RSS
The Vast Majority of US Jews Support Israel. Let’s Act on That Knowledge.
Members of extreme anti-Zionist group “Jewish Voice for Peace.” Photo: NGO Monitor.
JNS.org – Reading the results of a poll of American Jews demonstrating that a strong majority of the community believes that anti-Zionism is antisemitism, frowning harshly upon the tiny minority of their number associated with the global movement expressing solidarity with Hamas, it struck me that the only reason we pay attention to anti-Zionist Jews is because there are anti-Zionist non-Jews.
The poll, commissioned by a newly formed advocacy organization called the Jewish Majority, reveals that a full 70% of American Jews regard anti-Zionism as antisemitic by definition. An even greater number, 76%, said that the various campus demonstrations and protests in support of Hamas and its Oct. 7, 2023 pogrom in Israel were antisemitic. Asked whether Hamas wanted to commit genocide against Jews and Israelis, 85% answered yes. Between 73% and 79% said they were either members or supporters of mainstream Jewish organizations like the Jewish Federations of North America, the Anti-Defamation League, the American Jewish Committee and the Jewish National Fund.
Surveys in other countries where there is both a sizable Jewish community and a coruscating wave of antisemitism have delivered similar results. Hamas and its international cheerleaders are widely detested, and Israel is regarded supportively and affectionately, while tempered, proportionate criticism of Israeli policy—sadly, almost invisible these days—is seen as entirely acceptable and not deserving of the label “antisemitic.” Additionally, these surveys show that many Jews in America and abroad are feeling scared and rejected to the point of hiding their identities, and again, they blame Hamas and its supporters for this wretched situation.
So why do Jews who oppose the overwhelming majority get so much attention? Why can’t we just—as the survey data indicates we should—ignore them?
The answer is that the anti-Zionist non-Jews won’t let us. Even though, as I argued recently, the use value of Jewish anti-Zionism is dramatically declining, and even though antisemitic barbs are far more acceptable now on the anti-Zionist left than they used to be, Jewish anti-Zionists can still provide cover for Hamas advocates when they want to push back against the Jewish community’s concerns. For example, the weekly hate marches mounted by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign (PSC) in the United Kingdom usually feature a tiny section of demonstrators who call themselves the “Jewish Bloc” (incidentally, so as not to indulge Jewish “privilege,” the Jewish Bloc has now been joined by a Christian Bloc!)
When the PSC tried to organize a demonstration last month in central London on a Saturday—planning to gather in a location two minutes from a synagogue where Shabbat services would be in full flow—the Jewish Bloc was wheeled out as evidence to counter the protests of Jewish leaders that such an assembly risked intimidating those attending the synagogue and even degenerating into antisemitic violence.
The presence of these Jews also helps to enable antisemitism by diverting the wider public from perceiving the myriad connections between obsessive hatred of Israel and the classical antisemitism many of them learned about in school. Pro-Hamas marches invariably feature signs and placards—invocations of the Holocaust, accusations of Jewish media and financial control—that make the slogan “From the River to the Sea” seem mild by comparison. But if you have a photo of a handful of Jews standing alongside looking unperturbed, then where’s the problem?
By the same token, if someone unschooled in these issues sees the name “Jewish Voice for Peace” above a graphic declaring that “death to Israel” is a “moral imperative,” and adding, “may the entire colony burn to the ground for good” (as posted by that organization’s University of Michigan chapter last year) will they grasp that the message is antisemitic and genocidal? And when these groupings refuse to condemn the antisemitism of a Kanye West or a Yahya Sinwar—but not Elon Musk, and only then because he sits at Donald Trump’s right hand—then isn’t it reasonable to assume that their silence equates to acceptance?
Jewish anti-Zionists like to say that the “Jewish establishment”—i.e. anyone who doesn’t share their toxic opinions about Israel—doesn’t represent Jews. It’s past time for the rest of us to retort, “You don’t represent us,” and reflect that sentiment in the manner in which we run our communities.
Every synagogue, every community center, every charitable foundation, every college Jewish association and every communal representative body should declare that Jewish anti-Zionists are no longer considered part of our community. They should do so on the basis of a definition of anti-Zionism: an ideology that prescribes the elimination through violence of the State of Israel; that traffics in antisemitic messages and imagery in pushing its case; and that willfully distorts the meaning of the term “Zionism” beyond recognition, which is why I prefer to write the term “antizionism” without the hyphen.
Some Jews will bristle at this suggestion because we are a people who enjoy debate and disagreement. But there is debate, and there is incitement. Jewish anti-Zionists actively assist our mortal enemies in the most underhand and insidious way. They are the modern equivalent of the Yevsektsiya, the Jewish department of the Soviet Communist Party, whose role was essentially to crush all expressions of Judaism and Zionism alike. If we don’t banish them from our ranks, they will continue, despite their small number, to dangerously undermine our community and confuse non-Jews who might otherwise be sympathetic.
