RSS
Exposing the Palestinian Authority’s False Claim That Israel Is an ‘Artificial Colonial Implant’
Britain’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer and Palestinian Authority’s Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa signed a Memorandum of Understanding in London, April 28, 2025. Photo: Screenshot
The Palestinian Authority (PA)’s presentation of Israel as a foreign colonial implant in the Middle East is one of the most fundamental parts of its ideology, around which the PA has built the Palestinian identity.
The PA’s denial of thousands of years of Jewish history in the Land of Israel includes the lies that Jews did not live there and would never have thought of settling there until Western colonialism “planted” them in “Palestine.”
According to the false PA narrative, the West hatched Zionism to solve its Jewish problem by getting rid of its society-destroying Jews, who could then serve as a front line “against the Arab states” in the region.
PA leader Mahmoud Abbas explained that Europeans in general suffered from the Jews and “even Hitler … fought the Jews because they worked based on usury and money, in other words, they caused ruin.” Getting rid of the harmful Jews and having a colonial implant is what Abbas called “two birds with one stone.”
The colonialism narrative is central to PA ideology, as it denies Israel any rights to exist in any borders. It also efficiently creates backing around the world for the PA’s claim to “Palestine from the river to the sea.” During the current war, this slogan and the colonialism narrative have been adopted by pro-Palestinian protesters internationally as a definitive truth.
This “satanic project” — as Abbas’ advisor Mahmoud Al-Habbash terms Zionism and the creation of Israel — was started by the British, which “brought in strangers who had no connection to Palestine.”
The PA claims that international colonialism wanted to destabilize the Arab region and therefore “created the Zionist idea” and “planted” the Jews in “Palestine”:
Abbas’ advisor: “The British Mandate opened the doors to Jewish immigration to Palestine and brought in strangers who had no connection to Palestine …
Maybe the world will not recognize the [Palestinian] political entity but rather [only] a part of the historical homeland, but the historical homeland will remain all of Palestine (i.e., all of Israel) for all the Palestinians …
[Mahmoud Al-Habbash, Facebook page, Nov. 29, 2024]
Palestinian Media Watch has exposed numerous statements by Al-Habbash in which he has labeled Jews and Israelis as “Satan” and “evil.”
According to Al-Habbash, Israel now serves “the American colonialist project,” and Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu “exploited” Hamas’ massacre and launch of its terror war against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023 for this “satanic plot”:
Al-Habbash: “[Israeli Prime Minister] Netanyahu exploited what happened on Oct. 7, 2023 to carry out his satanic plot that strives to eliminate the Palestinian cause and expand the scope of the war into a regional war, with which he will outline anew the geographical and political maps of the region in a way that will serve the American colonialist project, which strives for hegemony and colonialism of a new kind in the Arab region.”
[Mahmoud Al-Habbash, Facebook page, Oct. 9, 2024]
Similarly, top PA and Fatah official Jibril Rajoub has claimed that “the Americans and the Europeans” use Israel to “control the entire region” and its resources:
Fatah Central Committee Secretary Jibril Rajoub: “[Israel] is a project that targets the entire Middle East region.
Israel is a guarantee for the Americans and Europeans to control this entire region, its oil, its sea routes, its economy, everything in it.”
[Jibril Rajoub, Facebook page, Jan. 15, 2025]
The PA’s answer to why Jews went along with the West’s plans and willingly established themselves in “Palestine,” to which they had no connection, is answered by PA antisemitic ideology: The Jews came for money, lured here by the West with promises that they could earn more money in “Palestine” than elsewhere:
Advisor to Head of The Committee to Resist Settlements and the Wall Ayed Morrar: “If an opportunity was given to the expansionist occupation [i.e., Israel] to settle in Egypt and Jordan they would not miss the opportunity …
There is no religious or emotional connection between a resident of the occupation state and this state. They told him: You earn $1,000 in France, in Palestine you can earn $1,200 or $1,500, and therefore he came for this reason, with international support, to be a military base for the West in the Middle East.”
[Official PA TV, Dec. 12, 2024]
A different explanation was provided by a Tunisian academic who explained that “traditional colonialism” was in fact “Zionist colonialism”:
Political science lecturer Dr. Ibrahim Al-Rifa’i: “Was traditional colonialism just French and British?”
Official PA TV host: “Or Italian?”
