Uncategorized
Wikipedia’s Information Intifada
Nuseir Yassin, of “Nas Daily” fame. Photo: Screenshot.
Wikipedia describes itself as “a free online encyclopedia that anyone can edit,” guided by a “neutral point of view” and built on “verifiable, reliable sources.”
It aspires to collect and disseminate “the sum of all human knowledge.” That promise — open, collaborative, neutral — is what gives it authority. It is also what makes the erosion of that neutrality so consequential.
In many fields, Wikipedia muddles along imperfectly but credibly.
On Israel and Jewish history — and other politically charged flashpoints — the claim of neutrality collapses under scrutiny.
The problem is not criticism. Democratic states invite criticism. The problem is structural asymmetry: highly motivated ideological editors, operating fluently within Wikipedia’s rules, steadily tilt the terrain while insisting it remains level.
The recent episode involving Nas Daily and its creator, Nuseir Yassin, offered a public glimpse into how this works.
In a Facebook video, Yassin — who has more than 70 million followers — described how a small group of anonymous editors reshaped his Wikipedia biography after he became more vocal in condemning Hamas and advocating peace with Israel.
Because he is an Israeli Arab increasingly viewed as “too positive on Israel,” edits were inserted reframing an otherwise positive biography in a sharply negative light. Attempts to revise what he characterized as inaccuracies were reverted. The page was eventually locked with the disputed edits intact. What prevailed was not neutral adjudication but persistence — who could marshal citations that satisfied Wikipedia’s sourcing hierarchy and outlast opponents in procedural trench warfare?
If a globally recognized public figure can watch his biography bend in real time, what chance does a small state with barely one-tenth of one percent of the world’s population have when the same machinery turns against it?
Spend time on major entries — Zionism, Israeli–Palestinian conflict, Apartheid, Gaza genocide accusation — and a pattern emerges.
Zionism, the modern national movement of the Jewish people, is framed primarily through the lens of European settler colonialism, despite the historical record that Jewish religious, linguistic, cultural, and legal traditions originated in the Land of Israel and that Jewish communities maintained a continuous presence there for millennia. The indigenous dimension is acknowledged but subordinated to colonial terminology as the dominant interpretive frame.
The term “apartheid” appears not simply as an allegation advanced by bitterly biased activists, but in ways that blur the line between advocacy and adjudicated legal finding — even though no international court has determined that Israel constitutes an apartheid state, and the application of the 1973 Apartheid Convention remains disputed.
Strikingly, Wikipedia rarely situates the term within a regional context where gender-based legal discrimination, religious supremacy, and criminalization of apostasy are codified in the laws of multiple Arab states
Across much of the Middle East, women inherit half of what men inherit under formal legal systems, religious minorities face structural discrimination, and conversion away from Islam can carry legal penalties. In Wikipedia, this entrenched hierarchy seldom anchors discussions of “apartheid.” The label is reserved almost exclusively for the region’s lone Jewish state.
Most jarring is the treatment of “genocide.” The 1948 Genocide Convention defines genocide as acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such.
That specific intent requirement is central. Allegations that Israel’s war against Hamas constitutes genocide hinge on proving an intent to destroy Palestinian Arabs as a group. Israel’s conduct during the war — including advance warnings to civilians, establishment of humanitarian corridors, facilitation of aid deliveries, and coordination of a 2024 polio vaccination campaign reaching more than one million Gazans — certainly complicates (really, eviscerates) any claim of group-destruction intent. Yet across Wikipedia entries, “genocide” often appears less as a contested legal allegation and more as an emerging consensus. The definitional threshold recedes, activist language advances.
Other examples are more granular but telling. On the Zionism page, the movement’s 19th-century articulation by Theodor Herzl as Jewish self-determination in a historic homeland is juxtaposed with colonial analogies implying foreign implantation, despite the First Zionist Congress (1897) explicitly defining its aim as establishing a home for the Jewish people in Eretz-Israel.
