Uncategorized
Are Pro-Israel Influencers Really Being Paid $7,000 Per Post?
Palestinian militants stand guard on the day that hostages held in Gaza since the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attack, are handed over to the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC), as part of a ceasefire and hostages-prisoners swap deal between Hamas and Israel, in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Oct. 13, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ramadan Abed
Last month, the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft claimed that Israel is paying popular social-media personalities an average of $7,000 per post on TikTok and Instagram to promote pro-Israel content.
Citing “previously unreported” documents filed under the US Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), the foreign policy think tank and research institute said Bridges Partners – a Washington-based firm working with Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs through Havas Media Group Germany – had invoiced roughly $900,000 for an “Influencer Campaign” running from June to November 2025.
According to the think tank, once supposed administrative and production costs were subtracted, about $552,946 remained “for influencers,” producing an estimated 75–90 posts. From that, it concluded each post must be worth roughly $6,000–$7,000.
The claim spread quickly across social media and was repeated by several media outlets. But a review of the same FARA filing shows that this interpretation simply doesn’t hold up.
What the Documents Actually Show
-
It’s a campaign budget, not pay-per-post.
The insertion order lists month-by-month “Influencer Campaign (USD)” miscellaneous costs that cover both “payments for influencers and production.” It’s a single, pooled campaign budget — not a rate card, not a per-post payment schedule. -
Post numbers are estimates, not evidence.
Each phase mentions “Post volume: approx. 25–30.” These are planning projections, not verified outputs. Dividing total costs by these estimates to produce a “per-post” figure is simply bad math. -
Influencer numbers are projected, not proven.
The document says “5–6 influencers begin creating content,” then “3–4 additional activated,” and two “3–4 more.” That totals around 14–18 influencers planned, but no names or contracts appear anywhere. It’s a staffing plan, not a confirmed roster. -
No breakdown of how the money was spent.
The filing never specifies how much of the budget went to influencers versus production, travel, editing, or management. The claim that “$552,946 was left for influencers” is a guess, not a fact. -
The “second document” isn’t separate — it’s just an appendix.
The appendix to the same FARA filing lists legal fees, consulting services, and banking costs. It doesn’t tie those expenses to influencer work or identify anyone who was paid to post. You can’t subtract those numbers and pretend the remainder equals “influencer pay.” -
It’s a proposal, not a signed contract.
Each section of the order is marked “No Contract,” showing these are budgeted phases and estimates, not finalized payment agreements or invoices.
The Bottom Line
Nothing in the FARA filing supports the claim that influencers were paid $7,000 per post — or any specific per-post amount at all. The $900,000 represents a broad campaign allocation covering all costs of content development and management over several months, not a set fee to creators for each upload.
If readers need perspective, many governments run formal programs to promote their narratives and counter hostile information operations online. Israel’s MFA explicitly maintains Digital/Communications & Digital Diplomacy offices that share official information, engage audiences, and combat online antisemitism/misinformation via social channels. In short, openly declared public-diplomacy activity, not covert pay-per-post schemes.
Sensational averages — like “$7,000 per post” — are viral by design. They are attention-grabbing and apparently “specific.” But specificity does not equal sourcing. The Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft’s $7,000 figure is a plausible arithmetic result of a chain of assumptions (inferred headcount + estimated post volumes + guessed allocation of budget to creators).
If reporters, platforms, and readers want to know what creators were actually paid, the only definitive evidence would be contracts, invoices named to individual creators, or bank records showing payments to named influencers. Absent that, the responsible framing is that the filing shows a planned, blended campaign. It does not prove $7,000-per-post payouts.
There’s nothing unusual about governments running public diplomacy campaigns. In Israel’s case, such efforts are a necessity. Since the Hamas attacks on October 7, 2023, antisemitism and anti-Israel disinformation have exploded online – from Hamas-produced propaganda videos to coordinated social-media campaigns designed to delegitimize Israel and to glorify terrorism. Israel’s enemies haven’t only fought with rockets and rifles, but with trending hashtags, deep-fake “evidence,” and doctored images shared millions of times before facts can catch up.
It’s precisely this information war that explains why Israel invests in counter-messaging and digital diplomacy. Such activity is transparent, routine, and defensive in nature: the modern equivalent of a press office, not a covert “influencer army.”
The “$7,000-a-video” claim will no doubt keep spreading online, because sensational numbers travel faster than nuance. But the FARA filing does not prove secret pay-per-post operations. It shows a modest, bureaucratic public-diplomacy campaign. Once again, Israel finds itself not only defending its borders, but defending truth itself in an arena where lies go viral long before the first fact-check lands.
The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.
Uncategorized
‘For As Long As Necessary’: Katz Says Campaign Against Iran Entering Decisive Stage
Israel’s Defense Minister Israel Katz and his Greek counterpart Nikos Dendias make statements to the press, at the Ministry of Defense in Athens Greece, Jan. 20, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki
i24 News – Israel Katz said Saturday that the confrontation with Iran had entered a “decisive phase,” as US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets continued and regional tensions escalated.
Speaking after a security assessment at Israel’s defense headquarters alongside Eyal Zamir, chief of staff of the Israel Defense Forces, and senior military and intelligence officials, the Israeli defense minister said the campaign against the Islamic Republic would continue “for as long as necessary.”
“The global and regional struggle against Iran, led by American President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, is intensifying and entering its decisive phase,” Katz said.
Katz also praised US strikes on Kharg Island, a key Iranian oil hub, describing them as a “severe blow” to the Iranian regime. He said the attacks were an appropriate response to Iranian threats against the strategic Strait of Hormuz and to what he called Tehran’s attempts to pressure the international community.
