Uncategorized
A lackluster exhibit gives short shrift to Claude Lanzmann’s legacy — and to the Shoah’s victims
For reasons both political and cultural, it’s a worrying moment in history when New York City dedicates valuable gallery space to pale echoes of exhibits from German-speaking museums. That is currently the case, though, for The Recordings: Voices from the Shoah Tapes — the new exhibition at The New York Historical (formerly The New York Historical Society) and Documents of Injustice: The Case of Freud at the Austrian Cultural Forum NYC.
The Austrian Cultural Forum is a tiny vertical glass and aluminum skyscraper a block away from MoMA in New York’s Midtown East. Built in 2002 on a plot of a townhouse and with that aesthetic in mind, it is a hidden gem. On the ninth floor overlooking St. Patrick’s Cathedral, a single room represents the Freud Museum’s current exhibit of the trove of documents testifying to the legal appropriation of the Freud families’ assets and the murder of Sigmund Freud’s sisters (Freud, his wife and daughter Anna escaped from Austria to London, where he died 22 days after Hitler invaded Poland.) The minimal exhibition comprises six wall banners, a single display case of documents, and a TV screen with four intercut testimonies from Yale’s Fortunoff Video Archive for Holocaust Testimonies. In the videos, Jewish women who grew up in the same district as Freud’s famous Berggasse 19 address bear witness to the sudden absence of legal and social protection after the Nazi Anschluss in March, 1938.
Barely a mile north at the Historical, a bewildering series of absences dog the small but potentially important Shoah exhibit — itself a splinter of the concurrent display at the Jewish Museum of Berlin — Claude Lanzmann: The Recordings.
The most striking absence in a show dedicated to highlighting the audio tapes Claude Lanzmann recorded during the research for his documentary film, is the lack of the film Shoah itself in all its 9-hour sobering majesty: not an excerpt cycling on a wall monitor, not a related screening or two in the auditorium while the show is up — nada. The several stations all have screens showing transcripts and translations next to headphones where two visitors at a time can listen and one larger screen has video testimony that Lanzmann chose not to use.
As Lanzmann told me when I interviewed him for the Forward, at the heart of Shoah are some crucial silences. The Fortunoff video at ACF spells that out a little more in the dedication at the end of the testimonies: “You cannot interview the dead.”
The Recordings, for their part, bear witness to some of the sounds and testimonies that were available to Lanzmann as he embarked upon his filming but chose not to use. The film itself is so arresting, and so epic in scale that, for example, he could exclude all of his research on the atrocities in Lithuania without significantly affecting the final 9 hour-long monument. As the descendant of Lithuanians and after historian Simon Schama’s trip there for PBS, the newly-public testimony from witnesses Lanzmann interviewed in Lithuania at NYH is deeply arresting.
According to Louise Mirror, CEO of NYH, the institution chose to host this shadow show as the United States heads to its 250th birthday to promote democracy “by showing what democracy isn’t.” But that’s at least one step too far into negative space — promoting democracy by showing one instance of fascism, an exhibition for audio tapes that are not on display, tapes that were research for the documentary Shoah that were not used for the documentary. So, yes, the film shows the indifference of the populations of Europe to the (murderous) removal of Jews, but the NYS’ show’s deferrals and absences do not serve that same idea.
Unlike the modest but appropriate setting of the Freud room which, sharing the same name as the Viennese show, is explicitly a satellite show,vThe Recordings has its own name and is jammed into the first third of a single long exhibition hall with Stirring the Melting Pot. That latter is a putatively companion exhibition of NYH archive photos showing the multicultural history of New York City. The logic is clear, explicit even, but not good — New York has always been a place of refuge: where Jews, Hungarians (Jews and not), Ukrainians, Ethiopians (Jews and not), Italians and many others could make a new home.
It’s scant solace for the ethnic cleansing of Europe and this unfortunate juxtaposition shows an almost obscene disproportionality.
Any significant exhibition about the Shoah must center loss in some way or other. The multi-year catastrophe we call by that name was the unthinkably vast systematic destruction of a European civilization and murder of its people by a modern, developed, mechanized European nation state. The extent of the civilization is essentially unrepresentable, its annihilation is unfathomable, and the bureaucratised slaughter of millions incomprehensible. So not only do we feel grief and horror at the inhumanity of it, but we also feel loss at our own inability to grasp the enormity of the events.
To put up a few neighborhood photos of the New York “Melting Pot” after listening to the negative space defining the yawning abyss at the moral heart of modern culture feels a little like bringing a box of chocolates to the Tree of Life shivas. It’s inadequate and inappropriate, if you want to do a Holocaust exhibition, do it properly, if you want to promote democracy, do it properly.
The occasion for the exhibit, apart from America’s birthday, is the 100th anniversary of Lanzmann’s birth, 80 years since Auschwitz was liberated and 40 years since Shoah was released. Lanzmann left all his archive to the Jewish Museum of Berlin, where the main show is, but little or none of that material has either physically or spiritually come to New York. Sadly, though there are significant moments of horror and enlightenment, this show is a poor commemoration of a great man, a catastrophic historical loss and an immense cultural achievement.