On the Hamas Charter entry, the organization’s 1988 covenant — which calls for Israel’s destruction and invokes many antisemitic conspiracy tropes — is summarized, but its eliminationist doctrine is softened by emphasis on a 2017 political document that did not recognize Israel’s legitimacy and that Hamas leaders have not treated as superseding their foundational objective.
This is not accidental drift. Research on Wikipedia governance shows how a relatively small number of highly active editors can dominate contentious areas. Policies emphasizing consensus and “reliable sourcing” can be navigated — and exploited — by organized activists. Advocacy NGOs are cited as authoritative. Broader context is dismissed as “undue weight.” Editors who resist face procedural attrition. Over time, ideological stamina begins to resemble institutional authority.
Conflicts are fought with narratives as much as weapons.
On Wikipedia, narrative compression is visible. A Mideast century shaped by Ottoman collapse, British administration, the 1937 Peel Commission proposal, the 1947 UN Partition Plan and its rejection by Arab leadership, and multiple interstate wars is flattened into a morality tale with a single Jewish aggressor.
Meanwhile, uncomfortable chapters of Palestinian Arab political history receive less narrative gravity.
Haj Amin al-Husseini, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, met Adolf Hitler in Berlin in November 1941, lived in Germany during the war, broadcast pro-Nazi propaganda in Arabic, and recruited Muslims for Waffen-SS units in the Balkans. These ideological crosscurrents between European fascism and segments of Arab nationalist and later Islamist movements are historical facts. They are acknowledged on Wikipedia. But they are rarely treated as structurally significant.
Similarly, Hamas’ founding charter invokes hadiths about killing Jews and frames its struggle in explicitly religious and eliminationist terms. Those elements are central to understanding the conflict. Yet they occupy less narrative weight than allegations leveled against Israel.
Wikipedia’s defenders argue that it merely reflects “reliable sources.” But source designation itself is political.
Wikipedia considers outlets like Al Jazeera — funded by the Qatari state — generally reliable for news reporting, while treating some US outlets, including Fox News, as generally unreliable for factual claims outside opinion content. When advocacy organizations are elevated and contextual scholarship is marginalized, neutrality becomes branding rather than practice. Wikipedia does not invent accusations; it curates them. Curation is power.
The consequences extend far beyond one website. Wikipedia is often the first stop for students, journalists, diplomats, and policymakers. Artificial intelligence systems ingest its summaries as baseline knowledge. When framing tilts there, the tilt does not dissipate; it amplifies.
History offers reminders. Medieval blood libels were recorded as fact before they became pretexts for violence. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion circulated as documentary evidence before it was exposed as fabrication. Both were dressed in the language of scholarship. Both hardened into assumed truth before they cracked.
Racist distortion rarely arrives announcing itself. It condenses quietly.
This is not a plea to shield Israel from criticism. It is a warning about structural asymmetry — and a call to stop treating Wikipedia as a neutral authority until it confronts and corrects its institutional failures. When Jewish indigeneity is minimized, when eliminationist ideologies are relegated to footnotes, and when grave legal terms are repurposed as political weapons, neutrality has already been compromised.
Neutrality is not a branding exercise. It is a discipline that requires enforcement, transparency, and accountability. If Wikipedia cannot uphold that discipline in politically charged domains, then universities, media outlets, policymakers, technology companies, and researchers should stop defaulting to it as an authoritative source.
Conventional wisdom is formed in real time on its pages. If those who value intellectual integrity continue to outsource their baseline knowledge to a system structurally vulnerable to ideological capture, they become complicit in the distortion. Wikipedia reform must precede Wikipedia reliance.
Micha Danzig is an attorney, former IDF soldier, and former NYPD officer. He writes widely on Israel, Zionism, antisemitism, and Jewish history. He serves on the board of Herut North America.
Uncategorized
Israel Expands Iran Strikes as Tehran Moves to Name New Supreme Leader
People stand near a destroyed vehicle as smoke rises after a reported strike on Shahran fuel tanks, amid the US-Israeli conflict with Iran, in Tehran, Iran, March 8, 2026. Photo: Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
Israeli forces expanded their bombardment of Iran overnight, striking fuel depots near Tehran, while Bahrain said an Iranian attack had damaged one of its desalination plants, signaling a widening assault on vital infrastructure across the region.
