Uncategorized
Americans are waking up to right-wing antisemitism. We’re still ignoring the root problem
Nick Fuentes is ascendant. The millennial neo-Nazi with a growing base of followers, called Groypers, is finally entering the mainstream after years of working in the darkest corners of the internet. His recent appearance on Tucker Carlson’s podcast set off a civil war on the right — one that shows no signs of abating, as new reports suggest Republican Jewish donors are struggling to decide how to respond to the crisis.
I, like many others, believe that Fuentes and his movement have brought the Republican Party, and much of the American right, closer to a culture that embraces open antisemitism than at any point in modern history. But attributing that change to Fuentes doesn’t tell the full story of how we got here. Not just in the United States, but around the world.
Because the real engine behind the rise of antisemitism today is the far-right’s digital ecosystem, which is primed to elevate fringe extremists like Fuentes, integrate them into other movements, and deliver their message to millions. Individuals matter, but that ecosystem matters far more. And that is the part we still are not talking about enough.
Change does not happen through individuals. It happens through networks. The danger posed by someone like Fuentes is obvious, but it is still the danger of a single propagandist. The danger posed by the major distribution networks enabling him and his ilk is different. It is structural. Platforms can decide who gets amplified, who gets reinstated, and which narratives move from the fringe into the mainstream. And amid President Donald Trump’s second term, as social media networks have broadly done away with content moderation in response to criticism suggesting it silences conservative ideas, that power is more dangerous that ever.
Trump may be the MAGA movement’s leader. But it is networks of influencers, podcasters, and others that allowed him to politically survive past the disastrous end of his first term and win the popular vote in 2024. And those people were able to succeed because the owners of social media platforms allowed them to spread the bigotry, false facts, and conspiracy theories required to keep him afloat.
The most obvious case of this truth is that of Elon Musk, whom I argued in the Forward more than two years ago is the most dangerous antisemite in this country. That argument still holds true. Fuentes was not on Twitter before Musk bought it. He had been suspended by virtually every social media platform and streaming service, includingYouTube, Reddit, TikTok and Spotify, for his hateful, bigoted rhetoric, and his participation in the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection at the Capitol.
In 2024, Musk reinstated him, allowing him to tap into a network to which he previously did not have access. Musk also reinstated countless other antisemites and bigots, including Andrew Anglin, founder of the neo-Nazi Daily Stormer, and David Icke, popularizer of the antisemitic conspiracy theory that claims the world is run by shapeshifting alien lizard people.
One of the early signs that Musk would make his platform friendly to those who spread antisemitism came when he offered Tucker Carlson a chance to host a show on X after the pundit was fired in disgrace from Fox News. There, Carlson had obsessively shared conspiracy theories about George Soros, mainstreamed the Great Replacement conspiracy theory, and platformed Kanye West’s antisemitism. Once Carlson accepted his offer, Musk, known for gaming the algorithm to his advantage, used both his own massive following and X itself to elevate Carlson.
Carlson has used that launchpad to build a powerful independent audience. The result: His interview with Nick Fuentes alone was seen by 18 million people on Twitter and 6.5 million on YouTube. Millions more accessed it via audio podcast channels, where Carlson consistently sits on the top of the charts. As of this writing, his is the 5th most popular podcast on Spotify. This does not include viewership of the countless clips shared by other accounts, which get spread to tens of millions.
To put this in perspective, at its most popular, Carlson’s show on Fox News was viewed by 5.3 million people.
X helped return Carlson to the mainstream. It platformed Fuentes. And then Carlson made Fuentes mainstream, bringing him new visibility and legitimizing his views among those who would otherwise be put off by them.
In other words, he gave Fuentes access to a whole new network — one that has allowed antisemitism and far-right bigotry to thrive in this new era.
X is at the center of the ecosystem. A recent report from the Center for Countering Digital Hate and the Jewish Council for Public Affairs found that posts containing antisemitic language got 193 million views between February 2024 and January 2025. Particularly striking was that 9 out of 10 of the biggest antisemitic influencers on X had more followers on that platform than any other.
But the reality is bigger than X. It is bigger than Musk. It is a phenomenon that has spread across the internet — especially as platforms like Facebook and YouTube have ceded responsibility for fact-checking and content moderation.