The post A lackluster exhibit gives short shrift to Claude Lanzmann’s legacy — and to the Shoah’s victims appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Pope Leo Says Those Who Wage War Are Thieves Stealing Away Our Peaceful Future
Pope Leo XIV looks on as he meets with Catholic religious education teachers attending a national meeting organised by the Italian Bishops’ Conference (CEI), in the Paul VI Hall at the Vatican, April 25, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Yara Nardi
Pope Leo on Sunday described those who wage wars and appropriate the earth’s resources as thieves who rob the world of a peaceful future, issuing a warning about the use of nuclear power on the anniversary of the Chernobyl reactor accident.
Ukraine is commemorating the 40th anniversary of the world’s worst nuclear disaster on Sunday amid lingering fears that Russia’s four-year-old war could spark a repeat of the tragedy.
In his weekly address after the Angelus prayer, the Pontiff said the Chernobyl accident had left a mark on humankind’s collective conscience.
“It remains a warning over the use of ever more powerful technologies,” the Pope, who has just returned from a 10-day tour across four African nations, said.
“I hope that at all decision-making levels, wisdom and responsibility always prevail, so that atomic power can always be used to support life and peace,” he added.
Commenting on the Gospel of the day, which contained the metaphor of a sheep thief, Pope Leo said thieves came under many appearances, listing as examples “superficial lifestyles driven by consumerism,” prejudices and wrong ideas.
“And let’s not forget also those thieves who, by plundering the earth’s resources, by fighting bloody wars or feeding evil in whichever form, are simply taking away from all of us the chance of a future of peace and serenity,” he added.
Leo, the first US pontiff, has attracted the ire of President Donald Trump after becoming more outspoken against war and despotism.
Uncategorized
UK’s Starmer and Trump Discuss ‘Urgent Need’ to Restore Shipping in Strait of Hormuz
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and US President Donald Trump (not pictured) hold a bilateral meeting at Trump Turnberry golf course in Turnberry, Scotland, Britain, July 28, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and US President Donald Trump discussed the urgent need to get shipping moving again in the Strait of Hormuz during a call on Sunday, a Downing Street spokesperson said.
“The leaders discussed the urgent need to get shipping moving again in the Strait of Hormuz, given the severe consequences for the global economy and cost of living for people in the UK and globally,” the spokesperson for Starmer’s office said in a statement.
“The prime minister shared the latest progress on his joint initiative with President (Emmanuel) Macron to restore freedom of navigation,” the spokesperson added.
Uncategorized
Palestinian Leader’s Loyalists Win Local Elections, Including Some Seats in Gaza
A Palestinian man votes during the municipal election at a polling station in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip April 25, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa
Loyalists of President Mahmoud Abbas won most races in Palestinian municipal elections, election officials said on Sunday, in a vote that for the first time in nearly two decades included a city in the Gaza Strip run by rival Hamas.
Saturday’s ballot marked the first elections of any kind in Gaza since 2006 and the first Palestinian polls since the Gaza war began more than two years ago with Hamas’ cross‑border attack on southern Israel.
Abbas’ West Bank–based Palestinian Authority (PA) said the inclusion of the Gaza city Deir al‑Balah, which suffered less damage than other areas of the coastal territory during the war, was intended to show that Gaza was an inseparable part of a future Palestinian state.
The elections, in which voter turnout was low, had been held “at a highly sensitive moment amid complex challenges and exceptional circumstances,” Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa said as results were announced on Sunday.
But they represented “an important first step in a broader national process aimed at strengthening democratic life … and ultimately achieving the unity of the homeland,” he said.
POSSIBLE INDICATOR OF HAMAS SUPPORT
Hamas, which ousted the PA from Gaza in 2007, did not formally nominate candidates in Gaza and boycotted the race in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, where Fatah’s victory was widely expected.
But some candidates on one of the Deir al-Balah lists were widely seen by residents and analysts as aligned with the movement, making the vote a potential indicator of support for the Islamist group.
Preliminary results showed that the list, known as Deir al‑Balah Brings Us Together, won only two of the 15 seats contested in Gaza.
The Nahdat Deir al‑Balah list, backed by Abbas’ Fatah party and the Western-backed PA, secured six seats. The remaining seats were won by two other Gaza-based groups, Future of Deir al‑Balah and Peace and Building, not affiliated with either faction.
Abbas loyalists swept the election in the West Bank, running unchallenged in many seats.
Fatah spokesperson Abdul Fattah Dawla noted that turnout was close to that for the last municipal elections in the West Bank, in 2022, praising voters for participating despite ongoing violence by Israel.
“By electing figures linked to Fatah, voters appear to be seeking unrestricted international support for municipal governance and a gradual political shift that could extend beyond the local level,” said Palestinian political analyst Reham Ouda.
The recent war has left much of Gaza reduced to rubble, with many residents displaced and focused on survival. Israel has continued conducting strikes despite an October ceasefire.
In Gaza, voter turnout reached just 23 percent, while in the West Bank it was 56 percent, according to Chairman of the Central Elections Commission Rami al‑Hamdallah.
Al‑Hamdallah said some of the ballot boxes and voting equipment did not make it into the enclave because of Israeli security restrictions, though those challenges were overcome.
Hamas’ Gaza spokesperson, Hazem Qassem, downplayed the significance of the election results, saying that they had no impact on wider national issues.
