RSS
A Lesson for the Media: Terrorists Are Not Journalists
A Palestinian Hamas terrorist shakes hands with a child as they stand guard as people gather on the day of the handover of Israeli hostages, as part of a ceasefire and a hostages-prisoners swap deal between Hamas and Israel, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip, Feb. 22, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ramadan Abed
Terrorists are not journalists. But some in the media would have you think otherwise.
In the Israel-Islamist conflict, there is a longstanding trend of news outlets portraying terror operatives as reporters. In doing so, they diminish the work of, and endanger, real journalists who are often doing dangerous work.
An April 1, 2025 article in Foreign Policy magazine embodies the problem. FP claims that the latest war between Israel and Hamas “has killed more journalists than the US Civil War, World Wars I and II, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the wars in Yugoslavia, the post-911 war in Afghanistan combined.”
The publication cited a new report by Brown University’s Costs of War project for proof. But there’s a problem with this claim: it’s a lie.
As the Middle East analyst Daniel Laufer observed on X, FP “rewrote WWI/II to demonize the Jewish state.” The magazine “laundered Al Jazeera claims of Gaza media killed” while Al Jazeera “staff moonlight as terrorists.” This is a fact.
Numerous Al Jazeera employees have been caught working as terror operatives. As the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), a Washington D.C.-based think tank, noted in an August 2024 briefing, an Al Jazeera employee, Ismail al-Ghoul, who was killed in a July 31, 2024 missile strike, was a member of Hamas’s elite Nukhba force.
After his death, Al Jazeera accused Israel of “assassinating” its journalists. Yet not only was Ghoul a Hamas operative, but he also took part in the October 7 massacre. Ghoul helped instruct Hamas operatives on “how to record attacks on IDF forces and published the resulting videos,” FDD noted. The IDF and Shin Bet, Israel’s domestic intelligence agency, called this a “vital part of Hamas’s military activity.” And he was far from the only Al Jazeera employee moonlighting as a Hamas operative.
In October 2024, Israel’s Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi said that it had “proof” that Al Jazeera reporters were “passing sensitive information to the enemy” about IDF troop locations.
Moreover, as FDD noted, on Jan. 7, 2024 “Al-Jazeera journalist Hamza al-Dahdouh and cameraman Mustafa Thuraya were killed in a targeted IDF strike as they were traveling from Khan Younis to Rafah. The IDF later revealed that al-Dahdouh — the son of the network’s Gaza bureau chief — was an operative in the ‘Electronic Engineering Unit’ and a regional official in the ‘Rocket Unit’ of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad terrorist group. The IDF also revealed that Thuraya’s name appeared on a list of operatives fighting for Hamas’s Al-Qadisiya Battalion.”
And in February 2024, the IDF revealed that Al Jazeera correspondents Muhammed Wishah and Ismail Abu Omar were also serving as Hamas commanders. Abu Omar had even filmed himself participating in the October 7 massacre. Jonathan Schanzer, the executive director of FDD and a former terror analyst for the US Treasury Department, highlighted Al Jazeera’s ties with Hamas in an exhaustive March 2024 article for Commentary Magazine. It’s a long list.
The numerous instances of collaboration between the two prompted Israel to shutter the faux news organization in the spring of 2024. Tellingly, FP’s article omitted all of this relevant information. Yet none of it is surprising.
Indeed, Al Jazeera itself is the state media of Qatar. Numerous former Al Jazeera employees have made their way to Western news outlets, including Reuters and The Washington Post, among others. In fact, the Post has employed more than two dozen staffers with links to Al Jazeera, the Qatar Foundation, and other similar orgs funded by Doha. The Qatar Foundation has even helped “shape” columns filed by Jamal Khashoggi, the Washington Post columnist who was killed in a Saudi consulate in 2018.
In a December 22 2018, article, the Post revealed that “text messages between Khashoggi and an executive at Qatar Foundation International show that the executive, Maggie Mitchell Salem, at times shaped the columns he submitted to The Washington Post, proposing topics, drafting material and prodding him to take a harder line against the Saudi government.” The newspaper also acknowledged that Khashoggi “appears to have relied on a researcher and translator affiliated with the organization.”
