The Trump administration has impounded more than $2 billion in federal funding previously awarded to Harvard University over the institution’s refusal to agree to a wishlist of reforms that Republican lawmakers have long argued will make higher education more meritocratic and less welcoming to anti-Zionists and far-left extremists.

“The administration’s prescription goes beyond the power of the federal government. It violates Harvard’s First Amendment rights and exceeds the statutory limits of the government’s authority under Title VI [of the Civil Rights Act],” Harvard interim president Alan Garber said on Monday in a statement. “It threatens our values as a private institution devoted to the pursuit, production, and dissemination of knowledge. No government — regardless of which party is in power — should dictate what private universities can teach, whom they can admit and hire, and which areas of study and inquiry they can pursue.”

The Trump administration imposed the $2.2 billion penalty on Harvard shorty after Garber’s statement became public, setting off what The Harvard Crimson said stands to be a “historic legal battle” which tests the conservative movement’s power to reform an elite higher education system that, it believes, is hollowing out American values of merit, patriotism, and civic responsibility.

While the immediate cause of the administration’s dispute with Harvard is the explosion of antisemitism seen on the school’s campus following Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel, the conversation on how to respond to that issue has since then evolved into a larger debate over elite higher education’s role in advancing so-called “woke” ideologies that have polarized the American public.

Garber alluded to this fact in Monday’s statement, noting that the Trump administration’s proposed polices for Harvard — or “demands,” as he described them — are as much, if not more, about cultural issues as they are about campus antisemitism. Contained in a letter shared by Garber and reviewed by The Algemeiner, the policies called for “viewpoint diversity in hiring and admissions,” the “discontinuation of [diversity, equity, and inclusion, or DEI, initiatives],” and “reducing forms of governance bloat.” They also implore Harvard to begin “reforming programs with egregious records of antisemitism” and to recalibrate its approach to “student discipline.”

Harvard, Garber said, is unwilling to do more than address campus antisemitism, dismissing the Trump administration’s other ideas as “assertions of power, unmoored from the law, to control teaching and learning at Harvard and to dictate how we operate.”

In response, US President Donald Trump said on Tuesday that he is open to levying severer financial sanctions one the university.

“Perhaps Harvard should lose its Tax Exempt Status and be taxed as a political entity if it keeps pushing political, ideological, and terrorist inspired/supporting ‘sickness?’ [sic],” Trump posted on Truth Social, a social media platform he founded. “Remember, Tax Exempt Status is totally contingent on acting in the PUBLIC INTEREST.”

Meanwhile, former US President Barack Obama on Monday lauded Garber for “rejecting an unlawful and ham-handed attempt to stifle academic freedom,” and former Harvard president Larry Summers, speaking to The Harvard Crimson, said that the school should spend down its $53.2 billion endowment fund to offset the federal government’s cuts.

Others, however, such as pro-Israel activist Shabbos Kestenbaum expressed more opprobrious views of Harvard, accusing it of “fighting Trump harder than it ever fought antisemitism.” Christopher Rufo, a conservative author and resident scholar of the Manhattan Institute, said Trump “has every right to withhold funding” due to the university’s embrace of DEI and holding of segregated graduation ceremonies.

In the past, Rufo has criticized the pro-Israel movement’s method of advocacy, arguing that it risks legitimating “left-wing racialist concepts.”

The Trump administration may ultimately “prevail” in a “protracted” fight against Harvard University, noting that it has not asked for anything that is not supported by the public, Peter Wood, higher education expert and president of the National Association of Scholars, told The Algemeiner on Monday.

“Harvard will use its considerable resources to wage lawfare, and there will be many stages of judicial intervention before this is settled,” Wood said. “The demands by the task force are reasonable and valid, while Harvard’s ‘resistance strategy’ will fail because it is fundamentally based on arrogance. Harvard considers that it is a law unto itself, and it is greatly at odds with the judgement of the American people.”

Wood added, “Harvard is wealthy enough to play out its tactics for a long time, but the university’s supporters will not be pleased to see the institution’s endowment squandered in a losing fight with the federal government.”

The Trump administration last week paused nearly $1.8 billion in combined federal funding to Cornell University and Northwestern University.

In March, it cancelled $400 million in federal contracts and grants for Columbia University, a measure that secured the school’s acceding to a slew of demands the administration put forth as preconditions for restoring the money. Princeton University saw $210 million of its federal grants and funding suspended too, prompting its president, Christopher Eisgruber to say the institution is “committed to fighting antisemitism and all forms of discrimination.” Brown University’s federal funding is also reportedly at risk due to its alleged failing to mount a satisfactory response to the campus antisemitism crisis, as well as its alignment with DEI movement.

“Jewish students studying on elite US campuses continue to fear for their safety amid the relentless antisemitic eruptions that have severely disrupted campus life for more than a year,” US Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a statement last month. “US colleges and universities benefit from enormous public investments funded by US taxpayers. That support is a privilege, and it is contingent on scrupulous adherence to federal antidiscrimination laws.”

Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.

The post Trump Administration Freezes $2 Billion in Federal Funds for Harvard University first appeared on Algemeiner.com.