(JTA) — President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have said they don’t want to see a renewal of the war against Iran – but they are issuing stark public warnings to Tehran that could bring the simmering conflict to a boil.

Trump endorsed Netanyahu for Prime Minister on Sunday, explaining that his leadership was critical to any renewed Iran campaign.

A third U.S. aircraft carrier is expected to arrive in the Middle East soon, amid signs that Washington is preparing for a possible resumption of hostilities, even though Israel’s Oct. 27 election and the American midterms on Nov. 3 are looming.

In multiple interviews, including with Channel 14, Netanyahu stressed that, “If Iran makes a mistake and tries to attack us, it will simply make the mistake of its life.” But he added, “It’s not convenient for us” for war to resume weeks before a national election in a country with no absentee voting.

Trump, for his part, told reporters in Atlanta last week, “Wait til you see what we do to Iran.”

Israeli experts have warned that renewed conflict is only a matter of time as an uneasy standoff has continued, with Iran disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz from where 20% of the world’s oil flows. At the same time, the U.S. is maintaining its economic pressure on Tehran.

High oil prices have risen 46% to $104 per barrel since the Feb. 28 attacks, pushing gasoline prices up 46% to $4.36 per gallon.That increase could give Trump another incentive for another strike, which would renew the war that was paused in April.

“Without a diplomatic settlement, the chances of escalation are very high,” Danny Citrinowicz, a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies, told JTA.

Trump has been unable to achieve a diplomatic agreement. Both Tehran and Washington believe they won the two-month war earlier this year. In practice, however, the Islamic regime is still in power with capacity to recoup its nuclear and ballistic missile losses and continues to exert some control in the Strait. All of which makes it difficult for Israel and the U.S. to show that they won.

“Trump cannot declare victory now, but he also cannot leave without doing something,” said Citrinowicz, who was also the former head of the Iran branch in the Israeli military intelligence directorate’s Research and Analysis Division. “On the other hand, the Iranians cannot allow the naval blockade to continue, so they will keep attacking tankers.”

Avner Vilan, a former senior Israeli security official and an expert on Iran, said “Trump has said he won’t attack before the midterm elections, and I think he has good reasons to hold off.”

He stressed, however, that the risk of escalation certainly exists. “We’re in a situation where both sides continue to exert pressure on each other, without any lasting agreement in place,” he said. “Everyone is on edge, and all it would take is one significant incident to send things spiraling out of control.”

Gil Murciano, CEO of Mitvim, the Israeli Institute for Regional Foreign Policies, said the unpopularity of the war with Iran among the American public makes a U.S.-initiated escalation before the midterm elections less likely. A Pew Research Center poll released last week found that 64% of Americans disapprove of how President Donald Trump is handling U.S. military action against Iran.

A poll conducted by the Institute for National Security Studies last month found that Israelis are divided over whether Israel should launch a preemptive strike on Iran, with opponents slightly outnumbering supporters.

The New York Times reported that officials in the Trump administration had discussed a short, intense campaign lasting about three days, focused on Iran’s missile and drone arsenal, potentially alongside strikes on energy infrastructure and Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps headquarters.

The Atlantic reported that the White House has asked the Pentagon to develop strike options against Iranian targets that could be carried out ahead of the midterm elections.

“A three-day campaign that would, for example, include a strike on Pickaxe Mount would allow Trump to say that he had obliterated Iran’s nuclear project, won the war and was ending the conflict,” Citrinowicz said. “That is one option. Another is to strike Iranian infrastructure facilities.” He cautioned, however, that even a planned three-day campaign could lead to a much broader and more prolonged escalation.

Mitvim’s Murciano said the main factor that could lead the Trump administration and Israel to launch another military campaign is the concern that “Iran could rebuild its capacity to produce surface-to-surface missiles and restore its drone capabilities in a way that would allow it to attack Israel and other countries in the region, as well as strengthen its ability to disrupt shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.”

He added that another key concern for Israel and the U.S. is the possibility of Iran making a breakthrough toward developing a nuclear weapon.

Vilan, the former Israeli security official, stressed that Israel’s interests do not fully align with those of the U.S.. “For Israel, a nuclear-armed Iran would pose a paramount strategic threat, and Iran must not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons,” he said.

