Connect with us

RSS

Victims or Visionaries?

Rendering of the Pool of Siloam during the Second Temple period. Photo: Shalom Kveller/City of David Archives

JNS.orgI was looking through my files and came across the notes of a sermon I made just before Israel’s disengagement from Gaza back in August 2005.

I called the unilateral disengagement a tragedy. Nearly 10,000 good Jews and idealistic Zionists who had built and developed Gush Katif and other areas into thriving, successful, productive communities were now dragged from their homes and expelled.

I said that I feared this heartbreaking event would affect all the people of Israel, the defense capabilities of the IDF and Jews around the world. I said I hoped I was wrong, but I feared I was right.

Boy, was I right! Tragic and heartbreaking indeed, as we now reap the fruits of that catastrophically flawed decision. Already then, the Palestinians in Gaza came out en masse wearing t-shirts proclaiming, “Today Gaza, tomorrow Jerusalem!”

That dire event, too, occurred just before Tisha B’Av, the Jewish people’s National Day of Mourning, which will be observed this coming Monday night and Tuesday. At that time, hundreds of thousands converged at the Western Wall praying for a miracle that might have stopped the calamity, but it was not to be.

Once upon a time, the Babylonians violently banished us from our land. Then, 500 years later, the Romans did the same. In 1492, the Jews were expelled from Spain by King Ferdinand and Queen Isabella. But in 2005, fellow Jews removed our own people from our homeland! At the time, I remember feeling that this was a re-enactment of Tisha B’Av.

And here we are now, with Tisha B’Av looming and rumors that Iran and its proxies are planning to launch an attack on Israel on that very day next week! I never knew they were such good students of Jewish history.

This Shabbat is known as Shabbat Chazon, from the opening line of the third and final Haftarah of Rebuke read at this time of mourning, Chazon Yeshayahu—“The Vision of Isaiah.”

We may not be prophets, but we must all be visionaries.

There is the famous Talmudic tale of some of the great sages who witnessed Jerusalem in ruins and wept. Rabbi Akiva, however, smiled. When his colleagues asked him how he could smile while seeing such devastation of our holy city, he replied, “Now that I have seen the prophecy of the Destruction fulfilled, I have even greater faith in the prophecies of the Rebuilding to come.” The other sages replied, “Akiva nichamtanu—Akiva, you have comforted us.”

The 18th-century Chassidic master Rabbi Levi Yitzchak of Berditchev famously wrote that on this Shabbat Chazon, a vision of our Third Temple to be rebuilt at the time of the Redemption is shown to all of us. Whether we see it manifested tangibly or not, our souls do sense it subconsciously. We may not merit to see it physically, but the vision is there and, somehow, it affects us in a spiritual way.

My respected friend and senior colleague, Rabbi Manis Friedman, points out that Fact and Truth are not necessarily always synonymous.

War is a Fact. Peace is Truth. Fact is what is. Truth is what ought to be.

At the Splitting of the Sea, when caught “between the devil and the deep blue sea,” the Israelites were instructed to “move forward.” But didn’t that mean going into the water? Well, at that most miraculous occasion, the facts yielded to the truth. Indeed, the sea split, and the Israelites crossed over on dry land while the pursuing Egyptians drowned.

The Churban, the Destruction of our Holy Temple, and the ensuing centuries of exile are a tragedy of the highest proportions. And yet, we need the vision to see beyond the facts on the ground and anticipate the great and awesome truths that will follow.

One interesting way of looking at the Destruction more hopefully is that G-d is doing a renovation and preparing for the most glorious Third and final Temple with the coming of the Messianic Age.

During a renovation, walls and houses may be leveled, but it is all for a bigger and more beautiful finished product that will eventually emerge. It is necessary destruction for the purpose of an improved and enhanced rebuilding.

I know that builders rarely finish the job on time and it is almost always delayed. Over 30 years ago, we renovated our home while living in it. The hardest part was preparing and eating our meals in the entrance hall while the kitchen was being remodeled.

It’s one thing to be delayed by a few weeks or months, but the renovation of the Temple in Jerusalem has been going on for over 1,900 years. Surely, this must be the longest renovation in history! But we do believe it, and we also believe that, in the end, this will truly be the most glorious Temple of all. Furthermore, it will usher in the long-awaited Redemption and the final banishment of evil from the face of the earth. I guess that’s something worth waiting for.

We must all be Rabbi Akiva’s students and followers. We, too, must become visionaries and develop a broader, deeper look and perspective.

