Back in August we printed a story titled “A detailed look at the awful predicament in which JNF Canada now finds itself since the CRA revoked its charitable status.” A large part of that story was taken from reporting done by Ellin Bessner for the CJN (Canadian Jewish News). Since then we have been asked by Bessner to give the CJN’s side of the story.
At the time we printed that story, and even up until the CJN approached us on Nov. 22, jewishpostandnews.ca did not contact the CJN for comment on JNF Canada’s’ accusations about their reporting. We regret our own lack of journalistic standards and have since removed that story from our website.
On November 22, we received an email from The CJN’s Bessner.  She had come across the article we had on our website and reached out to us.
Bessner insisted that JNF Canada’s claims about The CJN’s reporting on the CRA story are false. Bessner adds that JNF Canada’s claim that the CJN never asked them for their views is also not true.. 
Following is Ellin Besser’s view of what happened between JNF Canada and the CJN:

After their Aug. 10 revocation, The CJN contacted the JNF to ask for an interview. They agreed to talk to The CJN, but asked us to wait to do the interview until Aug. 16, a full six days after the CRA revoked their charitable status. We waited because we wanted to give JNF enough time to speak to us fully.  Also, there was Tisha B’av on Monday Aug. 12 so JNF’s staff was not available.
As JNF well knows, and the public knows because we put it into our reporting, The CJN team of Bessner and Jonathan Rothman conducted an hour-long, videotaped interview with JNF CEO Lance Davis by ZOOM, on Aug. 16. We even made sure that Davis made his own audio recording of the interview on his personal phone. 
While other news organizations were quick off the mark after Aug. 10 to publish a JNF revocation story, these other outlets did not conduct a full journalistic investigation, and published only JNF’s side.
While waiting for our interview, we continued our reporting. We knew that under the Income Tax Act’s privacy rules, the CRA never comments on cases while the audits and negotiations are underway. In fact, by law, the CRA cannot divulge anything about its audit process to the public, until after a charity is revoked. Then, the public can ask for the CRA’s internal documents concerning the reasons why a charity was revoked. So we asked. 
On Aug. 15, the day before our scheduled JNF interview, the CRA released to us 358 pages of internal documents regarding its dealings with JNF, including some documents dating back to 1967, when JNF Canada was officially granted charitable status in Canada.
No other news outlet in the world received the documents at this time; The CJN was the first. Our team read all the 358 pages the night before our interview. 
During our interview with Lance Davis the next day, we told him that we had the CRA’s documents. During the interview, we went through the issues which the CRA documents had raised. 
It was obvious that Davis had prepared talking points for his interview, as we had sent him the questions in advance, which they had requested. He was reading off another computer screen. Davis answered all our questions, including a list of issues raised in the CRA documents.
These ranged from missing paperwork, lack of oversight and direction, why documents were not provided in English or French but in Hebrew, why they were not kept in Canada but in Israel, why in-house travel expenses were not receipted the way CRA needed, why the donations to JNF from Canada went not to buying trees at all, until 2017, but to paying labour costs for workers in Israel.
We went back and forth with the JNF team over the next ten days by email, as we fact-checked issues. They also acknowledged this. They answered our fact-checking questions. We told them when our stories would likely be coming out, and we told them there would be print stories and a podcast or two. 
In the meantime, to get our story as complete as possible, we consulted with financial experts and charity experts, with JNF donors and with our lawyers.
It became apparent that JNF was extremely careful about who we spoke to, as we learned they had vetted what one of the donor interviewees told us: JNF’s p.r. person told me he had heard the raw tape of our interview shortly after we had hung up after we conducted it, but long before it was published.
Only after all CJN’s due diligence, which was a full sixteen days after JNF’s revocation, did we publish our series of stories. 
On the evening of Aug. 26, we reported on the contents of the CRA allegations, linking to the CRA documents, and that same evening, we also released our podcast containing JNF’s Davis’ interview. We also ran a lengthy print story early the next morning, again quoting Davis extensively. 
The following day we ran another podcast with some donors’ views, and more JNF arguments.
Here are all the stories and articles which The CJN has published on the CRA/JNF story.
JNF has been spinning things to attack our reporting, because they assume few people actually took the time to read The CJN’s work.
JNF is saying it was “blindsided” by the CRA’s revocation. But the truth is, and the documents which CRA released (and later JNF released and JNF told us) show JNF has been secretive about its own legal communications with the CRA dating back to 1967, and through four subsequent CRA audits. They received an amnesty from the new Revenue Minister in the 1990s.
The fifth audit, started in 2014 and has been the source of the agency’s latest problem over the last 10 years. 
Unlike the CRA, JNF was always able to publicly release their legal communications and letters back and forth with CRA. They did not do this back in 1989, when they were told they were not in compliance. They did not do so in August 2019, when they received the official Notice of Intention to Revoke, from when the clock to revocation started ticking. And they did not do so in June 2023, even after JNF received a letter saying the NITR notice was confirmed. 
Even during our interview, JNF did not disclose it had its own documents that could better show the context of its challenges dealing with the CRA.  JNF chose to release these only in September on their website. But they selectively released a document here and there to a “friendly” columnist for the National Post. These documents would have shown the fact that JNF’s detractors in the anti-Zionist advocacy world of Independent Jewish Voices, had their letter writing campaigns and media statements and briefing reports taken into consideration by CRA communications staff.
JNF also did not disclose on its website their annual audit documents for the years between 2018 and 2023, where the auditors’ reports stated the CRA had informed JNF it was going to lose its charitable status.
This is a lack of transparency on JNF’s part, thus hiding this knowledge from their donors, supporters, and the wider public. They also did not file these with the CRA, as they were legally required to do.
Only after our stories came out, did JNF upload the missing paperwork to its own website and posted on the CRA’s.
Two things can be true at the same time: JNF was facing compliance problems with CRA rules for years and hid this from its donors and the Canadian public and JNF acknowledged to us and to the CRA that it wanted to keep this issue quiet.
It is also possible that JNF was treated unfairly by the CRA, who may have been influenced by anti-Israel groups, or anti-Israel staff. The CRA denies this, but only time and Access to Information requests for Cabinet documents and internal CRA communications will tell.
During the pandemic, JNF had requested and obtained some documents from the CRA through access to information requests, showing internal reports that outline the media campaigns/internal pressure on the department from anti-JNF groups including Independent Jewish Voices, who wanted to have the charity shut down. 
JNF could have released these important documents to the CJN and to the wider public immediately, but chose not to do so. We only found them on the JNF website, in September. And we reported on this, too.
Likely this will all be decided by the Federal Court of Appeal. 

