Uncategorized
Best Gambling Sites for Canadians in 2026: Gambling Nerd Ranks the Top Picks
Gambling Nerd approaches Canadian gambling sites with a simple question: does the platform actually work well for someone in Canada? Accepting Canadian registrations is only the beginning. CAD accounts, Interac availability, withdrawal times, licensing, provincial restrictions, games and sportsbook coverage can make two apparently similar sites very different once real money is involved.
There is also no universal “best” gambling site. An NHL bettor looking for player props has different priorities from someone interested in slots, live blackjack or poker-style games. Gambling Nerd’s Nerd Nook Hub adds an educational layer to that comparison by examining concepts such as RTP, house edge, probability, sportsbook margins and odds.
For a broader look at the market, the Gambling Nerd guide to gambling sites in Canada covers Canadian casinos, sports betting, banking and regional considerations.
Best Gambling Sites for Canadians in 2026
For Canadian players, Gambling Nerd currently places IZZI Casino first overall, with Betway standing out for slots, North Casino for its welcome package and Hell Spin for poker variants. Sports Interaction is also particularly relevant to players who want casino games and Canadian-focused sports betting within the same platform.
The important distinction is that these sites have different strengths. Instead of treating the ranking as five interchangeable casinos, Canadian players can use it to identify the platform that most closely matches how they actually play.
| Rank | Gambling Site | Gambling Nerd Score | Best For | CAD Support | Interac | Sportsbook |
| 1 | IZZI Casino | 4.5/5 | Overall experience | Yes | Check current cashier | No |
| 2 | Betway | 4.5/5 | Online slots | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| 3 | North Casino | 4.5/5 | Welcome package | Yes | Yes | No |
| 4 | Hell Spin | 4.5/5 | Poker variants & game variety | Yes | Yes | No |
| 5 | Sports Interaction | 4/5 | Sports + casino | Yes | Available payment options vary | Yes |
Payment methods, promotions and availability can change, so current conditions should always be checked before opening or funding an account.
1. IZZI Casino – Best Overall for Canadians
Gambling Nerd score: 4.5/5
IZZI takes the overall position because its strengths aren’t concentrated in a single area. Gambling Nerd’s Canadian research highlights its game variety, promotions and flexible banking, while its minimum deposit starts at $5.
The casino has more than 600 video slots alongside digital table games, live blackjack, roulette and baccarat. Providers include Yggdrasil, Betsoft, BGaming and Evolution.
Banking includes cards, e-wallets and several cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and Tether.
That makes IZZI a better fit for someone looking for an all-around casino than a player choosing exclusively according to one promotion.
Main advantage: Strong balance between games, banking and promotions.
Potential drawback: Players specifically looking for Interac should confirm its current availability in the cashier before depositing.
Best for: Canadians who want a balanced casino rather than choosing primarily according to bonus size.
2. Betway – Best for Canadian Slot Players
Gambling Nerd score: 4.5/5
Betway is Gambling Nerd’s specialist pick for slots.
Its library includes established titles and providers, while progressive jackpot games provide another reason it stands apart from smaller casino platforms. Canadian players can also access familiar banking methods, including Interac.
Betway additionally operates a sportsbook, making it relevant to players who might spend Saturday on NHL markets and use the casino at another time without maintaining completely separate accounts.
The drawback is that its promotions shouldn’t automatically be considered the strongest simply because the platform itself is well established. Bonus terms still need to be compared independently.
Main advantage: Strong slot selection combined with casino and sportsbook products.
Potential drawback: Bonus value should be compared with newer, more promotion-focused competitors.
Best for: Slot players who value established software providers and also want access to sports betting.
3. North Casino – Best Welcome Package
Gambling Nerd score: 4.5/5
North Casino demonstrates why bonus size and bonus value aren’t necessarily the same thing.
Its Canadian welcome package advertises up to C5,000acrossthefirstfivedeposits.Thefirstdepositreceivesa100%matchuptoC1,000, followed by four 50% matches worth up to C$1,000 each.
