RSS
A New Dawn: The Case for Regime Change in Iran
Protestors gather in solidarity with anti-regime protests in Iran outside the Iranian embassy in Helsinki, Finland. Photo: Reuters/Lehtikuva/Heikki Saukkomaa.
This policy shift is reminiscent of the decisive moment at the Guadalupe meeting in 1979, when global leaders chose to withdraw support from the Shah of Iran. That decision precipitated the fall of his regime, and the rise of a government that has since been a thorn in the side of international security. The current administration’s stance effectively closes the door on appeasement with a regime characterized by criminality and a lack of legitimacy, acknowledging that diplomacy with such an entity is not just fruitless but counterproductive.
The indispensability of leaders like Reza Pahlavi in this context cannot be overstated. Their advocacy for a democratic Iran free from the grip of authoritarianism and terrorism is not only a beacon of hope for the Iranian people, but also a strategic imperative for the international community.
The necessity for regime change in Iran, underpinned by the quest for stability and peace in the Middle East, is a complex yet unavoidable conclusion. The current regime’s entrenched position as a destabilizing force, through its support for proxy conflicts and its pursuit of nuclear capabilities, presents an insurmountable obstacle to regional harmony and international security. The transition towards a government that embodies the principles of democracy, respect for human rights, and peaceful coexistence is essential for dismantling the architecture of conflict that has defined the region for decades.
Such a transition requires a multifaceted strategy encompassing international diplomacy, economic incentives, and the empowerment of civil society within Iran. The global community must unite in its support for the Iranian populace, advocating for peaceful change and the establishment of a governance structure that reflects the will and aspirations of its people. This approach not only addresses the immediate challenges posed by Iran, but also lays the groundwork for a sustainable peace, facilitating the country’s reintegration into the global community as a constructive and responsible actor.
The recalibration of US policy towards Iran and the advocacy for regime change are not merely policy positions, but essential steps towards achieving stability and peace in the Middle East. The leadership of figures like Pahlavi is critical in navigating the complex landscape in Iran, and helping move the country towards democracy and prosperity. As the international community contemplates the path forward, it must recognize that the quest for a peaceful and stable Iran is intrinsically linked to the broader aspirations for global security and harmony. The journey is undoubtedly fraught with challenges, yet the promise of a democratic Iran, championed by visionary leaders and supported by a unified international effort, remains a goal worth pursuing for the sake of the Iranian people and the world at large.
In the journey toward a future free from the clutches of tyranny, I am reminded of a pivotal conversation between George W. Bush and an Iranian political figure, wherein Bush stated that the US wanted to see a democratic regime in Iran, but didn’t want to interfere. This sentiment encapsulates the delicate balance of supporting change without direct intervention. The onus, therefore, falls on the Iranian people to dismantle this brutal regime — a task of monumental difficulty.
The demise of such a regime cannot be achieved lightly or without a comprehensive plan. It necessitates the strategic support of the US intelligence community and the diplomatic engagement of global powers, including Russia and other Asian states, who eye a stake in Iran’s future post-regime. The path is arduous, but the collective effort can pave the way for a new Iran, marking the end of tyranny and the dawn of a new era of peace and democracy.
Erfan Fard is a counter-terrorism analyst and Middle East Studies researcher based in Washington, D.C. He focuses on Middle Eastern regional security affairs, with a particular emphasis on Iran, counter-terrorism, IRGC, MOIS, and ethnic conflicts in MENA. Erfan is a Jewish Kurd of Iran, and he is fluent in Persian, Kurdish, Arabic, and English. Follow him from this twitter account @EQFARD.
The post A New Dawn: The Case for Regime Change in Iran first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Sweden Ends Funding for UNRWA, Pledges to Seek Other Aid Channels
View of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) building in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip. Photo: Abed Rahim Khatib / Flash90.
i24 News – Sweden will no longer fund the U.N. refugee agency for Palestinians (UNRWA) and will instead provide humanitarian assistance to Gaza via other channels, the Scandinavian country said on Friday.