“For Trump, preventing Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon is an important goal, but he also wants to end the war, reopen the Strait of Hormuz and bring down energy prices,” he added. “Another military campaign could actually take him further away from those objectives.”

Trump and other administration officials have said publicly they believe Iran is at a point of weakness. “Trump may think that Iran is so weak that just one more push will make it collapse. I think that is a mistake,” Citrinowicz said.

The analysts believe an escalation is more likely after the midterm elections.

Murciano noted that if Trump loses the midterm elections and loses his ability to shape domestic policy without control of Congress, he may shift his focus toward cementing his foreign policy legacy.

Vilan cautioned that while some of the political constraints on Trump may ease after the midterm elections, that does not necessarily make another military campaign against Iran worthwhile.

“If the goal is to force Iran into a nuclear deal, it needs to be explained why another round of strikes would achieve what previous strikes have not,” he said. “It is hard to see how additional military force would change Iran’s position. If the goal is to bring down the regime, it is equally unclear how another round of strikes would bring that about — and, in particular, whether it could be achieved in the next two years, before a new president takes office in the White House,” the former senior Israeli security official said.

Iran could also initiate an escalation itself if it believes that Israel or the U.S. is preparing to attack, said Citrinowicz.

“It does not want to be caught by surprise for a third time. The likelihood of that happening is higher than it was in the past, but the Iranians still prefer a gradual escalation over a broad and immediate one,” he said.

Vilan added that “the Iranian regime is facing a dilemma. On the one hand, the economic pressure on it is immense, and time is not necessarily on its side. On the other hand, it knows that an all-out war could threaten its survival.”

Another factor that could come into play is the Houthis, Iran-backed rebels in Yemen who have seized significant territory along the Red Sea coast in recent weeks and disrupted shipping through the Bab el-Mandeb Strait, adding to pressure on the global economy.

“The Houthis are a very important factor in the regional conflict, and their recent gains illustrate the limits of American military superiority,” Vilan said.

Their impact on the prospects of another campaign against Iran could cut both ways, he added. “As the campaign in Yemen becomes more complicated, the Americans have less incentive to open another front. On the other hand, a major escalation by the Houthis could draw the U.S. into a broader military engagement, potentially bringing an escalation with Iran closer.”

Meanwhile, diplomatic contacts between the U.S. and Iran continue through intermediaries. The New York Times reported that the White House believes progress has been made in the talks.

This article originally appeared on JTA.org.

The post A renewed Iran war is only a matter of time, Israeli experts warn appeared first on The Forward.

(JTA) — BOULDER, Colo. – Voters in this Rocky Mountain foothills college town could soon elect a mayor who won’t affirm that Israel should exist, just a year and a half after an antisemitic terror attack struck the city’s historic downtown.

Protests against Israel’s operations in Gaza cropped up in Boulder in the months following the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas attacks on Israel. Such rallies not only became a fixture on street corners, but they also seeped into the chambers of City Council – transforming public comment periods about local issues into heated clashes about a conflict 7,000 miles away. At the center of these clashes was often Taishya Adams, a council member who had primarily run on climate resilience and affordability issues during her 2023 campaign.

But the Israel-Palestinian conflict hit much closer to home after a June 2025 firebombing on Boulder’s Pearl Street Mall. The attack killed one person and injured a dozen others who were participating in a Boulder Run for Their Lives walk, aimed at drawing attention to the Israeli hostages who were still being held by Hamas in Gaza at that time. The day after the attack, Adams was the sole council member who refused to sign a collective statement condemning it.

“The Israel genocide has been one of the defining moments of my tenure,” Adams, who is now running for mayor, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency.

Asked whether she believes the state of Israel should exist, she said, “I know that people want to hear this easy yes/no, but I don’t believe that creating false binaries is going to lead to our collective liberation.”

Adams, who joined the council just two months after the Oct. 7 attacks, added that it doesn’t matter whether she believes Israel should exist.

“Any state that exists has the responsibility to administer equal rights, whether that’s Israel or the United States or any state,” she said.

Although she shares similar positions on issues such as climate change and affordable housing with many of her fellow council members, Adams has split from her colleagues – including her top opponent, incumbent Mayor Aaron Brockett – on Israel.