Media Matters recently diagnosed this issue, showing that “Nine of the 10 online shows… with the largest total following across platforms were right-leaning, accounting for at least 197 million total followers and subscribers.”
Even if X disappeared, Musk’s efforts with it have helped create an ecosystem for antisemitism to thrive in. Even if Carlson, Musk, and Fuentes disappeared, the issue would remain.
That’s because we’ve come to a point at which the power of far-right networks outstrips that of the platforms on which they exist. Many of the antisemitic influencers taking off on X existed well before it became their platform of choice. They have learned from experience that they must exist in multiple places if they wish to maintain their influence; even if they are banned from certain platforms in the future, they’ve succeeded in building audiences that will likely travel with them.
Unfortunately, many of those fighting antisemitism have not learned the same lesson.
If digital networks like this are the engine of political change today, then the test for any movement fighting antisemitism is whether it can build such a network of its own. The far-right has done this with remarkable focus. Our institutions have not.
Instead, they’ve increasingly turned inward, creating an echo chamber focused on combatting criticism of Israel, while failing to sufficiently engage with these serious and growing domestic threats.
While the far-right links its influencers, platforms, funders, and micro-cultures into a self-reinforcing ecosystem, Jewish institutions have built closed loops that rarely reach beyond their traditional base.
This is not the way to make change: It is the way to lose influence.
The post Americans are waking up to right-wing antisemitism. We’re still ignoring the root problem appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
White House Releases New National Security Strategy Indicating Renewed Focus on Western Hemisphere
US President Donald Trump speaks at the White House in Washington, DC, US, Sept. 25, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque
The White House late on Thursday night released its new “National Security Strategy,” indicating a sharp pivot of the nation’s strategic focus toward the Western Hemisphere while recalibrating US engagement with Europe, the Middle East, and Asia.
The 33-page document only mentions Israel and the Middle East briefly, instead focusing closer to home.
“After years of neglect, the United States will reassert and enforce the Monroe Doctrine to restore American preeminence in the Western Hemisphere, and to protect our homeland and our access to key geographies throughout the region,” the strategy states. “We will deny non-Hemispheric competitors the ability to position forces or other threatening capabilities, or to own or control strategically vital assets, in our Hemisphere. This ‘Trump Corollary’ to the Monroe Doctrine is a common-sense and potent restoration of American power and priorities, consistent with American security interests.”
The strategy adds that the Trump administration wants “to ensure that the Western Hemisphere remains reasonably stable and well-governed enough to prevent and discourage mass migration to the
United States; we want a Hemisphere whose governments cooperate with us against narco-terrorists, cartels, and other transnational criminal organizations; we want a Hemisphere that remains free of hostile foreign incursion or ownership of key assets, and that supports critical supply chains; and we want to ensure our continued access to key strategic locations.”
Publication of the strategy came just after the results of a major new defense survey showed that the American public still overwhelmingly supports active US global leadership and robust military strength.
The White House argues in its strategy that more local challenges represent the most urgent threats to US sovereignty and domestic stability. At the same time, the document downplays the view that deep involvement in conflicts abroad advances US interests. While it reaffirms the importance of alliances and deterrence commitments, it rejects the role of Washington as “global policeman,” instead prioritizing a stronger homeland, resilient supply chains, and revitalized domestic industrial capacity. The strategy also calls for major investment in missile-defense capabilities, including a nationwide system sometimes referred to as a “Golden Dome for America,” echoing Israel’s longstanding layered defense architecture.
The White House’s strategy coincides with the release of data from the newly published Reagan National Defense Survey, which finds Americans more supportive of engagement and global leadership than many pundits have suggested. According to the findings, 64 percent of Americans want the US to be more engaged in world affairs, not less, and 87 percent believe maintaining the strongest military in the world is essential. Meanwhile, 71 percent of Americans say global peace is most likely when the US holds clear military superiority. The data also shows strong majorities support defending key allies if attacked, while 68 percent back building a national missile-defense system, reflecting rising concern about long-range threats.
For Israel and the Middle East, the White House strategy signals a recalibrated emphasis on preventing Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon, securing vital maritime chokepoints, and supporting Israel’s long-term security, including cooperation on advanced defense technologies.