The decision comes on the heels of multiple revelations regarding the agency’s employees’ involvement in the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led massacre in southern Israel that triggered the war in Gaza.
Sweden’s decision was in response to the Israeli ban, as it will make channeling aid via the agency more difficult, the country’s aid minister, Benjamin Dousa, said.
“Large parts of UNRWA’s operations in Gaza are either going to be severely weakened or completely impossible,” Dousa said. “For the government, the most important thing is that support gets through.”
The Palestinian embassy in Stockholm said in a statement: “We reject the idea of finding alternatives to UNRWA, which has a special mandate to provide services to Palestinian refugees.”
Israeli Deputy Foreign Minister Sharren Haskel thanked Dousa for a meeting they had this week and for Sweden’s decision to drop its support for UNRWA.
“There are worthy and viable alternatives for humanitarian aid, and I appreciate the willingness to listen and adopt a different approach,” she said.
The post Sweden Ends Funding for UNRWA, Pledges to Seek Other Aid Channels first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Pope Calls Gaza Airstrikes ‘Cruelty’ After Israeli Minister’s Criticism
Pope Francis waves after delivering his traditional Christmas Day Urbi et Orbi speech to the city and the world from the main balcony of St. Peter’s Basilica at the Vatican, December 25, 2021. Photo: REUTERS/Yara Nardi
Pope Francis on Saturday again condemned Israeli airstrikes in Gaza, a day after an Israeli government minister publicly denounced the pontiff for suggesting the global community should study whether the military offensive there constitutes a genocide of the Palestinian people.
Francis opened his annual Christmas address to the Catholic cardinals who lead the Vatican’s various departments with what appeared to be a reference to Israeli airstrikes on Friday that killed at least 25 Palestinians in Gaza.
“Yesterday, children were bombed,” said the pope. “This is cruelty. This is not war. I wanted to say this because it touches the heart.”
The pope, as leader of the 1.4-billion-member Roman Catholic Church, is usually careful about taking sides in conflicts, but he has recently been more outspoken about Israel’s military campaign against Palestinian terrorist group Hamas.
In book excerpts published last month, the pontiff said some international experts said that “what is happening in Gaza has the characteristics of a genocide.”
Israeli Minister of Diaspora Affairs Amichai Chikli sharply criticized those comments in an unusual open letter published by Italian newspaper Il Foglio on Friday. Chikli said the pope’s remarks amounted to a “trivialization” of the term genocide.
Francis also said on Saturday that the Catholic bishop of Jerusalem, known as a patriarch, had tried to enter the Gaza Strip on Friday to visit Catholics there, but was denied entry.
The patriarch’s office told Reuters it was not able to comment on the pope’s remarks about the patriarch being denied entry.
Israeli officials were not immediately reachable for comment on Saturday, the Jewish Sabbath, and the Israeli military did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The post Pope Calls Gaza Airstrikes ‘Cruelty’ After Israeli Minister’s Criticism first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
IDF Pledges to Implement Lessons from Failure to Intercept Houthi Missile
Iranian-backed Yemeni terrorist leader Abdul-Malik al-Houthi. Photo: Screenshot
i24 News – The Israeli military said on Saturday that while the investigation into the failure to intercept the missile that hit Tel Aviv early in the morning was still ongoing, some lessons were already being implemented. The ballistic missile, fired by Yemen’s Houthi jihadists, landed at a playground in a residential area, leading to 16 people sustaining injuries from glass shards.
Israel Defense Forces (IDF) spokesperson said that “some of the conclusions have already been implemented, in regards of both interception and early warning.”
The spokesperson added that “no further details regarding aerial defense activities and the alert system can be disclosed due to operational security considerations.”
The Houthis have repeatedly fired drones and missiles towards Israel in what they describe as “acts of solidarity” with Palestinians in Gaza.
The post IDF Pledges to Implement Lessons from Failure to Intercept Houthi Missile first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login