When asked by JTA if he believes Israel should exist, Brockett replied, “I do,” noting that this is his personal belief and not relevant to his role as a city councilor.

Adams earned the endorsement of Boulder County Democratic Socialists of America soon after announcing her candidacy for mayor this summer. But another powerful local faction, Boulder Progressives, chose to back Brockett, listing Adams as a second option in the city’s ranked-choice voting system.

While internal city council divisions on Israel-Gaza were apparent from the get-go, tensions escalated following the Pearl Street Mall attack.

The day after the attack, city council members formally denounced it as an “act of violence and terror.” Their statement, issued with the mayor and city manager, recognized “in the strongest possible terms that this was a targeted, antisemitic attack.” The authors stressed that such “dread and insecurity, backed by a history of persecution, are all too familiar” to Jewish residents.

“We cannot – and will not – allow antisemitism to become normalized here,” their statement added, stressing a need to “refrain from any commentary or speculation about the suspect.”

Rather than sign the statement, Adams issued her own the next day, explaining that her decision “did not reflect any lack of empathy or support for Jewish community members – or an attempt to somehow justify the horrific act committed by this individual.”

Instead, she said she withheld her signature because her colleagues wouldn’t link the attack to both antisemitism and “anti-Zionism.” Stating that the attacker had used the latter term in previous remarks, Adams argued that its inclusion would allow them “to be real about the possible motivations for this heinous act.”

“Denying our community the full truth about the attack denies us the ability to fully protect ourselves and each other,” she stated. “I would have been eager to sign the statement if my colleagues could agree to my edit.”

Asked by JTA why this was a dealbreaker, Adams again referenced previous comments made by the attacker, Mohamed Sabry Soliman. Videos that described God as “greater than Zionists,” allegedly recorded by Soliman before the firebombing, circulated on an Arabic-language Telegram channel named for Hamas’ attacks on Israel, according to the Anti-Defamation League. (Channel moderators posted the videos, but the ADL said it had not authenticated them.) Separately, an FBI affidavit said Soliman told investigators “that he wanted to kill all Zionist people and wished they were all dead.”

In retrospect, Adams said that she would have preferred if Soliman’s language had focused on “the actions of the Israeli government” rather than on Zionism, thereby “uncoupling the actions of a state from the actions of a people.” She said that at his May 7 plea and sentencing hearing, he apologized to the Jewish people and was specific about his stance against “allowing any state to commit war crimes and to commit a genocide.”

“I was raised that a half truth is a lie,” Adams added. “And the full truth of what he said and what he did was not exclusive to people who identify as Jewish.”

Regardless of his motivation, Adams said she condemned Soliman’s actions and stressed that “an eye for an eye is a no.” But standing with the victims, she explained, means telling them “the potential causes for the harm that was done to them.”

Brockett, who was mayor at the time, disputed his opponent’s approach, recalling how in the difficult aftermath of the attack, he and most of his colleagues wanted to “make a very strong, unequivocal statement” that condemned the incident as antisemitic.

“We were reeling from the magnitude of that and how incredibly awful it was, and how badly people were injured,” he said, noting that he was unwilling to include the term “anti-Zionist,” because he felt that this would be speculative about the attacker’s motives.

Rabbi Fred Greene, of Congregation Har Hashem, offered a similar perspective, stressing that this “turning point for our community” required moral clarity from elected officials: namely, an “unequivocal statement that antisemitism has no place in Boulder.”

“Most of the council rose to that moment,” Greene said. “But when even one member of the council cannot sign a joint condemnation without attempting to relitigate the definition of antisemitism, that sends a painful message to Jewish residents about where they stand.”

Conflict-fueled chaos seized City Council

The dispute over the condemnation statement followed about 20 months of council meetings that included contentious public comment sessions about the Gaza war.

Demonstrators began disrupting these sessions in late 2023, protesting the war and urging members to consider a ceasefire resolution. Comments at times included antisemitic hate speech, particularly against Jewish council member Tara Winer, according to Boulder Reporting Lab. Officials suspended some individuals and limited poster sizes, as they struggled to maintain both order and free speech.

