Smith Hall at the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities. Photo: AlexiusHoratius.

“The vast majority of Israelis are bad people,” claimed my pro-Palestinian classmate during a discussion a few weeks ago.

The discussion was about the legitimacy of Zionism — the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in their ancestral homeland. According to my classmate’s repugnant belief, most Israelis are inherently bad people because they are both “settlers” and racists. Another one of my pro-Palestinian classmates subsequently chimed in, asserting that Jews don’t have the right to self-determination in the Land of Israel, and that Israel should never have been created.

While these are two fairly insignificant instances of hate perpetuated by pro-Palestinian activists, they are representative of the widespread bigotry and ignorance plaguing the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities campus.

Although I’m not Jewish (I was raised as a Greek Orthodox Christian), I have always identified as a liberal Zionist. I’ve always believed that the Jewish people have the right to self-determination in their ancestral homeland. I’ve always believed that Israel’s right to exist is incontestable. Since the Palestinians have lived in the Land of Israel (which they call Palestine) for generations, I have always believed that Palestinians also have a right to live on the land. In my ideal world, the two peoples would figure out how to both overcome the trauma that they have experienced, and live in peace with one another. I don’t think any rational person would argue that these beliefs are radical or unreasonable.

Certainly, every activist advocating on behalf of Israel that I’ve encountered has understood and welcomed my views. The same can’t be said for the pro-Palestinian demonstrators that I’ve conversed with at the University of Minnesota.

Every time that I mention my Zionist convictions, pro-Palestinian activists become outraged. When pro-Palestinian demonstrators hear the word “Zionism,” many of them wrongly assume that it inherently equates to the oppression of Palestinians. When I remind pro-Palestinian activists that Zionism is simply the right of the Jewish people to self-determination in the Land of Israel, many of them never cease to tell me that I’m wrong.

Whenever pro-Palestinian activists are confronted by the horrors that took place on October 7, 2023, I always hear them argue some variation of “history didn’t begin on October 7.” Yes, that’s definitely correct. However, whenever I talk about the atrocities committed by Palestinians on the Jewish people throughout history, it’s always dismissed as “misleading” or “irrelevant.” Apparently, it’s “misleading” or “irrelevant” when I mention the massacres of Jews that took place in Hebron and Safed in 1929, or the assassination of 127 Jews in Kfar Etzion one day before the State of Israel was declared, or the suicide bombings that took place during the Second Intifada. While pro-Palestinian activists rightly decry the killing of innocent Palestinians, many of them curiously turn a blind eye when confronted with the killing of innocent Israelis.

Moreover, elementary facts about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict that I often mention are constantly ignored. For example, when I mention that so many families from the Palestinian elite sold land to the Jews before the establishment of Israel, it’s invariably labelled as “misleading” or “irrelevant” by the Palestinian propagandists that I come in contact with. It’s definitely understandable to be critical of certain Israeli policies (I am myself), but it’s wholly unproductive to ignore basic historical facts that illustrate that both peoples have possessed a role in creating and perpetuating the conflict. I’ve been talked down to and ridiculed many times for simply recounting history and defending the Jewish people’s right to self-determination.

Unfortunately, I’m not alone in my experiences. Radical pro-Palestinian activity and propaganda has a history of being pervasive at the University of Minnesota.

Last year, pro-Palestinian groups continuously denied or justified the massacre of 1,200 Israelis on October 7, 2023. For instance, “VICTORY TO THE AL-AQSA FLOOD” was previously written on the campus quad. During the fall of 2024, pro-Palestinian demonstrators belonging to UMN Students for a Democratic Society “barricaded doors and windows,” “spray-painted security cameras,” and occupied a university building. Earlier this year, “REST IN MARTYRDOM HASSAN NASRALLAH!! GLORY TO HEZBOLLAH! GLORY TO HAMAS!” was written inside of a tunnel on campus.

Earlier this month, pro-Palestinian demonstrators protested a private speech by Yinam Cohen, even going as far to label him a “war criminal” for simply being the Consul General of Israel to the Midwest. Free speech should never be suppressed, but wouldn’t it be more reasonable for pro-Palestinian activists to listen to Cohen and subsequently set up alternative forums to discuss the issue without hating and intimidating others? Recently, I spoke with Michael Oren (a former Israeli ambassador to the US), and I disagreed with him on certain issues. Nevertheless, I still learned a lot from his perspective. If pro-Palestinian activists truly cared about resolving the conflict, wouldn’t they listen to and attempt to understand the other side?