The headline number is substantial, but so is another figure: 60x wagering requirements apply to the package.
That needs to be considered before opting in.
North Casino also supports CAD and Canadian-friendly banking methods including Interac. Its game library covers thousands of slots alongside table and live dealer games.
Main advantage: Large multi-deposit welcome package and broad game selection.
Potential drawback: The 60x wagering requirement makes reading the complete bonus terms particularly important.
Best for: Canadians who prioritize promotions but are comfortable evaluating wagering requirements before claiming them.
4. Hell Spin – Best for Poker Variants and Banking Choice
Gambling Nerd score: 4.5/5
Hell Spin is particularly useful for demonstrating the difference between a poker room and casino poker.
It doesn’t operate a traditional player-versus-player poker room, but its large casino library includes games such as Casino Hold’em and Caribbean Stud alongside live dealer poker formats.
Its banking selection is another strength for Canadians. Options include Interac, Interac e-Transfer, cards, e-wallets and cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin, Litecoin and Ethereum.
The casino has more than 4,000 games, so players who regularly move between slots, table games and live dealer products have considerably more variety than they would at a smaller specialist platform.
Main advantage: Extensive game library and broad Canadian banking support.
Potential drawback: Players seeking traditional online poker against other players will need a dedicated poker room instead.
Best for: Casino players who enjoy poker variants and want Interac and crypto payment choices.
5. Sports Interaction – Best for Canadian Sports Fans
Gambling Nerd score: 4/5
Sports Interaction fills a different role in this ranking.
Its biggest attraction is the combination of a sportsbook and casino with a distinctly Canadian focus. CAD support and coverage of sports popular with Canadian audiences make it particularly relevant to people who consider sports betting their primary activity and casino games a secondary feature.
For an NHL bettor, that may be more useful than joining a casino with thousands more slots but a weaker sportsbook.
The trade-off is that its casino isn’t as extensive as some casino-first competitors.
Main advantage: Strong combination of Canadian sports betting and casino gaming.
Potential drawback: Casino-first players can find larger game libraries elsewhere.
Best for: Canadians who primarily follow sports but want casino games available through the same platform.
Best Gambling Sites That Accept Canadians
The phrase “Canadian gambling site” can be misleading because it can describe several different things.
A site might be operated within a provincial regulatory framework. Another could be an international gambling site that accepts Canadian customers. A third may specifically support Canadian dollars and local payment methods.
Those characteristics aren’t interchangeable.
This matters particularly when evaluating international sites. Accessibility tells you whether an account can be created from a location. Licensing tells you which regulatory framework governs the operator.
The Gambling Nerd-check: Don’t assume that accepting Canadian players means a gambling site is regulated by a Canadian provincial authority.
Which Canadian Gambling Site Fits You?
Someone who mainly plays slots should start the comparison with Betway. Its strength is its slot library rather than simply having the largest headline promotion.
A player prioritizing a substantial welcome package might look more closely at North Casino, but its 60x wagering requirement should be evaluated alongside the C$5,000 advertised package.
Hell Spin makes more sense for someone who regularly switches among slots, live dealer tables and poker-style casino games.
Sports Interaction has the clearest role for sports fans who want to combine betting with occasional casino play.
IZZI is the more balanced choice when none of those individual specializations dominates the decision.
This is ultimately more useful than declaring that one gambling site must be best for every Canadian.
Which Canadian Gambling Sites Accept Interac?
Interac is one of the clearest ways a gambling site can adapt its banking experience for Canadians.
Betway, North Casino and Hell Spin are among the ranked platforms offering Interac support. However, players should check the cashier before depositing because payment availability can change and deposit options aren’t necessarily identical to withdrawal options.
| Gambling Site | Interac | CAD | What to Check |
| Betway | Yes | Yes | Current deposit and withdrawal limits |
| North Casino | Yes | Yes | Minimums and maximums |
| Hell Spin | Yes | Yes | Interac vs Interac e-Transfer options |
Interac transactions can be considerably easier for someone accustomed to Canadian online banking than dealing with foreign currency or unfamiliar payment processors.
