Uncategorized
Jesse Jackson, civil rights leader with strained Jewish relations, dies at 84
(JTA) — The Rev. Jesse Jackson, the Black leader who sought to build a “rainbow coalition” for America’s future but struggled to include Jews in it, has died at 84.
For American Jews, Jackson’s use of an antisemitic epithet, criticism of Israel and association with the Nation of Islam’s Louis Farrakhan during his first presidential run in 1984 proved hard to overcome, even as the towering figure apologized in part and preached reconciliation.
“This man is brilliant, he is a leader,” Edgar Bronfman, then president of the World Jewish Congress, said in 1992 after inviting Jackson to address its conference in Brussels. “Do I trust him totally? Of course not. Because he is not a Jewish leader, he is a Black leader, he’s got a different agenda. Do I think that he and I can work together to bring the Black and Jewish communities together to fight against racism? Yes.”
Born in the Jim Crow South and educated as a Baptist minister in Chicago, Jackson emerged as a purveyor of a hopeful vision of racial inclusion and economic uplift in the years after the assassination of Martin Luther King, Jr., with whom he had worked. After clashing with other King allies over the appropriate tenor of civil rights activism, he formed his own group — ultimately called Operation PUSH — to advance his vision: uniting groups marginalized economically or politically into a governing majority to achieve economic and social justice.
Soon, his group’s economic boycotts were winning commitments to minority hiring and propelling him into the political mainstream. Jackson succeeded in negotiating the freedom of U.S. hostages abroad, including in Syria and Cuba in 1984. Soon, he was mounting a historic campaign for president, becoming only the second Black national candidate since Reconstruction. In his second Democratic primary run, in 1988, he won 11 primaries and caucuses, nabbing 7 million votes and driving a dramatic expansion in the number of Black registered voters.
But criticism dogged Jackson, even as he notched civil rights and national politics wins. Some in his own community accused him of caring more about the concerns of affluent African-Americans than about the poverty afflicting the majority of Black people in the United States; others charged him with profiting personally off of his advocacy.
Perhaps the most significant breaches came with American Jews, who had played a prominent role in the civil rights movement of the 1960s.
In 1979, he met in Lebanon with Palestinian Liberation Organization leader Yasser Arafat in an effort to broker ties between the group and the United States. At the time, the U.S. position was not to engage with the PLO or its leader until it had acknowledged Israel’s right to exist.
Jackson also visited Israel during the same trip, but two Jewish members of the delegation — including one who helped plan it after working with Jackson to oppose a Nazi march in Skokie, Illinois, the previous year — quit in protest partway through, saying that they had concluded that Jackson was a “dangerous man” who “cares not one bit about the Israeli point of view.”
In 1983, soon after announcing his first presidential campaign, the far-right Jewish Defense League announced a “Jews for Jackson” effort to thwart him. The announcement prompted Jackson’s first denial that he was antisemitic.
Tensions exploded early the next year when Jackson admitted that he had used the term “Hymietown” to describe New York City in what he believed had been a private conversation with a reporter. The term, an offensive slur for Jews that riffs off the name Hyman, smarted for a community that had hoped antisemitism in the United States was a thing of the past.
Jackson first denied making the comments, including during a televised national debate, but then apologized in a speech at a synagogue in Manchester, New Hampshire, ahead of the first presidential primary. “It’s human to err, divine to forgive,” he said, explaining that he had not wanted the comment to disrupt his campaign.
“I appeal to you tonight as a Jewish community to find yourself in the rainbow coalition,” Jackson continued, adding, “I categorically deny that I am either antisemitic or anti-Israel.”
At the same time, Jackson declined to distance himself from Farrakhan, a longtime associate who had introduced him at a Chicago rally. After Farrakhan made new antisemitic comments, calling Judaism a “gutter religion,” Jackson’s campaign denounced the comments but not Farrakhan himself.