While pro-Palestinian demonstrators at the University of Minnesota incessantly object to actions taken by the United States and Israel, they are dramatically silent on the damage Hamas inflicts upon Gazan civilians. Never have I witnessed pro-Palestinian college demonstrators utter a single word about either the oppression Hamas perpetuates on Gazan civilians, or the recent protests in Gaza, some of which are explicitly against Hamas rule.

Instead, many pro-Palestinian demonstrators at the University of Minnesota are committed to utilizing the Gazan population as a statistic in order to delegitimize Israel. At the University of Minnesota, bigotry and ignorance about Zionism and the history of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict remain prevalent. As someone who isn’t Jewish, I can’t imagine how my Jewish peers are feeling in reaction to the omnipresence of anti-Zionism (and antisemitism), but I will always be there to defend them.

Richard McDaniel is an undergraduate political science student at the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities.

The post What It’s Like to Be a Non-Jewish, Zionist Student at the University of Minnesota first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

A London bus outside the Houses of Parliament. Photo: public domain.

Border security and a visa policy. There isn’t a single sovereign state in the world that doesn’t have both.

The United Kingdom certainly does — a robust one, no less. For Palestinians, a visa is mandatory to enter the UK, whether for tourism, family visits, business, or study — short stay or long.

In addition to a visa, Palestinians must present a valid passport, proof of accommodation (hotel booking or invitation from a local host), evidence of financial means (bank statements, employer letter, etc.), and a return or onward travel ticket. Processing is time-consuming, often expensive, and far from guaranteed.

The irony of this, however, has been lost on British Labour MPs Abtisam Mohamed and Yuan Yang, who apparently believed their parliamentary status placed them above the entry requirements enforced on ordinary visitors when they arrived in Israel earlier this month.

Upon landing at Tel Aviv’s Ben Gurion Airport and telling border authorities they were on a “parliamentary delegation to visit humanitarian aid projects in the West Bank,” they were found to have misrepresented the nature of their visit, denied entry, and promptly deported — just like anyone else who flouts standard entry procedures.

The two MPs were, in fact, on a trip arranged by Caabu — the Council for Arab-British Understanding — a lobby group that specializes in escorting British parliamentarians on carefully choreographed “fact-finding” tours of the West Bank.

According to NGO Monitor, Caabu’s stated aim is to “counter the Israel lobby” in British politics — a mission it advances by promoting inflammatory, evidence-free accusations of “ethnic cleansing” and “apartheid,” under the guise of educational outreach.

In the aftermath of Hamas’ October 7 massacre, Caabu’s director, Chris Doyle, stopped just short of defending the atrocities outright, instead casting them as the inevitable “reaction” to decades of Israeli policy. “Hell in Gaza,” he warned, “will never equal heaven in Israel.” A grimly revealing insight into Caabu’s wider agenda.

For Mohamed, though, this wasn’t a matter of border policy, as she told the House of Commons, but an act of “control and censorship” — part of a broader effort, she claimed, to suppress those trying to “expose” Israel.

She went further still, casting her routine deportation as political repression and invoking the familiar antisemitic dog whistle: “No state, however powerful, should be beyond criticism.”

One must assume, then, that Mohamed also views the UK’s visa system — which requires Palestinians to navigate layers of bureaucracy and reserves the right to deny them entry — as an example of a state’s unrestrained power.

Mohamed and Yang landed in Israel at 2:30 p.m. on Saturday, April 5, on a flight from Luton, accompanied by two aides. During questioning, the two MPs — both vocal supporters of BDS — claimed they were part of an official parliamentary delegation. That claim was reportedly untrue: no Israeli authority had received notification of such a delegation, nor had any approval been granted, according to Israel’s Interior Ministry.

Interior Minister Moshe Arbel denied entry to all four individuals “in accordance with the law,” noting their intent to cause harm to the state.

