Uncategorized
Pager Attack: How the Media Whitewashed Hezbollah Terrorists and Slandered Israel
The pager attack targeting thousands of Hezbollah terrorists — which Israel is believed to be behind — stands as one of the most precise, large-scale counterterrorism operations ever conducted.
CCTV footage from Beirut and its suburbs reveals the meticulous coordination of the blasts, showing members of the Iranian-backed Lebanese group struck by explosions from booby-trapped devices they were carrying.
While Israel has not officially commented or acknowledged any responsibility, a former Israeli official, quoted by Axios, stated that Israeli intelligence planted explosives in devices Hezbollah had imported for a future operation. The attack was expedited to prevent Hezbollah from uncovering the trap.
Though some details of Tuesday’s events remain unclear — like the devices’ origin and how they were rigged — one fact is indisputable, confirmed even by Hezbollah: this was a precision strike targeting their militants within a globally recognized terrorist organization.
Even if we put aside @DailyMailUK‘s erroneous reference to Tel Aviv, why is it Israel that is held responsible for putting the “Middle East on the brink” by allegedly responding to a terrorist org that has been launching attacks since Oct. 8?
Here’s some more poor coverage. pic.twitter.com/wfwsE7F9Lu
— HonestReporting (@HonestReporting) September 18, 2024
This truth was largely obscured by international media outlets in their early coverage of the attack.
Several outlets, including The Guardian, BBC, and the UK’s Daily Mirror, found creative ways to sidestep mentioning Hezbollah altogether in headlines, referring to it instead as an “exploding pager attack in Lebanon.”
The Mirror went a step further, calling it a “bizarre” incident, suggesting that thousands of random people — and their pagers — were the targets, rather than Hezbollah militants.
Meanwhile, ABC News framed the event as “wireless devices” mysteriously exploding “in the hands of their owners,” despite quoting a Hezbollah-owned media outlet as its source.
A “Major Escalation”?
Another glaring issue in Tuesday’s coverage was how the media framed the attack as pushing the Middle East to the brink of major escalation.
This narrative dominated reports from journalists, security analysts, and defense experts filing from the comfort of their offices in London and New York. The Daily Mail’s front page, for example, breathlessly warned of the “Middle East on the Brink,” while also managing to misidentify Tel Aviv as Israel’s capital in a confused splash.
It’s telling to compare this headline with the Daily Mail’s coverage of Hezbollah’s rocket strike on Majdal Shams, which killed 12 Druze children.
Not once did the outlet accuse Hezbollah of destabilizing the region, despite the direct hit on a soccer field full of kids.
Indeed, a July article by the Daily Mail about the Majdal Shams tragedy flipped the narrative entirely, claiming Israel would “expand [the] war on new fronts” after responding to the attack with a targeted drone strike on top Hezbollah commander Fuad Shukr.
While The Guardian quietly amended a headline on a piece by its defense and security editor Dan Sabbagh after being called out by HonestReporting for blaming Israel for escalating the conflict, the outlet’s global affairs correspondent, Andrew Roth, still described the “exploding pager attack” as “another blow for US peace hopes.”
Apparently, Roth doesn’t think Hezbollah’s frequent, indiscriminate attacks on Israel have done anything to hinder peace efforts.
Meanwhile, an article in The Washington Post — which was passed off as “analysis” — argued that Israel targeting terrorists was proof of its “hunger for war” and a desire to “escalate” tensions in the region.
At the same time, the piece commended Iran and Hezbollah — who have repeatedly vowed to wipe Israel off the map — for their “great deal of restraint.”
Every headline from any reputable news outlet should have been simple: “Israel Targets Hezbollah Terrorists in Precision Pager Attack.”
That’s it. That’s what we know happened.
The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.
The post Pager Attack: How the Media Whitewashed Hezbollah Terrorists and Slandered Israel first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
Uncategorized
Report: Iran’s New Military Plan Is Regime Survival Through Regional Escalation
Members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) attend an IRGC ground forces military drill in the Aras area, East Azerbaijan province, Iran, Oct. 17, 2022. Photo: IRGC/WANA (West Asia News Agency)/Handout via REUTERS
i24 News – After last year’s devastating conflict with the United States and Israel, Iranian leaders have reportedly adopted a major strategic shift aimed at expanding the war across the Middle East to secure the regime’s survival, according to the Wall Street Journal.
Previously, Iran responded to foreign strikes with limited, targeted reprisals. The new doctrine abandons that approach, aiming instead to escalate the conflict regionally, particularly against Gulf Arab states and critical economic infrastructure. The goal is to disrupt the global economy and pressure Washington into shortening the war.