Ibrahim Al-Rifa’i: “It was actually Zionist colonialism … They [the Jews] think that the entire world that is outside the circle of Zionism are goyim [i.e., non-Jews] and that Zionist globalization should rule, and they have been waging a world war ever since the time before traditional colonialism. Traditional colonialism was completely Zionist. This colonialism with its various names — British, English, French — was just Zionist colonialism.”
[Official PA TV, Capital of Capitals – Tunis, Feb. 12, 2025]
Official PA TV helps cement the PA narrative that Israel was created as a colonialist outpost. A host on PA TV taught viewers that because the Middle East was “a threat” to “European and American capitalism,” Israel was created as “a hostile entity” in the Arab region and as “a friend to colonialism”:
Official PA TV host: “The establishment of Israel was not a Jewish project, but rather a Zionist project at the initiative of the Zionist bourgeoisie that was all an appendix of the European and American capitalism.
The first who suggested turning this into a realistic fact was [former] British Prime Minister [Sir Henry Campbell-] Bannerman. At the start of a European conference at the start of the 20th century, he said: ‘The European civilization is under threat of disintegration and extinction, and it is our duty to find an effective way to prevent its collapse.’
Then the conference arrived at a plan that requires thwarting any unification or agreement between the Middle East countries because they constitute the only threat to the future of Europe, and the means of achieving this [solution to the problem] is establishing an external national entity that is foreign to the region, hostile to its residents, and a friend to colonialism.”
[Official PA TV, The Philosophy of Endurance, Oct. 26, 2024]
A former PA Security Forces major general stressed that it was Britain that led “the theft” of “Palestine” for the benefit of the “large colonialist project”:
PA Security Forces Maj. Gen. (ret.) Ahmed Issa: “Israel is the only state that was not established by its people on its land. It was established through theft, and it is a product of a large colonialist project led by the colonialist states under the leadership of Britain.”
[Official PA TV, Israel in the News, Oct. 28, 2024]
Abbas’ Fatah Movement sees itself as engaging in “the struggle” ever since in order to “liberate Palestine” from “colonialism”:
Fatah Revolutionary Council member Ahmed Ghneim: “This revolutionary [Fatah] leadership constituted the backbone of Fatah and played a decisive role in the resolution of the Palestinian people against the Israeli occupation, in addition to its central role in developing the strategy of Fatah, which has not stopped aspiring to liberate the Palestinian territories from colonialism.”
[Al-Quds, Jan. 7, 2025]
Similarly, a regular columnist for the official PA daily claimed that “Israel is a tool for the Crusader states” and all the American administrations:
Columnist for official PA daily Omar Hilmi Al-Ghoul: “Israel is a tool … which is pushing towards turning the conflict from a political, economic, cultural, and social conflict into a religious conflict.
The Crusader states, which still have the idea of settling accounts with the Arabs and Muslims nesting in their minds, are still continuing to revolve around [this idea].
[Official PA TV, Sept. 24, 2024]
Palestinian Media Watch reported on a column in the official PA daily in which the writer compared “the colonial West” to the Greek god Zeus giving Israel/Pandora a box of weapons that Israel opened, and that now sows death and destruction in the world.
Representatives from the PLO also support this demonizing false Palestinian narrative. Director of the PLO’s Arab Relations Anwar Abd Al-Hadi recently referred to Israel as “a state that someone put together”:
PLO Arab Relations Director Anwar Abd Al-Hadi: “Israel has no roots in the ground. Israel is a state that someone put together, a state that the West created. A state that is comprised of people with 90 citizenships.
Therefore, if Israel will not give the Palestinian people what it deserves, there will be an explosion inside Israel.”
[Official PA TV, Capital of Capitals – Damascus, Nov. 17, 2024]
A covert reference to Israel as a colonial power was made by a PA district governor, who said that “Palestine will be liberated like it was liberated from the yoke of the ancient colonialist powers”:
Salfit District Governor Abdallah Kmeil: “Palestine will be liberated after years of oppression. This land will be liberated like it was liberated in the past from the yoke of the ancient colonialist powers and the empires that occupied Palestine.
The empires left, the Mongols left, the Romans and the Crusaders left – and Palestine and the Palestinian people remained.”