On Shabbat, we show no outward signs of mourning. We look beyond. Please G-d, that vision will translate to reality even before this Tisha B’Av, and our courageous soldiers will win the war on all fronts, our hostages will come home safely, and these days of sadness and mourning will be transformed into days of joy and thanksgiving.

The post Victims or Visionaries? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

US-backed Gaza Relief NGO Vows ‘Legal Action’ Against AP Claim Group Fired on Palestinian Civilians

Palestinians collect aid supplies from the US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, in Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip, June 9, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Hatem Khaled

The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF), a US-backed nonprofit operating aid distribution centers in the Gaza Strip, is pushing back forcefully against an Associated Press report alleging that its contractors opened fire on Palestinian civilians.

The GHF is accusing the AP of withholding key evidence and relying on a “disgruntled former contractor” as a central source.

“In response, we are pursuing legal action,” the organization said in a statement released Wednesday.

GHF said it conducted an “immediate investigation” after being contacted by the AP, reviewing time-stamped video footage and sworn witness testimony. The group concluded that the allegations were “categorically false,” stating that no civilians were fired upon at any of their distribution sites and that the gunfire heard in the AP’s video came from Israeli forces operating outside the vicinity.

“What is most troubling is that the AP refused to share the full video with us prior to publication, despite the seriousness of the allegations,” the statement read. “If they believed their own reporting, they should have provided us with the footage so we could take immediate and appropriate action.”

The nonprofit’s public rebuttal raises sharp questions about the AP’s reporting process, suggesting the outlet declined to engage with the organization in good faith and instead leaned on a source GHF describes as having been terminated “for misconduct” weeks prior. The group also claimed the AP’s recent coverage of its activities had begun to “echo narratives advanced by the Hamas-controlled Gaza Ministry of Health.”

The AP has not yet responded publicly to the GHF’s accusations or provided clarification about its decision not to share the video footage before publication. The original report alleged that American contractors employed by GHF had fired weapons near or toward civilians.

The GHF statement confirmed that a contractor seen shouting in the AP’s video had been removed from operations, though the group insisted this was unrelated to any violence and did not constitute evidence of wrongdoing.

GHF, which describes its mission as delivering food to Gaza “safely, directly, and without interference,” said it remains committed to transparency but would not allow its operations to be “derailed by misinformation.”

The dispute highlights the fraught information environment in Gaza, where limited access and competing narratives frequently complicate the verification of on-the-ground events.

The post US-backed Gaza Relief NGO Vows ‘Legal Action’ Against AP Claim Group Fired on Palestinian Civilians first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Shock Poll: Most Jews Approve of Trump’s Job Performance, Strike on Iran

US President Donald Trump speaks in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, Feb. 11, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

A new Siena Research poll finds that a majority of Jewish voters in New York approve of President Donald Trump’s job performance and his handling of the Israel-Iran war.

The survey found that a majority of Jewish respondents, 57 percent, approve of the job Trump is doing in his second term as president, compared to 42 percent who disapprove.

Even more striking, 64 percent of Jewish voters say they approve of Trump’s handling of the Israel-Iran conflict, signaling strong alignment with his foreign policy stance in a community that has historically leaned Democratic in national elections.

The poll results highlight a notable political shift in one of the most reliably liberal constituencies in the country. In 2020, Trump won only about 30 percent of the Jewish vote nationally, and similar trends held in New York. But since his return to office in the 2024 election, a victory that itself stunned many observers, Trump has emphasized an aggressive pro-Israel posture, including increased military aid and unwavering rhetorical support during Israel’s war with Iran and Hezbollah.

The Israel-Iran war, which erupted earlier this year following escalating attacks between Israel and Iran, and Tehran’s deepening involvement with proxy forces in Lebanon and Syria, has become a key flashpoint in international politics and a central issue for American Jews. Trump has repeatedly vowed to back Israel “without hesitation,” and his administration has taken steps to provide military resupply, expand intelligence sharing, and block UN resolutions critical of Israeli operations.

In response, his approval ratings among Jewish voters, particularly Orthodox and pro-Israel segments, appear to have climbed sharply.

“This marks a significant departure from previous voting patterns,” said Lauren Saperstein, a political scientist at NYU focused on Jewish American voting behavior. “Trump has successfully tapped into security concerns, especially in light of the Iran threat, and that’s resonating with voters who may have disagreed with him on other issues in the past.”

Past data has suggested Orthodox Jewish voters tend to favor Republican candidates more heavily, while Reform and secular Jews lean Democratic. The new 57 percent approval figure indicates broader support than Trump has previously received from the Jewish electorate in New York.

