A Torah scroll. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

A major part of the double Torah portion we read this week (which ends the Book of Vayikra) is what is called the Tochecha, which translates as “the rebuke.”

Here are some selections from Chapter 26.

If you follow My laws and faithfully observe My commandments, I will grant your rains in their season, so that the earth shall yield its produce …you shall eat your fill of bread … I will grant peace in the land … You shall give chase to your enemies … I will be ever present in your midst. I will be your God, and you shall be My people.

But if you disobey Me and remain hostile to Me, I will send misery and diseases … and discipline you sevenfold for your sins. You shall eat the flesh of your sons and your daughters … I will lay your cities in ruin and make your sanctuaries desolate, I will make the land desolate, so that your enemies will settle in it … And I will scatter you among the nations, and Your land shall become a desolation and your cities a ruin.

In some synagogues, the custom is to read it very quickly in a soft tone — as if to tiptoe through the painful stuff, as quickly as possible.

On the one hand, it seems so out of touch with the way we think today. Life rarely works out so simply — and we are often not rewarded or penalized in the name of true justice. And yet, it is surprising how accurate it has been in describing the rise and the fall of the Jewish people.

One way of looking at this is to say that thanks to archaeology and the large amount of information that we have accumulated over the years about the culture, language, and literature of Mesopotamia, we can see how this sort of blessing and curse — promise and threat — was universal.

Whenever monarchs came to power, they would open their reign with a demand for loyalty. In exchange, they would promise protection, wealth, health, happiness, safe borders, and all good things that the monarch was committed to providing. At the same time, they would warn the people that if they betrayed the monarch, they would suffer from invasion, death, slavery, sickness, and oppression. Sometimes it worked, and sometimes it didn’t. But it was a way of keeping the people in line.

This part of the Torah is another example of how external culture and attitudes provide a background to the Torah. Everybody at that time would have expected promises from rulers, while as we now know, politicians often do not keep them.

But there’s another way of looking at this — perhaps more psychologically. Perhaps we should read these Biblical formal declarations as words of promise and rebuke intertwined. Designed to give us a feeling that there is some power we can feel that cares about us — who wants to help us, but also wants to prevent us from going off track and making the wrong decisions. And it’s this push and pull that we needed in ancient times — and today.

The author is a writer and rabbi, currently based in New York. 

The post God’s ‘Rebuke’ in This Week’s Torah Portion first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Joe Rogan, host of The Joe Rogan Experience podcast on Spotify. Photo: Screenshot.

If you listened to the March 5 episode of the top-rated podcast on Spotify in the US, you would hear, in the first 30 minutes, that:

• Richard Nixon was framed;
• Time travel is possible;
• Charles Manson was a CIA asset;
• The 1960s anti-war movement was a CIA operation; and
• Sirhan Sirhan (the convicted assassin of Senator Robert Kennedy) had been subjected to mind control.

Then, after just a few more minutes, you would hear the guest, Ian Carroll, tell the host, Joe Rogan, “I sound crazy to someone that doesn’t do their own research.”

You don’t say.

If anyone were brave or gullible enough to keep listening after Carroll’s assertion that he “sounds crazy” only to “someone that doesn’t do their own research” (or if you were forced to keep listening because it was your job), you would hear Carroll wonder if the Egyptian pyramids were built by telepathic aliens and hear him, along with Rogan, claim that we don’t really know what happened at 7 World Trade Center.

The destruction of 7 World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, was litigated in multiple cases, with multiple parties fighting over hundreds of millions of dollars. One litigation lasted over 10 years, and an army of lawyers was involved. I briefly worked on one of the cases myself. And I can promise you, we know what happened at 7 World Trade Center.

I suppose I can’t prove that the pyramids weren’t built by telepathic aliens. But should anyone really have to?

This is the sort of exasperation that prompted Douglas Murray, on the April 10 episode of Rogan’s show, to exclaim in frustration, “you don’t need to consume endless versions of a revisionist history!”

It takes about five minutes to look up and then spout off a conspiracy theory, but exponentially longer to debunk one. The sheer number of bizarre claims made on this program, thrown out rapidly one after another for over two and a half hours, could send an actual, serious researcher on a months’ long, or longer, full-time quest to conclusively debunk each one.