I should be clear that I am not speaking here of excommunication, which is a religious matter. I am addressing the problem in civic terms, arguing that one of the conditions for participation in privately funded, communally run Jewish institutions should be agreement with the proposition that Israel is a central and valued component of Jewish life after the Holocaust.
Eighteen months after the deadliest assault on Jews since the Holocaust by Islamists who murdered and raped and kidnapped in the name of destroying the “Zionist entity,” that shouldn’t be controversial. By publicly disowning and dissociating from those Jews who have joined the enemy camp, we will send a signal to the pro-Hamas movement—overwhelmingly composed, after all, of non-Jews—that their cover is blown, and that we see them for what they are: not critics of Israel, not even merely as “anti-Zionists,” but as die-hard, uncompromising Jew-haters with whom we will never be at peace.
The post The Vast Majority of US Jews Support Israel. Let’s Act on That Knowledge. first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
UCLA Settles Antisemitism Lawsuit, Agrees to Donate Millions to Jewish Civil Rights Groups
A pro-Hamas demonstrator uses a bullhorn during a protest at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) on March 11, 2025. Photo: Daniel Cole via Reuters Connect.
The University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has agreed to pay $6.45 million to settle a lawsuit which accused it of fostering a discriminatory and antisemitic learning environment during the 2023-2024 academic year.
The sum includes $2.33 million in donations for a consortium of Jewish civil rights organizations, including the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), Academic Engagement Network (AEN), and UCLA’s Hillel International campus chapter; another $320,000 will be awarded to the UCLA Initiative to Combat Antisemitism. The accusers — Yitzchok Frankel, Joshua Ghayoum, and Eden Shemuelian, who were UCLA students at the time of filing, as well as UCLA Health Dr. Kamran Shamsa — will split the remaining $3.6 million.
“Antisemitism harassment, and other forms of intimidation are antithetical to our values and have no place at the University of California,” UC Board of Regents Chair Janet Reilly said in a press release on Tuesday. “We have been clear about where we have fallen short, and we are committed to doing better moving forward. Today’s settlement reflects a critically important goal that we share with the plaintiffs: to foster a safe, secure, and inclusive environment for all members of our community and ensure that there is no room for antisemitism anywhere on campus.”
Filed in June 2024, the suit excoriated UCLA’s handling of a “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” that an anti-Zionist student group erected on campus in the final weeks of the 2024 spring semester, explaining that it was a source of antisemitism from the moment it went up. According to the complaint, students there chanted “death to the Jews,” set up illegal checkpoints through which no one could pass unless they denounced Israel, and ordered campus security assigned there by the university to ensure that no Jews entered it.
Alleging that UCLA refused to clear the encampment despite knowing what was happening there, the complaint charged that administrators put on a “remarkable display of cowardice, appeasement, and illegality.” In doing so, it continued, UCLA allowed a “Jewish Exclusion Zone” on its property, violating its own policies as well as “the basic guarantee of equal access to educational facilities that receive federal funding” and other equal protection laws.
Numerous antisemitic incidents occurred at UCLA before the spring encampment, the complaint added.
Just five days after Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel, the complaint said, anti-Zionist protesters chanted “Itbah El Yahud” at Bruin Plaza, which means “slaughter the Jews” in Arabic. Other incidents included someone’s tearing a chapter page out of Philip Roth’s 2004 novel The Plot Against America, titled “Loudmouth Jew,” and leaving it outside the home of a UCLA faculty member, as well as Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) staging a disturbing demonstration in which its members cudgeled a piñata, to which a picture of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s face was glued, while shouting “beat the Jew.”
In Tuesday’s press release the plaintiffs said in a joint statement with UCLA that “we are pleased with terms today’s settlement. The injunction and other terms UCLA has agreed to demonstrate real progress in the fight against antisemitism.”
UCLA’s legal woes did not end with Tuesday’s settlement. On the same day, the US Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division ruled that UCLA’s response to antisemitic incidents, some of which were cited in the students’ lawsuit, constitutes violations of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. The ruling could threaten the $1 billion in direct funding the university receives from the federal government annually.
“Our investigation into the University of California system has found concerning evidence of systemic antisemitism at UCLA that demands severe accountability from the institution,” Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. “This disgusting breach of civil rights against students will not stand: the [Department of Justice] will force UCLA to pay a heavy price for putting Jewish Americans at risk and continue our ongoing investigations into other campuses in the UC system.”