Brockett said that he still could not comprehend “why people have directed so much energy at the Boulder City Council on these topics for so long, given our complete lack of influence or involvement with the Middle East.”

Rabbi Marc Soloway, of Boulder’s Congregation Bonai Shalom, expressed similar bewilderment at this phenomenon, questioning how “a so-called liberal place has become so poisoned.” He balked at the idea that people are “willing to somehow stand behind Hamas as a liberation movement and not acknowledge what’s really happened.”

Adams was one of just two council members who voted in February 2024 to consider the ceasefire resolution. The proposal did not advance. Opponents, including the mayor, cited a need to focus on local matters, while also referring to a city code that limited action on foreign issues, according to the Boulder Reporting Lab.

Then in February 2025, Adams was one of three council members who supported revisiting the city’s investment policy to consider excluding more weapons manufacturers. Some opponents viewed the proposal as a veiled attempt to push potential Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions policies against Israel. Before the informal vote, Adams cautioned against “investing in weapons,” saying she wanted “a peacemaking community” and not a “war-enabling community.”

Six months later, Adams was the only council member to support reopening the investment policy discussion. Her new request, she explained in a statement, stemmed from a U.N. Special Rapporteur report that accused certain companies, including Microsoft, of being “directly involved in Israel’s occupation and genocide.”

The U.N. report had cited findings from The Guardian alleging that Israel used Microsoft’s cloud technology and artificial intelligence during intense bombardments of Gaza. In response, Microsoft at first said internal reviews showed no evidence that its tools were “used to target or harm people.” But several months later, the company launched a formal review of new allegations regarding mass surveillance of civilians.

The U.N. report, Adams told JTA, showed that Boulder was investing in firms that “have committed war crimes,” when the city should spend its money on bolstering projects like renewable energy initiatives or regenerative agriculture.

Brockett said Boulder already had investment rules addressing social and environmental concerns, including changes adopted in 2017 while he was a council member. He opposed divesting from Microsoft, citing the ubiquity of its products and the difficulty of excluding every company whose tools might be used in ways residents opposed.

Asked if there was any further update or response to this issue, a spokesperson for Microsoft directed JTA to a September 2025 communication written by Brad Smith, the company’s vice chair and president. Smith stated that following a review, Microsoft had “ceased and disabled a set of services to a unit within the Israel Ministry of Defense,” including “specific cloud storage and AI services and technologies.”

Smith credited The Guardian for its reporting, noting that the outlet had access to external information that Microsoft did not due to its “customer privacy commitments.” He stressed that Microsoft prohibits the use of its tools for mass surveillance of civilians.

Assessing antisemitism in ‘the court of public opinion’

In the weeks following the Pearl Street attack, tensions over the Israel-Gaza war boiled over, prompting Boulder City Council members to approve new rules for open comment periods at their meetings.

The new rules, approved by all council members except Adams, included an earlier meeting start time, a shorter open comment window and an audio-only broadcast. Brockett said that just a few meetings after enacting these measures, the chaos calmed down.

“People get the same amount of time to speak as they did before,” he said, referring to a two-minute limit allocated to each speaker. “They still are allowed to say whatever they would like, within the limits of the First Amendment.”

Adams, on the other hand, expressed concern about the impact of an earlier start time on working families, as well as the lack of video during virtual testimony. Instead, she said she would have preferred the “consistent implementations” of existing rules.

A few days after the council passed the rules, Adams reportedly published multiple Instagram stories that two colleagues, Matt Benjamin and Mark Wallach, characterized as “offensive and antisemitic social media posts.” Because these posts were “stories,” they ordinarily would have disappeared after 24 hours unless saved as highlights, but Facebook users posted links to screenshots and recordings in the comments of Benjamin and Wallach’s statement.

One such story declared that “the biggest genocide in human history didn’t occur in Nazi Germany, but on American soil,” set to music from Schindler’s List. She was referring to tribal nations, stressing that “unlike Jewish people who received repatriation,” they “lost generations.” Another story accused Boulder of funding genocide.

Benjamin and Wallach said that her stories “crossed a serious line into antisemitism,” adding that “language in these posts reflects a more insidious, modern form of antisemitism, one that avoids explicit slurs but relies instead on double standards, dog whistles and coded messages.”