The detail beginners often miss is two-way support.
A casino might allow a payment method for deposits but require another method for withdrawals.
The Gambling Nerd-check: Before making an Interac deposit, verify whether Interac is also available for withdrawals on your account.
Why CAD Support Matters
Imagine starting with a C$200 bankroll.
With a CAD account, a C$10 wager represents exactly 5% of that starting amount. The deposit, balance, individual bets and eventual withdrawal remain easy to interpret in the same currency.
A USD-denominated account introduces exchange rates into that process.
That doesn’t automatically make a USD gambling account unsuitable for Canadians. It simply creates an additional variable, particularly if conversion fees or exchange-rate changes apply.
For a Canadian choosing between otherwise similar sites, native CAD support can therefore be a genuinely useful feature rather than a minor convenience.
The Gambling Nerd-check: Confirm the account’s base currency before depositing, not when requesting your first withdrawal.
Which Canadian Gambling Sites Have the Fastest Withdrawals?
There isn’t a single payout time that applies to every Canadian gambling site.
The payment method can matter almost as much as the operator.
Interac and e-wallet withdrawals can often be relatively quick. Cards and bank transfers may require additional business days. Crypto can process particularly quickly after the casino approves a withdrawal.
That last distinction matters.
Casino processing time describes how long the operator takes to approve and send a withdrawal.
Payment processing time describes what happens after the transaction enters Interac, an e-wallet, banking network or blockchain.
Gambling Nerd’s Canadian methodology includes testing withdrawals rather than relying entirely on advertised payout claims. Its real-money casino testing has also found particularly fast crypto withdrawals at some operators.
The Gambling Nerd-check: When a site says “fast payouts,” determine whether that claim refers to casino approval time, payment processing or the entire withdrawal.
Real Money Gambling Sites in Canada: What Does That Actually Mean?
“Real money gambling site” is a broad term.
It can describe an online casino where money is wagered on slots or blackjack, a sportsbook accepting wagers on the Stanley Cup, an online poker room or a platform combining several products.
It also distinguishes these platforms from free-play casino games and social casino products where the economic model and prize structure can work differently.
For beginners, this distinction matters because different real-money products require different comparisons.
A slot player should understand RTP and volatility. A sports bettor should understand odds and sportsbook margin. A poker player needs to distinguish games played against the house from poker played against other users.
The word “gambling” connects them, but the underlying products are very different.
Best Gambling Sites for Canadian Sports Fans
Canadian sports bettors have several locally relevant markets to consider.
NHL coverage is an obvious priority. A Toronto Maple Leafs or Edmonton Oilers fan may want player props, period markets, puck lines and live betting in addition to a simple game winner.
CFL bettors might care more about market depth around regular-season games and the Grey Cup.
Toronto Raptors fans introduce NBA player props and same-game markets, while Toronto Blue Jays followers need MLB coverage across a much longer season. NFL betting also remains important despite Canada not having an NFL franchise.
The best sportsbook shouldn’t therefore be determined solely by its welcome offer.
Check whether it actually provides strong coverage of the sports you follow, then compare the prices.
Two sportsbooks can offer the same Maple Leafs moneyline at different odds. That difference directly changes the potential return.
The Gambling Nerd-check: Compare sportsbook odds before sportsbook bonuses. A promotion is temporary; pricing affects every qualifying wager.
What Casino Games Should Canadians Compare?
A casino advertising 5,000 games isn’t automatically better than one offering 1,500.
The more useful question is what those games actually are.
Slot players should look at software providers, RTP information, volatility and bonus mechanics. Jackpot players may prioritize progressive networks. Live casino players need to consider table availability, limits and streaming quality.
Table rules can also affect the mathematics.
European roulette generally uses one zero, while standard American roulette adds a double zero. That changes the house edge despite both games being called roulette.
