RSS
Israel Says Hezbollah Using UN Troops in Lebanon as Human Shields as UNIFIL Refuses to Leave Combat Zones
UN peacekeepers (UNIFIL) vehicles drive in Marjayoun, near the border with Israel, amid ongoing hostilities between Hezbollah and Israeli forces, southern Lebanon, Oct. 11, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Karamallah Daher
United Nations peacekeepers will stay in all positions in Lebanon despite Israeli warnings that Hezbollah is weaponizing their presence in the Iran-backed terrorist organization’s war against the Jewish state.
“The decision was made that UNIFIL [the UN Interim Force in Lebanon] would currently stay in all its positions in spite of the calls that were made by the Israel Defense Forces [IDF] to vacate the positions that are in the vicinity of the Blue Line,” UN peacekeeping chief Jean-Pierre Lacroix said on Monday.
Lacroix’s announcement came after Italy, Britain, France, and Germany earlier in the day condemned what they described as Israeli attacks on the UN’s peacekeeping mission in Lebanon, calling them violations of international humanitarian law and demanding an immediate halt.
In a joint statement, the nations emphasized the “essential stabilizing role” of UNIFIL in southern Lebanon, where Hezbollah wields significant influence and has been fighting Israeli forces, and urged Israel to guarantee the peacekeepers’ safety.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu forcefully rejected accusations that Israel deliberately attacked UNIFIL personnel as “completely false.”
“It’s exactly the opposite. Israel repeatedly asks UNIFIL to get out of harm’s way. It repeatedly asked them to temporarily leave the combat zone, which is right next to Israel’s border with Lebanon,” he said.
UNIFIL appeared to rebuff Netanyahu’s calls to evacuate with Lacroix’s latest statement. However, the Israeli premier hasn’t been the only one warning of how Hezbollah was using the UN presence in Lebanon to its advantage.
Lieutenant Colonel (Res.) Sarit Zehavi, a resident of northern Israel and the founder and director of Alma — a research center that focuses on security challenges relating to Israel’s northern border — said that Hezbollah was using UNIFIL troops as human shields.
“UNIFIL troops are deemed non-combatants like the rest of the Lebanese population, and not an enemy. Every commander in the IDF knows this,” Zehavi told The Algemeiner.
Israel’s one mistake, she said, was agreeing in the aftermath of the 2006 Second Lebanon War to the deployment of 10,000 UNIFIL troops in southern Lebanon.
“It’s outrageous that UNIFIL is not enabling us to do what it was supposed to do in the past 18 years,” she said. “They are risking their lives for nothing. I hope they’ll come to their senses and withdraw, as requested.”
Israel has asked that the peacekeepers retreat five kilometers, or 3.1, miles north of the border, to stay out of the line of fire.
Israeli Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon on Sunday echoed similar sentiments.
“Hezbollah terrorists are using UNIFIL outposts as hiding places and as places of ambushes. The UN’s insistence on keeping the UNIFIL soldiers in the line of fire is incomprehensible,” said Danon.
The Lebanese terrorist group has launched more than 10,000 rockets into Israel since Oct. 8 of last year, a day after Hamas’s attack in Israel’s south, including more than 1,000 UAVs, one of which killed four Israelis on Sunday and wounded 70 more.
“For 18 years, UNIFIL personnel ignored the Hezbollah bases along the border and did not report any UN Resolution 1701 violations, which states that only the Lebanese army is allowed to operate in the area,” Danon said.
A UNIFIL report released on Monday about IDF incursions in the area raised concerns for Zehavi, who questioned the group’s effectiveness even as a monitoring entity. The report notably omitted any mention of the munitions and tunnels uncovered by the IDF just meters from UNIFIL posts.
“In almost every home that is in open areas, and under every tree, the IDF finds munitions,” she said. “It is clear that UNIFIL knew what was happening.”