Adams responded to her colleagues by accusing them of releasing “misinformation” in what she described as “an attempt to distract from the real work and conversations our council has ahead of us.” She stressed that “injustice to any individual or group of people is wrong and must be followed by repair and restitution.”

“If the shoe was on the other foot and I thought they were being antisemitic, I would have put proper paperwork together and launched an investigation,” Adams told JTA, criticizing their reliance on “the court of public opinion.”

Reflecting on this dispute, Greene, the rabbi from Har Hashem, said it’s not “particularly useful to declare whether someone is or isn’t antisemitic.” He noted, however, that some of the “posts have traded in antisemitic tropes: drawing false equivalencies with the Holocaust, implying that Jewish people have received undue reparations and framing Jewish concerns as obstacles to collective liberation.”

“Whether intentional or not, those tropes cause real harm,” Greene said. “When someone in a position of public trust continues to deploy them after being told – repeatedly and directly – how hurtful they are, that matters.”

A few weeks following the social media showdown, police arrested anti-Israel activist Laura Gonzalez for shouting profanities at a Jewish resident and confronting Benjamin. She was charged with felony retaliation against an elected official, as well as verbal and physical harassment misdemeanors. While the first two charges were dropped in May, Gonzalez is expected to face trial for the physical harassment misdemeanor, to which she has pleaded non guilty.

Asked for her opinion on the Gonzalez case, Adams acknowledged a spike in aggressive incidents, but she focused on the increase in such behaviors against participants at pro-Palestine events, where she said someone was recently pushed.

“It’s important that we investigate any situation where there’s allegations of physical harm,” Adams added. “Those investigations should be equal in strength and integrity.”

‘A very toxic environment for Jewish people’

The disagreements on Israel reflect a broader dispute over just how much the city council should be involving itself in foreign affairs.

Already in February 2024, Adams told fellow council members that the city has “skin in the game,” urging them to consider the ceasefire resolution. Citing the footprint of global technology, medical and defense firms in Boulder, she warned against behaving “like we do not have implications internationally.”

Adams criticized those who support “the actions of an ethno-state,” explaining that during a May 2025 trip to the West Bank – as part of the Boulder-Nablus Sister City Project – she “saw firsthand different roads for different people.” That trip, she said, resulted in a creative project called Uprooting Qahr, an Arabic word she defined as “anger that’s caused by oppression and displacement and dispossession.”

Asked if she also visited Israel, she said that she “landed in Israel, in Tel Aviv.” She said that she had intended to spend more time in Israel after her West Bank tour, but that her plans changed after the Yemen-based Houthis fired a ballistic missile at Ben Gurion Airport. After speaking with a few Israeli Jews in the West Bank, she credited them for “some solidarity and understanding that we are one human species on one planet.”

Brockett said that he, too, has visited Nablus as part of the Sister Cities project, but that on his trip, he also visited Boulder’s Israeli sister city, Ramat HaNegev. He has long argued the council should focus on local issues rather than take up a ceasefire resolution or devote formal meeting time to foreign policy matters.

“City councils exist to serve their residents — housing, transportation, public safety, local services,” Greene, of Har Hashem, told JTA. “Those are the responsibilities Boulder voters entrust their council with.”

Greene acknowledged “that elected officials are human beings with moral convictions” who might make value statements. But he noted that the war has “consumed meeting after meeting, month after month, at the expense of local needs.” That fixation, he added, became “a vehicle for rhetoric that made Jewish residents feel targeted and unsafe.”

Soloway, from Bonai Shalom, likewise described “a very toxic environment for Jewish people,” recognizing that this feeling is “not coming directly from City Council.”

“But I would say that some of the rhetoric and the posts of Taishya Adams [have] definitely fostered that,” Soloway said.

‘Jewish identity, love for Israel, grief over Gaza’

Discussing the “compromises made for the establishment of nation states” – including the U.S. and Israel – Adams emphasized that she isn’t asking anything of others that she isn’t willing to do herself, explaining that she has been working on right-of-return policies for Indigenous people whose land was stolen in Boulder.

“I know what segregation looks like as a descendant of enslaved Africans,” she said. “I understand what apartheid looks like.”

