Opinion
Eliminate one position and replace it with two positions – that’s what the Rady JCC did
By BERNIE BELLAN Every few years within the past few years it seems, a Jewish organization in Winnipeg terminates the employment of some senior executive within that organization – always without explanation.
In 2015, it was the dismissal of the CEO of the Jewish Federation after less than a year on the job that caused a bit of a stir within our community – although to be honest, not much of one. Then, in 2018 it was the dismissal of the newly hired CEO of the Jewish Foundation that occurred – again, without any explanation.
It always takes time to cultivate alliances within any new organization and the danger exists that anyone who is a newly appointed head of an organization will have to ward off attempts by others who have been there much longer to undermine their authority.
I have no brief to bear for either of the two CEOs who were dismissed, although in their brief tenures here I did have occasion to get to know them both – and liked them both. Yet, while I may still wonder about the circumstances in which both of them were unceremoniously fired – and how much that would have cost both the Federation and the Foundation in terms of severance packages, the fact that they were both “outsiders” certainly makes it easier to understand how their being let go didn’t cause much of a stir.
However, in the case of Tamar Barr, the former Assistant Executive Director of the Rady JCC, things appear to be much different.
Here we have one of the longest serving employees of the Rady JCC, and certainly one of the most likeable ones, being let go after 24 years at the Rady JCC. And, while it’s understandable that there have been massive layoffs at the Rady JCC due to Covid, this is one permanent layoff that is quite hard to understand.
If you take a look at our Aug. 4 issue, you’ll see two different job postings advertised by the Rady JCC: one for a Coordinator of Culture Programming and one for a Coordinator of Arts Programming. Those were the positions that Tamar filled – and she was just one person!
Not only did Tamar do a superlative job directing arts and culture programming, she was absolutely dedicated to the Rady JCC. From time to time I would approach Tamar with an idea – whether it was to start a Jewish Business Network that would bring newcomers to the city together with individuals who were longstanding Winnipeg residents; or a Jewish Book Club that would focus on Jewish-themed books and might actually have some male members (as opposed to almost every other book club with which I’m familiar and which seems to be totally comprised of women only); or to begin offering university level programs with teachers such as Tami Jacoby (who did teach at the Rady on three separate occasions).
In all three cases, not only did Tamar jump at the suggestions I gave her, together with former Rady JCC Executive Director Gayle Waxman, they threw their full support behind those ideas and made sure they succeeded.
I remember those meetings of the Jewish Business Network when we would have upwards of 70-80 individuals gathered in the Multipurpose Room. Tamar would be there at the door to greet everyone, she would make sure there were ample refreshments and snacks available – and long after the meeting was over, Tamar was there helping to clean up.
As in the case of the the dismissals of the CEOs of the Jewish Federationa and Jewish Foundation respectively, try as I might to pry a sliver of information from anyone on the boards of the organizations for which they had been employed, I was never able to obtain anything beyond the usual explanation that “so and so was not a people person” or that their “skills handling personnel” were deficient.
Yet, with Tamar Barr, she had extraordinary in person “people skills”. Of course, the advent of Covid in March 2020 has changed all our lives in ways that would have been unimaginable before, but so many of our Jewish organizations have adapted themselves to our much changed world.
The transition to online programming, especially by synagogues, has transformed the ways that many individuals interact. While it may not be as satisfactory an experience an in-person gatherings, the fact that people can still maintain some semblance of connectivity online has helped to insure a continuity in programming and prayer sessions that would likely have been dismissed as unlikely to have much appeal had it been suggested prior to Covid.
And, as I’ve noted many times before, the ways in which the Gwen Secter Centre, under the direction of its executive director, Becky Chisick, has stepped up to provide some imaginative online (and more lately in-peson) programming for seniors – often in collaboration with music impresario Karla Berbrayer, has been most impressive.
Still, as we head into a most uncertain future, with the Delta variant spreading quickly – even into areas where individuals have been double vaccinated, viz. Israel, and as epidemiologists warn us that a “fourth wave” is a certainty, what we are seeing with a return to large-scale in person gatherings may be short-lived. While we may all be wishing for a return to the kinds of in-person events that we took for granted, the threat that the Delta variant poses may require us to continue sticking to participating in online events instead going forward indefinitely.
