RSS
How Do Israelis Really Feel About Benjamin Netanyahu?
US House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) and Senate Foreign Relations Chair, US Sen. Ben Cardin (D-MD), listen as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses a joint meeting of Congress at the US Capitol in Washington, DC, July 24, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Craig Hudson
On Wednesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke before a joint session of Congress, to near constant and thunderous applause by American lawmakers and their guests.
However, one Republican and some 70 Democrats boycotted the Prime Minister’s speech, including former Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and presidential hopeful, Vice President Kamala Harris. (Though Harris said she had already committed to another engagement). Capitol Hill also saw several violent protests, including the burning of American flags.
Some of the lawmakers who skipped the speech claim to be “pro-Israel but anti-Netanyahu,” and claim that many Israelis feel the same. But is that really true?
It is common for the United States to oppose leaders of dictatorships or enemy states, but it is extremely rare to oppose the democratically-elected leader of an ally, regardless of that leader’s local popularity.
Israel’s detractors in America and around the world (as well as many Israelis) frequently quote Israel’s Channel 12 poll indicating that 72% of Israelis want Netanyahu to resign. Yet alone, the headline is misleading: in fact, only 44% of Israelis want the Prime Minister to resign immediately, while 28% want him to resign only after completing the current war in Gaza. The remaining 28% support Netanyahu and would like to see him remain in office.
These figures reveal two important insights: one is that a majority of Israelis (56%) do not want to see a change in leadership until after the current war is complete; the second is that Netanyahu actually has a relatively high degree of support by Israeli standards.
Being accustomed to a two party system, Americans typically see anything less than 50% support as a sign that the public opposes a particular leader. Yet Israel is a multi-party, coalition democracy, where 25% to 30% support is often enough to put a frontrunner ahead of all other contenders.
In fact, if elections were held today, according to another Channel 12 poll, right-leaning former prime minister Naftali Bennett would win with 36% support, while Netanyahu would come in second with 28%. In other words, Netanyahu remains a mainstream political figure with significant support, by Israel’s multi-party standards.
This is not meant to be an endorsement nor a critique of Netanyahu, but merely a sober and unbiased review of the actual math behind the headlines.
The principal Israeli complaint against Netanyahu is that (according to some) he has put the war against Hamas ahead of efforts to return the hostages, perhaps even as a cynical ploy to hold onto power as long as possible. Critics also argue he has mismanaged the war — and did not act decisively enough at the outset or at other pivotal points.
For his part, Netanyahu insists that only military pressure can induce Hamas to agree to a hostage release deal. And recent events back him up. Netanyahu’s critics claim he alone is stopping a deal — but many others, including the US, claim Hamas is the impediment.
In every negotiation, Hamas has agreed to return hostages only in a slow trickle, yet when Israel agreed to this framework last May, Hamas immediately changed the deal, indicating that they would initially return the bodies of dead hostages while still holding on to living hostages until later. Meanwhile, Hamas gave contradictory and changing reports as to how many hostages they could even locate. In other words, based on evidence, it is possible that Israel could give in to every Hamas demand and yet still not necessarily secure the return of the remaining hostages.
Another Israeli complaint against the Prime Minister, including by some IDF commanders, is that Israel can and should agree to end the war against Hamas and may then simply re-enter Gaza later, if necessary. Many other military and political leaders disagree with this. Either way, when Israel signaled last month that it may be open to negotiating an end to the war, Hamas immediately shifted the focus of negotiations, seeking enforcement mechanisms to prevent the IDF from ever breaching the agreement.
To be clear, this is not intended as a critique of complaints by the families of hostages, who are undergoing unimaginable suffering, nor of the IDF commanders, who have performed exceptionally under difficult circumstances, but rather this is meant to be an accurate and unbiased review of the complex and very real challenges that stand in the way of Israel achieving its goals, including the return of the hostages.
Israel is an outspoken democracy where criticizing the government is practically a national sport. While Netanyahu has faced considerable internal criticism, there are actually a variety of nuanced opinions on the complex challenges that Israel is facing. Ultimately, the American headlines that most Israelis oppose Netanyahu is an oversimplification at best, and a broad misreading at worst.
Daniel Pomerantz is the CEO of RealityCheck, an organization dedicated to deepening public conversation through robust research studies and public speaking.
The post How Do Israelis Really Feel About Benjamin Netanyahu? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Hostage Families Reject Partial Gaza Seal, Demand Release of All Hostages
Demonstrators hold signs and pictures of hostages, as relatives and supporters of Israeli hostages kidnapped during the Oct. 7, 2023 attack by Hamas protest demanding the release of all hostages in Tel Aviv, Israel, Feb. 13, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Itai Ron
i24 News – As Israeli leaders weigh the contours of a possible partial ceasefire deal with Hamas, the families of the 50 hostages still held in Gaza issued an impassioned public statement this weekend, condemning any agreement that would return only some of the abductees.
In a powerful message released Saturday, the Families Forum for the Return of Hostages denounced what they call the “beating system” and “cruel selection process,” which, they say, has left families trapped in unbearable uncertainty for 638 days—not knowing whether to hope for reunion or prepare for mourning.
The group warned that a phased or selective deal—rumored to be under discussion—would deepen their suffering and perpetuate injustice. Among the 50 hostages, 22 are believed to be alive, and 28 are presumed dead.
“Every family deserves answers and closure,” the Forum said. “Whether it is a return to embrace or a grave to mourn over—each is sacred.”