Blackjack works similarly. Rules concerning dealer actions, doubling and payouts can alter the mathematical return.
This is why Gambling Nerd treats game quality as more than a count of how many thumbnails appear in the lobby.
Are Bigger Canadian Gambling Bonuses Better?
Consider two hypothetical promotions.
Casino A offers 200% up to C$2,000.
Casino B offers 100% up to C$500.
The first appears obviously better until the terms are opened.
If Casino A requires 60x wagering while Casino B requires 20x, the comparison becomes substantially more complicated. Game contribution, expiry dates, maximum bets and cash-out restrictions can change it further.
North Casino provides a practical example. Its C$5,000 package is one of its most noticeable features, but the 60x wagering requirement belongs in the same conversation.
The Gambling Nerd-check: Don’t compare bonus percentages until you’ve compared what must be wagered to use them.
Best Gambling Sites in Ontario vs the Rest of Canada
Ontario needs to be treated separately when discussing Canadian online gambling.
The province has a competitive regulated iGaming market overseen through Ontario’s provincial framework. Players participating within that market use operators authorized for Ontario.
International gambling sites available elsewhere in Canada shouldn’t simply be presented as Ontario alternatives.
This means a national ranking needs an important qualification: a site that Gambling Nerd evaluates for players in Alberta, British Columbia or Quebec may not be the appropriate recommendation for someone located in Ontario.
Ontario players should confirm that an operator is authorized for the provincial market before creating an account.
The Gambling Nerd-check: A national “Canada” ranking doesn’t override provincial availability. Check your province before evaluating the rest of the site’s features.
Do the Best Gambling Sites Change by Province?
Yes, because Canada doesn’t have one identical online gambling environment from coast to coast.
Ontario has its competitive regulated iGaming framework. British Columbia operates PlayNow through the British Columbia Lottery Corporation. Quebec has its provincial offering through Loto-Québec, while other provinces follow their own models.
That creates a distinction between what exists provincially and which international gambling sites may be accessible from different parts of Canada.
Alberta is another particularly relevant market for online gambling research, while Quebec players may additionally care about French-language accessibility.
The practical lesson is simple: check provincial availability before spending time comparing bonuses, games or payment methods.
What Should Quebec Players Look For?
Quebec introduces several additional considerations.
CAD support and familiar banking remain important, but French-language accessibility may also matter. Players should determine whether the site itself, its terms and its customer support are available in a language they’re comfortable using.
Quebec also operates its own provincial gambling products through Loto-Québec.
International sites should therefore be evaluated separately rather than being presented as though they operate within the same provincial framework.
For a beginner, understanding that distinction is more important than immediately comparing welcome bonuses.
How Gambling Nerd Tests Canadian Gambling Sites
Gambling Nerd’s rankings aren’t based solely on reading promotional pages.
The site’s Canadian methodology includes practical testing of the player experience, including registration, deposits, mobile usability and withdrawal requests. Licensing, game software, customer support and bonus terms are also evaluated.
Canadian reviews introduce additional questions.
Does the platform support CAD? Which Canadian banking methods are actually available? How does the site handle withdrawals? Is it appropriate for the player’s province?
That testing matters because advertised specifications don’t always describe the complete user experience.
A casino can advertise thousands of games but have inconvenient banking. Another might promote fast withdrawals while requiring a lengthy internal approval process. A huge welcome offer can lose much of its appeal once the wagering conditions are examined.
The goal is therefore to assess the platform rather than one headline feature.
Nerd Nook Hub: The Site Doesn’t Change the Mathematics
The Nerd Nook Hub approach becomes particularly useful once players move beyond comparing operators.
Consider a slot advertised with 96% theoretical RTP.
That does not mean someone depositing C100shouldexpecttofinishasinglesessionwithC96. RTP is a theoretical long-run measurement calculated across a very large number of plays.
Sports betting has its own mathematics.