[Official PA TV, Giants of Endurance, Dec. 27, 2024]
Along the same lines, another PLO official demanded that Jews “return to their origins in Europe and other states from which they came”:
PLO Representative to the UN and International Organizations in Geneva Ibrahim Khreisheh: “Israel is an occupying state, and it needs to end its occupation…
They think according to the religious stories that Greater Israel from the Nile [River] to [the Euphrates River in] Iraq is the land of Greater Israel. Most of them came from various nations and ethnic groups from Europe and other states and stole the Palestinian land. …
Therefore, those who claim their ‘historical right’ [i.e., the Jews] need to return to their origins in Europe and other states from which they came. Palestine will remain for the Palestinians.”
[Official PA TV News, Oct. 12, 2024]
In November 2024, at the Mediterranean Dialogues Conference in Rome, Rawhi Fattouh, the chairman of the Palestinian National Council (the legislative body of the PLO), got up and left a “dialogue meeting” upon seeing that Israeli Parliament Member Yuli Edelstein was also participating, explaining he did so because he refused to “sit with a colonialist who steals lands”:
Chairman of the National Council [Fattouh] cut short the dialogue meeting and resigned from it in protest over the presence of colonialist [Israeli Parliament Member] Yuli Edelstein, who arrived as a representative of the Israeli Parliament…
Fattouh submitted to the participants and the Italian Parliament a protest letter in which he clarified that one should not sit with a colonialist who steals lands, violates international law, and intimidates the native residents…
[Official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, Nov. 28, 2024]
The author is a senior analyst at Palestinian Media Watch, where a version of this article was originally published.
The post Exposing the Palestinian Authority’s False Claim That Israel Is an ‘Artificial Colonial Implant’ first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Hezbollah Chief Makes Overtures to Saudi Arabia for Front Against Israel
Lebanon’s Hezbollah leader Sheikh Naim Qassem delivers a speech from an unknown location, Nov. 20, 2024, in this still image from video. Photo: REUTERS TV/Al Manar TV via REUTERS.
Hezbollah chief Naim Qassem on Friday urged Saudi Arabia to turn “a new page” with the Iran-backed terrorist group and set aside past disputes to create a unified front against Israel, following years of hostility that strained Riyadh’s ties with Lebanon.
Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states designated Shi’ite Hezbollah a terrorist organization in 2016. In recent months, Riyadh has joined Washington and Hezbollah‘s rivals within Lebanon in pressuring the Lebanese government to disarm the Islamist group, which was badly weakened by last year’s war with Israel.
In a televised address on Friday, Qassem said that regional powers should see Israel, not Hezbollah, as the main threat to the Middle East and proposed “mending relations” with Riyadh.
“We assure you that the arms of the resistance [Hezbollah] are pointed at the Israeli enemy, not Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, or any other place or entity in the world,” Qassem said.
He said dialogue would “freeze the disagreements of the past, at least in this exceptional phase, so that we can confront Israel and curb it” and said that pressuring Hezbollah “is a net gain for Israel.”
Saudi Arabia once spent billions in Lebanon, depositing funds in the central bank and helping rebuild the south after a 2006 war between Hezbollah and Israel – only to see the group grow more powerful in Lebanon and the region with Iran’s help.
Relations soured sharply in 2021 when Sunni Saudi Arabia expelled the Lebanese ambassador, recalled its own envoy, and banned Lebanese imports. A statement in Saudi state media at the time said Hezbollah controlled the Lebanese state’s decision-making processes.
Hezbollah‘s then-secretary general Hassan Nasrallah called Saudi Arabia‘s crown prince Mohammad bin Salman a “terrorist” and repeatedly criticized Saudi‘s role in Yemen.
But recent months have seen seismic political shifts in the region, with Israel pummeling Hezbollah last year and killing Nasrallah, and rebels toppling the group’s Syrian ally Bashar al-Assad in December.
RSS
UN Security Council Decides Not to Lift Iran Sanctions
Members of the UN Security Council vote against a resolution that would permanently lift UN sanctions on Iran at the UN headquarters in New York City, US, Sept. 19, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz
The United Nations Security Council did not adopt a draft resolution on Friday to permanently lift sanctions on Iran, but Tehran and key European powers still have eight days to try and agree to a delay.
The 15-member UN Security Council was required to vote on the draft resolution on Friday after Britain, France, and Germany launched a 30-day process on Aug. 28 to reimpose UN sanctions, accusing Tehran of failing to abide by a 2015 deal with world powers that aimed to prevent it from developing a nuclear weapon. Iran denies having any such intention.