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
RSS
‘Kill All the Jews’: FBI Investigates Attack at New York Kosher Restaurant as Possible Hate Crime
Illustrative: FBI agents and NYPD officers work near the scene of a reported shooter situation in the Manhattan borough of New York City, US, July 28, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz
A recent assault in New York targeting Jewish diners, who suffered several injuries and said they were also verbally accosted with antisemitic slurs, is being investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) as a possible hate crime, The Algemeiner has learned.
Bita Golbari, 51, a New York resident, told The Algemeiner that the FBI called her on Tuesday to discuss the incident that happened during the early morning hours of July 20 inside and then in front of a kosher restaurant in Queens called Sezam, which serves Russian and Central Asian cuisine. Public affairs officials at the FBI’s New York field office did not respond by press time to a request for comment on the bureau’s involvement in the case.
Officers of the New York City Police Department’s (NYPD) 112th Precinct who were at the scene of the crime filled out two complaint reports about the violent attack that were obtained by The Algemeiner. Neither police report classified the incident as a hate crime, just an assault with an intent to cause injury. The Algemeiner made multiple efforts to speak to the detective in charge of the case but to no avail. The NYPD’s Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Public Information did not respond to a request for comment on why the assault was not being investigated as a possible hate crime.
Golbari was having dinner with her husband and several other Jewish couples at Sezam late at night on July 19 before the violence ensued. She said there was a table nearby with several men and, around midnight, they brought two women from outside the restaurant to join the table. Golbari’s close friend, Elham Sharga, 45, was with her at the restaurant that night.
“From the beginning of the night, I saw there was a table next to us with a few men sitting at it, and they were staring at us. They were looking at our table,” Sharga told The Algemeiner. “My spot [at our table] was really close to them. I was really scared, so I moved my chair to the other side to sit next to my other friend. I didn’t give them attention; I just moved my spot.”
The two women who came into the restaurant at around midnight were responsible for starting the violence and uttered antisemitic slurs, but the men at their table also participated in physically assaulting Golbari’s family and friends, Golbari told The Algemeiner.
The altercation began when Golbari’s group was getting ready to leave the restaurant at around 1 am. Sharga could not find her handbag and noticed that one of the women at the nearby table had taken it, she explained. Sharga approached the woman and asked why she took her bag. In response, the female attacker pulled Elham’s hair and threw her down. The other woman joined in and started hitting Sharga as she remained on the floor.
“Hitting me on my head, my belly, my back, my neck,” Sharga recalled. “They were pulling my hair. And then I heard the other guys come and they all started hitting me. I was thinking I was dying. I was screaming for help. My husband heard and came to help me. Then they started hitting my husband. His face was full of blood. His arm was bleeding.”
Sharga’s husband was pushed, thrown on the floor, punched and kicked, she said.
“I really don’t know how long I was on the floor getting beaten up,” Sharga added. “I saw them then running after my other friends and saying, ‘You guys are Jewish, we wanna kill you all tonight’ … They pushed Bita’s husband. I see everyone screaming and he was on the floor. His head was bleeding. I was bleeding everywhere; I was in pain. They really were killing me. I was getting beaten up from head to toe.”
Sharga was hospitalized following the attack and fractured her ribs. She said she still experiences pain throughout her entire body.
Golbari noticed the violence as she was leaving Sezam, she told The Algemeiner.
“At the end of the night, I’m walking out the door and I see everybody is fighting,” she recalled. “I see my friend Elham on the floor and they [the two women] are kicking and hitting her, punching … and I see my husband and the other people all fighting with the guys.”
Golbari then quickly ran outside the restaurant to call 9-1-1. One of the women who was attacking Sharga saw Golbari go outside and began chasing her down the street.
“She came after me in the street,” Golbari said. “And I tried to hold up one of the cars in the middle of the street and I said, ‘Please call the police, someone is trying to kill me.’ So, she [the driver] rolled down her window and called the police, I think. I saw her phone in her hand. But the girl who was following me, reached me. She grabbed me and she said, ‘What the f–k are you trying to do? Are you trying to call the police on us? We are going to kill all of you Jews.’ And then she punched me so hard in the face I thought I was dead. And I said to myself, ‘She’s going to kill me.’ And I just ran for my life.”
“I crossed the street, I found a guy, I held his hand, and I said, ‘Please, don’t leave my side. Somebody is trying to kill me.’ He said, ‘Are you Jewish?’ I said, ‘Yes.’ And he said, ‘OK, I’m going to help you. It’s OK, stay by me,’” Golbari continued. “He held my hand, and when the girl saw that he was with me, she ran. Her friend [the other attacker] saw that she was running, and she also ran.”