That’s why, given Tamar Barr’s years of experience organizing events reaching across the spectrum of cultural and social activity at the Rady JCC, I find it so difficult to understand why what was initially a temporary layoff has become something permanent. Regardless, we wish Tamar well.
*****
Speaking of hard to understand decisions, in the past couple of weeks I spent some time trying to understand where the University of Manitoba is headed with a long established course: “History of Anti-Semitism and the Holocaust”.
On page 7 of this issue Prof. Lionel Steiman corrects some mistakes I had made in writing about that course in our last issue. And, while the course was not offered by the university for the 2020-21 academic year, it is listed as being offered again in the 2021-22 academic year.
However, and this is one of those strange situations given how close we are to the beginning of the new 2021-22 academic year, as yet, there has been no instructor hired for that particular course.
In 2019-20 the course had been taught by Jody Perrun, who has also been teaching the same course at the University of Winnipeg for years. While Jody informed me in an email that he will still be teaching the course at the University of Winnipeg this coming academic year, he went on to write that he “had to take a full-time job with the federal government to get some job security”. (In the same email he bemoans the lot of sessional instructors at both universities.)
While Jody also explained that he had “right of first refusal” to teach that course at the University of Winnipeg, he had no such right at the University of Manitoba. As a result, the university’s collective agreement requires that the course be offered first to all members of the History Department to teach. Then, if no one asks to teach that course (and it is highly unlikely anyone from History will ask to teach it, since no one from that department has ever asked to teach it ever since Lionel Steiman’s retirement), it will be advertised by the university and someone will be “hired from the pool of applicants” – if there are any, according to Roisin Cossar, Professor and Acting Head of the History Department.
And, strange as it may seem – Jody Perrun tells me that he may very well apply to teach that course at the U of M again, given that it’s an evening course, and he may be able to fit it into his schedule. But we’re only a month away from the start of classes. You’d think the university would have these things sorted out by now.
By the way, both the University of Manitoba and the University of Winnipeg say they will be offering the course on “The History of Anti-Semitism and the Holocaust” online this coming year, so if you’re interested in taking that course from the comfort of your home, you will be able to. (You’ll have to register and pay for it the same as any other university course though.) And, while we know for certain who will be teaching the course at the U of W, Roisin Cossar told me to “check back with her in the early fall to see who is in place” to teach the course at the U of M. Kind of makes you wonder about planning at the U of M, doesn’t it?
One more thing: In a future issue we’ll have more about Jody Perrun’s plans to take students on what would be his second tour of Holocaust sites, which he’s hoping to have organized in 2022. Let’s hope that Covid won’t get in the way of Jody’s plans.
Local News
Is It Alberta’s Turn to Regulate Online Gambling? Looking at the Possibilities
Online gambling and betting in Canada is booming, with each province allowed to regulate its own space. Ontario, Canada’s most populated province, turned two this year after leading the way in April 2022. In what should motivate Alberta and other provinces, Ontario is already reaping the rewards, generating $100 million annually in gambling revenue. Will the local administration in Alberta do what is needed?
Talks have been rife that Alberta is considering going the Ontario way by having an open-licensing system. In July 2023, the minister for Service Alberta and Red Tape Reduction, Dale Nally, issued a mandate to make this province a hub of online sports betting and gambling.
Alberta Premier Danielle Smith recently asked Nally to cooperate with indigenous partners and other stakeholders to develop an online gaming strategy. The main focus will be on revenue generation and responsible gambling. In light of this, Nally said Alberta’s primary focus is becoming a “leading hub for iGaming” with streamlined regulations and low corporate taxes. Such conditions should position Alberta to become a leading iGaming destination.
A few weeks ago, the minister attended the ICE international gaming conference held in London. Together with Ontario’s Attorney General, Doug Downey, and other stakeholders, Nally participated in a roundtable discussion regarding the status of iGaming in Canada. CDC Gaming Reports also revealed that the discussion highlighted the success of iGaming in Ontario and how Alberta can emulate this success story.