That summer, Jackson also made new comments about Israel that violated sacrosanct beliefs among American Jewish leaders. Jackson endorsed the idea of a Palestinian state alongside Israel at a time when the idea was far out of the mainstream of American and Israeli politics. He also raised questions about U.S. military aid to Israel, saying that Israeli weapons were being used to maintain apartheid in South Africa.
Relations had soured so much that Jackson became a wedge issue during the 1988 election, when Republican strategists and figures such as Vice President George Bush suggested that Democrats were not forceful enough in condemning antisemitism.
There were some signs of openness. Jewish leaders, including Rabbi David Saperstein of the Religious Action Center of Reform Judaism, said Jackson had met privately with them in an effort to mend fences. “It is a different Jackson in 1988 than in 1984,” Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, said at the time. “One has to recognize and welcome that certain sensitivity he is now showing.”
By the early 1990s, Jackson had made gains in building trust with segments of the Jewish community, speaking at synagogues and Jewish community forums and participating in Holocaust remembrance events. In July 1992, he made two headlining speeches condemning hatred of Jews, at the Democratic National Convention and to a World Jewish Congress meeting in Brussels.
In the World Jewish Congress speech, he condemned antisemitism, praised Zionism as a “liberation movement” and called for Jews and Blacks to renew their joint fight against racism.
“Let us not turn closed scars into open wounds in the name of freedom and candor,” he said. “Let us be wise enough to act our way into a way of thinking, and not just think and talk ourselves into not acting.”
Bronfman, the WJC’s president, told the Jewish Telegraphic Agency at the time that he had invited Jackson to speak over the objections of many Jewish voices, because he wanted to make sure that a conference focused on racism against Jews also examined racism in the United States.
The speech won over some in attendance. “I was proved to be wrong,” said an Australian co-chair of the WJC’s board who had opposed Jackson’s invitation. “I do see genuine opportunities now, if we move forward, to some sort of a rapprochement.”
But Foxman said Jackson would still have to do more to convince him. “It is a record that has been marred by an insensitive view of Jewish history, the Holocaust, Zionism and the modern Jewish state, its government and their policies,” he said. “One speech to the Jewish community in the Palace of Congresses in Brussels will not repair it.”
Foxman said he would work with Jackson if Jackson chose to deliver similar comments before Black audiences in the United States.
By the late 1990s, a thaw appeared to have taken place. Yeshiva University invited Jackson to speak on the topic of Black-Jewish relations. While Jackson faced some protests at Park Avenue, at Y.U., President Norman Lamm praised him as a “leading, vibrant” activist who has “performed miracles in fostering racial harmony.”
During that speech, Jackson denied that “Black antisemitism,” then a topic of growing concern among Jewish leaders, was a structural phenomenon, saying that any hatred that existed was confined to misguided individuals and not a product of the community as a whole. He also argued that the far right posed a greater threat to Jews in the United States.
Around the same time, Jackson participated in a vigil on behalf of Iranian Jews outside Park East Synagogue in New York City. Rabbi Marc Schneier, whose father Arthur is Park East’s rabbi, said following Jackson’s death, “I have lost a cherished friend.”
Jackson maintained personal relationships with other Jewish figures. Following the death in 2021 of Robert Marx, a pioneering social justice advocate and leading Reform rabbi in Chicago who drew inspiration from his experiences marching with King, Jackson issued a bereft statement praising him as “the Jewish voice for justice” and saying, “We prayed together, sang together, and marched together. When Nazis marched in Skokie, we fought hate together. We have always been together. I love him so much. I miss him already.”
Some Jewish groups eulogized Jackson on Tuesday, though often acknowledging the wrinkles in his record. “It’s no secret that there were also very painful moments in Rev. Jackson’s relationship with the Jewish community, and he is a testament to engagement even when there are deep disagreements and pain,” said the Jewish Council for Public Affairs, a civil rights group, in a statement. “He went on to be a key ally to the Jewish community, underscoring the urgency of building strong, long-lasting alliances against bigotry wherever it exists.”
