Pope Francis on Sunday delivered his Easter message. He talked about abortion. He talked about migrants of the sort that are crossing the southern border into America and making their way into cities like New York. He talked about the need to free the Israeli hostages seized on Oct. 7. He talked about conflicts in at least 12 different places, including Ukraine, the Western Balkans, Armenia and Azerbaijan, Haiti, Myanmar, Sudan, the Democratic Republic of Congo, and Mozambique.

So what was the New York Times‘ headline about the pope’s speech? The online headline was, “Amid Health Concerns, Pope Delivers Strong Easter Message Calling for Gaza Cease-Fire.” The print headline was, “As Health Concerns Loom, Pope Calls for Gaza Cease-Fire in Easter Message.”

The Times news article also ended by emphasizing Gaza: “And in Gaza, he said the eyes of suffering children ask: ‘Why? Why all this death?’” Yet if one read the pope’s text carefully and in context, it seemed clear that the “eyes of the children” comment applied not restrictively to Gaza, but generally, to conflicts worldwide, including the one in Ukraine, where the pope also called for peace.

The Vatican’s paragraph with the “eyes of the children” comment did not include the word “Gaza.” The full passage said, “How much suffering we see in the eyes of the children: the children in those lands at war have forgotten how to smile! With those eyes, they ask us: Why? Why all this death? Why all this destruction?  War is always an absurdity, war is always a defeat! Let us not allow the strengthening winds of war to blow on Europe and the Mediterranean. Let us not yield to the logic of weapons and rearming. Peace is never made with arms, but with outstretched hands and open hearts.”

The fact that the word “lands” was plural, not singular, coupled with the inclusion of “Europe” along with the Mediterranean appears to indicate that the pope was making a general statement, not accusing Israel alone of imposing misery on children, which would be quite an Easter message to come from the Catholic Church.

The Times news article omitted the pope’s claim that “peace is never made with arms,” which runs counter to the historical experience of the “peace through strength” approach that won America a Cold War victory, as well as the Allied military victory that brought World War II to an eventual peaceful conclusion.

The Times account omitted entirely the pope’s reference to abortion. “Yet how much the precious gift of life is despised! How many children cannot even be born?” the pope said. Maybe Times editors felt that including it might damage, for left-leaning Times online readers, the appeal of the pope’s call for a Gaza ceasefire?

The headline encapsulated the tilt that has characterized the Times coverage of Israel generally. There’s been a Times-driven disproportionate emphasis on the Israel-Hamas conflict in Gaza over anything else. And even when a newsmaker has called for the release of the hostages who were seized by terrorists on Oct. 7, that’s been downplayed in favor of a headline about “cease-fire” and an image of the eyes of Gazan children that wasn’t even present with specificity in the pope’s speech.

Say what you will about Pope Francis — he’s been reasonably sensitive to the problem of post-Oct. 7 Jew-hate. Unfortunately, the Times itself hasn’t entirely lived up to Francis’ standard. In a Feb. 2 letter to “my Jewish brothers and sisters in Israel,” the pope wrote, “The path that the Church has walked with you, the ancient people of the covenant, rejects every form of anti-Judaism and antisemitism, unequivocally condemning manifestations of hatred towards Jews and Judaism as a sin against God. Together with you, we, Catholics, are very concerned about the terrible increase in attacks against Jews around the world. We had hoped that ‘never again’ would be a refrain heard by the new generations, yet now we see that the path ahead requires ever closer collaboration to eradicate these phenomena.” As far as I can tell from an archive search, the New York Times failed even to cover that letter.

When the pope calls for a ceasefire in Gaza, the Times is all over it. When the pope condemns antisemitism, the Times ignores it. The Times coverage is less illuminating for what it says about the pope, and more illuminating for what it discloses about the Times.

Ira Stoll was managing editor of The Forward and North American editor of The Jerusalem Post. His media critique, a regular Algemeiner feature, can be found here.

The post New York Times Imposes Its Own Anti-Israel Tilt on Pope’s Easter Message first appeared on Algemeiner.com.