Khashoggi’s editor, the Post’s Karen Attiah, has never addressed whether she was aware that the columns under her purview were effectively being written by someone else. Now a columnist herself, Attiah has become known for accusing Israel of genocide and proudly retweeting “what did y’all think decolonization meant?” on October 7. The Post itself has flogged the idea that the Jewish State intentionally targets journalists and has given free ad space to Reporters Without Borders and the Committee to Protect Journalists.
As the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis (CAMERA) has noted, both of these organizations have listed known terrorists as journalists. CPJ’s own database of slain journalists even identifies some who have worked for outlets associated with Hamas and Hezbollah, among other designated terrorist groups.
Notably, Qatari-linked entities have also funded numerous Western universities and think tanks. As CAMERA has documented, Brown University is foremost among them. CAMERA’s investigations into Brown revealed that the university has excluded Jewish students, had student organizations who called the October 7 massacre “just,” and hosted forums where speakers cheered the attack.
Until recently, Brown’s “Choices” program, which served approximately one million students and 8,000 schools, was supported by the Qatar International Foundation. Brown ended the program in April 2025 after “growing scrutiny over alleged anti-Israel content in the program and accusations of indirect Qatari funding,” Ynet reported.
Nor is FP itself immune. As Tablet’s Armin Rosen reported, the magazine is the “official podcasting partner of the Doha Forum and the only media organization whose logo appears on the front page of the website for the Doha Debates. Both events are a project of the state-funded Qatar Foundation.”
Suffice to say: Al Jazeera, Brown, Foreign Policy Magazine, and The Washington Post are hardly unbiased when it comes to reporting on Qatar, Hamas, and Israel. Their ability to judge what constitutes journalism and terrorism is, at best, severely compromised.
But others have worked to blur the lines between the two.
As CAMERA documented, on June 2, 2022, the National Press Club released a statement “calling attention to the shooting of another Palestinian journalist by Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).” The NPC lamented the death of Ghufran Hamed Warasneh, a “radio presenter” who was merely “commuting to work.”
But the day before, the Times of Israel reported that Warasneh was “armed with a knife” and had “approached a soldier stationed in the southern West Bank before being shot and killed.”
The Times of Israel even obtained pictures of the knife that was found at the scene. Further, Israel’s Channel 12 news noted that Warasneh had “attempted a stabbing attack in the past” in Hebron.
Yet, the NPC, which bills itself as a “professional and social club for working journalists and communications professionals,” was unmoved.
Nor is the problem new.
In 2015, for example, the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate published a list of 17 “journalists” who they claimed were killed in IDF operations in 2014. But a study by the Meir Amit Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center found that “almost half (eight out of 17) were names of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) terrorist operatives, or were journalists who worked for the Hamas media.” Yet, “the Palestinian Journalists Syndicate and the Gaza office of the ministry of information tried to hide their military-terrorist identity, representing them only as journalists and media personnel.” The Center’s 2015 study was burnished with extensive evidence, including pictures of the “journalists” carrying weapons and wearing headbands identifying them as terrorists.
Indeed, as CAMERA noted in 2016, the Newseum, a now defunct D.C. museum that sought to “educate the public about the value of a free press in a free society,” had listed several slain members of terrorist groups in its memorial to fallen journalists. Among them were Hussam Salama and Mahmoud al-Kumi, operatives who worked for Hamas’s al-Aqsa TV, which was run by Fathi Hammad, a man named by the US State Department in 2016 as a “specially designated terrorist.”
These individuals aren’t journalists. One doesn’t just set aside his Hamas headband and put on a flak jacket labeled “press” and magically transform into a reporter. News organizations that conflate terrorists with journalists endanger their own employees and beclown the standards of their own profession.
The writer is a Senior Research Analyst for CAMERA, the 65,000-member, Boston-based Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting and Analysis.
The post A Lesson for the Media: Terrorists Are Not Journalists first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
US Senate Confirms Thomas Barrack as Ambassador to Turkey Amid Concern Over Ankara’s Hamas Support
Thomas Barrack, a billionaire friend of Donald Trump who chaired the former president’s inaugural fund, exits following a not guilty verdict at the Brooklyn Federal Courthouse in Brooklyn, New York, US, Nov. 4, 2022. Photo: REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
The US Senate on Tuesday confirmed Thomas Barrack, a private equity leader and long-time supporter of President Donald Trump, as the new US ambassador to Turkey, a country which has had a tumultuous relationship with Washington in recent years despite their shared membership in the NATO alliance.