Zehavi said that much of the problems arose when examining UN Resolution 1701, adopted in 2006 after the Second Lebanon War, which mandated a buffer zone free of armed groups and to prevent the area from being used for hostile activities. She questioned the division of responsibility in two seemingly contradictory articles of the resolution between UNIFIL and the Lebanese army in securing the area between Israel’s border and the Litani River.
“Who’s to ensure that this area is not used for all these purposes by a terrorist organization? Is it UNIFIL or the Lebanese army?” Zehavi asked, adding that at this point, “it doesn’t really matter.”
“Neither of them implemented the mandate, and from day one, Hezbollah deceived the whole world and continued rebuilding its terrorist activity in southern Lebanon,” she explained.
In the future, UNIFIL’s mandate should be limited to serving as mediator and capped at 1,000 personnel, Zehavi said. But she also called for another coalition to enter southern Lebanon, one that would be “willing to clash with Hezbollah.”
The key issue, Zehavi said, is that it’s impossible to fully implement UN Resolution 1701 as long as Hezbollah is not seen as an “illegitimate entity” within Lebanon. She argued that while Hezbollah operates both as a political party in Lebanon’s Parliament and government and as a massive social movement, the terrorist group essentially functions as a “state within a state,” with parallel civilian infrastructures that provide services to the population, thereby securing widespread support.
Despite the IDF’s successes in targeting Hezbollah’s munitions and rocket depots, Alma estimates that Hezbollah still retains around 50,000 mortars with ranges of up to 10 kilometers. Additionally, there are about 25,000 Grads and other mid-range rockets capable of reaching distances between 30 to 80 kilometers. For longer ranges of 80 to 200 kilometers, Hezbollah is believed to have around 2,000 rockets. However, Zehavi acknowledged that there are no current estimates for how many long-range missiles Hezbollah may still have in its arsenal.
Zehavi outlined four types of tunnels built by Hezbollah, each serving a specific function. The first type, border crossing tunnels, are meant to infiltrate Israel, with a recently discovered tunnel extending just a few dozen meters from Lebanon into the Israeli community of Zarit. Its opening shaft was discovered only dozens of meters away from a UNIFIL watchtower.
The second type is tactical tunnels, which link homes and strategic points in southern Lebanon. These tunnels were originally designed to facilitate Hezbollah’s invasion plans and defend against IDF incursions. Hezbollah’s plan to invade Israel — which included abductions — was “copy-pasted” by Hamas, she said.
In practice, since Hezbollah shelved plans for an invasion, the terrorist group has mainly used those tunnels to avoid direct combat, instead attacking from a distance with anti-tank missiles and mortars.
The third type, known as strategic tunnels, form a vast network stretching hundreds of kilometers, and are supported by Iran and North Korea. These tunnels are used to transport launchers and military personnel across Lebanon, from Beirut to the south and from the Lebanese-Syrian border.
Lastly, explosive tunnels are specifically designed to target IDF forces, with the intent of causing significant damage as Israeli units advance.
Beyond the fighting in Lebanon, Zehavi also described Iran’s recent massive missile attack on Israel as a declaration of war and called on Israel and its allies to attack Iran’s nuclear program.
Netanyahu, Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and IDF Chief of Staff Herzl Halevi held a secret meeting on Sunday night at the headquarters of the Military Intelligence Directorate near Tel Aviv to discuss the country’s planned retaliation against Iran, according to Ynet.
The last such secret meeting reportedly occurred right before the Israeli airstrike last month that killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah.
The post Israel Says Hezbollah Using UN Troops in Lebanon as Human Shields as UNIFIL Refuses to Leave Combat Zones first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
A History of Hanukkah and Jewish Survival
A Hanukkah menorah. Photo: Pixabay
We like to think that Hanukkah was the great victory of Judah, the son of Mattiyahu the Priest (who initiated the resistance) against the mighty Syrian or Seleucid Greeks over 2,000 years ago. The Seleucid campaign against Judea began when Antiochus the 4th invaded in 167 BCE). He believed his culture was far superior to that of the Jews. Jewish merchants were beginning to rival the Greeks in the Eastern Mediterranean, so commercial rivalry was a factor too.