Jackson announced in 2017 that he had Parkinson’s disease and had been increasingly out of the public eye. He shared a stage with Farrakhan at a memorial service for the singer Aretha Franklin in 2018 and traveled to Auschwitz in 2019 for a memorial service for the Roma victims of the Holocaust before making his last major public appearance in a wheelchair at the 2024 Democratic National Convention in Chicago. His organization announced in November that he had been hospitalized, and his family announced on Tuesday that he had “died peacefully.”
He is survived by his wife Jacqueline; six children including his son Jesse Jackson, Jr., who was elected to Congress in Illinois; and several grandchildren.
The post Jesse Jackson, civil rights leader with strained Jewish relations, dies at 84 appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
A shocking Purim experience (from the memoirs of I. J. Singer)
אינעם בוך זכרונות פֿונעם פּראָזע־מײַסטער, י. י. זינגער, „פֿון אַ וועלט וואָס איז נישטאָ מער‟, געפֿינט זיך אַ רירנדיקע פּורים־מעשׂה.
דאָס בוך איז אַרויס אין יאָר 1946, צוויי יאָר נאָך זינגערס פּלוצלינגדיקן, פֿריצײַטיקן טויט. דאָס ווערק האָט זיך צוערשט געדרוקט אין פֿאָרווערטס נאָך זײַן פּטירה, אונטערן נאָמען „אמתע פּאַסירונגען‟, אָבער זינגער אַליין האָט זײַן ווערק אַ נאָמען געגעבן „פֿון אַ וועלט וואָס איז נישטאָ מער‟. לויט זײַן פּלאַן, האָט דאָס ווערק געזאָלט אונדז געבן אַ ברייט קינסטלעריש בילד פֿון זײַן לעבן, און איבערהויפּט פֿונעם לעבן פֿון זײַן סבֿיבֿה, פֿון די קינדעריאָרן ביז זײַן קומען קיין אַמעריקע. עס האָט געזאָלט זײַן אַ ווערק פֿון דרײַ בענד, אַרום פֿופֿצן הונדערט זײַטן.
אין זײַן רײַכער ליטעראַרישער ירושה, האָט זינגער אונדז אָבער איבערגעלאָזט די ווײַטערדיקע לוסטיקע פּורים־מעשׂה (געדרוקט דאָ אין אַ פֿאַרקירצטן נוסח), וואָס איז פֿאָרגעקומען אין זײַן שטוב ווען ער איז געווען אַ קינד.
שיִעלע — אַזוי הייסט דער יונגער י. י. זינגער — דערציילט וועגן אַ מלמד, ר’ מיכל דוד, אַ פֿריילעך ייִדל, וואָס ס׳האָט זיך בײַ אים, נעבעך, פֿאַרענדיקט שוין גאָרנישט פֿריילעך. אַהרן צייטלין האָט אַ מאָל געשריבן וועגן י. י. זינגער, אַז ער איז געווען „אַ גײַסטיקער רעוואָלוציאָנער, וואָס האָט נישט אָנגענומען — נישט געוואָלט און נישט געקאָנט אָננעמען — דעם סדר פֿון דער וועלט‟. אין אָט דעם מעשׂהלע קען מען דאָס שוין גוט דערפֿילן.