Decimal odds of 2.00 correspond to a 50% break-even probability before accounting for how the wider market has been priced. If another sportsbook offers a better price on the exact same outcome, the underlying basketball or hockey game hasn’t changed—the price has.
Bonuses, site design and payment methods don’t alter these underlying mathematical principles.
That’s why choosing a gambling site and understanding the games are two separate decisions.
The Gambling Nerd-Check Before Joining a Canadian Gambling Site
Start with location rather than the welcome bonus. Confirm that the platform is appropriate for your province and understand which regulatory framework applies.
Then check the currency. If you want to manage your bankroll in Canadian dollars, confirm CAD support.
Next comes banking. Verify that your preferred deposit method is available and, crucially, determine how you will withdraw.
After that, examine what you actually want to play. A sports bettor should compare markets and odds. A slot player should look at providers and games. Someone interested in both needs a platform that performs well in both areas.
Only then does it make sense to evaluate the welcome offer.
That produces a useful rule for Canadian beginners:
Don’t ask only whether a gambling site accepts Canadians. Ask whether it actually works well for Canadians.
Frequently Asked Questions About Canadian Gambling Sites
What are the best gambling sites in Canada?
Gambling Nerd currently ranks IZZI as its best overall option for Canadian casino players, while Betway stands out for slots, North Casino for its welcome package and Hell Spin for poker-style casino games. Sports Interaction is particularly relevant to players who prioritize sports betting alongside casino gaming.
Which gambling sites accept Canadians?
Numerous international gambling sites accept Canadian customers, but availability can differ by province. Acceptance from Canada also shouldn’t be confused with regulation by a Canadian provincial authority.
Which Canadian gambling sites accept Interac?
Betway, North Casino and Hell Spin are among the ranked sites offering Interac banking. Players should verify current cashier availability and whether Interac is supported for both deposits and withdrawals.
Which gambling sites accept Canadian dollars?
Several gambling sites targeting Canadians offer CAD-denominated accounts. CAD support can make deposits, bankroll tracking and withdrawals easier to understand by removing the need to continually translate balances into another currency.
What are the best gambling sites outside Ontario?
The answer depends on the player’s province and preferred product. Gambling Nerd evaluates international sites including IZZI, Betway, North Casino and Hell Spin for Canadian audiences, while Ontario requires separate treatment because of its regulated provincial market.
Are gambling sites different in Ontario?
Yes. Ontario operates a distinct competitive regulated online gambling market. Players in Ontario should verify that a platform is authorized for use within the province rather than assuming that a general Canadian recommendation applies there.
How long do Canadian gambling sites take to pay out?
It depends on the operator and withdrawal method. E-wallets, Interac and cryptocurrency can be relatively fast, while cards and bank transfers may take longer. Casino approval time should also be distinguished from the time required by the payment network.
What should Canadians check before joining a gambling site?
Province availability, licensing, CAD support, deposit and withdrawal methods, payout conditions, games or sports markets, bonus terms and player-control features should all be checked before depositing.
Finding the Best Gambling Site for You
The best gambling site for a Canadian NHL bettor doesn’t necessarily have to be the best casino for a slot player.
Someone following the Maple Leafs may prioritize hockey markets and sportsbook pricing. A slots player might care about software providers and Interac withdrawals. A Quebec user could put French-language support higher on the list, while an Ontario resident first needs to establish whether the operator is authorized for the provincial market.
That is why Gambling Nerd’s Canadian approach works better as a decision process than as a simple list of five brands.
For Gambling Nerd, the best gambling site for Canadians isn’t necessarily the platform advertising the biggest bonus. It’s the one that combines suitable games or betting markets, transparent terms, appropriate licensing and banking options that genuinely work for the individual Canadian player.
About Gambling Nerd
Gambling Nerd is the editorial brand and collective byline of GamblingNerd.com, an independent gambling media website that publishes experience-based reviews, guides, and analysis of online casinos, sportsbooks, and poker sites for gamblers of all experience levels worldwide. Its Nerd Nook Hub provides educational resources that break down sports betting mathematics, casino game theory, probability, odds, and other key concepts to help players make more informed decisions.
