampage, torturing, gang raping, and murdering men, women, and children in their homes in grisly fashion. And then taking more of them hostage to torture them in their terror tunnels – still, to this day.
One of those hostages, Keith Siegel, grew up in Chapel Hill. It is now 400+ days that he and 100 others are still being held in Hamas terror tunnels. Keith still has family in the Chapel Hill area, including his sister. What does this banner say to them?
The new keffiyeh banner, hanging above the front doors of the Chapel Hill courthouse, honors and glorifies the very activists who are now appearing before the local courts.
This gives the appearance that the Chapel Hill government endorses or is complicit in attempts to influence or intimidate public officials on matters before the court. Whether intentional or not, promoting this banner by the town is a chilling overreach of local government on issues of law, justice, neutrality, and community safety.
This banner was hung at the same courthouse that was recently scheduled to hear charges against members of the UNC chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP). The UNC-SJP chapter was suspended by the university along with some of its student activists for repeated issues such as vandalism on campus and substituting the Palestinian flag in place of the US flag.
Jews in Chapel Hill feel disregarded, mistreated, unseen, and unsafe. The message being sent to the courts and to the community is clear — local government has chosen the side of the Palestinian activists and anti-Israel inciters, and has thus dismissed the safety and well being of the Jewish community.
Chapel Hill residents are furious and frustrated after contacting the Chapel Hill Community Arts & Culture with heartfelt, anguished letters, only to receive form letter responses.
One local resident wrote on a WhatsApp group, “I don’t think anyone is reading our letters … It seems to me they simply don’t care.”
You know very well what a keffiyeh means to many if not most Jews in the United States. You know very well how this symbol has been used to marginalize and intimidate Jewish students and staff on the UNC campus. You know very well that a Jewish citizen of Chapel Hill is being held captive in the terror dungeons of Hamas.
Is this poster what you really want “welcoming“ visitors to Chapel Hill?
I contacted Chapel Hill mayor Jessica Anderson, the Town Council, and Chapel Hill Community Arts & Culture for comment. At the time of publication, no responses were received.
Peter Reitzes writes about issues related to antisemitism and Israel.
The post Is the Government of Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Celebrating Anti-Israel ‘Resistance’? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login