— דניאלה מאַוער
אַ ייִד אַ מלמד פֿאַרגלוסט זיך צו ווערן אַ מלאך
ר׳ מיכל דוד איז געווען אַ קליין, לעבעדיק פּאַרשוינדל, מיט אַ שיטער, בלאָנד בערדל, אַ ייִדל אַ שטיק קוועקזילבער. בײַם לערנען האָט ער ליב געהאַט צו שניצן מיט אַ מעסערל. ער האָט אויסגעשניצט טאַבאַק־שטעקעלעך פֿון קאָרע, וואָס ער האָט אַוועקגעשאָנקען מתּנות צו אַלטע ייִדן, גרויסע טאַבאַק־שמעקער; אָדער ער האָט אויסגעשניצט פֿון האָלץ אַן אתרוג־פּושקע. ער האָט אויך פֿאַר אונדז אויסגעאַרבעט פֿאַרביקע לאַמטערנדלעך, מיט וועלכע מיר פֿלעגן אַהיימגיין אין די ווינטערנעכט פֿון חדר. געלערנט האָט ער מיר אַ פֿריילעכן ניגון, אָפֿט מאָל צוקנאַקנדיק מיט די פֿינגער פֿאַר שׂמחה.
די באַלעבאָסטעס, בײַ וועלכע ער האָט געגעסן טעג, האָבן אָנגעקוואָלן פֿון אים, ווײַל אַלץ האָט ער ליב געהאַט, פֿון יעדן מאכל הנאה געהאַט. די חסידים האָבן געלעקט די פֿינגער פֿון אים, ווײַל ער האָט געקענט דערציילן די וווּנדערלעכסטע מעשׂיות פֿון צדיקים און גוטע־ייִדן. אויך פֿאַר אונדז, ייִנגלעך, פֿלעגט ער דערציילן אַ וועלט מיט מעשׂיות, די פֿאַנטאַסטישסטע מעשׂיות פֿון צדיקים און בעל־שמס, וואָס האָבן געהאַט קפֿיצת־הדרך, געווען רואה־ואינו־נראהס און באַוויזן נאָך אַזעלכע קונצן.
אויף חסידישע סעודהלעך און ימים־טובֿים האָט ר׳ מיכל דוד געקערט וועלטן. ער האָט געזונגען מיט אַ הויך קוויטשיק קולכל, געקאָנט מאַכן אַ סך „לחיימס”, ווי פֿאַר אַ חסיד פּאַסט, און ער האָט געטאַנצט גאָרנישט מיד צו ווערן. דער עיקר האָט ער ליב געהאַט צו טאַנצן אויפֿן טיש…
פֿאַר פּורים האָט ר׳ מיכל דוד אינגאַנצן אָפּגעלאָזט די גמרא און געגרייט זיך צום פֿריילעכן יום־טובֿ. ערשטנס, האָט ער אויף דער מזרח־וואַנט פֿון בית־המדרש אָנגעצייכנט מיט אַ חלבֿן ליכט גרויסע אותיות און געמעלעכסטן. דער מלמד האָט אײַנגעטונקען אַ שמאַטע אין אַש פֿון בית־המדרש־אויוון און דערמיט איבערגעגאַנגען איבער דעם חלבֿ, און גלײַך זײַנען די אותיות און צייכענונגען געוואָרן שוואַרץ און אָנזעוודיק. מיר האָבן דערזען אַ גרויסע אויפֿשריפֿט: „משנכנס אדר מרבין בשמחה‟, וואָס מיינט, אַז ווי נאָר עס הייבט זיך אָן דער חודש אָדר, דאַרף מען אָנהייבן זיך משׂמח זײַן. אונטער דעם שיינעם אויפֿשריפֿט פֿון געכּתיבֿהטע אותיות איז געווען אויסגעמאָלט אַ פֿלעשל בראָנפֿן און צוויי הענט גיבן זיך לחיים. אין חדר האָט ער מיט אונדז געלערנט די מגילה, שניצנדיק דערבײַ די שענסטע גראַגערס פֿאַר אַלע תּלמידים.