Soloway expressed concern about such comparisons. He said that Adams “presents herself as a real student of history” but then equates the U.S. to Israel, whose “history is so utterly different.”

“The original colonizers of America were not indigenous in any way, and no one would ever claim they are,” he added. “But Jews have been indigenous to the Middle East.”

Adams discussed her recent attempts to engage with Boulder’s Jewish community, noting that over the past year, she “made a stronger effort to reach out directly and really left the ball in their court.” She said she met with some local rabbis one-on-one and also made connections through the Denver/Boulder Jewish Voice for Peace.

The JVP chapter did not respond to a request from JTA for comment.

As for her opponent, Brockett said that if he wins another term, he would “offer full support” to Jewish residents and “speak out if anything antisemitic occurs.”

“We don’t have the ability to prevent some speech like that from occurring, but we can show that it’s unacceptable and that the leadership of the city stands in solidarity with the Jewish community in Boulder,” Brockett said.

Addressing the current morale, Greene said that his congregants “feel less safe, more on edge, more vulnerable.” For example, he observed that those who have devoted their lives to “tikkun olam” – repairing the world – now “find themselves cast as complicit in something they abhor.”

Soloway, meanwhile, noted that “Jews were integral in a lot of movements that have stopped fascism, and now we’ve become the fascists in the eyes of so many.”

“It’s extraordinary how so many examples of Jewish involvement in civil rights have just somehow been conveniently erased,” he said. “We’ve just become the demons because of our connection to Israel and Zionism.”

Such unease has affected other institutions in Boulder, including parts of the school system. The Boulder Valley School District this summer settled a federal civil rights lawsuit with the Anti-Defamation League, after the parents of a Jewish middle schooler alleged that their child had endured years of bullying and antisemitic harassment.

In its settlement, the district announced plans to address antisemitic discrimination and harassment in schools, conduct training for staff, provide educational programming for students and create an advisory council to address antisemitism.

Other young Jews in Boulder, including those who attend the University of Colorado, are also struggling with a palpable uptick in hostile rhetoric. At the beginning of the school year, Boulder Students for Justice in Palestine released their “2026 Statement of Commitment,” demanding one state “from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea.” And on Oct. 7, as CU Boulder Hillel hosted a memorial event, Boulder SJP held a “vigil for the martyrs of Palestine” on campus as well.

Elyana Funk, the Hillel chapter’s executive director, said she has increasingly needed to advocate for the students, but she also noted some positives amid the pain. Hillel, she explained, has “been bursting at the seams and growing,” with a 30% participation surge in the past couple years and an 80% jump in Shabbat attendance.

Funk estimated that about 2,500 to 3,000 Jewish students – out of about 32,600 total undergraduates – are enrolled at the university, but she had no records of how many students are registered to vote in this city, as opposed to in their hometowns.

But when Boulder’s Jewish voters do head to the polls in November, they will do so with the possibility of electing a mayor who won’t confirm if Israel should exist.

When considering that prospect, Greene declared that “Israel’s right to exist is not a partisan position.” People can raise concerns about Israel’s government, humanitarian issues in Gaza and rights of Palestinians while also maintaining “that Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish state,” Greene argued. An unwillingness to do so, he said, should be “disqualifying for someone seeking to lead a city with a substantial and deeply connected Jewish community.”

“Jewish identity, love for Israel, grief over Gaza, fear of antisemitism — these things can coexist in a single Jewish heart,” Greene added. “When the public discourse flattens all of that into a binary, it erases us.”

This article originally appeared on JTA.org.

The post Antisemitic terror rattled the Rockies last year. Now Boulder could have a mayor who won’t say whether Israel should exist. appeared first on The Forward.

A rabbi fired a month into her job at Emory University’s Hillel says she was dismissed over her fiancé’s criticism of Israel and pro-Palestinian activism. Hillels of Georgia, the nonprofit that runs the campus group, disputes that, saying it lost confidence in her honesty and judgment soon after she started in the role.

The rabbi, Nikki Golomb, 31, says she applied for the job in March and started at Emory on July 1, after graduating this spring from the Hebrew College rabbinical school in Massachusetts, a century-old institution that describes itself as having “a strong commitment to pluralism.” On Aug. 3, Rabbi Larry Sernovitz, the CEO of Hillels of Georgia, called her into his office in suburban Atlanta and told her she was being fired because she was in a close relationship with someone who speaks disparagingly about Israel, she said in an interview with the Forward.