Public support for the Jewish state remains strong, though there are indications of waning. Sixty-six percent of Americans view Israel as an ally, a decrease from 72 percent the year prior, according to the Reagan survey.
The survey indicates that 60 percent of Americans approved of the June 2025 US airstrike targeting Iranian nuclear infrastructure, though partisan divides remain prevalent. Enhanced pressure on Tehran, including sanctions and cyber measures, garner even broader bipartisan support.
Experts indicate that for Israel, a long-standing partner deeply affected by US posture in both Europe and the Middle East, the strategy’s emphasis on missile defense, deterrence, and countering Iranian ambitions will be particularly reassuring. However, some analysts argue that the strategy’s overall de-emphasis on the Middle East and apparent desire to be less engaged outside the Western Hemisphere could prove problematic for the Jewish state.
Uncategorized
Hamas Braces for Israeli Operations Abroad, Continued Clan Opposition in Gaza
Palestinian Hamas terrorists stand guard at a site as Hamas says it continues to search for the bodies of deceased hostages, in Beit Lahiya in the northern Gaza Strip, Dec. 3, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Stringer
Hamas is increasingly preparing for what it sees as an imminent Israeli attempt to assassinate senior leaders abroad, urging members to tighten personal security as the group simultaneously works to consolidate its weakened position in Gaza and reassert control over the enclave.
According to the Arabic newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat, Hamas officials reported rising concern over additional Israeli strikes on the Palestinian terrorist group’s top echelon abroad in the wake of last week’s killing of Hezbollah commander Haitham Tabtabai and September’s operation in Qatar targeting Hamas’s senior leadership.
Despite US “reassurance messages” to several parties — including mediators in Turkey, Qatar, and Egypt — that further strikes on senior Hamas members abroad would not be repeated, the group’s leadership says it “does not trust Israel.”
“There are expectations of a new assassination attempt with the Israeli government’s efforts to obstruct the second phase of the ceasefire agreement and its claim that the movement has no intention of advancing toward a deal,” the Palestinian terrorist group said.
Hamas members reportedly received new instructions requiring all fixed meetings at a single location to be canceled, with leaders instead holding irregular gatherings at rotating sites.
Meanwhile, the head of an armed Palestinian faction opposing Hamas in Gaza died on Thursday while mediating an internal dispute between families and groups within the militia, dealing a setback to Israeli efforts to support Gazan clans against the ruling Islamist group.
Yasser Abu Shabab, a Bedouin tribal leader based in Israeli-held Rafah in southern Gaza, had led one of the most prominent of several small anti-Hamas groups that emerged in the enclave during the war that began more than two years ago.
Following the incident, Hamas said in a statement that the fate of anyone who “betrayed their people and homeland and agreed to be an instrument in the hands of the occupation [Israel]” was inevitable, accusing Abu Shabab of “criminal acts” that amounted to a “flagrant deviation from national and social consensus.”
Abu Shabab’s death would be a boost to Hamas, which has branded him a collaborator and ordered its fighters to kill or capture him.
“The occupation that could not protect its own agents will be unable to protect any of its collaborators, and anyone who undermines the security of their people and serves their enemy is destined to fall into the dustbin of history, losing all respect and standing in society,” the terrorist group said in its statement.
Gaza’s Popular Forces confirmed that its leader died of a gunshot wound as he intervened in a family quarrel, and dismissed as “misleading” reports that Hamas was behind Abu Shabab’s killing.
Ghassan al-Dahini, who could assume leadership of the group following the incident, pledged to continue Abu Shabab’s project and resist Hamas by establishing an alternative to the terrorist group’s rule.
“With God’s help, and following my brother Yasser’s plan, we will return as we were — more determined and stronger,” al-Dahini said in a statement, according to Hebrew media. “We will keep fighting with every last ounce of strength until every final terrorist is gone.”
“Today, Hamas will see its true face — the one the world should have recognized long ago. We will restore hope to all Palestinians, to all free people, to the oppressed, and to everyone who believes in peace,” he continued.