אין ביידע טעג פֿון פּורים און שושן־פּורים האָט ר׳ מיכל דוד ממש איבערגעקערט דאָס שטעטעלע. ווען מען האָט געלייענט אין בית־המדרש די מגילה, האָט ער צונויפֿגענומען אַלע ייִנגלעך, נישט נאָר די תּלמידים זײַנע, נאָר אַפֿילו פֿרעמדע, און קאָמאַנדעוועט מיט אונדז בײַם גראַגערן יעדעס מאָל, ווען מען האָט דערמאָנט המנען. ער אַליין האָט געמאַכט פֿאַר זיך אַליין דעם גרעסטן גראַגער. ער האָט אויך געטופּעט מיט די פֿיס, און נישט נאָר בײַ המנס נאָמען, נאָר אויך ווען מען האָט דערמאָנט המנס ווײַב זרש און זייערער צען זין. דאָס וואָס אַ ייִד מיט אַ באָרד גראַגערט אין בית־המדרש האָט אַרויסגערופֿן גרויס שׂמחה בײַ אונדז ייִנגלעך. מיר האָבן שיִער נישט דאָס בית־המדרש צעלייגט. מײַן פֿאָטער איז אַפֿילו געווען אומצופֿרידן, ווײַל מיר האָבן געשטערט דעם בעל־קורא אין לייענען די מגילה, אָבער ער האָט זיך נישט געבייזערט. מען האָט אויף דעם פֿריילעכן מיכל דוד זיך נישט געקאָנט בייזערן. חוץ דעם, איז עס דאָך געווען פּורים, ווען מען דאַרף משׂמח זײַן.
נאָך דער מגילה האָט מיכל דוד גענומען גיין איבער די הײַזער, פֿון איין באַלעבאַטישער שטוב צו דער אַנדערער, און מאַכן „לחיימס”. אין שושן־פּורים האָט ער צונויפֿגענומען די חסידים און געמאַכט הוליאַנקעס. די חסידים האָט מען אַזעלכע זאַכן נישט געדאַרפֿט בעטן. זיי זײַנען אַלע מאָל גרייט געווען צו אַ סעודהלע, צו אַ שׂמחה. זיי האָבן געקויפֿט אַ פֿאַס ביר און געטרונקען אויף וואָס די וועלט שטייט. זיי זײַנען געגאַנגען פֿון הויז צו הויז, וווּ זיי האָבן געגעסן און געטרונקען און געטאַנצט. די ייִנגלעך זײַנען נאָכגעלאָפֿן. די פּראָסטע לײַט, די מתנגדים, האָבן געקוקט קרום אויף די חסידישע הוליאַנקעס, אָבער די חסידים האָבן זיי געהערט ווי המן דעם גראַגער און זיי אויף צו־להכעיס נאָך העכער געזונגען און געטאַנצט. מיכל דוד האָט געטאַנצט אויף דער גאַס. ער איז גאָרנישט מיד געוואָרן פֿון טרינקען און האָפּסען און זינגען און פֿרייען זיך. צום־לעצט זיינען די חסידים אַרײַנגעקומען צו מײַן פֿאָטער אין שטוב.
„רביצין, פּורים מעג מען טאַנצן אויפֿן טישטעך. עס זאָל אַ רוח המנען אין זײַן טאַטנס טאַטן אַרײַן ביז עמלקן!‟ האָט מיכל דוד געשריגן און געטופּעט מיט די פֿיס.
דערנאָך איז ער אַראָפּגעשפּרונגען פֿון טיש, אײַנגעהילט זיך אין טישטעך ווי אין אַ טלית און זיך פֿאַרשטעלט פֿאַר אַ מלאך.