Judah (the name Maccabee is not mentioned in Talmudic sources) did indeed defeat some Seleucid armies and retook the Temple and purified it in 164 BCE. But in fact, the fighting went on for some five years.
Although in between, the Temple did indeed function the way it did before Antiochus, nevertheless it was not a clear-cut victory. The in-fighting in the court of the Syrian Greeks, the assassination of kings and rival generals, all contributed to stalemate with Syrians still holding on to their fortress in Jerusalem.
Judah was killed in the battle of Elasa in 160 BCE. Judah’s brother Jonathan was killed in 143 BCE. Only with the last brother Simon, who was recognized officially as Judea’s high priest and the head of the Judean state in 142 CE, did Judea become independent, for a while.
Judah did not establish the annual eight-day festival we have today. He did replicate the Eight Days of King Solomon’s original dedication of the first Temple when he re-took it. The late Talmudic rabbis established the ongoing eight days to commemorate the miracle of the oil not mentioned earlier. And their failure to mention Judah indicates their disapproval of the Hasmonean dynasty in general as it played out.
Was Hanukkah just a matter of military conquest — or just cultural disagreement with the Greeks? There were no Palestinians to be seen. In competing for markets, Greeks killed Jews and Jews killed Greeks back. John Hyrcanus, Simon’s successor ,was particularly effective at retaliating against those who attacked Jews even beyond his territory.
Within the Jewish community of Judea, there were huge divisions, which reflected the precise divisions that exist today within the Jewish communities in Israel and the Diaspora.
Succeeding generations could not even agree what the significance of Hanukkah was. For those who fought, it was a military victory that ultimately led to the establishment of regaining and re-opening the Temple and an autonomous state.
For the rabbis of the Talmudic era, who were scarred by the Roman conquests, it was a celebration of the spiritual flame kept burning by the few against the many. Judah the fighter was not mentioned. Some saw it as a response to the Diaspora festival of Purim, others as the interaction between the Diaspora and Israel, with both suffering from different pressures and antagonisms. What we now call antisemitism.
A lot has changed over the last 2,000 years — and a lot has not.
Empires have come and gone, rulers have risen and died, and Jews remain a people as Bilaam says (Numbers 23:9) “A nation that dwells alone and is not regarded (or valued) by the other peoples.” We have always been loners. Does this really matter? For some it does and that explains why so many Jews have always abandoned the confines of Jewish life to try to thrive in the non-Jewish world. It also explains why others have fought for their beliefs and freedom — and why some have become zealots.
We should not be surprised today to discover how many Jews are antagonistic to the Jewish people, and certainly not about how the non-Jewish world continues to be extremely ambivalent towards us. Both in the Middle East and in the West, communities are now no longer as monochromatic or as unified as they once were. Mass migrations have changed the complexity of many societies and divided them against themselves.
This is why the Hanukkah story is so important. It’s the only festival we have that records the military triumph of Israel against its opponents, and the survival of our tradition despite the continuous, repeated attempts to snuff us out.
We have thrived despite it all. In our prayers every single day of the year, we think of Jerusalem and returning to it in our minds if not in our bodies. This is something that the world just does not get — because they are not concerned with history or facts. This is our story, whichever the way the wind blows, and they will not snuff our lights out.
The author is a writer and rabbi, currently based in New York.
The post A History of Hanukkah and Jewish Survival first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Deriving Harmony: A ‘Mathematical’ Reading of Parshat Vayigash and the Story of Yosef
Reading from a Torah scroll in accordance with Sephardi tradition. Photo: Sagie Maoz via Wikimedia Commons.
Parshat Vayigash brings us to one of the most emotionally charged moments in the Torah.
