Connect with us

Uncategorized

Disaster in Yemen: Saudi Arabia Just Bombed the UAE, and Empowered Iran

Personnel from EU maritime mission Eunavfor Aspides’ transport a casualty during rescue operation following an attack by Yemen’s Houthis on the Dutch-flagged general cargo ship Minervagracht, which caught fire in the Gulf of Aden, in this screengrab taken from handout video released on Sept. 30, 2025. Photo: Eunavfor Aspides via X/Handout via REUTERS

Last week, the Saudi Royal Air Force didn’t bomb Houthi rebels or Iranian weapons depots. Instead, in a stunning act of “Blue on Blue” warfare, they bombed the proxy forces of their closest ally, the United Arab Emirates, in the port city of Mukalla.

This was not a mistake. It was a message. And for those in Israel and the US dreaming of a unified “Arab NATO” to counter Tehran, the message is catastrophic: the anti-Iran coalition is officially dead.

The strikes on Mukalla were the kinetic finale to a diplomatic standoff that has been festering for months. In late December, Saudi intelligence flagged a maritime vessel departing from the Emirati port of Fujairah, bound for Mukalla. Its cargo? Not humanitarian aid, but a massive shipment of armored vehicles and heavy weaponry destined for the Southern Transitional Council (STC) — the UAE-backed secessionist movement that has effectively carved a statelet out of South Yemen.

Riyadh’s response was swift and brutal. Viewing the armament of a separatist entity on its southern border as an existential threat, the Kingdom issued an ultimatum that shattered the polite fiction of Gulf unity: withdraw the shipment and vacate the contested positions “within 24 hours,” or face the consequences.

The UAE, perhaps banking on the alliance’s history, called the bluff. They lost.

Saudi jets pounded the 37th Division Camp and the port facilities in Mukalla, destroying the shipment and killing at least seven STC fighters.The psychological impact was immediate. The UAE announced the “conclusion” of its military presence in the area — a diplomatic euphemism for a forced retreat — while their local proxies began a chaotic withdrawal. Witnesses in Mukalla reported a disorganized rout, with retreating fighters looting government buildings and loading refrigerators and washing machines onto military vehicles as they fled toward Aden.

Into this vacuum stepped the “National Shield Forces” (Daraa Al-Watan). Funded, trained, and salaried directly by Riyadh, this new proxy army has successfully retaken Mukalla and the strategic Ash Shihr oil terminal.

This shift represents a fundamental change in the war’s geology. Saudi Arabia is no longer fighting just the Houthis; it is now actively dismantling the infrastructure of Emirati influence in Yemen. The fight is over the “Triangle of Power” — the oil and gas fields of Marib, Shabwa, and Hadramout. Riyadh envisions a pipeline from the Empty Quarter to the Arabian Sea to bypass the Iranian-threatened Strait of Hormuz. An independent, UAE-controlled South Yemen sitting on that pipeline route is a strategic non-starter for the House of Saud.

The implications for Israel and the West are grim. The concept of a monolithic Sunni bloc standing against the Islamic Republic of Iran has been revealed as a mirage. While Saudi F-15s were busy targeting Emirati-supplied armored personnel carriers, the Houthi rebels — Iran’s premier proxy — sat back and watched their enemies destroy each other.

The chaos has already forced the STC to redeploy six brigades of the elite “Giants Forces” (Al-Amaliqa) away from the frontlines with the Houthis to defend their southern strongholds against the Saudis. This leaves the strategic city of Marib vulnerable. If the Houthis seize this moment to launch a new offensive, they could capture Yemen’s last government-held oil fields without facing significant resistance.

Perhaps most alarming is the silence from the West. The Trump administration, despite its “maximum pressure” rhetoric against Iran, appears paralyzed by this internecine conflict between its two key Arab partners. A State Department spokesman issued only a tepid call for “restraint,” highlighting a total loss of American leverage over the Gulf monarchies. The “Big Brother” dynamic, where Washington could pick up the phone and force Riyadh and Abu Dhabi to play nice, is over. The US now faces the nightmare scenario of mediating a war between its own allies while trying to contain Iran.  

The airstrikes in Mukalla are a turning point. The “Blue on Blue” incident proves that national interests in Riyadh and Abu Dhabi have superseded collective security. For Israel, this means that the security architecture of the Red Sea cannot be outsourced to a Gulf coalition that is busy aiming its weapons at itself.

As the smoke clears over Mukalla, the winner is not Saudi Arabia, and certainly not the people of Yemen. The winner is the regime in Tehran, which just watched the American-backed security order in the Arabian Peninsula bomb itself into oblivion.

