A US congressional committee threatened to subpoena Columbia University on Thursday, alleging that school officials have delayed sharing evidence and documents that are necessary for investigating its response to antisemitism on the campus.

The US House Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating Columbia since last December, following an explosion of antisemitic incidents in which pro-Hamas zealots chanted antisemitic slogans and, in some cases, beat up Jewish students with impunity. As part of the inquiry the committee has requested a trove of documents, including correspondence between school officials and disciplinary records, generated after Oct. 7 and the onset of the Israel-Hamas war.

In a statement, the committee’s chairwoman, Rep. Virginia Foxx (R-NC) suggested that Columbia has essentially obstructed the body’s investigation.

“Despite repeated requests, Columbia has failed to produce priority items requested by the committee,” Foxx said. “These priority items, which are critical to the investigation, include communications by priority custodians of documents, including multiple members of Columbia’s Board of Trustees; records of Board of Trustees meetings; and requested information on disciplinary cases.”

Foxx added, “In many cases, these items were requested months ago. Columbia’s continued failure to produce these priority items is unacceptable, and if this is not promptly rectified, the committee is prepared to compel their production.”

On Friday, a Columbia University spokesperson told The Algemeiner: “We have received the chairwoman’s letter, and we are reviewing it. We are committed to combating antisemitism and all forms of hate.”

A hailstorm of criticism and legal cases has fallen on the university since anti-Israel students and faculty began a campaign aimed at expelling Zionists from campus and forcing school officials to boycott and divest from Israel. It has been alleged that the school refused to respond to numerous incidents of antisemitic harassment, intimidation, and assault.

“F—k the Jews,” “Death to Jews,” “Jews will not defeat us,” and “From water to water, Palestine will be Arab” were among the chants shouted by students on campus grounds after the tragedy, who allegedly violated the school’s code of conduct and never faced consequences, according to a lawsuit filed by the StandWithUs Center for Legal Justice (SCLJ). Faculty engaged in similar behavior. On Oct. 8, professor Joseph Massad published in Electronic Intifada an essay cheering Hamas’ atrocities in southern Israel the prior day, which included slaughtering children and raping women, as “awesome” and describing men who paraglided into a music festival to kill young people as “the air force of the Palestinian resistance.”

Litigation in that case is ongoing.

Recently, the university settled a lawsuit in which it was accused by a student of neglecting its obligation to foster a safe learning environment amid riotous pro-Hamas protests that were held at the school throughout the final weeks of the academic year.

The resolution of the case, first reported by Reuters, calls for Columbia to hire a “Safe Passage Liaison” who will monitor protests and “walking escorts” who will accompany students whose safety is threatened around the campus. Other details of the settlement include “accommodations” for students whose academic lives are disrupted by protests and new security policies for controlling access to school property.

Filed in April, when anti-Zionist students first erected and began living in a “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” on the campus’ South Lawn, the complaint painted a damning portrait of Columbia’s handling of a situation that quickly exploded into a conflagration in which Jewish students were physically and verbally assaulted, outsiders infiltrated the campus, and protesters cheered terrorism while destroying school property.

The complaint’s main contention was that Columbia grossly erred in establishing virtual learning instead of enforcing school rules that prohibit unauthorized protests and clearing the encampment.

“This response reflects a troubling reality: the campus environment has deteriorated to the point where the risk of violence and harassment is too high to maintain normal academic operations,” the plaintiffs alleged. “This shift to hybrid learning also sends a troubling message: that violence and threats are effective in disrupting the educational experience and will not be met with immediate consequences, if at all.”

In July, thousands of rabbis called on Columbia University president Minouche Shafik to resign over her choosing not to fire four administrators who sent each other text messages which, she said herself, “disturbingly touched on ancient antisemitic tropes” during a panel featuring Jewish speakers.

As previously reported, Columbia administrators Susan Chang-Kim, Cristen Kromm, Matthew Patashnick, and Josef Sorett, who is dean of Columbia College, sent a series of messages — released by the education and workforce committee — which denigrated Jews while spurning their concerns about rising antisemitism and the fate of Israel, denouncing them as “privileged” and venal. The remarks were exchanged amid a deluge of antisemitic incidents at Columbia and specifically denounced Jewish leaders who appeared at the school as panelists to plea for help and explain the link between anti-Zionism and antisemitism.

In response, Shafik, who took office in July 2023, has attempted to assuage concerns that Columbia has become a sanctuary for antisemites.

“We will launch a vigorous program of antisemitism and antidiscrimination [sic] training for faculty and staff this fall, with related training for students under the auspices of university life,” she said in a statement addressing the administrators’ conduct. “Columbia’s leadership team recognizes this as an important moment to implement changes that will build a stronger institution as a result. I know that you all share this commitment.”

Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.

The post US Lawmakers Threaten to Subpoena Columbia University in Antisemitism Probe first appeared on Algemeiner.com.