Uncategorized
Why Those Fighting for the Jews Should Concede that Anti-Zionism Is Not Antisemitism
Rutgers University students holding an anti-Zionist demonstration on March 19, 2024. Photo: USA Today Network via Reuters Connect
Anti-Zionism is not antisemitism, as the latter is typically conceived.
Anti-Zionism is its own libel-spewing hate movement targeting the Jews, and it’s time the Jewish people and their allies recognize this and change our tactics.
We have lost the battle over anti-Zionism on campuses and elsewhere because we have been fighting too hard to identify it with antisemitism. It is time to join the battle against anti-Zionism itself.
A new organization called the Movement Against Anti-Zionism has the mission to make all this clear. Here is just one example that illustrates the need to change tactics.
The widely-made claim that Federal investigations into campus Jew-hatred are “misusing civil rights law to squash political dissent,” as Jessica Corbett recently expressed it, rests on a deep misunderstanding of what that hatred looks like today. It assumes that Jew-hatred still wears its old “antisemitic” uniform: swastikas, slurs, caricatures, and conspiracy theories.
But Jew-hatred manifests differently in different times, and mutates and adapts. The operative Jew-hatred of our era is neither the anti-Judaism of Christian yore nor the antisemitism of late modern race science (though that is on the rise today as well). It is anti-Zionism, a moralized, intellectualized, and socially acceptable hatred of the Jewish collective that masks itself in the language of justice.
Whereas antisemitism treats the Jew as an alien within society, anti-Zionism treats the Jewish state as an alien among nations. The vocabulary has changed, but the underlying impulse remains constant: to mark the Jewish identity of the era as uniquely illegitimate. Anti-Zionism allows (on paper) that Jews may exist as individuals — but not as a people with collective rights, casting their sovereignty not as self-determination but as mortal sin. The hatred that was once expressed through the language of race and religion is now expressed through that of rights and resistance.
The AAUP (American Association of University Professors) and MESA (Middle East Studies Association) report cited by Corbett frames campus antisemitism probes as an effort to silence “criticism of Israel.” Yet its own rhetoric reveals a deeper prejudice. It begins by asserting that Israel is waging a “genocidal war” in Gaza, presented not as argument but as premise. This is not critique; it is anti-Zionist libel, the moral inversion by which Jewish survival is reframed as moral crime. The purpose is not to critique Israel but to isolate it, not to debate policy but to deny legitimacy. Anti-Zionism is not “critique of Israel” any more than antisemitism is “critique of Jews.”
To describe anti-Zionist accusations as “mere criticism” is to misunderstand how modern bigotry operates. Hatred no longer announces itself openly; it hides beneath the cloak of virtue. On university campuses, this takes the form of polite exclusion: the Israeli scholar uninvited from a panel, the Jewish student told that solidarity requires renouncing Zionism, the cultural institution that celebrates diversity except when it includes Jews who refuse to disavow their people’s homeland. Each act seems minor, even principled. Taken together, they constitute the moral architecture of contemporary discrimination.
Anti-Zionism is not identical to antisemitism, but is its direct descendant, a mutation adapted to the moral grammar of the 21st century.
The ongoing Federal civil rights investigations are not an assault on liberty, but an attempt to recognize how hate has changed its form. They do not criminalize dissent, but acknowledge that the boundary between political speech and ethnic animus has blurred — primarily, or only — with respect to the world’s one Jewish state.
To challenge anti-Zionism is not to silence dissent. It is to insist that equality includes Israelis and their supporters too. The refusal to grant Israel what every other nation takes for granted — the right to self-definition and security — is discrimination, whether clothed in theology, theory, race, or virtue. The tragedy of the AAUP and MESA report, and of the article that amplifies it, is that they mistake the exposure of prejudice for its creation. By defending exclusion as conscience, they do not protect freedom — they excuse its perversion.
Anti-Zionism is the hate that learned to pass as justice. To recognize it as such is not censorship. It is moral clarity — the refusal to let an old hatred hide under the banner of a fashionable cause.
If you agree then check out the Movement Against Anti-Zionism–and join the battle.
Andrew Pessin is Professor of Philosophy at Connecticut College and founder of the Institute for the Critical Study of Antizionism.
Uncategorized
Mediators Still Seek to Bridge US, Iran Gaps Despite No Face-to-Face Talks
People walk past a billboard with a graphic design about the Strait of Hormuz on a building, amid a ceasefire between US and Iran, in Tehran, Iran, April 27, 2026. Photo: Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
Work has not halted to bridge gaps between the United States and Iran, sources from mediator Pakistan said, despite the absence of face-to-face diplomacy after President Donald Trump called off a trip by his envoys over the weekend.
Iranian sources disclosed Tehran’s latest proposal on Monday, which would set aside discussion of Iran‘s nuclear program until the war is ended and disputes over shipping from the Gulf are resolved. That is unlikely to satisfy Washington, which says nuclear issues must be dealt with from the outset.
Hopes of reviving peace efforts have receded since the US president scrapped a visit on Saturday by his envoy Steve Witkoff and son-in-law Jared Kushner to Islamabad, the Pakistani capital, where Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi shuttled in and out twice over the weekend.
Araqchi also visited Oman over the weekend and went to Russia on Monday, where he met President Vladimir Putin and received words of support from a longstanding ally.