They accused the Israeli government of allowing political considerations to prevent a full agreement that could have brought all hostages—living and fallen—home long ago. “It is forbidden to conform to the dictates of Schindler-style lists,” the statement read, invoking a painful historical parallel.
“All of the abductees could have returned for rehabilitation or burial months ago, had the government chosen to act with courage.”
The call for a comprehensive deal comes just as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu prepares for high-stakes talks in Washington and as indirect negotiations between Israel and Hamas are expected to resume in Doha within the next 24 hours, according to regional media reports.
Hamas, for its part, issued a statement Friday confirming its readiness to begin immediate negotiations on the implementation of a ceasefire and hostage release framework.
The Forum emphasized that every day in captivity poses a mortal risk to the living hostages, and for the deceased, a danger of being lost forever. “The horror of selection does not spare any of us,” the statement said. “Enough with the separation and categories that deepen the pain of the families.”
In a planned public address near Begin Gate in Tel Aviv, families are gathering Saturday evening to demand that the Israeli government accept a full-release deal—what they describe as the only “moral and Zionist” path forward.
“We will return. We will avenge,” the Forum concluded. “This is the time to complete the mission.”
As of now, the Israeli government has not formally responded to Hamas’s latest statement.
The post Hostage Families Reject Partial Gaza Seal, Demand Release of All Hostages first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Melbourne Police Investigate Wave of Antisemitic Attacks, Including Synagogue Arson
Illustrative. Vandals defaced the Melbourne Hebrew Congregation in Australia on June 22, 2025. Photo: Screenshot
i24 News – A wave of antisemitic incidents across Melbourne is under urgent investigation by Victoria Police, after a synagogue was set alight, a Jewish-owned restaurant targeted by protesters, and a third attack saw multiple cars torched at a business in the city’s northeast.
The third incident occurred around 4:30 a.m. Saturday at a business on Para Road in Greensborough. Offenders set fire to three vehicles and sprayed graffiti on both the cars and a nearby building wall. One car was destroyed, and two others sustained moderate damage.
“There were references of antisemitism in the graffiti,” Dunstan confirmed, adding that the business had previously been linked to pro-Palestinian activism.
While police say no direct link between the three incidents has been established yet, they are not ruling out the possibility of coordination.
The attacks began Friday night, when a man was seen pouring a flammable liquid on the entrance of the East Melbourne Hebrew Congregation and setting it alight around 8 p.m., while around 20 people were inside for Shabbat services. Worshipers quickly evacuated through the back, and the fire was contained to the front of the building. No injuries were reported.
Police have released an image of a suspect believed to be in his 30s, of Caucasian appearance, with a beard and long hair.
Just hours after the synagogue arson, a protest of around 70 people moved through Swanston Street before a smaller group gathered outside Miznon, a popular Jewish-owned restaurant in the CBD, chanting offensive slogans. One man was arrested and later released on summons for hindering police.
In response to the series of attacks, federal agencies including the Australian Federal Police (AFP) and the Australian Security Intelligence Organization (ASIO) have joined the investigation.
“This is disgraceful behavior by a pack of cowards,” said Victorian Premier Jacinta Allan. “Any attack on a place of worship is an act of hate. Any attack on a Jewish place of worship is an act of antisemitism. There should be no hesitation in calling this what it is.”
The post Melbourne Police Investigate Wave of Antisemitic Attacks, Including Synagogue Arson first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Trump Says Iran Has Not Agreed to Inspections, Give Up Enrichment
US President Donald Trump speaks at a meeting with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte (not pictured), at the NATO summit in The Hague, Netherlands, June 25, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Brian Snyder
US President Donald Trump said on Friday that Iran had not agreed to inspections of its nuclear program or to give up enriching uranium.
He told reporters aboard Air Force One that he believed Tehran’s nuclear program had been set back permanently although Iran could restart it at a different location.
Trump said he would discuss Iran with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu when he visits the White House on Monday.
“I would say it’s set back permanently,” Trump said as he traveled to New Jersey after an Independence Day celebration at the White House. “I would think they’d have to start at a different location. And if they did start, it would be a problem.”
Trump said he would not allow Tehran to resume its nuclear program, adding that Iran did want to meet with him.
The U.N. nuclear watchdog said on Friday it had pulled its last remaining inspectors from Iran as a standoff deepens over their return to the country’s nuclear facilities bombed by the United States and Israel.
The U.S. and Israel say Iran was enriching uranium to build nuclear weapons. Tehran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.
Israel launched its first military strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites in a 12-day war with the Islamic Republic three weeks ago. The International Atomic Energy Agency’s inspectors have not been able to inspect Iran’s facilities since then, even though IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said that is his top priority.
Iran’s parliament has passed a law suspending cooperation with the IAEA until the safety of its nuclear facilities can be guaranteed. While the IAEA says Iran has not yet formally informed it of any suspension, it is unclear when the agency’s inspectors will be able to return to Iran.
Iran has accused the agency of effectively paving the way for the bombings by issuing a damning report on May 31 that led to a resolution by the IAEA’s 35-nation Board of Governors declaring Iran in breach of its non-proliferation obligations.
The US and Israeli military strikes either destroyed or badly damaged Iran’s three uranium enrichment sites. But it was less clear what has happened to much of Iran’s nine tons of enriched uranium, especially the more than 400 kg (880 pounds) enriched to up to 60% purity, a short step from weapons grade.
The post Trump Says Iran Has Not Agreed to Inspections, Give Up Enrichment first appeared on Algemeiner.com.