Uncategorized
The two ways to see Oct. 7 – and how they’ll influence the Israeli election
There are two ways to look at the Oct. 7 attacks, and which way you do will determine, to a large degree, whether you want to see Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu survive the next election.
The first view is that Oct. 7 proved the Israeli-Palestinian conflict cannot be solved. The second is that it proved the conflict cannot be allowed to remain unresolved.
These conclusions point in almost opposite directions, yet both begin with something Israelis learned, or thought they learned, from the same horrific day. One says there is no point trying to mollify the Palestinians, because hatred of Israel runs too deep. The other says that leaving millions of Palestinians indefinitely in their current condition will produce catastrophe again and again. The tragedy is that Oct. 7 supplied powerful evidence for both.
The first view is not without foundation. Even to Israelis (and people across the world) who have long sought a peaceful accommodation, it was shocking to see the sheer joy of the Hamas terrorists as they butchered families while filming their own barbarism, calling parents to brag, then dragging innocents into Gaza where crowds wildly cheered.
But the real shock was the support for this in the West Bank and Gaza – polls showed two-thirds to three-quarters of Palestinians approved – suggesting coexistence is impossible. Rarely have polls been more devastating. As a result, many Israelis lost sympathy for Palestinians and concluded that a cleansing inferno is required. The brutal war that followed certainly reflected that.
The second way to see Oct. 7 is that the Palestinian issue cannot be ignored – that the situation of the Palestinians was so unacceptable that something terrible was bound to happen. Many Israelis have trouble accepting this, because it does not really explain Hamas, which would fight Israel in any case, even if it were led by a far-left government willing to hand over to it every inch of the West Bank and Gaza and divide Jerusalem. But it might explain why so many Palestinians – even ones not in denial about the facts – were prepared to support it.
This view also offers at least one reason why the propaganda war waged by Hamas and its supporters has been so successful. There are others – including antisemitism and an outright denial of Israel’s right to exist . But the fundamentally unacceptable situation of the Palestinians is a big one, to be sure.
The combination of these factors yielded stunning results and contributed to an unfair vilification of the country that continues to frustrate Israeli voters.
By Oct. 9, before Israel had even identified all its dead or invaded Gaza, accusations of “genocide” were already circulating online, then among activists, NGOs, academics and eventually governments. By Oct. 13, protests denouncing “genocide” took place in London. On Oct 17, the Qatar-based Arab Center for Research & Policy Studies held a symposium called “The War on Gaza: Palestinian Defiance and Resistance against Orchestrated Genocide and Expulsion.”
Within weeks, South Africa accused Israel of “genocide” at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, invoking the “crime of crimes,” a term most associated with the Holocaust, the Armenian Genocide and Rwanda. “This libel is powered by a relentless campaign of indictment that engraves a lie into collective memory,” says Adam Fisher, one of Israel’s top venture capitalists, who has researched the propaganda campaign in detail.
When Israel’s military entered Gaza, it faced an enemy that had deliberately embedded weapons caches, command centers and rocket launchers in homes and crowded neighborhoods, including hospitals, schools, mosques and UN sites. Hamas fighters vanished into tunnels beneath civilian areas, turning every dead child, collapsed building and grieving parent into material for a global indictment of Israel on social media. The strategy was clear: maximize civilian suffering, isolate Israel internationally, weaken American Jewish support and ultimately erode U.S. backing.
The implication is that Oct. 7 was a response to Palestinian suffering. The suffering is real, but Hamas was never defending Palestinians. The Iran-backed jihadist group has long sought to destroy Israel rather than establish a Palestinian state, and its campaign of terrorism after the 1993 Oslo Accords helped destroy the peace process by driving Israelis to the right.