When she asked which relationship he meant, Sernovitz showed her two printouts, she said: a photo of her and her fiancé, Sam Stein, and what she believes was a screengrab from one of his videos. Stein, 32, posts about settler and military violence in the West Bank to Instagram, where he has more than 59,000 followers.

She said she was fired immediately.

Her account — first reported Thursday by Jewish Currents and later picked up by the Jerusalem Post — contradicts statements from Hillels of Georgia.

In a statement posted to social media Friday, the organization said it learned shortly after her start date of “information about her personal conduct and activities that would affect her ability to fulfill the role of a spiritual and ethical advisor to Jewish students,” and that her termination was “in no way based on the activities of her fiancé.”

A new statement sent to the Forward Sunday evening goes further, accusing Golomb of “ongoing false and misleading statements.” It says Hillels of Georgia vetted her during the hiring process, reviewed her social media and found nothing “indicating a misalignment with Hillel’s mission, programmatic goals or Jewish values.” She “disclosed no potential conflicts” when asked direct questions in multiple interviews with students and staff. Shortly into her tenure, it says, “this changed dramatically,” showing she had not been “truthful or transparent.” Leadership lost confidence in her “judgment and integrity,” it says.

The statement does not say what they believe she failed to disclose. It added: “A campus rabbi must be morally above reproach and demonstrate the highest ethical behavior. Rabbi Golomb did not meet that standard and was dismissed as a result.”

Asked whether she had any reason to believe the firing wasn’t about Stein, Golomb said no. “They never mentioned anything that I did, nor did they ask me any questions,” she said on Sunday.

“I’m shocked, and I’m honestly really angry,” she added. “It’s a blatant lie, unless they fired me for reasons that they did not tell me.”

The firing occurred as American Jewish institutions debate how much room to allow for dissent about Israel, especially among younger Jews. A survey released in August found that nearly 40% of young Jewish adults have pulled back from or become more selective about participating in Jewish spaces in recent years, many citing hostile conversations or a lack of room for nuance about Israel and the Palestinians. Hebrew College, Golomb’s alma mater, said her firing “has the potential to set a dangerous precedent.”

Golomb says she signed an employment letter, not a contract, and was an at-will employee. Georgia law allows an employer to fire such an employee “with or without cause.” Her attorney, Abby Kelman, told Jewish Currents that Hillels of Georgia was within its legal rights to fire her.

A posted job description for campus rabbi at Emory — which has roughly 1,500 Jewish students — includes leading Shabbat, teaching and pastoral care, and says nothing about a staff member’s political views, though it ties Hillel’s mission to students’ “enduring connection to Jewish life and Israel.”

A long-running fight over Israel at Hillel

Hillel International, the umbrella group for campus chapters, says it is “steadfastly committed” to Israel. Its guidelines bar chapters from working with or hosting groups or speakers who deny Israel’s right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state, support boycotting it, or seek to “delegitimize” it.

The same guidelines say Hillel welcomes a range of student views on Israel and objects to excluding students for their beliefs. They say nothing about staff members or their families. A Hillel International spokesperson declined to comment on the record about the Emory firing.

The rules have been contested for more than a decade. In 2013, the student board at Swarthmore College’s Hillel voted to reject the guidelines, the first chapter to do so, and Vassar’s Jewish student group followed in 2014 as part of a movement called Open Hillel.

Since the Oct. 7 attacks, Jewish professionals have described losing jobs over criticism of Israel. Maura Finkelstein, a Jewish tenured professor at Muhlenberg College in Pennsylvania, was fired in 2024 after sharing a pro-Palestinian post on social media.

A 2024 investigation interviewed 18 Jewish professionals at 16 organizations who said they were fired, pushed out or saw their roles disappear over criticism of Israel or support for a ceasefire, including at Hillels in Chicago and Kansas. A Hebrew teacher at an Indiana synagogue said he was fired the day after attending a pro-Palestinian rally.