Rafah has been the scene of some of the worst violence during the ceasefire, with residents reporting gunbattles on Wednesday that left four Israeli soldiers wounded. On Thursday, the Israeli military said its forces killed about 40 Hamas fighters trapped in tunnels beneath the city.
Shortly after the US-backed ceasefire to halt fighting in Gaza took effect in October, Hamas moved to reassert control over the war-torn enclave and consolidate its weakened position by targeting Palestinians who it labeled as “lawbreakers and collaborators with Israel.”
Since then, Hamas’s brutal crackdown has escalated dramatically, sparking widespread clashes and violence as the group moves to seize weapons and eliminate any opposition.
Social media videos widely circulated online show Hamas members brutally beating Palestinians and carrying out public executions of alleged collaborators and rival militia members.
Uncategorized
Palestinian Official Calls Drop Site News Founder an ‘Apologist’ for Hamas, Ex-Obama Aides Say They ‘Love’ the Site
Abdal Karim Ewaida, the Palestinian ambassador to Côte d’Ivoire, in October 2023. Photo: Screenshot
A Palestinian diplomat accused a popular new anti-Israel website of running cover and acting as an apologist for Hamas.
Abdal Karim Ewaida, the Palestinian ambassador to Côte d’Ivoire, posted on social media about Drop Site News on Tuesday, after the website reported that the Palestinian Authority was planning to ban Hamas and other terrorist factions from running in future elections.
“Pro-resistance parties and armed resistance remains one of the single most popular points in [Palestinian] public polling,” said Jeremy Scahill, founder of Drop Site News. “The Palestinian Authority is saying, ‘You are not allowed to run for public office anymore.’ And when you look at what the defense of this is on the part of the Palestinian Authority, it is a pathetic defense.”
In response, Ewaida lambasted Scahill in a social media post.
“As for Jeremy Scahill — a journalist who transitions between outlets, perhaps pursuing higher remuneration — he consistently excuses Hamas and [Yahya] Sinwar’s purported interest in reconciliation solely to vilify the Palestinian National Authority and President Mahmoud Abbas. It is astounding,” the Palestinian official wrote.
Sinwar, who was killed by Israeli forces last year, was the leader of Hamas and mastermind of the Palestinian terrorist group’s Oct. 7, 2023, invasion of and massacre across southern Israel.
“He acts as a fervent apologist for Hamas and jihadist elements,” Ewaida continued, referring to Scahill, “even to the point of rationalizing [Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin] Netanyahu’s claims of financially bolstering Hamas as being in Israel’s interest, while attempting to spin it as favorable to Hamas itself. He seems to believe he can speak with impunity.”
Ewaida went on to castigate Drop Site News in general, saying that the “platform’s credibility is deeply compromised. We are acutely aware of its sources of funding and underlying motives. The day will come when your malicious objectives and relentless advocacy for Hamas — now apparent to all — will be fully exposed, leaving little doubt about your benefactors.”
Let me be clear from the outset: I represent the State of Palestine as its ambassador, not the Palestinian Authority as an envoy—a distinction that stands regardless of opinion.
Secondly, your platform’s credibility is deeply compromised. We are acutely aware of its sources of… https://t.co/E6Ym43wWL0
— Ambassadeur Abdal Karim Ewaida (@KarimEwaida) December 3, 2025
One day after Ewaida’s post, the hosts of the influential progressive podcast “Pod Save America” — all one-time aides to former US President Barack Obama — mentioned Drop Site News, saying “we love you guys” and “we are readers.”
The two hosts that were part of that conversation, Ben Rhodes and Tommy Vietor, served as speechwriter and spokesman, respectively, for Obama in the White House, focusing on national security issues.
In a follow-up to the episode, the Drop Site News posted on its X account “Pod Save the World = confirmed Drop Site readers,” and Rhodes responded, “yes readers.”
Good correction! And yes readers.
— Ben Rhodes (@brhodes) December 3, 2025
Many former Obama staffers have become vocally critical of Israel in recent years, especially amid the war in Gaza. However, Rhodes’s views on Israel were particularly critical at the time they were serving in government as well, so much so that during the Obama administration, he earned himself the nickname “Hamas” in the White House. The nickname was coined by Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, as Rhodes revealed in his memoir, The World as It Is.