The Israeli embassy in London issued a statement explaining: “These individuals had accused Israel of false claims, were actively involved in promoting sanctions against Israeli ministers, and supported campaigns aimed at boycotting the State of Israel.”

The UK’s own Foreign Office, it’s worth noting, explicitly states that foreign nationals can legally be denied entry to Israel if they’ve publicly called for a boycott or belong to an organization that has. It’s right there on the government’s website — advice Mohamed and Yang might have reviewed before confirming their airline tickets.

But their apparent disbelief that Israel would actually enforce its own laws has been matched, headline for headline, by the British media’s hyperventilation over the supposed diplomatic scandal.

Sky News has breathlessly tracked every twist of the saga, with headlines about the “furious row” over the Labour MPs’ denied entry and helpful explainers outlining “what the MPs said about the war in Gaza” — just in case anyone was still wondering why they might not be welcomed with open arms.

The Guardian is doing its best to amplify the manufactured indignation, leading its coverage with Foreign Secretary David Lammy’s condemnation of Israel’s decision as “unacceptable, counterproductive, and deeply concerning.”

Curiously, it failed to mention Lammy’s own support, back in 2008, for banning Israeli MPs from entering the UK — a rather pertinent omission, as noted by journalist Stephen Pollard in The Spectator.

Labour MP Emily Thornberry weighed in with her characteristic self-importance, declaring that the deportation was particularly egregious because Mohamed and Yang were, in her words, “potential leaders” of the UK.

“They are highly respected parliamentarians,” she told the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg, “and Israel is badly advised to try to alienate them, to humiliate them, and to treat them in this way, because people listen to what these two young women say — and they will do for decades to come.”

This would be the same Emily Thornberry, chair of the UK Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee, who once told Sky News that, if Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu visited the UK, she’d have no problem arresting him. Apparently, arresting a current leader is fine — but deporting two “potential” ones is beyond the pale.

So while the BBC blares about how “astounded” these MPs are, and The Independent frets about the “escalat[ing] diplomatic row,” let’s take a moment to remind the media — and our stunned British lawmakers — of a basic principle:

It’s called the law, and it applies to everyone. And as the Brits themselves might put it, this is nothing more than a storm in a teacup.

The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.

The post The UK Media Attacked Israel for Refusing Entry to BDS-Backing Politicians; But Israel Was Right first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas addresses the 79th United Nations General Assembly at United Nations headquarters in New York, US, Sept. 26, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Just as it did last month, the Palestinian Authority (PA) announced last week that it is paying February’s monthly “allowances” to Palestinian prisoners, terrorists, and their families.

One announcement was made laconically by the Postal Service, while the “PA employees’ salaries” Telegram channel mentioned in two separate statements that these payments were particularly for “Martyrs, prisoners, and the wounded,” as can be seen in the chart below:

While the Palestine Post announcement again did not specify to whom the payments were going to, the employees’ channel said explicitly (twice) that they were meant for terrorists.

Palestinian Media Watch (PMW) has no doubt that these are terror salaries, since the PA postal service only began facilitating them after the PA banks closed 35,000 terrorist bank accounts. The reason the bank accounts were closed was because PMW warned the banks that if they  continued facilitating those accounts, they would be violating Israeli law and therefore subject to civil and criminal liability.

It is noteworthy that the payments being made are for February 2025 — a month’s delay. PMW has reported that the PA had skipped the payment of a full month’s salary to its employees in 2023 and has not made it up. This is due to the PA being mired in financial crisis because of its high expenditures on payments to terrorists and the resulting losses in international support. Since then, all salaries are for two months prior rather than for the previous month, as would be standard.

PMW has been closely monitoring these payments and will continue doing so, as nothing has changed despite Mahmoud Abbas’ presidential decree, where he lied to Western audiences and said he would end “pay-for-slay.” He indeed seems to be making good on his previous promise to Palestinians that even if the PA would be “left with one penny, it will be paid to the families of the Martyrs and the prisoners.”

Ephraim D. Tepler is a contributor to Palestinian Media Watch (PMW), where a version of this article first appeared. 

The post Despite False Promises, Palestinian Authority Proudly Continues ‘Pay-for-Slay’ Program first appeared on Algemeiner.com.