Also in 2024, after 900 employees of Jewish organizations signed a letter calling for a ceasefire, some said they faced backlash from their employers. At Emory, dozens were arrested at a pro-Palestinian encampment in April 2024. Three professors who were among those arrested sued the university this spring.

Rabbi Mike Rothbaum, a Reconstructionist rabbi in San Diego who led an Atlanta congregation from 2022 to 2025, says that after Oct. 7, Emory students who were critical of Israel came to him saying they had been made to feel they would have no place in Jewish life if they voiced that criticism publicly. “Access to the Judaism we love is conditional on our acceptance of Israeli policies we don’t,” he recalled one student telling him.

A Hillel rabbi in Westchester County, N.Y., from 2006 to 2011, Rothbaum recalls that speakers there had to be Zionist, and he assumes that remains true. “What’s divisive,” he said, “is telling Jews who care about Jewish values their conversation and actually their presence are not welcome.”

Jewish leaders have acknowledged the strain. At a Jewish Federations of North America conference in November, an executive said institutions should lead with public support for Israel while creating internal spaces for honest conversation.

Jewish groups point to the rise of hostility toward Jewish students on campus since Oct. 7. The Anti-Defamation League counted 1,694 antisemitic incidents – including some acts of anti-Zionism in their count – on U.S. campuses in 2024 and 583 in 2025, a 66% drop it attributed in part to colleges addressing antisemitism, though it says the 2025 level is still nearly four times that of 2021.

From Jerusalem to Emory

Golomb was in Jerusalem on Oct. 7, 2023, spending a year at the Pardes Institute as part of her rabbinical training. On Simchat Torah, she was getting ready to walk to services with her roommate when the sirens sounded. Their phones were turned off for the holiday, so they ducked into the nearest shelters without knowing why. It wasn’t until the third or fourth siren, she said, that someone checking his phone told them the country was “at war with Gaza.”

Shortly after the attack, she said, she joined Rabbis for Ceasefire, a group of rabbis calling for an end to the fighting. “I was witness to a lot of deep pain and suffering from both Israelis and Palestinians,” she said. “I am a big believer in peace, and I believed, and I still believe, that a ceasefire is the best and safest option for Palestinians and for Israelis and for Jews around the world.”

Her name was on the group’s public member list on its website before she applied for the Emory job. Asked Sunday if he was aware of this when Hillel hired Golomb, Sernovitz replied, “As far as vetting goes, we used the information we had at the time.”

Golomb says her relationships with both critics and supporters of Israel make her better suited to campus work. “I think the ability to be in a relationship with people who share different views is an asset,” she said.

Golomb and Stein met in September 2023 in Israel at Pardes, where he was also studying. She stayed in Israel until May 2024. From August 2024 to April 2025, Stein worked as a field coordinator in the West Bank for Rabbis for Human Rights, which brings volunteers, mostly Jewish, into Palestinian communities facing settler violence. The practice is called protective presence. The idea, Stein said, is that outsiders’ presence discourages attacks, and if violence happens, they document it. (Mike Huckabee, the U.S. Ambassador to Israel, called the latest attack in the West Bank by settlers a “despicable act of terror,” which left a Washington Post photographer hospitalized for days.)

Stein said it felt horrible that he could be the reason Golomb was fired. “It made me feel like a liability as a partner, like someone that brings trouble,” he said Sunday from the West Bank, where he is helping Palestinian farmers with the fall olive harvest. “Just as a human being, it made me feel like a pariah. It made me feel like a dirty little secret that has to be hid.”

What’s next

Golomb is now job-hunting in Atlanta, a city she moved to for a job she held for a month. She said she has not heard from Hillels of Georgia since going public. After two months of negotiating through her lawyer, she said, the organization offered six weeks’ severance, up from an initial offer of two weeks, and declined to extend her health insurance. She turned down the offer.

Since moving to Atlanta, Stein has been driving for Lyft “to kind of just stay busy and make a tiny bit of money,” he said, while looking for more work. He is due back from the olive harvest in mid-November.

“If we’re able to stay in Atlanta, that would be wonderful,” Golomb said.

“We want to make it work, quite frankly,” Stein said, “because moving sucks.”

They plan to marry next summer.

The post Was this campus rabbi fired over her fiance’s criticism of Israel? She says yes, the Hillel says no appeared first on The Forward.