Barrack’s confirmation passed with a 60-36 vote, largely supported by Republican senators, who control 53 out of the Senate’s 100 seats.
In his confirmation hearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee earlier this month, Barrack highlighted Turkey’s strategic significance as a US ally and emphasized Ankara’s position within NATO.
“Sitting at the most strategic crossroads of Europe, Asia, and the Middle East, Turkey’s NATO contributions are numerous,” he told lawmakers.
While speaking to committee members, he underscored the strength and size of Turkey’s military, the second largest in NATO.
Barrack’s confirmation comes as Turkey has continued to support the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas and be one of the world’s most vocal critics of Israel, Washington’s closest ally in the Middle East, amid the ongoing war in Gaza.
Turkey has long hosted senior Hamas officials, such as Marwan Muhammad Abu Ras, who in recent months has spread pro-terrorist propaganda in speeches and on the country’s state-controlled media outlets.
“The Qassam Brigades [the military wing of Hamas] are at the forefront of the war and the jihad. … You must support the Qassam Brigades — with your prayers, your wealth, your politics, your weapons, with everything you have, you must support the Qassam Brigades,” Abu Ras said during a rally in southeastern Turkey earlier this month, according to the Nordic Research and Monitoring Network.
Several Hamas leaders have established residence in Turkey, often accompanied by their families. Some have acquired Turkish citizenship and passports, integrating further into the country. Many have even invested heavily in the real estate sector and now operate multi-million-dollar businesses. In addition to their commercial activities, these individuals remain actively involved in fundraising efforts that support Hamas’s international network.
Meanwhile, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has been one of the most vocal anti-Israel voices during the Gaza war. In February, for example he demanded that Israel pay reparations “for the harm it inflicted through its aggressive actions in Gaza.”
Last year, Erdogan made an explicit threat to invade Israel, leading Israel’s foreign minister to call on NATO to expel Turkey. Ankara also called on the United Nations to use force if it can’t stop Israel’s military campaign against Hamas.
Turkey has reportedly blocked cooperation between NATO and Israel since October 2023 because of the war in Gaza and said the alliance should not engage with Israel as a partner until the conflict ends.
Last year, Ankara also ceased all exports and imports to and from Israel, citing the “humanitarian tragedy” in the Palestinian territories as the reason.
Erdogan has frequently defended Hamas terrorists as “resistance fighters” against what he described as an Israeli occupation of Palestinian land. He and other Turkish leaders have repeatedly compared Israel with Nazi Germany and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu with Adolf Hitler
The day after Barrack’s confirmation, the Jewish Institute for National Security of America (JINSA) released a report arguing that the Trump administration should keep Turkey out of the US F-35 fifth-generation fighter program, calling the country a “potentially threatening regional power” and citing Ankara’s extensive ties to Hamas.
“The United States must carefully consider whether Turkey, a rising, and potentially threatening, regional power led by the authoritarian, pro-Hamas, neo-Ottoman President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, can be trusted with this advanced jet,” the report stated.
JINSA noted Turkey’s decision to acquire the Russian S-400 air and missile defense system, despite repeated warnings from US officials. Washington ultimately blocked Turkey from procuring and producing the F-35 as a result. Ankara has sought to be readmitted into the program, and the Trump administration has reportedly been working on a deal to sell Turkey the jets if it relinquishes the S-400.
The post US Senate Confirms Thomas Barrack as Ambassador to Turkey Amid Concern Over Ankara’s Hamas Support first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Harvard Releases Long Awaited Antisemitism Task Force Report — and an Apology From the University’s President
Harvard University president Alan Garber attending the 373rd Commencement Exercises at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, US, May 23, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Brian Snyder
Harvard University has released its long anticipated report on campus antisemitism and along with it an apology from interim president Alan Garber which acknowledged that school officials failed in key ways to address the hatred to which Jewish students were subjected following Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel.
The over 300-page document, released on Tuesday, provides a complete account of antisemitic incidents which transpired on Harvard’s campus in recent years — from the Harvard Palestine Solidarity Committee’s (PSC) endorsement of the Oct. 7 terrorist atrocities to an anti-Zionist faculty group’s sharing an antisemitic cartoon which depicted Jews as murderers of people of color — and said that one source of the problem is the institution’s past refusal to afford Jews the same protections against discrimination enjoyed by other minority groups. It also issued recommendations for improving Jewish life on campus going forward.