As fighting escalated on day nine of the US-Israeli campaign against Iran, Tehran moved closer to naming a new supreme leader after the killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, with every indication suggesting his powerful son Mojtaba could take charge.
Israel’s military threatened to kill any replacement for Khamenei, while US President Donald Trump said the war might only end once Iran’s military and rulers had been wiped out.
BLACK SMOKE HANGS OVER TEHRAN
Thick, choking black smoke hung over Tehran on Sunday, residents said, after strikes on oil storage facilities had lit up the night sky with plumes of orange flame.
Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said the large-scale attack marked a “dangerous new phase” of the conflict and amounted to a war crime.
“By targeting fuel depots, the aggressors are releasing hazardous materials and toxic substances into the air, poisoning civilians, devastating the environment, and endangering lives on a massive scale,” he wrote on X.
Israeli military spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Nadav Shoshani told reporters the depots were used to fuel Iran’s war effort, including producing or storing propellant for ballistic missiles. “They are a legal military target,” he said.
Shortly after the attack, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said his government would press on with the assault and strike Iran’s rulers “without mercy.”
“We have an organized plan with many surprises to destabilize the regime and enable change,” he said in a video statement. “We have many more targets.”
Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was not interested in negotiating an end to the conflict that has sent energy prices skyward, hurt business and snarled global travel.
“At some point, I don’t think there will be anybody left maybe to say, ‘We surrender,’” Trump said.
IRANIAN DRONES STRIKE GULF STATES
The governments of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain reported Iranian drone attacks in their countries on Saturday and early Sunday, with a huge fire engulfing a government office block in Kuwait.
Kuwait’s interior ministry said two of its officers were killed “while performing duties,” while the UAE said four migrant workers had died in Iranian attacks there so far.
Showing the intensity of the offensive, the UAE said air defense teams had knocked out 16 ballistic missiles and 113 drones fired towards the Gulf state on Sunday. One missile fell in the sea and four drones hit the country’s territories.
Bahrain said on Sunday that an Iranian drone attack had caused “material damage” to a desalination plant, though the country’s electricity and water authority said the strike had not disrupted water supplies.
It was the first time an Arab country has said Iran targeted a desalination facility during the conflict. On Saturday, Iran said a US attack had struck a freshwater desalination plant on its Qeshm Island, disrupting water supplies in 30 villages, calling it “a dangerous move with grave consequences.”
Saudi Arabia has told Tehran that continued Iranian attacks on the kingdom and its energy sector could push Riyadh to respond in kind, people familiar with the matter told Reuters.
Lebanon has also been pulled into the conflict after the Iran-backed militant group Hezbollah launched rockets and drones into Israel last week, with nearly 400 people killed by Israel over the past week, the health ministry said.
Israel killed at least four people when it struck a hotel in central Beirut on Sunday, saying it had targeted Iranian commanders operating in the city — the first such strike on the heart of the Lebanese capital — amid heavy bombardment of the southern suburbs and the country’s south and east.
IRAN GETTING CLOSER TO NAMING A NEW LEADER
The clerical body charged with choosing Iran’s next supreme leader could meet as soon as Sunday to name a successor to Khamenei, who was killed in an attack early in the conflict, Iranian media reported.
A majority consensus over the successor has more or less been reached, said Assembly of Experts member Ayatollah Mohammad Mehdi Mirbaqeri, according to the Mehr news agency.
Another member of the council, Ayatollah Mohsen Heidari Alekasir, said in a video that a candidate had been selected based on Khamenei’s guidance that Iran’s top leader should be “hated by the enemy.”
Two Iranian sources told Reuters last week that the clear favorite was Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba Khamenei, who amassed power under his father as a senior figure in the security forces and the vast business empire they control. Choosing him would signal that hardliners remain firmly in charge.