Looking into the Alberta Budget 2024, it’s evident that state monopoly could soon give way to Canadian casinos to thrive in the province. Alberta took the first baby steps towards a more liberal gambling sector after setting aside $1 million for gambling. This budget will support the looming review of the Gaming, Liquor, and Cannabis Act and supporting Regulation. The idea is to review the entire regulatory framework to find more funding ways for Alberta charities and community projects.
Major operators like BetMGM, PointsBet, and PokerStars have since hired lobbyists to ensure commercial operators become a reality in Alberta. Speaking to investors and industry analysts in March this year, PointsBet CEO Sam Swanell tipped Alberta and British Columbia to legalize online betting soon. He noted that this could provide the much-needed expansion of that TAM.
Alberta is yet to take full advantage of online gambling despite being the country’s fourth-largest province, with around 4.3 million people. Smaller markets in North America, such as West Virginia and Connecticut, are already benefiting from commercialized online gambling. The good news is that noises about legal online gambling are getting louder in Alberta. It’s just a matter of when the government will make the announcement.
What Next for Online Gambling and Betting in Alberta?
Including a $1 million gambling review budget is definitely a step in the right direction. However, there’s still much to do to end Alberta’s long-standing gambling status quo. But at least the budget opens the door for further discussions and reforms regarding iGaming in Alberta. That discussion has been underway, although the momentum has increased in the last year or so.
As it stands, PlayAlberta.ca is the only regulated online gaming platform in Alberta. It’s a government-run website operated by the AGLC (Alberta Gaming Liquor and Cannabis). Besides casino games, this website provides sports betting and lottery-style gaming experiences. The legal sign-up age on PlayAlberta.ca is 18 years.
For Albertans who prefer more gambling freedom, the government doesn’t restrict anyone from joining offshore operators. Most gaming sites operating in Alberta are licensed in Curacao, the UK, and Malta. Compared to PlayAlberta.ca, these websites provide a more extensive variety of games, rewards, and general experience.
In conclusion, it’s just a matter of when Alberta will introduce an open-licensing market. This approach has proved to be a success elsewhere, especially in Ontario. A recent Ipsos report in Ontario revealed that only 13.6% of the residents prefer to gamble on offshore websites. Alberta could soon follow this path, although there’s much work to do to realize this dream.
Opinion
Hamas savages make no distinction between Israeli Jews, Arabs
By MYRON LOVE I remember many years ago attending a presentation by Simon Wiesenthal, the world’s leading Nazi hunter, during which he made the point that the focus of Holocaust education should not be on the number six million – the number of estimated Jews who were murdered – but rather on the 12 million martyrs – including other targeted groups such as the Roma, people who were gay, the mentally and physically handicapped and the many great many Slavic people who were also murdered. After the Jews, the Slavs were next on the list.
By focusing strictly on Germans killing Jews, he observed, it became too easy to make it out to be only Germans versus Jews – thereby making it easier for Holocaust deniers and absolving the other European peoples who were complicit in the killings.
Similarly, while we naturally mourn our Jewish brethren who were so horribly slaughtered on October 7, we need to also bear in mind that Hamas made no distinction in its murderous rampage between Israeli Jews and Israeli Arabs or between Israelis and foreign workers.
In a posting for The Gatestone Institute on November 30, Israeli-Arab journalist Khaled Abu Toameh noted that he Hamas terrorists who attacked Israel on October 7 did not slaughter Jews alone. The terrorists also murdered and kidnapped scores of Muslim citizens of Israel, including members of the Bedouin community. The terrorists’ murder spree made zero distinction between young and old, Muslim and Jew.
“Scores of Arab Israelis were wounded, murdered or taken prisoner,” he reported.
One such brave individual was 23-year-old Awad Darawshe, an Arab-Israeli paramedic who was on duty at the music festival near Kibbutz Re’im, which was among the first locations under attack. When the medical staff on site were ordered to flee, he insisted on remaining behind to treat the wounded.
Abu Toameh suggests that the paramedic thought that because he was Arab, he could reason with the killers. He was murdered nonetheless.
Another courageous Arab-Israeli that the writer noted, 50-year-old Abed al-Rahman Alnasasrah, was murdered by Hamas terrorists when he attempted to rescue people from the music festival. He was married and a father of six children.