“I am sorry for the moments when we failed to meet the high expectations we rightfully set for our community. The grave, extensive impact of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas assault on Israel and its aftermath had serious repercussions on campus,” Garber said in the statement that accompanied the report. “Harvard cannot — and will not — abide bigotry. We will continue to provide for the safety and security of all members of our community and safeguard their freedom from harassment. We will redouble our efforts to ensure that the university is a place where ideas are welcomed, entertained, and contested in the spirt of seeking truth; where argument proceeds without sacrificing dignity; and where mutual respect is the norm.”
The committee charged with writing the report — the Presidential Task Force on Combating Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias — said that Harvard should enact a slew of reforms to achieve Garber’s hopes for the institution. It recommended reforming admissions to foster an “environment where each student is in genuine community with people with whom one may disagree”; using pre-orientation programs as a time for preparing new Harvard students for the immensity of being selected for membership in an elite institution of higher learning; reforming “time and place” policies which govern expression and peaceful assembly; and requiring offices charged with investigating complaints of discrimination to appoint an official who specializes in antisemitism and anti-Zionist bias.
“It is clear to the task force that antisemitism and anti-Israel bias have been fomented, practiced, and tolerated not only at Harvard but also within academia more widely,” the report continued. “We urge Harvard’s leadership, including the president, provost, deans, faculties, and offices of equity, diversity, inclusion, and belonging to become champions in the fight against antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias — first at Harvard, and then as a model for institutions of higher learning everywhere.”
Further recommending that Harvard empower members of the task force to monitor the university’s implementation of its proposed policies, the report added, “We further call on Harvard’s leaders to combat, with equal resolve, all other forms of prejudice and intolerance, including anti-Muslim, anti-Arab, and anti-Palestinian bias. This charge is made with particular urgency to those schools that operate in deeply politicized fields, such as medicine, public health, and education.”
Harvard’s report on campus antisemitism comes as the university prepares for a protracted legal battle with the Trump administration over the federal government’s impounding billions of dollars of taxpayer funds previously awarded to it, a measure imposed on the institution after it rejected policy suggestions proposed by the Trump administration to make it, according to the government, more meritocratic and less welcoming to left-wing extremists and antisemites. Throughout this conflict, US President Donald Trump has denounced the university as a betrayer of American values.
“Harvard is an Anti-Semitic, Far Left Institute, as are numerous others, with students being accepted from all over the World that want to rip our Country apart,” Trump said, writing on Truth Social on Thursday. “The place is a Liberal mess, allowing a certain group of crazed lunatics to enter and exit the classroom and spew fake ANGER and HATE [sic]. It is truly horrific. Now, since our filings began, they act like they are all ‘American Apple Pie.’ Harvard is a threat to democracy.”
Harvard has since taken steps towards meeting the Trump administration halfway, including by releasing the antisemitism report as was demanded of it on April 21. In March, it paused a partnership with a higher education institution located in the West Bank. On Thursday, just days after suing the Trump administration to stop its sequestration of federal funds, it moved to relocate disciplinary processes to the office of the president — a Trump administration demand. Most notably, Harvard has defunded segregated graduation ceremonies it has held for decades to legitimate a strain of identity politics which rejects racial integration and the shared destiny of the American people. Conservatives have argued for years that Harvard’s embrace of identity politics contributed to antisemitism on the campus.
More remains to be seen from the university, the Harvard Jewish Alumni Alliance, a group formed amid the post-Oct. 7 antisemitic outrages, said on Wednesday, writing on X.
“We appreciate the report’s identification of 3 problematic academic frameworks fueling campus antisemitism: denying Jewish connection to our ancestral homeland, embracing a distorted settler-colonialism framework, and refusing to recognize Jews as a historically vulnerable group,” the group said. “We now await concrete action plans from deans and meaningful implementation from President Garber, particularly regarding oversight of academic programs, accountability measures, and clear responsibility with metrics and public reporting.”
It added, “We remain concerned that the report retreats to comfortable academic parlance about ‘balance’ and ‘constructive dialogue’ in the face of factually incorrect narratives. Let’s hope Harvard isn’t burying a serious problem in the spectacle of academia.”