„רביצין, איך בין דער מלאך מיכאל — האָט ער געשריגן — גיט מיר צוויי פֿלעדערווישן, וועל איך מאַכן פֿליגל.‟
מײַן מוטער, אַ מתנגדישע טאָכטער, האָט דעם צעקאָכטן חסיד קיין פֿלעדערווישן נישט געוואָלט געבן. אָבער ער איז נישט געווען פֿויל און אַליין אַרײַן אין קיך. ער האָט אויסגעזוכט צוויי גענדזענע פֿליגל, וועלכע ער האָט מיט שטריקלעך צוגעבונדן צום טישטעך, אַזוי אַז ער זאָל אויסזען ווי אַן אמתער מלאך. דערנאָך האָט ער גענומען אַ הויפֿן מעל און זיך אויסגעמעלט דאָס פּנים. פֿאַרוואָס אַ מלאך דאַרף האָבן אַן אויסגעמעלט פּנים ווייס איך נישט, אָבער אַזוי האָט ר׳ מיכל דוד געטאָן. אין אָט דעם הילוך איז ער אַרײַן אין מײַן פֿאָטערס שטוב אין גענומען טאַנצן אַ מלאכים־טאַנץ. דער ייִד האָט געשוועבט ווי אַ רוח. ייִדן האָבן צוגעפּאַטשט מיט די הענט און גערופֿן פֿריילעך:
„לעבעדיק, מלאך מיכאל!‟
מיט אַ מאָל, האָט דער מלאך מיכאל צעשפּרייט זײַנע הענט ווי פֿליגל און אַ פֿלי געטאָן גלײַך דורכן פֿענצטער אין דרויסן אַרויס.
אַרײַן אין שטוב צוריק איז ער שוין נישט אויף די אייגענע פֿיס. מען האָט אים געטראָגן. זײַנע לעבעדיקע אויגן זײַנען געווען געשלאָסן. פֿון איין אויג האָט גערונען בלוט. אַ צעקנאָדערטן, ווי אַ בינטל טויטע אבֿרים, האָט מען אים געטראָגן אין זײַן טישטעך מיט די פֿלעדערווישן מיטן אויסגעמעלטן פּנים. מען האָט גלײַך אַרײַנגערופֿן דעם גוייִשן פֿעלדשער פּאַוואָלסקי, וואָס האָט געוווינט אין שכנות.
„איך קאָן גאָרנישט טאָן, דאָס אויג רינט אים אויס,‟ האָט ער געזאָגט.
אַלע ייִדן אַרום, אויסגעניכטערטע אין איין רגע, זײַנען געשטאַנען מיט אַראָפּגעלאָזענע קעפּ. מײַן פֿאָטער האָט זיך געבעטן בײַם אויסגעצויגענעם מלמד:
„ר׳ מיכל דוד, איר זעט מיך, ר׳ מיכל דוד? … ענטפֿערט, ר׳ מיכל דוד….‟
ר׳ מיכל דוד האָט נישט געענטפֿערט. זײַן פּנים, אויסגעשמירט אין מעל, האָט אויסגעזען ווי אַ מת. די פּראָסטע ייִדן, וואָס זײַנען אָנגעלאָפֿן, האָבן געמוסרט די חסידים:
„חסידקעס, שיכּרים זענט איר, נישט קיין ייִדן — האָבן זיי געמורמלט — אַזאַ אומגליק…‟
מײַן פֿאָטער איז געווען חושך. מײַן מוטער האָט געוויינט. אין מיטן וויינען האָט זי זיך דערמאָנט אַז מען דאַרף צינדן ליכט, ווײַל שושן־פּורים איז דעמאָלט אויסגעפֿאַלן אין פֿרײַטיק.
איך האָב געקוקט אויף דעם מלמד מײַנעם, וואָס איז געלעגן אויסגעצויגן אויף דער גרינער קאָלדרע, געלעגן אַ שווײַגנדיקער, מיט אַן אויסגעמעלט פּנים, איבער וועלכן אַ דין שנירעלע בלוט האָט זיך געשלענגלט, און איך האָב געהאַט תּרעומות צו גאָט, וואָס האָט געקאָנט אָפּטאָן אַזאַ אומגערעכטיקייט, און אין אַ יום־טובֿ דערצו. דאָס איז געווען שוואַרץ־שבת.