Yosef, now a powerful ruler in Egypt, reveals his identity to his brothers, setting the stage for reconciliation after years of separation, pain, and misunderstanding. The parsha highlights themes of forgiveness, unity, and divine providence, as fractured relationships are mended and a family realigns with its shared destiny.
From a mathematical perspective, the resolution in Parshat Vayigash can be seen as a system of linear equations. Just as a system requires each equation to be satisfied simultaneously at a single solution point, the family’s conflicting perspectives and needs converge into a unified outcome. This metaphor provides a structured lens through which to understand the intricate interplay of values, responsibilities, and emotions in this story.
The Mathematical Framework: Systems of Linear Equations
A system of linear equations consists of two or more equations that must be satisfied simultaneously. For example:
Here, x and y represent variables, while the coefficients
This concept mirrors the narrative arc of Parshat Vayigash. Yosef’s perspective, shaped by his journey and Divine purpose, represents one equation, while Yehdah’s plea, grounded in responsibility and repentance, represents another. Both have their own unique parameters, yet the Torah demands that their paths intersect to achieve harmony.
Yosef’s Equation
Yosef’s trajectory is shaped by years of hardship and Divine intervention. Sold into slavery by his brothers, he rises to become the viceroy of Egypt, using his position to save countless lives during a devastating famine. His equation includes parameters such as forgiveness, hidden identity, and the fulfillment of his prophetic dreams. Yosef operates with a long view of history, understanding that his suffering was part of a Divine plan to ensure the survival of his family.
In mathematical terms, Yosef’s line reflects a higher-level perspective. His decisions are calculated, testing his brothers to see if they have truly changed. He places Benjamin in a position of vulnerability, forcing his brothers to confront their past actions and demonstrate growth.
Yehudah’s Equation
Yehudah’s line, meanwhile, is rooted in loyalty, repentance, and self-sacrifice. Once a key player in the sale of Yosef, Yehudah now steps forward as the family’s moral leader. His heartfelt plea to protect Benjamin, even offering himself as a slave in his brother’s place, demonstrates a profound transformation. Yehudah’s parameters include responsibility for his actions, a commitment to his father Yakov, and a willingness to endure personal suffering for the sake of his family’s unity.
Yehudah’s line represents a grounded, immediate perspective. He is not thinking about grand plans or Divine foresight; he is focused on the here and now, ensuring Benjamin’s safety and preserving his father’s fragile spirit.
Solving the System
The brilliance of Parshat Vayigash lies in how these two “lines” converge. Yosef and Yehudah begin from vastly different places: Yosef with his concealed identity and tests, and Yehudah with his guilt and earnestness. Through their charged interaction, each adjusts their position, mirroring the process of manipulating equations to find a solution.
Yosef’s eventual revelation — “I am Yosef” — is the moment when the system resolves. At this point, all conditions are satisfied: Yosef’s need to confirm his brothers’ repentance, Yehudah’s commitment to his family’s well-being, and the overarching Divine plan to reunite Yakov’s children.
The solution to the system is a point of harmony where all variables align. The family’s unity is restored, not by erasing their differences, but by finding a resolution that respects and incorporates each perspective.
Lessons from the Formula
The system of linear equations in Parshat Vayigash teaches us profound lessons about reconciliation and harmony. Just as mathematical systems require each equation to maintain its integrity while finding common ground, human relationships thrive when differing perspectives are acknowledged and balanced. The Torah shows us that unity is not about uniformity; it’s about creating a space where all voices can contribute to a shared solution.
The process of solving such a system highlights the importance of adjustments and dialogue. Yosef and Yehudah’s interactions involve testing, negotiation, and moments of vulnerability. The result is a meaningful reconciliation that strengthens their family’s bond.