At the same time, Katz said the Israeli Air Force was continuing a “powerful wave of attacks” against targets in Tehran and other parts of Iran.
He accused the Iranian leadership of using “regional and global terrorism” and strategic blackmail in an effort to deter Israel and the United States from pursuing their military campaign, warning that such actions would be met with a “strong and uncompromising response.”
Katz added that the outcome of the conflict would ultimately depend on the Iranian population. “Only the Iranian people can put an end to this situation through a determined struggle, until the overthrow of the terrorist regime and the salvation of Iran,” he said.
According to the minister, the confrontation now pits the Iranian regime’s determination to survive against growing military pressure from Israel and its allies.
Uncategorized
Trump Rejects Efforts to Launch Iran Ceasefire Talks, Sources Say
US President Donald Trump speaks on the day he honors reigning Major League Soccer (MLS) champion Inter Miami CF players and team officials with an event in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, US, March 5, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst
President Donald Trump’s administration has rebuffed efforts by Middle Eastern allies to start diplomatic negotiations aimed at ending the Iran war that started two weeks ago with a massive US-Israeli air assault, according to three sources familiar with the efforts.
Iran, for its part, has rejected the possibility of any ceasefire until US and Israeli strikes end, two senior Iranian sources told Reuters, adding that several countries had been trying to mediate an end to the conflict.
The lack of interest from Washington and Tehran suggests both sides are digging in for an extended conflict, even as the widening war inflicts civilian casualties and Iran’s closure of the Strait of Hormuz sends oil prices soaring.
US strikes on Iran’s Kharg Island, the country’s main oil export hub, on Friday night underscored Trump’s determination to press ahead with his military assault. Iran’s new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has vowed to keep the Strait of Hormuz shut and threatened to step up attacks on neighboring countries.
The war has killed more than 2,000 people, mostly in Iran, and created the biggest-ever oil supply disruption as maritime traffic has halted in the Strait of Hormuz, through which a fifth of the world’s oil is transported.
ATTEMPTS TO OPEN LINES OF COMMUNICATION
Oman, which mediated talks before the war, has tried multiple times to open a line of communication, but the White House has made clear it is not interested, according to two sources, who like others in this story were granted anonymity in order to speak freely about diplomatic matters.
A senior White House official confirmed Trump has rebuffed those efforts to start talks and is focused on pressing ahead with the war to further weaken Tehran’s military capabilities.
“He’s not interested in that right now, and we’re going to continue with the mission unabated. Maybe there’s a day, but not right now,” the official said.
During the first week of the war, Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform that Iran’s leadership and military were so battered by US-Israeli strikes that they wanted to talk, but that it was “Too Late!” He has a history of shifting foreign policy stances without warning, making it hard to rule out that he might test the waters for restarting diplomacy.
“President Trump said new potential leadership in Iran has indicated they want to talk and eventually will talk. For now, Operation Epic Fury continues unabated,” a second senior White House official said when asked to comment on this story.
The Iranian sources said Tehran has rejected efforts by several countries to negotiate a ceasefire until the US and Israel end their airstrikes and meet Iran’s demands, which include a permanent end to US and Israeli attacks and compensation as part of a ceasefire.
Egypt, which was involved in mediation before the war, has also tried to reopen communications, according to three security and diplomatic sources. While the efforts do not appear to have made progress, they have secured some military restraint from neighboring countries hit by Iran, according to one of the sources.
Egypt’s foreign ministry, the government of Oman and the Iranian government did not respond to requests for comment.
POSITIONS HARDEN ON ALL SIDES
The war’s impact on global oil markets has significantly increased the cost for the United States.
Some US officials and advisers to Trump urge a quick end to the war, warning that surging gasoline prices could exact a high political price from the president’s Republican Party, with US midterm elections looming.
Others are pressing Trump to maintain the offensive against the Islamic Republic to destroy its missile program and prevent it from obtaining a nuclear weapon, according to Reuters reporting.
Trump’s rejection of diplomatic efforts could indicate that, for now, the administration has no plans for a quick end to the war.
Indeed, both the United States and Iran appear even less willing to engage than during the opening days of the war, when senior US officials reached out to Oman to discuss de-escalating, according to several sources.
One source said Iran’s top security official, Ali Larijani, and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi had also sought to use Oman as a conduit for ceasefire discussions that would have involved U.S. Vice President JD Vance.
But those discussions have not materialized.
Instead, Iran’s position has hardened, said a third senior Iranian source.
“Whatever was communicated previously through the diplomatic channels is irrelevant now,” said the source.
“The Guards strongly believe that if they lose control over the Strait of Hormuz, Iran will lose the war,” the source added, referring to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, an elite paramilitary force that controls large parts of the economy.
“Therefore, the Guards will not accept any ceasefire, ceasefire talks, or diplomatic efforts, and Iran’s political leaders will not engage in such talks despite attempts by several countries.”
Uncategorized
US Strikes More Than 90 Iranian Military Targets on Kharg Island, CENTCOM Says
A satellite image shows an oil terminal at Kharg Island, Iran, February 25, 2026. Photo: 2026 Planet Labs PBC/Handout via REUTERS
United States forces executed a large-scale precision strike on Kharg Island in Iran on Friday night, the US Central Command said on Saturday.
“US forces successfully struck more than 90 Iranian military targets on Kharg Island, while preserving the oil infrastructure,” CENTCOM said.
The strike destroyed naval mine storage facilities, missile storage bunkers, and multiple other military sites, the US military said in a post on X.
President Donald Trump threatened on Friday to strike the oil infrastructure of Iran’s Kharg Island hub, unless Tehran stopped attacking vessels in the Strait of Hormuz.