Uncategorized
Stumbling across Jewish history in a vintage store
I have never lived alone. I’ve never even lived with only my partner, at least not for all that long. We’ve always had roommates. And that means we’ve always had roommates’ stuff.
Honestly, I’ve loved this. I mean, I’ve had my issues with individual roommates, ranging from minor nits to major clashes. But generally, I have liked the benefits of living with people, which I’d summarize as: friendship, finances and furniture.
This time in my life is drawing to a close soon, however, as my partner and I prepare to move into our own place. And it’s time to figure out what my tastes are. Sure, I’ve accrued some things — a rug my grandfather braided, a bookshelf a Harvard School of Design student made and abandoned in my grad school apartment. But I’ve never bought a couch. And I’ve never had to fill a big wall, much less a whole apartment, with art.
As a culture writer, this task feels especially laden with meaning — I feel like my taste is on trial. I like abstract art, yet, at least within my budget, so many abstract paintings look like the visual equivalent of Muzak. I want my art to be meaningful, personal, to tell a story about who lives here and what they value. I would love my furniture, too, to be an interesting statement, but ultimately, we need something to sit on. I’m less willing to just fill walls.
Which is why I was so thrilled, finally, to be stopped in my tracks by a piece of art on the website of Johnny Cakes Design, an interior design store in Providence. An engraving, it depicts a naked man, slumped on the ground, his head hanging over a glass of wine, his beard carved out of spiraling lines. Two women, holding a bunch of grapes, stand over him, embracing. The description said the artist, Abram Krol, had lived through the Holocaust, but little else.
The store was closed, but I called to ask if I could get in to see it that afternoon — I was irrationally certain someone would buy it any second — and Britt Machado, the owner, told me she could let me in.
Machado had listed the piece online as “Epreuve d’essai,” but, she told me, she’d learned that is simply a French term for a test print, part of the process of engraving. She didn’t know too much else about it; she had purchased it at an auction in either upstate New York or Connecticut. I bought it and quickly discovered that, while Krol is relatively obscure in the U.S. — though MoMA has one engraving of a mandril monkey — in France, he’s a well-known member of the School of Paris, artists who made the capital an art center in the 20th century.
Born in 1919, Krol grew up in a Hasidic family in Poland. But when he was 12, his father, a noted Talmudist, had a spiritual crisis and became a devoted atheist, completely upending their lives. Krol moved to France at 19 to study to become a civil engineer, as his mother pushed him to do, but ended up joining the French foreign legion in 1939 — as a way to avoid Poland’s draft — and landing in Avignon.
He began to take painting classes, but World War II was coming and Krol was tipped off about the impending danger for Jews as France was occupied by the Nazis. He assumed a false identity and took a job in a factory.
The main biography of Krol that I could find, a French website written by his son, Andre, gives little detail about how Krol survived the Holocaust, or how he felt; after noting Krol took a false identity, it jumps to his first exhibition, in Paris in 1946, and then to the 1950s, when his career took off.
But his artwork gives hints of how the Holocaust affected him. In 1953, Krol made an engraving in memory of his parents and his brother, who had perished in concentration camps. A book of engravings and poems, La Fiancée du septième jour (The Seventh-day Bride), includes a poem that longingly captures the rhythms of the Jewish rituals Krol performed in his childhood. He writes of walking in the footsteps of his ancestors, of Yom Kippur prostrations and the feeling of the leather straps of the tefillin. But in the next poem, fire has consumed the village.
“The knees that carried me, wandering, are charred, and the ash of their flesh is scattered across the flowery fields of Europe,” Krol writes, in French. “May we meet again.”
Much of his work grappled with biblical themes. A Haggadah that intimately depicts a Jewish family crouched on the ground, searching for the final crumb of bread before the holiday begins, and a series of ceramic works shows Hasidic men reading Torah. From 1967 to 1971 he worked on a series of 187 engravings depicting the entire Torah, one per chapter, producing starkly textured, minimalist images of Adam and Eve intertwined, Sarah with a pregnant Hagar.
He seems to have been trying to understand his father’s shift from Hasidic scholar to atheist intellectual, a time he references obliquely, writing only that “I owed it to my childhood” to return to the stories of the Bible. Or perhaps he was trying to connect with the family he had lost.