Democrats, for their part, have struggled to maintain a cohesive stance on the Israel-Iran conflict. Many Democrats criticized Trump for deciding to strike at Tehran’s nuclear facilities, arguing that the president unnecessarily risked causing a broader regional war.  Within the Democratic Party, divisions over Israel policy have widened, with younger progressives more likely to criticize the war and push for conditions on US aid to its longtime ally.

The poll results could have significant implications for upcoming congressional races in New York, where Jewish voters represent a sizable and politically active bloc. Several House districts in Brooklyn, Queens, and Long Island could be influenced by the shift in sentiment, particularly if Democrats are seen as divided or insufficiently supportive of Israel.

As the conflict in the Middle East continues, Trump appears to be benefiting from his strong messaging in favor of Israel and against antisemitism.

The post Shock Poll: Most Jews Approve of Trump’s Job Performance, Strike on Iran first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

The Anti-Israel Mob Never Mentions Women’s Rights in Israel — Compared to the Middle East

Paris 2024 Olympics – Judo – Women -78 kg Victory Ceremony – Champ-de-Mars Arena, Paris, France – August 01, 2024. Silver medallist Inbar Lanir of Israel celebrates. Photo: REUTERS/Arlette Bashizi

In parts of the Middle East, women still live in deeply patriarchal, often brutal systems. Changes exist more on paper than in practice. Power remains in the hands of men, religious systems, and political elites — and this repressive treatment often goes unchallenged.

This happens in places like Gaza under Hamas, in Afghanistan under the Taliban, in Iran under the ayatollahs, and even in Saudi Arabia, where “reforms” like women driving made headlines in 2018.

Let’s be clear: not every Muslim-majority country treats women this way. In places like Jordan, Egypt, and Turkey, many women work, study, and participate in public life. But even there, legal protections and personal freedoms often lag behind. And in the four examples mentioned — Gaza, Iran, Afghanistan, and Saudi Arabia — women face severe, institutionalized oppression. These are not fringe cases; they reflect the governing ideologies of millions.

Now contrast that with Israel.

In Israel, the only liberal democracy in the region, both Jewish and Arab women live with rights and freedoms unheard of in most of the Middle East.

In Israel, women:

  • Vote and run for office
  • Serve as Supreme Court judges, ministers, professors, doctors, and CEOs
  • Join the military, even in combat roles
  • Protest publicly without fear of being shot or jailed
  • Choose how to dress, where to work, whom to marry, and what to believe
  • File police reports and expect legal protection

Women in Israel are not just present, they lead. They command battalions, fly fighter jets, debate in the Knesset, run start-ups, and shape policy. Gender equality is not perfect — no country is — but legally, all women are fully protected.

And this is the part that’s almost never said: Arab women in Israel also enjoy more rights than in any Arab country. They study in top universities, vote freely, become doctors, lawyers, and leaders. Yes, some face traditional cultural pressures in their communities, but under Israeli law, they are citizens with equal rights, and legal recourse when those rights are violated.

Can the same be said for women in Gaza, ruled by Hamas? For women under the Taliban in Afghanistan? Or for the brave Iranian women imprisoned for removing their headscarves?

If you are a self-respecting feminist in the West, this should be a moral line: Israel is the only place in the Middle East where women are truly free. In Tel Aviv, if a woman is raped, she can go to the police. She’ll be heard, investigated, supported.

In Tehran, she might be blamed. In Riyadh, she could be imprisoned. In Kabul, she might be killed. In Gaza, she might be forced to marry her rapist.

So ask yourself: if you support women’s rights, why are you aligning with regimes or movements that strip women of their humanity?

Something is deeply broken when women in free societies chant slogans for groups that would silence, veil, and imprison them. When feminists march with Palestinian flags, are they aware that under Hamas, there is no LGBTQ+ freedom, no feminist activism, no legal protections for women?

You don’t have to support every policy of the Israeli government to recognize this truth: Israel is the only country in the Middle East where a woman can live as a full, free citizen.

Western feminists need to wake up. When you champion groups like Hamas or regimes like Iran “for the cause,” you are betraying the very values you claim to fight for.

Until that realization comes, I ask just one thing: If you truly care about women, why on earth are you standing against Israel?

Sabine Sterk is the CEO of Time To Stand Up For Israel. 

The post The Anti-Israel Mob Never Mentions Women’s Rights in Israel — Compared to the Middle East first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News