The post A shocking Purim experience (from the memoirs of I. J. Singer) appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Iranian Regime Uses HispanTV to Spread Antisemitic Propaganda Across Latin America, ADL Warns
Iranians attend an anti-Israel rally in Tehran, Iran, April 19, 2024. Photo: Majid Asgaripour/WANA (West Asia News Agency) via REUTERS
As the Iranian regime escalates its campaign of disinformation against Israel, Tehran is now flooding Latin America with antisemitic propaganda and pro-terrorist messaging, using outlets such as HispanTV to reach millions of Spanish-speaking audiences and reshape public perceptions in the region.
On Tuesday, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) released a new report detailing a dramatic rise over the past two years in antisemitic and anti-Israel content on HispanTV, the Spanish-language network run by the Iranian regime as part of its coordinated disinformation campaign across Latin America.
With the capacity to reach nearly 600 million Spanish speakers through satellite, cable, livestreaming, and social media, ADL characterizes HispanTV, which launched in 2012, as “the world’s leading platform for peddling antisemitic hate and disseminating anti-Israel prejudice and incitement across Latin America and the wider Spanish-speaking world.”
According to the report, HispanTV consistently disseminates content that reinforces long-standing antisemitic stereotypes about Jewish influence, spreads conspiracy theories, fuels the demonization of Israel, and glorifies Iranian-backed terrorist groups like Hamas and Hezbollah.
The study notes that the network’s hateful content has escalated sharply over the past two years, especially in the wake of the Hamas-led invasion of and massacre across southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023.
“HispanTV consistently frames Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, attacks as legitimate and praiseworthy acts of resistance worthy of celebration,” the report says. “This reframing is essential to the channel’s ideological project, converting mass violence into a foundational myth of liberation.”
Across its broadcasts, HispanTV portrays Jews and Zionism as “an omnipresent, evil force” manipulating governments through a coordinated malicious scheme, reinforcing deeply entrenched antisemitic stereotypes about Jewish influence and power.
The report also finds that another central theme in the network’s coverage is the glorification of terrorist groups, depicting them as “extraordinary examples of heroism and bravery,” celebrating attacks that killed civilians, and vowing continued violence until the “complete annihilation of the occupants” — an apparent reference to Israel.
“The Iranian regime’s media outlet is spreading classic antisemitic conspiracy theories and anti-Israel propaganda to potentially millions of people across Latin America and beyond, making the Islamic Republic a destabilizing force not only in the Middle East, but across the Spanish-speaking world,” ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said in a statement.
“With antisemitism already at historic levels globally, Tehran is funding a massive media propaganda operation that is priming the pump for spreading antisemitism and hate against Israel and Jews the world over,” he continued.
While systematically undermining Israel’s right to exist — depicting the Jewish state as a “colonial,” “genocidal,” and “terrorist” project — HispanTV presents the Iranian regime as a principled alternative to Western democracies and positions Tehran as the leader of the “Axis of Resistance,” according to the ADL’s newly released report.
The Iranian network also depicts Jews and Israelis as “operating a highly organized global disinformation apparatus designed to deceive the world and justify genocide,” minimizing or outright denying the reality of antisemitism.
The ADL argues that the lack of decisive action by governments, international bodies, and corporations has allowed the Islamic regime to leverage HispanTV to disseminate its hateful conspiracies around the globe.
“If this threat is not seriously addressed, the result will likely be the radicalization of Spanish-speaking audiences across Latin America and beyond,” the report says.
Uncategorized
US Justice Department Launches Investigation Into Antisemitism at Lincoln Memorial University Medical School
US Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights Harmeet Dhillon at the Justice Department in Washington, DC, US, Aug. 7, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Kent Nishimura
The US Department of Justice has opened an investigation into Lincoln Memorial University (LMU) in Tennessee for allegedly having “engaged in discrimination against its Jewish students” over several years, the agency announced last week.