No normal person has that kind of time — and that’s part of the conceit here. Carroll, a former Uber Eats driver turned “independent researcher,” wants his audience to feel that if they believe such claims, they are the ones who are in-the-know, in possession of a secret knowledge that powerful people are trying to keep hidden.

And unfortunately someone who believes, or is even willing to entertain, Carroll’s ridiculous claims might also believe him when he claims that Jeffrey Epstein was working for the Mossad to gather intelligence on American officials, or that a group of Jewish philanthropists investing in Jewish causes was conducting espionage (“it is unclear if we have proof that they were conducting espionage,” Carroll says. Do your own research!). Or that “Israel has so much control over our government right now. And I’m not saying that all Jews are in on something. Clearly, Internet. Thank you.”

Such a listener might also have believed comic Dave Smith when he claimed on a solo appearance on Rogan’s show, prior to his “debate” with Douglas Murray, that the US is bombing Yemen “on behalf of Israel,” or when he said of Palestinians in the West Bank, “under Israeli control they have zero rights, zero rights whatsoever,” or when he said that Israel has “gotten us into like seven wars.” (April 3, 2025.)

Those same listeners might also have believed Darryl Cooper’s Holocaust revisionism on March 13, 2025. But these are just the same old tired conspiracy theories, now recycled into a new media environment that has no guardrails. (In fact, most antisemitism — at its root — is just a conspiracy theory.)

It’s good to know, of course, that Carroll doesn’t believe in David Icke’s theories about reptiles (calling them a “grift”), or that the earth is flat (purposeful misinformation meant to “obfuscate the narrative,” he says), but is that really our new baseline? One would hope not.

Rogan ended the episode, after play-acting for the supposed censors, “I can’t believe what you said … I am so upset that I even platformed you, you’re outrageous!” by more seriously telling Carroll that he was “very, very reasonable” and performing a “valuable service.”

Nor was Ian Carroll the first obvious kook that Rogan had on his show – he has previously hosted Terrence Howard, Roger Waters, and Abby Martin.

And just this week, Rogan was once again suggesting that aliens may have built the pyramids in Egypt. (May 14, 2025.) Notably, Rogan pushed back much harder on the former Egyptian Minister of Antiquities, Dr. Zahi Hawass, who opposes such bonkers theories, than he ever pushed back on Carroll. But it took Carroll just a couple of minutes to promote the claim that the pyramids could have been built by telepathic aliens, and it took an actual archeologist with decades of experience two hours to rebut it.

No one knows better than CAMERA that the credentialed experts don’t always get things right. But that’s not an excuse to promote baseless conspiracy theories pedaled by someone with no credibility whatsoever.

Rogan is entertaining, and many people enjoy the super-long format that has at other times allowed him to get much more in-depth into issues than television news, even magazine formats like 20/20 or 60 Minutes, can allow. But if a listener can learn one thing from Carroll, Cooper, and Smith’s interviews on this podcast, it’s that Joe Rogan, who boasts, “I was arguing with people about the moon landing on the radio before [expletive] there was any podcasts,” doesn’t vet his guests for any type of intellectual rigor whatsoever.

It’s also clear that Rogan often lacks the desire or knowledge to push back on some of his guests’ crazier claims. And he’s happy to use his show to promote wild conspiracy theories — including, but certainly not limited to, those about Jews and Israel. After all, it creates controversy and makes for a great podcast — and lots of profit for Rogan.

Karen Bekker is the Assistant Director in the Media Response Team at CAMERA, the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis.

The post Why Joe Rogan’s Assault on Facts Is So Dangerous first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Palestinians displaced by the Israeli military offensive, shelter in tents, in Gaza City May 11, 2025. REUTERS/Dawoud Abu Alkas

Negotiations have continued to end the Gaza war, with no result. Hamas is still refusing to relinquish its hold on Gaza and demanding that a ceasefire include its continued governance, the total withdrawal of Israeli forces from Gaza, and the rebuilding of Gaza at the expense of the international community.

Israel is demanding the return of all the remaining hostages, the removal of Hamas from Gaza, and the complete demilitarization of the area. The Israelis offered a partial agreement that Hamas refused. In a gesture to President Trump, Hamas released a hostage who has dual American and Israeli citizenship.