Through my research, I’ve discovered that the print I now own became a work titled “Les Filles de Loth,” or “Lot’s daughters.” (It was a test for printing his engravings with multiple colors; the final product, which adds a striking rust-colored sun, is held at the Paris Museum of Modern Art.)
It depicts one of the most uncomfortable moments in Genesis, an incestuous scene in which Lot’s daughters — believing humanity to be destroyed after God smites the city of Sodom — get their father drunk and have sex with him in order to, they believe, ensure the continuation of the human race.
It is, I think, a testament to the artist’s ongoing interrogation of his relationship with Judaism, and with morality at large, as it grapples with one of humanity’s strongest taboos — incest — juxtaposed against the threat of extermination. What is right and wrong in the face of something so horrifying?
“During his final years, whenever he was asked why he had embarked on a career as an artist, he explained that it was to counter the malevolence of the Nazis, who had sought to eradicate the Jewish people and every trace of their existence,” writes Krol’s son, the only mention of the Holocaust’s impact on his father. “Of his immediate family — his parents and brother — who had all perished in the camps, he was the sole survivor; he wished to leave behind a lasting testament to their time on earth.”
Looking at my print, itself an unfinished experiment, I see Krol’s continued engagement with the question of what to do with Judaism, and his refusal to discard a piece of his identity, however turbulent his relationship with it. It is a symbol of an ongoing, lived quest to understand, like Judaism itself. It has, after all, already inspired me to chase down Krol’s life’s work, pore over his poems and dwell on each scene of the Torah that he engraved.
That feels like the perfect centerpiece for my new home. Even if my mother’s first response to seeing it was, “Wow, they’re really…naked.”
The post Stumbling across Jewish history in a vintage store appeared first on The Forward.
Uncategorized
Milei Reaffirms Unwavering Support for Israel Ahead of Independence Day Visit
Argentine President Javier Milei speaks at the 12th annual Algemeiner J100 Gala on March 9, 2026, in New York City.
Argentine President Javier Milei has once again voiced his unwavering support for Israel ahead of a diplomatic visit beginning this weekend, during which he will take part in Independence Day celebrations and light a ceremonial torch.
In an interview with Israel’s Channel 14 on Thursday, Milei offered unequivocal support for Israel amid its ongoing war with Iran, describing the Islamist regime in Tehran as “an enemy to the West.”
“I defend Israel and the Jewish people because it is a just cause,” the Argentine leader said. “Israel stands as the fortress of the West. Turning your back on it would mean turning your back on a legacy that has produced one of the greatest civilizational achievements in history.”
“Rejecting Israel’s legacy to humanity means destroying everything that has made Western civilization great,” he continued.
Milei also praised both Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and US President Donald Trump, calling them “exceptional leaders,” amid what he described as a fight for democracy, freedom, and the very foundations of modern civilization.
“Beyond the threat of developing nuclear capabilities, Iran exports and finances terrorism around the world. It is not only an enemy of Israel, but of the entire West,” the Argentine leader said. “If we fail to understand the danger posed by this theocratic regime, we are jeopardizing our very existence.”
He also criticized the international community for what he portrayed as a lack of support for Washington and Jerusalem during the conflict, warning that such hesitation reflects a broader failure to confront rising global threats.
“They are cowards who are afraid to confront them. If you want peace, you must be prepared for war,” he said. “If we fail to understand that and refuse to face those who seek to destroy our existence, we will ultimately become victims anyway.”
In his third diplomatic visit to the Jewish state, Milei will arrive on Sunday to take part in Israel’s Independence Day celebrations, scheduled to run from April 19 to 22.
He will become the first foreign head of state to light a torch as part of the official Independence Day ceremony.
During his trip, Milei will also receive a series of honors, including the Presidential Medal of Honor from Israeli President Isaac Herzog and an honorary doctorate, in recognition of what Israeli officials describe as his exceptional contribution to Israel and humanity.
“Milei has demonstrated unwavering support for Israel on the international stage, stood alongside the families of Gaza hostages, and expressed a deep connection to the Jewish people and its heritage,” the Israeli president said in a statement announcing the decision, calling Argentina a “key ally.”
The Argentine leader “represents bold leadership and has pursued a clear, unequivocal policy of standing with the State of Israel as an ardent Zionist,” he continued.