Still, none of this makes the pre-Oct. 7 reality acceptable. In the West Bank, three million Palestinians live alongside some 500,000 Jewish settlers without equal rights, largely under military occupation, while extremist settlers have increasingly engaged in violence with the government and military often looking the other way. In Gaza, more than two million Palestinians endured a devastating Israeli-Egyptian blockade because Hamas ruled the Strip. It failed to prevent Hamas from arming itself while making civilian life miserable.
On Al Jazeera recently I was placed opposite a young Gazan named Ahmed Abo Askar, introduced as a humanitarian activist and engineering student. He said he had gone three days without eating, and looked like it. He hoped an aid flotilla might get through and then smuggle out his ailing father.
I tried to put things in perspective, explaining about Hamas and the need to be rid of it. Ahmed answered emotionally: “Israel, not Hamas, they are the ones who killed my sister, killed their children and their entire family on 6 November 2023. Not all of Palestinian people are Hamas. The goods, why it’s not entering? ‘It’s because of Hamas.’ We are not Hamas. We are human in the end.”
Everything I said was true – but he won the argument anyway, because he was a decent person suffering. No history lesson trumps that.
The insane situation has traumatized Palestinians and Israelis in parallel ways. The Palestinians – who are rooted in a conservative society disinclined to compromise – have been made, in large numbers, desperate enough to support a nihilistic movement like Hamas, which is truly genocidal against Jews.
As for Israelis, it has made huge numbers of them stop wanting to think seriously about Palestinians except through the lens of security and punishment. Some openly fantasize about expulsion. Empathy is viewed as naïve. Oct. 7 made Israelis a little crazy too – exactly per the plan of Hamas.
So the Israeli opposition — people deeply hostile to Netanyahu and his extremist coalition — is mostly afraid to touch the Palestinian issue at all in the campaign ahead of the Oct. 27 election, preferring to focus on Netanyahu’s epic domestic failures. Politically, the calculation is correct.
That is where the two interpretations of Oct. 7 attach themselves to the choice Israelis face in this election. Netanyahu has spent much of his career arguing, in practice if not always explicitly, that the Palestinian problem can be managed rather than solved: Contain Gaza, maintain Israeli control of the West Bank, expand settlements, periodically use overwhelming force and resist international pressure for Palestinian statehood.
If the lesson of Oct. 7 is that Palestinian hostility is essentially immutable and territorial compromise merely brings the enemy closer, then Netanyahu’s basic worldview survives despite his catastrophic failure on Oct. 7. The answer is deterrence and permanent Israeli security control — not another attempt at political reconciliation.
Gadi Eisenkot, the main challenger on the center-left, is more complicated. He is hardly offering Israelis a new Oslo: He has explicitly rejected a Palestinian state in the near- or medium-term and says the old two-state formula is unrealistic after Oct. 7. But he has also opposed more West Bank settlements and other measures that would make eventual territorial separation impossible.And he has long warned against Israel sliding into a binational state.
The implication is less a peace plan than a direction: Preserve the possibility of separating Israelis and Palestinians, change the conditions that perpetuate the conflict, and leave open a political horizon even if nobody can presently say exactly when it nears and how it ends. In that sense, the choice is not between Netanyahu and a dove. It is between continuing to manage an apparently permanent conflict and a government that might at least begin trying to move toward a possible peace.
But if Israelis conclude that Palestinians only understand force – which, by the way, Hamas clearly doesn’t – we’re guaranteeing a death spiral. Such a problem left to fester, without any attempt to change the dynamic, will blow up again and again. So after the election, if Netanyahu and his destructive right wing coalition are mercifully gone, this will need to be addressed in new and creative ways.
Both views of Oct. 7 rest on a foundation of facts. The invasion and massacre – and the widespread support for it among Palestinians – simultaneously dismantled both the Israeli left’s confidence in Palestinian intentions, and the Israeli right’s belief that the Palestinian problem could be indefinitely managed.
But it also proved that distrust is not a policy. Israel can build fences, destroy armies, assassinate commanders and punish those who attack it. What it cannot do is make millions of Palestinians disappear. If there is no political answer to that reality, eventually there will be another violent one.
