Connect with us

Uncategorized

Breaking the Equation in the North: The Key Is Not Just Military, It’s Civil

Smoke rises after an Israeli strike on Beirut’s southern suburbs, Lebanon, March 11, 2026, following an escalation between Hezbollah and Israel amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran. Photo: REUTERS/Raghed Waked

On February 28, the world witnessed the commencement of Operation “Roaring Lion,” a watershed moment in Middle Eastern security. This strategic collaboration between the Israel Defense Forces and US forces represents a direct challenge to the Iranian-led radical Shia axis, which has long held the region in a stranglehold.

As Hezbollah joins the fray, indiscriminately expanding its rocket fire toward central and southern Israel, we are once again forced to confront a fateful, recurring question: How do we prevent the next inevitable ceasefire from becoming nothing more than the starting line for Hezbollah’s next rearmament?

The failure of the November 2024 ceasefire agreement serves as a grim reminder that diplomatic promises without enforcement are a death sentence. That agreement was systematically violated by Hezbollah, while the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF), predictably, either could not or would not assert the state’s sovereignty.

This vacuum of authority necessitated hundreds of Israeli surgical strikes to thwart the reconstruction of terror infrastructure in South Lebanon. To ensure that the residents of Northern Israel can finally raise their children in long-term security, we must stop repeating the same failed patterns while expecting a different result. We require a holistic approach, one that doesn’t just clip Hezbollah’s wings, but dismantles its very foundation.

True victory requires the IDF to continue deepening its strikes against Hezbollah’s military infrastructure, but with a specific political end state in mind: enabling Lebanese sovereignty. This objective is not merely about removing an immediate tactical threat; it is about creating a power vacuum that necessitates action from the Lebanese state.

For too long, the Lebanese Armed Forces (LAF) and the Lebanese government have remained weak and deterred, paralyzed by Hezbollah’s military dominance. However, following Operation “Northern Arrows” in late 2024 and the current pressures of 2026, we are witnessing the first genuine flickers of courage. Lebanese politicians and media figures are no longer whispering their dissent; they are acting on it.

A profound example of this shift is the recent detention of Ali Barrou, a prominent pro-Hezbollah journalist and mouthpiece for the organization’s propaganda, by state security forces. Even more significant is the extraordinary declaration by the Lebanese Foreign Minister, calling for the expulsion of the Iranian ambassador from Beirut.

To the casual observer, these might seem like isolated diplomatic or legal maneuvers, but in the Lebanese context, they represent a tectonic shift in the internal balance of power. These actions signal that the paralyzing fear of Hezbollah is beginning to erode, and the state apparatus is finally attempting to reclaim its authority from its foreign-backed occupier.

Ending the organization’s military dominance is the essential fuel for this domestic defiance; without it, the Lebanese state will never find the spine to enforce its own laws, such as the constitutional ban on non-state actors holding weapons.

Yet, military pressure alone is insufficient because Hezbollah is not merely a militia; it is a “state within a state.” For decades, it has built a parallel civil society that is the secret to its endurance and the primary source of its grip on the Shia community.

Central to this is Al-Qard Al-Hasan, which functions as Hezbollah’s private, unregulated banking system. Because it operates outside the global banking network, it allows the organization to launder money and provide interest-free loans to its supporters, effectively bypassing international sanctions and “buying” the loyalty of the Shia street.

Similarly, the Jihad al-Bina construction wing serves as the organization’s shadow ministry of housing, rebuilding homes damaged in conflicts to ensure that supporters remain dependent on Hezbollah rather than the Lebanese government. These efforts are bolstered by welfare networks like Mu’asasat al-Shahid (The Martyr’s Foundation), which provides lifelong financial support to the families of fallen operatives.

By systematically targeting the financial and logistical pillars of these institutions, Israel can decouple the Shia population from Hezbollah’s influence. We are already seeing the cracks in this facade: the organization’s current inability to pay rent for displaced Shia supporters whose homes were destroyed has sparked unprecedented internal friction and public grumbling.

The opportunity to cut these lifelines has reached a critical, historical juncture. The geopolitical landscape of 2026 is vastly different from previous rounds of conflict. The collapse of the Assad regime in Syria and the Maduro regime in Venezuela has shattered the “Narcoterror” routes that previously funneled billions of dollars into Hezbollah’s coffers via captagon and cocaine trafficking.

Combined with the domestic instability in Iran, which has forced Tehran to prioritize its own survival over its proxies, a rare window has opened to “dry up” Hezbollah’s resources. This shift is not a naive scenario; it is an attainable strategic goal.

If Israel does not succumb to international pressures for a premature ceasefire before these civil and military conditions are met, we can fundamentally change the regional equation. Only when Hezbollah loses its military assets and its ability to provide for the “Shia Street” can the Lebanese army be compelled to enforce true sovereignty. This is the only path toward a “New Lebanon” — a state that no longer poses an existential threat to its neighbors.

Only on that “clear day” can we begin to discuss diplomatic processes that lead to lasting peace rather than just a temporary pause in an endless war.