During his visit, Milei will also meet with Netanyahu, and some reports suggest discussions could advance his earlier pledge to move Argentina’s embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
Uncategorized
Israeli Defense Chief Says Hezbollah Will Be Disarmed, Terror Group Vows Continued ‘Resistance’ as Truce Begins
Smoke rises following an airstrike in Lebanon, as seen from Israeli side of the border, April 11, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Amir Cohen
As a newly agreed ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon took effect, Israel’s defense minister warned on Friday that Hezbollah will ultimately be disarmed and Israeli forces will not withdraw from Lebanese territory, vowing the campaign will continue until the threat to Israel’s northern communities is fully eliminated.
During a press conference, Israel Katz said the military campaign had entered a temporary “freeze” phase under a 10-day ceasefire framework. However, he stressed that Israel’s operational objectives on the ground remain unfinished and the maneuver is far from complete.
“The IDF [Israel Defense Forces] will continue to hold all positions it has cleared and taken inside Lebanon,” the Israeli defense chief said. “The ground operation and nationwide strikes against Hezbollah have achieved significant gains, but the mission is not yet complete.”
“Disarming Hezbollah — whether through military force or political pressure — was and remains the central objective of the campaign to which we are committed,” he continued. “Significant political leverage has now also been created, with the direct involvement of US President [Donald Trump] and increased pressure on the Lebanese government to advance that goal.”
Katz’s remarks came shortly after the Iran-back Lebanese terrorist group issued a defiant statement rejecting the ceasefire and any prospect of direct negotiations with Jerusalem, while vowing its forces would continue resisting Israeli troops.
“Our fighters will keep their hands on the trigger, preparing for the enemy’s betrayal and violation of its commitments. We will remain loyal to the alliance until our last breath, and our flag will not fall,” the statement read.
“The presence of Israeli forces on Lebanese territory gives Lebanon and the Lebanese people the right to resist,” it continued.
Meanwhile, residents across southern Lebanon, Beirut, and other parts of the country began making their way back home as the ceasefire took effect, with social media footage showing reconstruction work already underway on infrastructure damaged during the war.
However, Israel has warned Lebanese citizens against returning to their homes at this stage, with officials saying that Hezbollah could try to exploit the situation to reestablish its terrorist infrastructure under civilian cover.
“With the ceasefire agreement taking effect, the IDF will continue to hold its positions in southern Lebanon in light of Hezbollah’s terrorist activity,” Col. Avichai Edraei, the IDF spokesperson in Arabic, said in a statement.
“Until further notice, you are asked not to move south of the Litani River,” he continued. “If the fire resumes, those who return to the security zone will be forced to evacuate in order to allow the mission to be completed.”
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also signaled that Israel does not intend to withdraw its forces from Lebanese territory, saying the military is establishing what he described as a “thickened security zone” along the border area.
“That’s where we are – and we’re not leaving,” the Israeli leader said in a video statement issued on Thursday.
Netanyahu also said the opportunity for a ceasefire emerged only after what he described as a dramatic shift in Lebanon’s strategic balance of power since the start of the war.
He pointed to major blows to Hezbollah’s military capabilities, including the killing of its longtime leader Hassan Nasrallah in 2024 and the subsequent destruction of large weapons stockpiles, saying these developments led to calls from Lebanese officials for direct peace talks for the first time in decades.
With negotiations now underway toward a longer-term arrangement, Netanyahu said Israel’s position rests on two core demands: the full disarmament of Hezbollah and a “sustainable” security-based peace framework.
For its part, Hezbollah insisted any agreement must include a complete Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory and adherence to a reciprocal “quiet for quiet”” arrangement — terms Israel has rejected.
Netanyahu also warned that Hezbollah, which openly seeks Israel’s destruction, still retains a significant rocket arsenal, saying neutralizing that threat will remain a central component of the ongoing security and political process.
According to a report by The Wall Street Journal, nearly half of the roughly 8,000 rockets fired by Hezbollah during the war were launched from the southern Litani River region — an area that, under previous agreements, was supposed to be fully demilitarized.
The newly agreed ceasefire, which took effect Thursday-Friday at midnight, establishes a fixed 10-day window intended “to allow for good-faith negotiations toward a permanent security and peace agreement.”