The post The two ways to see Oct. 7 – and how they’ll influence the Israeli election appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Country star Zach Bryan dons ‘Free Palestine’ shirt at Gillette Stadium
(JTA) — Zach Bryan, one of the world’s most popular country artists, appeared onstage wearing a shirt that read “Free Palestine” on Saturday night at Gillette Stadium outside Boston.
The venue was at the center of the dispute between stadium owner Robert Kraft and rapper Macklemore, who was blocked from performing there after Kraft objected to statements and imagery from an earlier stop on the tour and a “broader history” that Kraft characterized as antisemitic.
Representatives for Bryan and Kraft did not respond to requests for comment.
Bryan, whose biggest hits include “Something in the Orange” and his Kacey Musgraves duet, “I Remember Everything,” broke a stadium attendance record with 73,538 people on hand, the stadium said in an X post.
Kraft, the billionaire owner of the New England Patriots, helped lead an effort by stadium owners to block Macklemore from performing at their venues as Ed Sheeran’s opening act. Sheeran tried to distance himself from the venue owners’ actions, but his backup band and other acts subsequently withdrew from the tour.
This article originally appeared on JTA.org.
The post Country star Zach Bryan dons ‘Free Palestine’ shirt at Gillette Stadium appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Britain’s Green Party adopts ‘Zionism is racism’ motion
(JTA) — Britain’s Green Party on Sunday adopted a policy equating Zionism with racism, a move that immediately drew condemnation from the Israeli government and sparked concerns among some Jewish party members and the broader Jewish community.
The motion has also caused divisions within the party itself, with leader Zack Polanski, who is Jewish, skipping the vote and the party’s five sitting members of parliament issuing a statement on the policy.
Passing with 1,022 votes to 813 votes at the left-wing party’s annual conference, the motion argues that Zionism as an ideology is racist as it promotes “ethnonationalism,” and “privileges one ethnic group on the basis of the subjugation of others.”
It also declares the Greens to be an “anti-Zionist party” and that Zionism, the movement to develop and protect a Jewish state in Israel, will be “treated as any other form of racism.”
The motion also supports the establishment of a “single democratic Palestinian State in all of historic Palestine with Jerusalem as its capital.”
Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a press statement, “Today, the Green Party in Britain ceased to act as a political party and became a body that gives legitimacy to terrorism. The Greens have adopted not only the green of Hamas, but also its ideology: the elimination of the State of Israel through armed struggle.”
“The shocking resolution adopted today legitimizes armed struggle, calls for a Palestinian state ‘from the river to the sea’ – meaning the destruction of the State of Israel – and labels as ‘racist’ the aspiration of the Jewish people for self-determination,” the ministry statement said, adding that it “goes far beyond the boundaries of legitimate political debate.”
The ministry called on other political parties in Britain, particularly the ruling Labour Party, to reject the resolution.
In a letter to Polanski ahead of the vote, the Board of Deputies of British Jewry, Jewish Leadership Council and Community Security Trust said they had “acute concerns” about the motion and called on the party leaders to oppose it. They wrote that urgent action was needed to address growing antisemitism within the Green Party. Such a motion, they wrote, “fuels hatred of Jews.”
The five representatives of the Greens who sit in Parliament – MPs Ellie Chowns, Adrian Ramsay, Siân Berry, Carla Denyer and Hannah Spencer – issued a joint statement condemning the actions of the current Israeli government led by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu but emphasizing, “We know there is no conflict between supporting the rights of Palestinians and the rights of Jewish people.”
A clause was proposed to protect Jewish Greens by clarifying that the motion should not be used to “pressure, proscribe or discipline” those affiliated with synagogues or other Jewish groups that describe themselves as Zionist. The clause was voted down.
This article originally appeared on JTA.org.
The post Britain’s Green Party adopts ‘Zionism is racism’ motion appeared first on The Forward.