Lt. Col. (Res.) Eyal Dror served in the Israel Defense Forces for 31 years, specializing in civil-military coordination and humanitarian operations. He served as the Head of the Operations Branch for COGAT (Coordination of Government Activities in the Territories) and was the founding commander of “Operation Good Neighbor,” the IDF’s humanitarian mission to Syrian civilians. He is a resident of Kibbutz Dafna near the Lebanese border, and the author of Embracing the Enemy.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Pope Leo Says Those Who Wage War Are Thieves Stealing Away Our Peaceful Future

Pope Leo XIV looks on as he meets with Catholic religious education teachers attending a national meeting organised by the Italian Bishops’ Conference (CEI), in the Paul VI Hall at the Vatican, April 25, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Yara Nardi

Pope Leo on Sunday described those who wage wars and appropriate the earth’s resources as thieves who rob the world of a peaceful future, issuing a warning about the use of nuclear power on the anniversary of the Chernobyl reactor accident.

Ukraine is commemorating the 40th anniversary of the world’s worst nuclear disaster on Sunday amid lingering fears that Russia’s four-year-old war could spark a repeat of the tragedy.

In his weekly address after the Angelus prayer, the Pontiff said the Chernobyl accident had left a mark on humankind’s collective conscience.

“It remains a warning over the use of ever more powerful technologies,” the Pope, who has just returned from a 10-day tour across four African nations, said.

“I hope that at all decision-making levels, wisdom and responsibility always prevail, so that atomic power can always be used to support life and peace,” he added.

Commenting on the Gospel of the day, which contained the metaphor of a sheep thief, Pope Leo said thieves came under many appearances, listing as examples “superficial lifestyles driven by consumerism,” prejudices and wrong ideas.

“And let’s not forget also those thieves who, by plundering the earth’s resources, by fighting bloody wars or feeding evil in whichever form, are simply taking away from all of us the chance of a future of peace and serenity,” he added.

Leo, the first US pontiff, has attracted the ire of President Donald Trump after becoming more outspoken against war and despotism.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

UK’s Starmer and Trump Discuss ‘Urgent Need’ to Restore Shipping in Strait of Hormuz

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and US President Donald Trump (not pictured) hold a bilateral meeting at Trump Turnberry golf course in Turnberry, Scotland, Britain, July 28, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and US President Donald Trump discussed the urgent need to get shipping moving again in the Strait of Hormuz during a call on Sunday, a Downing Street spokesperson said.

“The leaders discussed the urgent need to get shipping moving again in the Strait of Hormuz, given the severe consequences for the global economy and cost of living for people in the UK and globally,” the spokesperson for Starmer’s office said in a statement.

“The prime minister shared the latest progress on his joint initiative with President (Emmanuel) Macron to restore freedom of navigation,” the spokesperson added.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Palestinian Leader’s Loyalists Win Local Elections, Including Some Seats in Gaza

A Palestinian man votes during the municipal election at a polling station in Deir al-Balah, central Gaza Strip April 25, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Mahmoud Issa

Loyalists of President Mahmoud Abbas won most races in Palestinian municipal elections, election officials said on Sunday, in a vote that for the first time in nearly two decades included a city in the Gaza Strip run by rival Hamas.

Saturday’s ballot marked the first elections of any kind in Gaza since 2006 and the first Palestinian polls since the Gaza war began more than two years ago with Hamas’ cross‑border attack on southern Israel.

Abbas’ West Bank–based Palestinian Authority (PA) said the inclusion of the Gaza city Deir al‑Balah, which suffered less damage than other areas of the coastal territory during the war, was intended to show that Gaza was an inseparable part of a future Palestinian state.

The elections, in which voter turnout was low, had been held “at a highly sensitive moment amid complex challenges and exceptional circumstances,” Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa said as results were announced on Sunday.

But they represented “an important first step in a broader national process aimed at strengthening democratic life … and ultimately achieving the unity of the homeland,” he said.

POSSIBLE INDICATOR OF HAMAS SUPPORT

Hamas, which ousted the PA from Gaza in 2007, did not formally nominate candidates in Gaza and boycotted the race in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, where Fatah’s victory was widely expected.

But some candidates on one of the Deir al-Balah lists were widely seen by residents and analysts as aligned with the movement, making the vote a potential indicator of support for the Islamist group.

Preliminary results showed that the list, known as Deir al‑Balah Brings Us Together, won only two of the 15 seats contested in Gaza.

The Nahdat Deir al‑Balah list, backed by Abbas’ Fatah party and the Western-backed PA, secured six seats. The remaining seats were won by two other Gaza-based groups, Future of Deir al‑Balah and Peace and Building, not affiliated with either faction.

Abbas loyalists swept the election in the West Bank, running unchallenged in many seats.

Fatah spokesperson Abdul Fattah Dawla noted that turnout was close to that for the last municipal elections in the West Bank, in 2022, praising voters for participating despite ongoing violence by Israel.

“By electing figures linked to Fatah, voters appear to be seeking unrestricted international support for municipal governance and a gradual political shift that could extend beyond the local level,” said Palestinian political analyst Reham Ouda.

The recent war has left much of Gaza reduced to rubble, with many residents displaced and focused on survival. Israel has continued conducting strikes despite an October ceasefire.

In Gaza, voter turnout reached just 23 percent, while in the West Bank it was 56 percent, according to Chairman of the Central Elections Commission Rami al‑Hamdallah.

Al‑Hamdallah said some of the ballot boxes and voting equipment did not make it into the enclave because of Israeli security restrictions, though those challenges were overcome.

Hamas’ Gaza spokesperson, Hazem Qassem, downplayed the significance of the election results, saying that they had no impact on wider national issues.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News