Amine Ayoub, a fellow at the Middle East Forum, is a policy analyst and writer based in Morocco. Follow him on X: @amineayoubx

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Michigan Democrats Nominate Lawyer Who Praised Hezbollah for Top University Post

A sign at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. Photo: Ken Lund.

The Michigan Democratic Party nominated attorney attorney Amir Makled over incumbent Jewish Regent Jordan Acker on Sunday, drawing fresh scrutiny towards Makled’s defense of international terrorist organizations and anti-Israel posture. 

Makled, a Dearborn-based civil rights attorney who has been outspoken in support of divestment from Israel, won the party’s nomination for one of two regent seats up for election this year, defeating Acker, who had become a frequent target of pro-Palestinian activists over his opposition to Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) efforts on campus.

The contest has drawn national attention because of the unusually broad authority held by University of Michigan regents, who are elected statewide and oversee the university’s finances, investments, executive leadership and major institutional policy decisions. The eight-member board plays a central role in decisions ranging from presidential oversight to responses to campus protest movements and demands for divestment.

For months, anti-Israel student activists and progressive organizers had pressed for changes to the board, arguing the university should divest from companies tied to Israel amid the war in Gaza. Acker, one of the board’s most vocal opponents of divestment, became a particular focus of that pressure campaign. In December 2024, pro-Hamas activists targeted Acker’s home with violent demonstrations, breaking his windows and spray-painting his car “Divest Free Palestine.” The vandals also spray-painted an inverted red triangle on Acker’s car, a symbol used to indicate support for the Hamas terrorist group. 

Makled, who represented a student arrested during the university’s 2024 anti-Israel encampment protests, had argued publicly that the university should reconsider its investment policies regarding Israel. His nomination, however, also drew scrutiny after resurfaced and later-deleted social media posts in which he appeared to praise Hezbollah and shared antisemitic content. The Michigan chapter of the Service Employees International Union reportedly withdrew its endorsement following the controversy.

An investigation by The Detroit News revealed that Makled was found to have deleted social media posts praising leaders of the Hezbollah terrorist organization. One of the posts referred to slain Hezbollah leader Hasan Nasrallah as a “martyr.” He also reposted antisemitic messages from far-right commentator Candace Owens which referred to Israelis as “demons” who “lie, cheat, murder and blackmail.”

Supporters of Acker have argued the outcome reflects a broader deterioration in support for Israel and tolerance of antisemitism within Democratic politics, particularly among younger and more progressive voters. Some also noted that Paul Brown, Acker’s non-Jewish running mate who had similarly opposed divestment efforts, was renominated while Acker was not, making the result especially symbolic for many Jewish Democrats.

The race underscores how university governance battles have become a new front in national political fights over Israel. While university divestment decisions are often constrained by legal and fiduciary obligations, regents can shape investment policy, institutional messaging and the university’s overall posture toward such campaigns.

With eight regents serving staggered terms and only two seats on the ballot this cycle, a single election does not determine the university’s investment policy outright. But activists on both sides increasingly view these races as critical long-term contests over whether public universities will resist or embrace institutional divestment from Israel.

As the general election approaches, the regent race is likely to remain a closely watched test of how far the Democratic Party’s internal debate over Israel is reshaping not only national politics, but the leadership of major American universities. Recent polls indicate that Democratic constituents have rapidly shifted away from supporting Israel 

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Rahm Emanuel joins calls for end to US ‘financial aid’ to Israel

(JTA) — Rahm Emanuel has joined growing calls for the United States to end subsidies tied to its military sales to Israel, arguing that Israel should purchase weapons on the same terms as other U.S. allies.

“The days of taxpayers subsidizing Israel militarily, that’s over,” Emanuel said during an appearance on Bill Maher’s HBO Max show “Real Time.” “No more financial aid.”

Emanuel is the Jewish former mayor of Chicago who is seen as a likely 2028 Democratic presidential candidate. His comments come months after he said that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli government bore responsibility for the starvation of Palestinians in Gaza last summer.

Now, as support for Israel hits a record low among Democrats and party leaders increasingly move away from the United States’ longstanding backing of the country, calls to end U.S. military aid to Israel are gaining traction.

Last week, all but seven Senate Democrats voted to block the sales of certain weapons to Israel, marking a doubling in the number of lawmakers backing similar resolutions in just two years.