The investigation, which will receive support from the US Department of Health and Human Services, was prompted by complaints that high-level officials at the LMU DeBusk College of Osteopathic Medicine “intentionally” prevented Jewish students from finishing final exams — an action that could lead to academic failure as well as squandering tens of thousands of dollars in tuition fees.
According to WBIR-TV, a local news outlet based in the city of Knoxville, LMU enacted a new policy which proscribed granting students exam exemptions based on their observing religious holidays. Two Orthodox Jewish students studying medicine are known to have been disproportionately impacted by the dictate, and, according to Rabbi Yossi Wilhelm of Chabad of Knoxville, their qualifications for becoming doctors were allegedly called into doubt by a college official who implied that religious observance is disqualifying.
“This Department of Justice is fiercely committed to shutting down the concerning outbreak of antisemitism that has been spreading on college campuses since the Hamas attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023,” Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general of the civil rights division of the Justice Department, said on Friday when the investigation was announced. “When colleges and universities single Jewish students out for adverse treatment, they are in clear violation of our civil rights laws and of this nation’s promise of equal opportunity for all Americans.”
Paula Stannard, director of the civil rights office of the Department of Health and Human Services, added, “All students should be free to learn and train in environments free from discrimination. Antisemitism has no place in our nation’s educational or medical training institutions, and OCR [the Office of Civil Rights] will work to ensure that federal civil rights laws are fully enforced.”
In a statement to The Algemeiner, Lincoln Memorial University denied discriminating against anyone, citing its “belief that every single person, regardless of race, situation, or background, deserves the right to a quality educational experience.”
It continued, “We would never intentionally discriminate against any member of our community, and we do not believe we did so as has been alleged in the concerns under investigation by the Department of Justice. Educating our future leaders is why we exist. Any decision that is made is always with the goal of providing the best education for each and every student.”
Antisemitism in academic medical centers located on college campuses is fostering noxious environments which deprive Jewish health-care professionals of their civil right to work in spaces free from discrimination and hate, according to a study by the StandWithUs Data & Analytics Department in May.
“Academia today is increasingly cultivating an environment which is hostile to Jews, as well as members of other religious and ethnic groups,” StandWithUs director of data and analytics and study co-author, Alexandra Fishman, said in a statement at the time. “Academic institutions should be upholding the integrity of scholarship, prioritizing civil discourse, rather than allowing bias or personal agendas to guide academic culture.”
Titled “Antisemitism in American Healthcare: The Role of Workplace Environment,” the study includes survey data showing that 62.8 percent of Jewish health-care professionals employed by campus-based medical centers reported experiencing antisemitism, a far higher rate than those working in private practice and community hospitals. Fueling the rise in hate, it added, were repeated failures of DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) initiatives to educate workers about antisemitism, increasing, the report said, the likelihood of antisemitic activity.
The study is not StandWithUs’s first contribution to the study of antisemitism in medicine. In December 2024, the Data & Analytics Department published a study which found that nearly 40 percent of Jewish American health-care professionals have encountered antisemitism in the workplace, either as witnesses or victims.
The study included a survey of 645 Jewish health workers, a substantial number of whom said they were subject to “social and professional isolation.” The problem left over one quarter of the survey cohort, 26.4 percent, “feeling unsafe or threatened.”
The issue is currently being investigated by the US House Committee on Education and the Workforce, with a focus on the University of California, Los Angeles’ (UCLA) David Geffen School of Medicine, the University of Illinois’ College of Medicine, and the University of California, San Francisco’s School of Medicine.
“This investigation will aid the committee in considering whether potential legislative changes, including legislation to specifically address antisemitism discrimination, are needed,” education committee chairman Rep. Tim Walberg (R-MI) wrote in a letter to Steven Dubinett, dean of UCLA’s Geffen School. “The committee has become aware that Jewish students and faculty have experienced hostility and fear at the hands of peers, colleagues, and administrators at UCLA Med, and it has not been demonstrated that the university has meaningfully responded to address and mitigate this problem.”
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.