The kind stranger escorted Golbari back to the restaurant, where she found her husband on the floor, bleeding from his lip and head after being brutally attacked. By the time NYPD officers arrived at the scene, all the attackers had fled either by foot or car. No arrests have been made yet. None of the restaurant staff intervened to stop the fighting, which started near the exit and proceeded outside of the establishment.
The manager of Sezam, Andrew, was present when the incident unfolded but did not want to provide his last name. He told The Algemeiner he believes “it was just a common fight between two drunk people. It was nothing extraordinary … They were just fighting. Pushing themselves and that’s it.” He added that the restaurant has been in touch with the NYPD about the incident.
Both Golbari and Sharga told The Algemeiner that the disc jockey performing that evening at Sezam was sitting at the table with the attackers. Sharga also said when she asked the DJ to play Hebrew music that night, he blatantly refused. The manager of Sezam was unwilling to share with The Algemeiner the name of the DJ performing at the restaurant the night of the attack.
The incident came amid a surge in antisemitic hate crimes in New York City following the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, invasion of and massacre across southern Israel. Jews were targeted in a staggering 54 percent of all hate crimes perpetrated in the city last year, according to data issued by the NYPD.
The NYPD complaint report from the early morning hours of July 20 noted that Golbari’s husband was punched in the face and back of the head multiple times. Golbari herself was punched in the face and neck, while Sharga and her husband both suffered several injuries, including to their face, legs, and arms.
Golbari’s husband was taken to the hospital on the night of the assault and remained there the next day as well. He was discharged but has since returned to the hospital twice because of a fever, loss of hearing in one ear, nausea, and severe headaches related to a head concussion and fracture he suffered during the attack, Golbari shared. He also had internal bleeding in his head that has since stabilized. He is still suffering from nausea and headaches.
“This is all because we are Jewish,” Sharga said. “Very sad. We just went out to have dinner. To have fun. Not to have these things happen to us.”
RSS
‘Pod Save America’ Hosts Call on Democrats to Cut All US Military Aid to Israel, No Longer Accept AIPAC Money
Pod Save America hosts on tour. Photo: Screenshot
The hosts of the influential progressive podcast “Pod Save America” — all one-time aides to former US President Barack Obama — on Tuesday called on the future Democratic presidential nominee to cut all funding and military ties with Israel, urging party leaders to adopt a “total mindset change” in their relationship with the Jewish state.
The trio of hosts — Tommy Vietor, Jon Lovett, and Jon Favreau — also said that Democrats should no longer accept money from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), send Israel military aid, or block anti-Israel resolutions at the United Nations. The Obama administration alumni lambasted Israel for deteriorating humanitarian conditions in the Gaza strip and pursuing military action in Lebanon, Iran, and Syria.
There has to be a total mindset change in the Democratic party. When the war ends, we are not going back to the pre-October 7 status quo. pic.twitter.com/Bow5zmYS2v
— Pod Save America (@PodSaveAmerica) July 29, 2025
“The things I want to see Democrats at least calling for is cutting off military assistance to Israel,” Vietor said. “I would like to see talk about sanctioning Israeli government officials that use genocidal rhetoric or talk about ethnic cleansing openly. We should support a ceasefire resolution at the UN.”
“When the war ends, we are not going back to the pre-Oct. 7 status quo,” he added, referring to the period before the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, invasion of and massacre across southern Israel.
Vietor argued that the Democratic Party should not develop close ties to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, decrying former US President Joe Biden’s decision to maintain a tight bond with the Israeli premier. He accused Netanyahu of continuing the war in Gaza for political purposes and said that he attacks Iran, Syria, and Lebanon “when he wants to.”
In the immediate aftermath of the Oct. 7 attacks, Hezbollah, a Lebanese terrorist organization, pummeled northern Israel almost daily with barrages of missiles. The Lebanese Islamist movement fired over 10,000 projectiles at Israel in 2024. About 70,000 Israelis were forced to evacuate their homes in northern Israel and flee to other parts of the country as a result. Israel responded with a blistering campaign targeting key command centers, military leaders, and weapons depots crippling Hezbollah’s military infrastructure.
Both Hamas and Hezbollah are backed by Iran, which the US intelligence community has for years identified as the world’s foremost state sponsor of terrorism.
“Especially if we are going to head into a primary, like, table stakes is going to be no more military aid for Israel,” Lovett added.
The ongoing Israel-Hamas war in Gaza has divided the American political left. Polling suggests that commanding majorities of liberals now express greater empathy for Palestinians than Israelis, representing a massive shift from previous years.
Seemingly in response to a shifting sentiment among liberal voters, the “Pod Save America” hosts have adopted a more adversarial posture against Israel in recent months.