OIL PRICES RISE AGAIN
With the warring sides still seemingly far apart on issues including Iran‘s nuclear ambitions and access through the crucial Strait of Hormuz, oil prices resumed their upward march when trade reopened on Monday. Brent crude was up around 3.5% at around $108.8 a barrel by 1500 GMT.
“If they want to talk, they can come to us, or they can call us. You know, there is a telephone. We have nice, secure lines,” Trump told “The Sunday Briefing” on Fox News.
“They know what has to be in the agreement. It’s very simple: They cannot have a nuclear weapon; otherwise, there’s no reason to meet,” Trump said.
Araqchi expressed a different perspective, telling reporters in Russia that Trump requested negotiations because the US has not achieved any of its objectives.
ISLAMABAD REOPENS AFTER LOCKDOWN TO HOST TALKS
Senior Iranian sources, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters the proposal carried by Araqchi to Islamabad over the weekend envisioned talks in stages, with the nuclear issue to be set aside at the start.
A first step would require ending the US-Israeli war on Iran and providing guarantees that Washington cannot start it up again. Then negotiators would resolve the US blockade and the fate of the Strait of Hormuz, which Iran aims to reopen under its control.
Only then would talks look at other issues, including the longstanding dispute over Iran‘s nuclear program, with Iran still seeking some kind of US acknowledgment of its right to enrich uranium for what it says are peaceful purposes.
In a sign that no face-to-face meetings are planned any time soon, streets reopened in Pakistan’s capital Islamabad, which had been locked down for a week in anticipation of talks that never took place. The luxury hotel that had been cleared out to serve as a venue was again taking reservations from the public.
Pakistani officials said negotiations were still taking place remotely, but there were no plans to convene a meeting in person until the sides were close enough to sign a memorandum.
SHIPPING SNARLED BY BOTH SIDES
Although a ceasefire has paused the US-Israeli strikes on Iran that began on Feb. 28, no agreement has been reached on terms to end a war that has killed thousands and driven up oil prices. Both sides could be settling in for a test of wills.
Iran has largely blocked all shipping apart from its own from the Gulf through the Strait of Hormuz since the war began. This month, the United States began blockading Iranian ships.
Six tankers loaded with Iranian oil have been forced back to Iran by the US blockade in recent days, ship-tracking data shows, underscoring the impact the war is having on traffic.
Between 125 and 140 ships usually crossed in and out of the strait daily before the war, but only seven have done so in the past day, according to Kpler ship-tracking data and satellite analysis from SynMax, and none of them were carrying oil bound for the global market.
With his approval ratings falling, Trump faces domestic pressure to end the unpopular war. Iran‘s leaders, though weakened militarily, have found leverage with their ability to stop shipping in the strait, which normally carries a fifth of global oil shipments.
However, experts have warned that the Iranian economy is on the verge of collapse, especially if the US blockade continues to slash Iran’s oil exports.
Uncategorized
Five Stand Trial in Germany Over Attack on Israeli Defense Company Office
Elbit Systems logo is seen in this illustration taken July 26, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration
Five people appeared in court in Stuttgart on Monday on charges of causing about 1 million euros ($1.17 million) of damage at the German site of an Israeli defense company, the court said.
Prosecutors say the defendants, aged 25 to 40, trespassed and shouted pro-Palestinian statements as they smashed office equipment, measuring devices and windows at the business in the southern city of Ulm, the court added.
According to the charges, the defendants acted as members of the “Palestine Action Germany” organization, which later published videos claiming responsibility for the attack.
The defendants, who were not named, are Irish, British, Spanish, and German, prosecutors have said.
News outlets including Stuttgarter Zeitung and broadcaster SWR said the vandalized office belonged to Israeli defense electronics firm Elbit Systems.
Elbit, which has an office in Ulm, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The court did not identify Elbit as the target of the Ulm attack but said the company had been the target of attacks by “Palestine Action” groups in 2024.
Attacks against Jewish people and targets have risen worldwide since war erupted in Gaza in October 2023, following an attack on Israel by Hamas-led terrorists and Israel’s subsequent military offensive.
Monday’s hearing took place in a high-security facility at the court, officials said.
The Stuttgart court has previously said that more than a dozen hearings have been scheduled in the case until the end of July.
Uncategorized
Ukraine to Take Measures Against Israel if Grain Ship Docks, Source Says
Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelenskiy attends a press conference with European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen (not pictured) and European Council President Antonio Costa (not pictured) on the fourth anniversary of Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, in Kyiv, Ukraine, Feb. 24, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Valentyn Ogirenko
Israel risks a diplomatic and legal response from Kyiv if it allows a vessel carrying grain from Russian-occupied Ukraine to dock at the port of Haifa, a Ukrainian diplomatic source told Reuters on Monday.
Israel‘s Haaretz newspaper reported earlier that the vessel Panormitis, which it said was carrying grain from occupied Ukrainian territory that Kyiv regards as stolen, was waiting for permission to berth in Haifa.
“If this ship and its cargo isn’t rejected, we reserve the right to deploy a full suite of diplomatic and international legal responses,” the Ukrainian source said on condition of anonymity.
Israel‘s foreign ministry did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Haaretz reported on Sunday that four shipments of grain from occupied Ukraine had already been unloaded in Israel this year.
“The practice of laundering stolen goods is unacceptable, and Israel has essentially shrugged off our demands regarding the previous vessel,” the source said.
The source added Kyiv was tracking the vessel, warning that allowing it to dock would have consequences for bilateral relations between Ukraine and Israel.