Trump has justified the biggest US military operation in the Middle East since the 2003 invasion of Iraq by saying Tehran posed an imminent threat to the United States, without providing evidence. He has also said Iran was too close to being able to build a nuclear weapon.
The US and Israel have discussed sending special forces into Iran to secure its stockpile of highly enriched uranium at a later stage of the war, Axios reported, citing four people with knowledge of the discussions.
Asked on Saturday about sending ground troops to secure nuclear sites, Trump said it was something they could do “later on.”
The US-Israeli attacks have killed at least 1,332 Iranian civilians and wounded thousands, according to Iran’s U.N. ambassador, Amir Saeid Iravani.
Iranian attacks have killed 10 people in Israel. At least six US service members have been killed, with Iran saying on Sunday it had struck US bases in Kuwait. Israel said on Sunday that two of its soldiers were killed in southern Lebanon.
Uncategorized
Iran Has Lost Nearly 70% of Its Missile Launch Capabilities
An Iranian missile is launched during a military exercise in an undisclosed location in Iran, Aug. 20, 2025. Photo: Iranian Army/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS
i24 News – Iran has reportedly suffered a significant reduction in its missile launch capabilities since the start of the military campaign.
According to information broadcast Saturday evening by Israeli public broadcaster Kan, a large portion of Iran’s missile launch systems have been destroyed or disabled during ongoing strikes carried out by Israel and the United States.
Estimates suggest that roughly 70% of Iran’s missile launchers have been either destroyed or rendered inoperable since the beginning of the offensive. Prior to the campaign, intelligence assessments indicated that Iran possessed approximately 420 missile launchers. Current estimates now place the number of operational systems at around 100.
Reports indicate that about 150 launchers were completely destroyed in precision strikes, while another 150 were damaged in air attacks, leaving them temporarily unusable. Some of the damaged launch systems are believed to have been moved into underground facilities, preventing their immediate deployment.
Despite these losses, military operations are continuing with the objective of further weakening Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities.
The broader military campaign has entered its eighth day. The strikes are targeting not only missile launch platforms but also wider military infrastructure and institutions linked to the Iranian regime.
According to the report, the campaign is being coordinated between Israel and the United States, with each focusing on different operational zones across Iran.
Israel is primarily targeting missile launch sites in western Iran, which are viewed as posing a direct threat to Israeli territory.
US forces are concentrating their strikes in southern Iran, where missile launches have previously targeted Gulf states and American military bases in the region.
The ongoing air campaign is part of a broader strategy aimed at permanently degrading Iran’s offensive missile capabilities and limiting its capacity to carry out long-range strikes across the Middle East.
Military operations remain active, and regional tensions continue to run high as the conflict enters its second week.
Uncategorized
Two Israeli Soldiers Killed in Southern Lebanon, Israel Military Says
The late Master Sergeant Maher Khatar, 38. Photo: IDF Spokesperson
i24 News – The Israel Defense Forces announced that Master Sergeant Maher Khatar, 38, from Majdal Shams, was killed during combat operations in southern Lebanon. Khatar served in the Combat Engineering Corps in the 91st Division.
The IDF said another soldier was also killed in the incident, though the name has not yet been cleared for publication. In addition, one combat officer was lightly injured and was evacuated to a hospital for medical treatment. The officer’s family has been notified, the military said.
According to the military, Khatar fell during an overnight incident in which missiles were fired toward IDF soldiers operating in the area.
The troops were attempting to retrieve a broken vehicle from a position in southern Lebanon when the attack occurred. The specific type of missiles used in the strike has not yet been determined, officials said.
Immediately following the attack, Israeli Air Force fighter jets struck multiple targets in the area, while Israeli forces carried out heavy fire against positions linked to the attack, according to a military official.
The IDF said its forces remain deployed in forward defensive positions along the northern front in order to protect residents of northern Israel. Military officials said regional divisions are conducting ongoing situational assessments and remain prepared for potential escalation.
“The IDF will continue to operate with force and determination to prevent enemy attacks and eliminate any threat posed to the State of Israel and its residents,” a military official said. The army added that it shares the family’s grief and will continue to support them.