Second Cup Café said that the anti-Israel protester had violated the chain’s “values of inclusion and community.”

(Nov. 24, 2024 / JNS) The Canadian chain Second Cup Café announced on Saturday that it shut down a franchisee’s cafe at Jewish General Hospital in Montreal and terminated its relationship with that person after the latter “was filmed making hateful remarks and gestures.”

“Second Cup has zero tolerance for hate speech,” the chain stated. “In coordination with the hospital, we’ve shut down the franchisee’s cafe and are terminating their franchise agreement.”

The person’s actions, the chain said, breach the franchise agreement and “violate the values of inclusion and community we stand for at Second Cup.”

Idit Shamir, the consul general of Israel in Toronto and western Canada, named the former franchisee as Mai Abdulhadi, and said that the latter had chanted “the Final Solution is coming” and performed a Nazi salute at Concordia University, “while running a café at Jewish General Hospital, a place built by Holocaust survivors.”

“Thankfully, Second Cup acted swiftly: café shut down, franchise revoked,” Shamir wrote. “Mai Abdulhadi—Hate speech isn’t just vile, it’s a threat, and it will be met with consequences.”

The company earned accolades—and some promises of business—from Paul Hirschson, the Israeli consul general in Montreal, and leaders at the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs, and Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center.

“This great Canadian, Montreal-owned company has taken this principled stand at risk to their own business. In so doing, they are showing the courage and leadership Canada needs right now but is so desperately lacking from those in the highest of public offices,” stated Leo Housakos, a senator from Quebec. “I hope everyone goes out and buys their coffee tomorrow.”

Michal Cotler-Wunsh, the Israeli special envoy for combating antisemitism, wrote that it “turns out moral clarity is not so difficult.”

“Thanks Second Cup for showcasing Canadian values standing up to lethal hate speech and incitement,” she wrote. “Antisemitism is not a problem of Jews. It’s a problem of antisemites and the people and places that allow it to spread.”

“How is it that a coffee chain was able to put out a statement condemning antisemitism and racial hatred, faster, clearer and unambiguously better, than the prime minister of Canada?” wrote Arsen Ostrovsky, CEO of the International Legal Forum.