Conclusion
Parshat Vayigash offers a timeless blueprint for resolving conflicts and building unity. Through the lens of a system of linear equations, we see how Yosef and Yehudah’s distinct trajectories intersect to create a harmonious outcome. Each perspective brings its own parameters, yet the solution honors them all. This mathematical metaphor not only deepens our understanding of the parsha, but also inspires us to seek alignment in our own relationships, finding points of connection where harmony can flourish.
Rochie Gottheil is an analyst by day and creates high school and college math curricula in her spare time. She can be reached at Rochel.desk@gmail.com
The post Deriving Harmony: A ‘Mathematical’ Reading of Parshat Vayigash and the Story of Yosef first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
How Hamas Lies About Israeli Hostages — With the BBC’s Help
The BBC logo is seen at the entrance at Broadcasting House, the BBC headquarters in central London. Photo by Vuk Valcic / SOPA Images/Sipa USA.
On Dec. 17, the BBC News website published a report by Yolande Knell and Rushdi Abualouf headlined “Gaza ceasefire talks in final stage, Palestinian negotiator tells BBC.” Readers of that report were told that:
Of 96 hostages still held in Gaza, 62 are assumed by Israel to still be alive.
As was the case in another BBC report published a week earlier, that portrayal fails to clarify that Hamas also holds two Israeli civilians who entered the Gaza Strip in 2014 and 2015, and the bodies of two soldiers who were killed in 2014.
Readers are also told that Israel’s concern for the security of its civilians is “problematic” and a nod to the “far right”:
According to his spokesman, [Israel’s minister of defence] Katz told members of the Israeli parliament’s foreign affairs committee on Monday: “We have not been this close to an agreement on the hostages since the previous deal,” referring to an exchange of hostages and Palestinian prisoners in Israel in November 2023.
He has since written on X: “My position on Gaza is clear. After we defeat Hamas’s military and governmental power in Gaza, Israel will have security control over Gaza with full freedom of action,” comparing this to the situation in the occupied West Bank.
“We will not allow any terrorist activity against Israeli communities and Israeli citizens from Gaza. We will not allow a return to the reality of before 7 October.”
Such comments are likely to be seen as problematic by negotiators trying to bridge gaps with Hamas. However, in Israel, they are seen as vital to guarantee the support of far-right Israeli cabinet ministers who have previously warned they would not agree to what they have described as a “reckless” deal in Gaza.
In a televised report about the talks which was aired on the BBC News channel on the same day, Rushdi Abualouf (located in Istanbul) told viewers that: [emphasis in italics in the original, emphasis in bold added]
“…also the first stage will allow the dead hostages — the civilian dead hostages — also will be released. So not only alive [sic] hostages but also the people who were killed in the airstrikes and they are civilians…”
With that highlighted statement Abualouf promoted and mainstreamed the long-standing Hamas propaganda whereby any deceased hostages were killed as a result of Israeli actions.
In August we saw that when such claims were shown to be false, the BBC failed to adequately inform its audiences when Hamas murdered six Israeli hostages, including American Hersh Goldberg-Polin.
Among the civilian hostages known to be deceased, are those who were murdered during the October 7 onslaught and their bodies then abducted and taken to the Gaza Strip. They include Idan Shtivi, Judith Weinstein Haggai, Gadi Haggai, Dror Or, Yair Yaakov, Manny Godard, Ilan Weiss, Eitan Levy, Ofra Keidar and two Thai nationals. Additional hostages were kidnapped alive and subsequently died or were murdered while in captivity.
Rushdi Abualouf not only promoted disinformation by claiming that the deceased civilian hostages were “killed in the airstrikes” — he deliberately misled BBC audiences by means of brazen promotion of the Hamas narrative, which is intended to erase its responsibility for the deaths of hostages and place the blame on Israel.
Hadar Sela is the co-editor of CAMERA UK — an affiliate of the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (CAMERA), where a version of this article first appeared.
The post How Hamas Lies About Israeli Hostages — With the BBC’s Help first appeared on Algemeiner.com.