Emanuel, whose father was born in Jerusalem and who volunteered as a civilian with the Israeli army during the Gulf War in the 1990s, told Maher that Israel should be able to fund its own military — and implied that it might not meet the United States’ standards for being able to purchase U.S.-made weapons.

“Israel is a very wealthy nation. There should be no more taxpayer support for what they want to do and they get the same deal that any one of our allies do,” Emanuel said. “They have to abide by the laws of the United States if they’re going to buy X weapons, and that’s how it should be constructed.”

In January, Netanyahu said for the first time that he wanted to “taper off” U.S. military aid to Israel over the next decade until it reaches zero. His pledge was quickly met with support from South Carolina Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham, who said at the time, “We need not wait 10 years.”

Speaking of the joint U.S.-Israeli war in Iran, Emanuel said the move amounted to a “violation of a rule Israel’s had for 78 years,” arguing that Israel had long sought to avoid pulling the United States into conflicts with its neighbors.

“The United States should never spill any blood for the state of Israel’s security,” Emanuel said. “What happened here going into Iran with the United States and Israel fighting together, which has never happened in 78 years, is a major change in policy for the State of Israel, which comes with political risk, and now they’re seeing it.”

The post Rahm Emanuel joins calls for end to US ‘financial aid’ to Israel appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Uncategorized

Michigan Democrats nominate Eli Savit, progressive Jewish prosecutor, for state attorney general

(JTA) — A progressive Jewish county prosecutor won the endorsement of Michigan’s state Democratic Party over the weekend in his bid for state attorney general, at a convention that also spotlighted deep divides over Israel within the party.

Eli Savit beat out another county prosecutor for the chance to succeed Dana Nessel, the state’s current AG, who is also a Jewish Democrat. He will be the Democratic nominee on November’s ballot.

Unlike Savit, who remains largely embraced by the left, Nessel has made enemies among the state’s pro-Palestinian activist contingent for her role in aggressively prosecuting University of Michigan encampment protesters.

The 41-year-old Savit has since 2021 been the prosecutor of Washtenaw County, which includes Ann Arbor and the university. A former clerk for Jewish Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, he was endorsed by Sen. Bernie Sanders and elected in a mini-wave of progressive prosecutors that also included Chesa Boudin in San Francisco.

While Boudin was forced out following a 2022 recall, Savit has remained in Washtenaw’s good graces as he’s pushed progressive proposals including decriminalizing consentual sex work, not seeking prosecutions for psychedelics consumption and curbing cash bail.

Savit has called himself “a bona fide American Jew” and has invoked his identity when opposing policies such as President Trump’s first-term 2019 executive order defining Judaism as a nationality as part of an effort to target BDS movements on college campuses. He has said his father’s family came from “shtetls in Russia, Poland, and the Ukraine,” and that his mother, originally from Iowa, converted to Orthodox Judaism. He also wrote a letter to the Wall Street Journal in 2016 to dispute a column wondering why more Jews don’t vote Republican.

Savit also played a part in prosecuting the university’s pro-Palestinian protesters, although his role was smaller than Nessel’s. In 2024 his office filed felony charges against four protesters for allegedly assaulting police officers during a sit-in at the university president’s house. Some activists accused Savit and his assistant prosecutor of “betraying their constituents” and “doing so to protect the university’s investments in genocide and apartheid.” (Two of the charged were permitted to enter a diversion program for young offenders, while the other two pled down to misdemeanors.)

When it came to the more high-profile charges against some of the school’s encampment participants, Savit allowed Nessel’s statewide office to handle the cases. Nessel was then accused of being “biased,” a charge she labeled as antisemitic; she ultimately dropped the charges against the protesters.

The attorney who defended the protesters, Amir Makled, also won the Democratic Party’s nomination Sunday in his bid to oust a Jewish, pro-Israel member of the University of Michigan’s Board of Regents. Makled won the party’s support despite reports of past social media activity in which he had retweeted antisemitic conspiracy theorist Candace Owens and praised Hezbollah’s assassinated leader.

Savit also unreservedly condemned the Temple Israel attack in Michigan as antisemitic and stated, “There is a lot of grief, a lot of pain from people that may have loved ones, may have relatives who are in the regions, may even have lost loved ones and relatives. But at the end of the day, that certainly does not give license to launch attacks on Jewish community spaces.”

His statements drew a contrast with Michigan U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed, also a favorite of the state’s progressive wing, whose own condemnation of the attack had also invoked Israel’s war in Lebanon.

The post Michigan Democrats nominate Eli Savit, progressive Jewish prosecutor, for state attorney general appeared first on The Forward.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News