By GERRY POSNER Add yet another name to the list of Winnipeg Jews who became psychiatrists and who have achieved fame elsewhere. I speak of none other than Dr. Charles Marmar, formerly of Montrose Street in the south end of Winnipeg. Some readers may well remember his parents, Dr. Maurice Marmar and Pearl (Brook) Marmar. In fact, it was Dr. Maurice Marmar, either intentionally or not, who influenced his son Charles to follow a career into medicine. Charlie wll recalls , going as a kid with his father, a family doctor and surgeon, on rounds at the Victoria General Hospital and deciding then and there that he wanted to follow a similar path as his dad. He just went down a different path.

Charlie grew up in the south end of Winnipeg, having attended River Heights School,then Kelvin High School. He also played hockey with the River Heights Cardinals. After obtaining a BSc at the University of Manitoba in 1966, he entered medical school at the U of M and graduated with his MD in 1970. He was all of 24 when he graduated medicine.
Marmar soon departed for Toronto, where he competed his residency in psychiatry. He obtained a fellowship from the Ontario Mental Health Foundation and studied neuropharmacology at the University of Toronto in 1976. Charlie then completed another fellowship in traumatic stress and grief in the Department of Psychiatry at the University of California at San Francisco in 1978.
After that, Marmar’s career really took off. In 1978, He advanced being a junior faculty member in the Department of Psychiatry at UCSF to becoming a professor there, then Chief of Psychiatry at the San Francisco VA Hospital in 1996. In 2009, Marmar made a major move across the continent to New York, where he assumed the position of Lucius N. Littauer Professor and Chair of the Department of Psychiatry at the New York University Langone Medical Center.
Currently, he is Peter S. Schub Professor and Chair in the Department of Psychiatry, Director of the Centre for Precision Medicine in Alcohol Use Disorder, and Executive Director of the Langone Health Military Family Centre in the NYU Grossman School of Medicine. Those are a lot of titles, but they clearly indicate that Marmar is one of the movers and shakers in this area of medicine.

Marmar’s list of hospital appointments started in 1983 and continues to this day. As mentioned above, he presently sits as the Director of the NYU Langone Center for Precision Medicine in Alcohol Use disorder and PTSD. Moreover, he has been deeply involved since 1982 with a variety of other professional positions and Major Visiting Appointments. You have to take my word when I say that the list is expansive, too long for the Jewish Post. Yet, that list pales in comparison to the honours and awards that have come Marmar’s way in his illustrious career as a psychiatrist. I could not help but notice the very first mention of achievement for Marmar was his Honours standing in genetics at the School of Medicine at the University of Manitoba in 1966. That was the start of many moments of distinction right up to the present time. I also note that, among the many prestigious honours bestowed upon Charlie Marmar was the 1999 J. Elliot Royer Award as the Outstanding Bay Area Psychiatrist from the University of California, San Francisco. As well, He has published over 400 (not an error) articles on the epidemiology, neurobiology and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder. In 2022, Charlie was named Master Clinician as the outstanding physician across all specialties at NYU Langone Health.

Let’s just say that Charlie Marmar has put in serious time with his work on committees, many of them major and continuing to this day. In fact, Charlie was and still is the Chair of the Disaster Psychiatry Centers Special Review Committee for NIMH. He has worked over a period of years with veterans and that work is evidenced by the many committees he has worked with, particularly in the field of PTSD. This is an area of psychiatry where Marmar has much experience and has attained much fame. His focus has ranged from combat related conditions in veterans, including veterans of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, to assisting refugees and earthquake victims suffering from PTSD.This kind of work has led Marmar to conduct studies in psychopharmacology, psychopathology, psychobiology, all relating to PTSD.

Needless to say, Marmar has been a member of professional societies all over the world and, moreover, he has been involved with editorial boards and has authored many articles and been the editor for many publications.

With all that said, what I got a kick out of was when I asked a psychiatrist with whom I am friendly in Toronto, if he knew a Charles Marmar and he answered, “ Charlie, I remember him well from his days in Toronto (now over 50 years ago). He was a rising star.”

So, you take a kid from Montrose Street and without even a shove, years later he is settled in New York, regarded as one of the leaders in his field. He is still at it. And of course, a big part of his success he attributes to his wife Anne (Stern) whom he met at the University of Manitoba Health Sciences Centre where she was studying Dental Hygiene. They married in 1971 and are the proud parents of two sons, Eli and Daniel. They also have five grandchildren: Amalya, Liyora, Tziyon, Noah and Isaiah. The couple remains close to their family and friends from Winnipeg, now living in Toronto, New Jersey, Northern California, Boston, Philadelphia and elsewhere in the Winnipeg diaspora.