Russia, China, Pakistan, and Algeria voted in favor of the draft text on Friday. Nine members voted against and two abstained.
The Security Council vote has now set up a week of intense diplomacy while world leaders – including Iran‘s President Masoud Pezeshkian – are in New York for the annual high-level UN General Assembly.
IRAN SAYS VOTE OUTCOME ‘WEAKENS DIPLOMACY’
“The door for diplomacy is not closed, but it will be Iran, not adversaries, who decide with whom and on what basis to engage,” Iran‘s UN Ambassador Amir Saeid Iravani told reporters after the vote.
Iran‘s Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi will meet with his European counterparts in New York next week on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly, he said, adding that Friday’s divided vote showed there was “no consensus in the council.”
“This decision weakens diplomacy and risks dangerous consequences for non-proliferation,” Iravani said.
Britain, France, and Germany have offered to delay reinstating sanctions for up to six months – to allow space for talks on a long-term deal on Tehran’s nuclear program – if Iran restores access for UN nuclear inspectors, addresses concerns about its stock of enriched uranium, and engages in talks with the United States.
“Without these most basic conditions being met, there is no clear path to a swift diplomatic solution,” Britain’s UN Ambassador Barbara Woodward told the council. “We are ready for further engagements, diplomatically, in the next week, and beyond to seek to resolve differences.”
Any delay on reimposing sanctions would require a Security Council resolution. If a deal on an extension can’t be reached by the end of Sept. 27, then all UN sanctions will be reimposed.
US REMAINS READY TO ENGAGE, ENVOY SAYS
Acting US Ambassador Dorothy Shea said that while the US voted “no” on Friday, it “does not impede the possibility of real diplomacy,” adding that a return of sanctions on Iran “does not preclude later removal through diplomacy.”
“More importantly, President Trump has continued to reiterate the United States’ ongoing readiness for meaningful, direct, and timebound dialogue with Iran – be it prior to the conclusion of the snapback process on Sept. 27, or after,” she told the council.
French UN Ambassador Jerome Bonnafont said that since the 30-day process – known as snapback – was triggered, the foreign ministers of Germany, France, and Britain had met twice with their Iranian counterpart.
“Our hand remains outstretched to find a negotiated solution,” he told the council before the vote.
Separately, Iran‘s strategic allies Russia and China finalized a draft Security Council resolution late last month that would extend the 2015 deal for six months and urge all parties to immediately resume negotiations. But they have not yet asked for a vote.
Russia and China, which are also parties to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal, have both rejected the Europeans’ bid to reimpose UN sanctions on Iran.
China’s UN Ambassador Fu Cong said the attempt to trigger snapback was “detrimental to the diplomatic effort towards an early resumption of talks, and may even bring about catastrophic consequences that are impossible to foresee and forfeit years of diplomatic efforts in one stroke.”
RSS
Japan Plans Not to Recognize a Palestinian State for Now, Foreign Minister Says
Japan’s Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya attends the 26th ASEAN Plus Three Foreign Ministers’ Meeting at the Kuala Lumpur Convention Centre in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, July 10, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Hasnoor Hussain/Pool
Japan does not plan to recognize a Palestinian state at UN meetings this month, Foreign Minister Takeshi Iwaya said on Friday.
But he also said that for Tokyo, which supports a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, it is not a matter of whether to recognize a Palestinian state, but when to recognize it.
“I’m aware voices calling for the recognition as a state are getting louder in the international community as well as in Japan,” Iwaya told a press conference.
“But the government has a responsibility to look hard into what will really lead to a two-state solution and to make diplomatic efforts towards that direction.”
A handful of US allies are preparing to recognize a Palestinian state as world leaders meet at the UN General Assembly in New York next week in the hope of putting pressure on Israel to allow more aid into Gaza and seek long-term peace.
Iwaya said Japan does not condone Israel’s unilateral action such as the expansion of its military operations in Gaza, and that Japan will respond if Israel takes further steps that would close the way to the realization of a two-state solution.
Asked if the Japanese response would include sanctions against Israeli ministers over the conflict in Gaza, Iwaya said the government will not exclude any options, including the recognition of a Palestinian state, in weighing its potential moves.