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
The post Harvard Releases Long Awaited Antisemitism Task Force Report — and an Apology From the University’s President first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Argentina Releases Trove of Documents Detailing Nazi War Criminals’ Activities After World War II
Argentina’s President Javier Milei attends a commemoration event ahead of the anniversary of the 1994 bombing attack on the Argentine Israeli Mutual Association (AMIA) community center, marking the 30th anniversary of the attack, in Buenos Aires, Argentina, July 17, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Martin Cassarini
The Argentine government has released nearly 2,000 previously classified secret service documents detailing the arrival of hundreds of Nazi war criminals who escaped to the country following the collapse of Nazi Germany during World War II.
“Starting today, anyone can access and download these documents,” Argentina’s Ministry of Interior said in a statement on X.
Previously declassified in 1992 under a decree by then-Argentine President Carlos Menem, the documents could only be accessed in a specially designated room at Argentina’s National Archives (AGN).
On Monday, government officials announced the completion of restoration and digitization work, making more than 1,850 reports and nearly 1,300 previously classified decrees accessible online. These documents shed light on the activities of prominent Nazi war criminals who took refuge in Argentina after World War II, including Holocaust architect Adolf Eichmann and the notorious Auschwitz concentration camp doctor Josef Mengele.
El Archivo General de la Nación hizo públicos documentos desclasificados sobre actividades nazis en Argentina y decretos presidenciales secretos.
Gracias a un extenso trabajo de restauración y digitalización, ahora podés acceder a más de 1850 informes y casi 1300 decretos… pic.twitter.com/4Ijs7fGqk0
— Vicejefatura de Gabinete del Interior (@vicejefaturaint) April 28, 2025
The published records show, for example, how Mengele — who was a physician and Nazi SS officer, nicknamed the “Angel of Death” for his inhumane medical experiments on prisoners at Auschwitz — entered Argentina in 1949 under the name Gregor Helmut and lived undisturbed in the country for decades.
Walter Kutschmann, a former Nazi official, also evaded justice for nearly 40 years. Despite being denounced to authorities in 1975, the records released by AGN show that he was not arrested until 1985. Instead, under his false identity, he worked in a hardware store, then as a taxi driver, and later as a purchasing director for the Argentine branch of the Osram lighting firm.
According to the previously classified documents, it is estimated that more than 10,000 Nazis used so-called “ratlines” to flee Germany as the Axis powers collapsed, with around half of them believed to have sought refuge in Argentina — known for its reluctance to grant extradition requests.
Titled “Documentation on Nazi Presence in Argentina,” these files include intelligence reports, photographs, and police records, compiling the results of investigations by federal authorities and the country’s leading intelligence agency from the 1950s to the 1980s.
Las autoridades de Argentina han revelado más de 1.850 documentos secretos sobre nazis de alto rango que huyeron a Sudamérica después del Holocausto !!!
Entre ellos: Josef Mengele, Walter Kochmann y Eduard Roschmann.
Gracias Milei !!! pic.twitter.com/I0Q0Iy7ax8
— Isaac (@isaacrrr7) April 29, 2025
Argentine President Javier Milei ordered the records to be released and digitized following a request by the Simon Wiesenthal Center — a California-based Jewish human rights organization — and a meeting with its representatives in Buenos Aires earlier this year. The organization is currently investigating ties between Swiss bank Credit Suisse and Nazi Germany.
“We commend the release of declassified archives to the public,” the Simon Wiesenthal Center’s Latin American office said in a statement on Tuesday.
Since taking office over a year ago, Milei has been one of Israel’s most vocal supporters, strengthening bilateral relations to unprecedented levels and in the process breaking with decades of Argentine foreign policy tradition to firmly align with Jerusalem and Washington.
Milei, who won Argentina’s November 2023 presidential election, has also been outspoken in his support and appreciation for Judaism. His presidency has come amid an economic crisis, soaring inflation, and longstanding corruption scandals that have burdened the country.
The Latin American leader will visit Israel in June, where he is expected to sign a Memorandum of Understanding with the Jewish State against terrorism and antisemitism. He is also scheduled to address the Israeli parliament and meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
In February 2024, on his first international trip as president, Milei visited Israel in a show of wartime solidarity and reiterated his pledge to move Argentina’s embassy to Jerusalem. During his visit, he also traveled to Kibbutz Nir Oz in the Negev, where Hamas-led terrorists kidnapped several Israelis from their homes, including the Bibas family, on Oct. 7, 2023.
The post Argentina Releases Trove of Documents Detailing Nazi War Criminals’ Activities After World War II first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login