Fatima Altallaqat, 35, from the Bedouin village near Ofakim, was murdered while working with her husband near the city of Ofakim in southern Israel. She was a mother of nine children, the eldest nine years old.
Abu Toameh quotes her husband as saying: “We’re a religious Muslim family and she wore the traditional headdress of a devout woman. It is inconceivable they [Hamas terrorists] could not see who was inside [the car]. They were five meters away from her as they passed.”
Forty bullets were fired into her.
Abu Toameh further cites the comments of Suleiman Zayadneh, brother and uncle, respectively, to four of the Arab-Israeli hostages, who describes himself “as proud to be a Palestinian and Muslim”.
‘The people who came to shoot and kill — they know nothing of religion,” the writer quoted Zayadneh as saying. “These [Hamas] people came and killed left and right.”
Abu Toameh went on to reference the words of Nuseir Yassin, a video blogger with 65 million followers. Two days after the massacre, he wrote: “I realized that… to a terrorist invading Israel, all citizens are targets. More than 40 of them [the murdered] are Arabs. Killed by other Arabs. And I do not want to live under a Palestinian government. Which means I only have one home, even if I’m not Jewish: Israel…. So from today forward, I view myself as… Israeli first. Palestinian second. Sometimes it takes a shock like this to see so clearly.”
Abu Toameh reported that “there have been many storie about reciprocal inter-communal generosity and heroism in the aftermath of this national tragedy, and they create hope for the future”.
He quoted a statement by the Darwashe Family:
“We are very proud of Awad’s actions… This is what we would expect from him and what we expect from everyone in our family — to be human, to stay human and to die human.”
Abu Toameh also quoted Ali Alziadna, four of whose family members were kidnapped, as saying that he was “touched by the outpouring of support” by other Israelis.
“People from all over the country have come to hug and support our family,” Alziadna said. “The entire nation is one family now.”
Abu Toameh pointed out that many Arab citizens of Israel serve as IDF officers and policemen, risking their lives for their fellow Israelis. Many are serving at the front lines, saving lives.
Undoubtedly, Abu Toameh suggested, one of the objectives of the Hamas massacre, in addition to slaughtering as many Israelis as possible, was to thwart normalization between Israel and Arab countries, especially Saudi Arabia. Hamas may also have aimed to damage relations between Jews and Arabs inside Israel.
”The terror group was, without doubt, hoping that we would witness another cycle of violence between Jews and Arabs inside Israel, similar to that which erupted in May 2021,’ Abu Toameh posited. “Then, Hamas succeeded in inciting a large number of Arab citizens of Israel to take to the streets and attack their Jewish neighbors and Israeli police officers.
“This time, however, the Arab-Israelis have not heeded the calls by Hamas. One reason is that Arab-Israelis saw, with their own eyes, how Hamas terrorists make no distinction between Jews and Muslims.
“Hamas has repeatedly demonstrated that it cares nothing for the well-being of Arabs and Muslims. From their luxury homes and hotel rooms in the safety of Qatar and Turkey, Hamas leaders give the orders to attack Israel and then sit back and let the world weep over the destruction they wrought upon their own people.
“On October 7,” Abu Toameh concluded, “Hamas metaphorically shot itself in the foot by showing the world, with unfathomably ghoulish pride, by way of Go-Pro cameras and other self-documentation, that it has neither a religious nor a secular-humanist set of values. Perhaps the Palestinians in the Gaza Strip should look at the Arab citizens of Israel and note how they enjoy equal rights, democracy, freedom of speech and a free media. If Palestinians wish to live well, like the Arab-Israelis, this is the time for them to get rid of Hamas and all the terror leaders who, for seven decades, have brought them nothing but one disaster after another.”
It is too bad that so many gullible fools in our Western societies refuse to open their eyes to the truth.
Opinion
An Arab Trusteeship Council for Gaza
By Prof. BRYAN SCHWARTZ Oct. 17, 2023 (Originally posted to The Times of Israel)
1 No peace is possible with Hamas. It is genocidally antisemitic. This position is foundational, not rhetorical or mutable. Waiting for the emergence of a “pragmatic” version of Hamas is suicidally naïve.