As part of direct mediation efforts from Washington, Trump invited Netanyahu and Lebanese President Joseph Aoun to White House talks aimed at advancing a broader settlement framework.
According to the US Department of State, the Lebanese government pledged to take “significant steps” to prevent Hezbollah from launching further attacks against Israeli targets.
“Both countries recognize the challenge posed by armed groups that violate Lebanon’s sovereignty and threaten regional stability … The only forces authorized to bear arms in Lebanon will be Lebanese government forces,” an official statement from the meeting said.
“Israel will retain its right to take all necessary measures for self-defense, at any time, against planned, immediate or sustained attacks,” it continued.
Uncategorized
Despite Winning New Jersey Special Election, Anti-Israel Candidate Underperforms in Heavily Jewish Town
Analilia Mejia, Democratic candidate for New Jersey’s 11th Congressional District, speaks to guests after winning the election in Montclair, New Jersey, US, April 16, 2026. Photo: REUTERS/Eduardo Munoz
In Thursday night’s US congressional election in the 11th district of New Jersey, Jewish voters seemed to defect from the Democratic nominee in massive numbers, potentially foreshadowing a significant shift in Jewish voting patterns.
Analilia Mejia, a progressive activist known for her sharp condemnations of Israel, comfortably won the special congressional election in New Jersey in the deep-blue district by a margin of 60 percent to 40 percent.
Despite defeating her Republican opponent by 20 points, however, pundits pointed out that Mejia underperformed expectations and that Democrats hemorrhaged support among heavily Jewish communities.
In Livingston, New Jersey, a town with a significant Jewish population, Mejia barely eked out a 51-49 majority over Joe Hathaway, a staggering sea-change from recent elections. The deep-blue town voted for Democratic Gov. Mikie Sherrill and Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris by margins of 0.5 and 12 points, respectively. Taking into account party registration, the town has seen a shift to the political right by over 50 percent since 2024.
Though Mejia won Thursday’s race by a comfortable margin, experts pointed out that the progressive insurgent underperformed throughout the affluent suburban district. When taking into account party registration patterns, Mejia underperformed in Millburn by 23 points, North Caldwell by 10 points, South Orange by 7 points, and West Caldwell by 6 points, among others.
Spectators suggested that Mejia’s impressive margin of victory could be attributed to anti-Trump sentiment and massive turnout among Democrats and depressed turnout from Republicans.
Mejia’s positions on Israel, once considered fringe within the party, are increasingly becoming more mainstream, particularly in elections dominated by liberal voters. Her rhetoric on Israel, which critics say is one-sided and inflammatory, has drawn backlash from moderates and pro-Israel Democrats.
The outcome raises fresh questions about the party’s direction heading into national elections. While progressives see momentum, others worry candidates like Mejia could alienate Jewish and moderate voters while complicating efforts to maintain a broad electoral coalition. Her victory is likely to deepen internal party tensions, especially as debates over Israel grow more polarized and politically charged.
Mejia has said Israel’s actions in Gaza amount to “genocide,” a position that put her well to the left of many mainstream Democrats. She has aligned herself with calls for stronger conditions, or outright opposition, to US military support for Israel, reflecting the broader progressive wing’s push to reassess the traditional US-Israel relationship. She has also aimed sharp criticism toward the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the preeminent pro-Israel lobbying group in the US, calling the organization “horrendous” and accusing it of dividing the Democratic Party.
A progressive organizer with a record of criticizing Israeli government actions, Mejia benefited from a coalition of younger voters, activists, and highly engaged ideological blocs. Her win is consistent with recent polling trends showing a generational divide within the party, with younger Democrats expressing more skepticism toward Israel than older cohorts.
Mejia’s struggles in heavily Jewish and moderate areas of the district could forecast a split between the Democratic Party and what has been historically one of its most reliable voting blocs.
Since Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel launched the Gaza war, the Democratic Paty’s rhetoric toward Israel has become increasingly hostile. Progressive Democrats, such as Reps. Ilhan Omar (MN) and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (NY), have accused Israel of committing “genocide” in Gaza.
This past week, approximately 80 percent of Democratic senators voted to halt military aid transfers to Israel, citing poor humanitarian conditions in Gaza and dismay over the US-Israeli war with Iran.