This decision followed the twelve-day war with Israel in June 2025, during which Israeli and US strikes eliminated senior Iranian military leaders, destroyed key air defense systems, and severely damaged nuclear facilities. In response, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei—before his elimination early in the current conflict—activated a strategy designed to maintain continuity even if top commanders were neutralized.
Central to this approach is the so-called “mosaic defense” doctrine: a decentralized military structure in which the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) operates through multiple regional command centers. Each center can conduct operations independently, allowing local commanders to continue fighting even if national leadership is incapacitated. This makes the military apparatus more resilient to targeted strikes.
Analysts cited by the Wall Street Journal suggest that Tehran’s calculation is to make the conflict costly enough for all parties to force the US and its allies into a diplomatic resolution.
However, the plan carries enormous risks. By escalating attacks on regional states and international economic interests, Iran could provoke a broader coalition against itself. Despite prior military losses, Iranian forces retain the capability to launch drone and missile strikes, maintaining their influence over the ongoing conflict.
For Iranian leaders, the immediate priority remains unchanged: the survival of the regime, even if it requires a major regional escalation.
Uncategorized
Katz Warns Lebanon to Disarm Hezbollah or ‘Pay a Heavy Price’
Israel’s Defense Minister Israel Katz and his Greek counterpart Nikos Dendias make statements to the press, at the Ministry of Defense in Athens Greece, Jan. 20, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Louisa Gouliamaki
i24 News – Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz on Saturday warned Lebanon’s leadership that it must act to disarm Hezbollah and enforce existing agreements, cautioning that failure to do so could lead to severe consequences for the Lebanese state.
Speaking after a high-level security assessment with senior military officials, Katz directed a message to Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, saying Beirut had committed to enforcing an agreement requiring Hezbollah’s disarmament but had failed to follow through.
“You pledged to uphold the agreement and disarm Hezbollah — and this is not happening,” Katz said. “Act and enforce it before we do even more.”
The meeting took place in Israel’s military command center and included Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir and other senior defense officials, as Israel continues operations on multiple fronts.
Katz emphasized that Israel would not tolerate attacks on its communities or soldiers from Lebanese territory.
“We will not allow harm to our communities or to our soldiers,” he said. “If the choice is between protecting our citizens and soldiers or protecting the State of Lebanon, we will choose our citizens and soldiers — and the Lebanese government and Lebanon will pay a very heavy price.”
The defense minister also referenced Hezbollah’s leadership, warning that the group’s current chief could lead Lebanon into further destruction.
“If Hassan Nasrallah destroyed Lebanon, then Naim Qassem will destroy it as well,” Katz said.
Katz stressed that Israel has no territorial ambitions in Lebanon but said it would not accept a return to the years in which Hezbollah launched repeated attacks on Israel from Lebanese territory.
“We have no territorial claims against Lebanon,” he said. “But we will not allow Lebanese territory to again become a platform for attacks against the State of Israel.”
He concluded with a warning to Lebanese authorities to take action against Hezbollah before Israel escalates its response.
“Do and act before we do even more,” Katz said.
Uncategorized
Trump Explores Possibility of Limited US Ground Deployment in Iran
United States President Donald J Trump in White House in Washington, DC, USA, on Thursday, December 18, 2025. Photo: Aaron Schwartz via Reuters Connect.
i24 News – US President Donald Trump has discussed the possibility of sending American ground forces into Iran as part of broader planning for how the country could be managed after the current conflict, reports NBC News.
The topic reportedly arose in discussions with senior aides and Republican figures outside the White House, where Trump outlined his thinking about what a post-war Iran might look like if the current confrontation significantly weakens the ruling regime. According to people briefed on those talks, the president has spoken about the need to secure Iran’s uranium reserves and prevent nuclear materials from falling into the wrong hands during any potential political transition.
Sources say Trump’s comments did not focus on the idea of a large-scale US military invasion. Instead, the discussions centered on a far more limited scenario involving a small contingent of American troops tasked with specific strategic missions. Such forces could potentially be deployed to secure sensitive nuclear facilities, protect critical infrastructure, or support stabilization efforts during a transitional period.
Those familiar with the conversations said the idea has been presented as one possible option among several scenarios being considered as the conflict evolves. Trump has reportedly also described a longer-term vision in which a new Iranian leadership could cooperate with Washington economically, particularly in the energy sector. In private conversations, he has suggested that the United States could eventually work with a post-regime Iran on oil production arrangements, drawing comparisons to the current cooperation between Washington and Venezuela.