2 Peace and cooperation are possible with most of Israel’s non-Iranian neighbours. They are militarily threatened by Iran, not Israel. For many in those countries, Iran’s version of Islam might be more problematic from the religious perspective than Israel’s Jewishness.
3 Hamas’ attack was partly to prevent a Saudi deal and a long-term economic cooperation
4 Israel has no territorial claim to Gaza and no material, religious, or ideological interest in running it.
5 Israel has vital moral and material interests in the emergence of a peaceful, demilitarized, and prosperous Gaza. If that can occur in the medium term, a long-term reconciliation of the Palestinians with Israel is achievable.
6 As and when Hamas is evicted from power, Gaza will need some new form of government.
7 The Palestinian authority probably cannot be trusted to take over Gaza. It is corrupt and lacked- and probably still lacks- credibility with a majority of the population in Gaza.
8 There used to be a concept called trusteeship in international law, whereby foreign powers would govern a territory in its best interests until its final status is clarified at the wishes of its own people.
9 The United Nations cannot be trusted to administer Gaza – any more than it has shown to be trustworthy to maintain strategic security in Southern Lebanon or to operate UNWRA in a manner that is effective for Palestinians and not hostile to Israel.
10 Consider this alternative. After Hamas is evicted from power, there is an interim period- say five to seven to ten years -of governance over Gaza by an Arab trusteeship council. The Council members are appointed primarily by Arab states sympathetic to Israel and eager to see the people of Gaza thrive. This Council could include local Gaza representatives and a representative of the Palestinian Authority but the majority would be representative of states like Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia.
11 The trusteeship agreement would be formal, agreed to by Israel, and unequivocally state its objectives, including:
-demilitarizing Gaza;
-defining the sole purposes for which outside reconstruction and development money can be spent and requiring strict accounting
-ensuring that the education system in Gaza is not contaminated by antisemitic hatred;
-promoting sound administration of Gaza, including providing for transparent and non-corrupt government, with significant safeguards for human rights, and conformity to the rule of law;
-promoting the development of a real economy for Gaza, not one fuelled primarily by international subsidies.
13 No state could participate in the Council without having a peace agreement with Israel.
14 In fact, the creation of the Council and Saudi participation in it could be part of a peace deal with Saudi Arabia. The deal could involve a reconstruction package from the Saudis for Gaza, which would help secure the support of the people of Gaza for the Council arrangement as an interim measure.
15 Policing would be carried out by a force composed of Palestinians and members of the police forces of Trusteeship states, under the direction of the Council.
16 The net effect would be to remove Gaza from Iran’s influence and establish temporary control by a consortium of mostly Sunni states. The latter would be chosen from among those that are at least reasonably friendly to Israel and genuinely committed to good governance in Gaza.
17 The definitive solution to the Arab-Israeli conflict can only be achieved in a series of steps. Compromises are even more painful if they are framed as permanent. But if practical peace, stability, and some prosperity can be achieved in the medium term in Gaza and the West Bank, an amicable and enduring resolution should be achievable with the Palestinians.
18 While Israel is under severe military menace right now, it is not too early to think about how a positive political outcome can be achieved after the necessary and painful battle is concluded.
19 The current catastrophe is a so-far successful attempt by the regime in Teheran to disrupt peace negotiations involving Israel, the United States, and Saudi Arabia. Political vision along with military force might enable Israel to turn around the situation and complete and consolidate a lasting peace with almost all of its Arab neighbours and to set the stage for a formal and enduring peace with the Palestinians. The Teheran regime would be isolated, diminished in prestige, and more likely to be replaced from within.
About the Author
Bryan’s Jewish-themed musical “Consoulation: A Musical Mediation” premiered in the Spring of of 2018; https://consoulation.com His new album will appear in the coming months. Bryan Schwartz graduated with a doctorate in law from Yale School and holds an endowed chair at the University of Manitoba Law School. He is the author or editor of over thirty books and collections of essays. Bryan also created and helps to deliver an annual summer program at Hebrew University in Israeli law and society. He has served as a visiting Professor at both HU and Reichman university. . As a practising lawyer, Bryan has argued a number of cases at the Supreme Court of Canada, advised governments, and served as an arbitrator at the provincial, national and international level.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login