On Monday, after several weeks of gradually taking more ground and intensifying aerial operations against Hamas and other terrorist personnel, Israel declared the beginning of a new escalated ground operation. Five divisions are now simultaneously attacking different localities in Gaza. The official objective is to capture most if not all the territory of Gaza.

Detonation of a tunnel: The red line emphasizes its route – the red plumes are from ventilation shafts.

In the run-up to the ground operation, the Israeli Air Force intensified its airstrikes on commanders, command centers and Hamas fighting positions. Many of these strikes required pinpoint accuracy, with small bombs or missiles sent into specific rooms Hamas had commandeered inside hospitals and schools. Others required heavier bombs to penetrate underground facilities.

Among the targets was the current Hamas chief, Mahmoud Sinwar (who replaced his brother Yahya Sinwar, killed in October 2024), and one, perhaps two, Hamas brigade commanders (those of the Rafah and Khan Yunis brigades) and several of Sinwar’s staff. It is unclear whether or not they were killed. A Saudi report claims that the bodies of Sinwar and at least 10 of his assistants were recovered, but Hamas has not officially admitted this.

Publicized details of the IDF’s new offensive show a different approach from previous operations. This time, there will be a simultaneous offensive throughout Gaza rather than a sequential one. The territory taken will be held and cleared.

Also, a different approach is planned for managing the civilian population. Previously, civilians were ordered to evacuate each area where the Israelis were operating and told to stay outside that area until the Israelis had withdrawn. This time, the plan is to set up humanitarian enclaves in areas taken by the Israeli forces, and supplies entering Gaza will be sent exclusively to those locations. The population will then be instructed to move to those enclaves via filtration points to ensure that Hamas and other terrorist personnel do not join them.

The civilian and humanitarian management of the enclaves will be in the hands of a new international organization, the US-based Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, set up specifically for this purpose. The UN, UNRWA, and other pro-Hamas NGOs will not be involved. To no one’s surprise, the UN establishment is criticizing this approach.

The location of an attacked Hamas post (marked in red) inside the compound of al-Ahali hospital (the white boundary).

More and more people in Gaza are allowing themselves to openly criticize Hamas, though the initial wave of public demonstrations appears to have abated after several participants were killed by Hamas. There have also been many more posts by Gazans who say they would leave Gaza permanently if they were allowed to do so.

While the number of such posts is increasing, it is still relatively small, and we don’t know how deep this sentiment is — are these people exceptions, or do they represent a much larger portion of the population? On several occasions, crowds have broken into storage sites where Hamas has been hoarding humanitarian aid. In one case, a local merchant’s warehouse was ransacked after it was published that he was hoarding food rather than selling it in anticipation of higher prices.

The Hamas Ministry of Health’s latest casualty update from May 17 claims approximately 54,000 killed and 120,000 wounded. Hamas still does not differentiate between combatants and non-combatants. According to the IDF, in January 2025 these included a verified total of more than 20,000 Hamas personnel and at least 3,000 personnel of other terrorist organizations. Since the resumption of fighting in March, many more terrorists have been killed, but no specific number has been provided. The number of wounded terrorists is not known but is probably at least similar to the number killed. And we have no way to know if any of Hamas’ numbers are accurate.

Another Israeli soldier died earlier this week in Gaza, bringing the total number of casualties since October 8 to 420. 

Israeli offensive operations continue in the West Bank, though their intensity has diminished. Resistance to Israeli operations is also waning. Those killed are usually commanders who refuse to surrender or who are in the middle of conducting attacks on the Israelis.

Hamas has attempted to galvanize the population to join the fighting against the IDF, but with virtually no response so far. In fact, the frequency of terrorist attacks against Israelis has gone down considerably. Since the last update, it has reached one of its lowest levels in many years.

The Fatah-controlled security forces of the Palestinian Authority have continued their operations against their Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad rivals in areas where the Israelis are not operating. They have arrested several hundred.

Dr. Eado Hecht, a senior research fellow at the BESA Center, is a military analyst focusing mainly on the relationship between military theory, military doctrine, and military practice. He teaches courses on military theory and military history at Bar-Ilan University, Haifa University, and Reichman University and in a variety of courses in the Israel Defense Forces. A version of this article was originally published by The BESA Center.

The post Here’s What’s Happening in Gaza Right Now first appeared on Algemeiner.com.