Features
Marcus Spiegel’s writing career continuing to blossom
Last June we had a story about Marcus Spiegel, a young writer originally from Winnipeg whose parents are Esther and Jeff Spiegel, and whose in-laws are Neta and Yair Bourlas. At the time Marcus had just had one of his short stories published in the very prestigious “Pushcart Book of Short Stories.”
The story, which is titled “A Tale of Two Trolls” was first published in the Santa Monica Review, which is a national literary journal sponsored by Santa Monica College.
As we noted in that June article, Marcus’s story tells the story of two misfits named Yuri and Winch, who are both college dropouts. They have a YouTube show and podcast, and they purport to be “alt-right” activists, but their primary ambition in the story is to exact retribution on a former professor of Yuri’s by the name of Baendorf. It’s all quite mindless – and hilarious, especially when Winch dresses up as a frog wielding a samurai sword as he prepares to attack Professor Baendorf.
After talking recently with Marcus’s mother Esther, we asked her whether Marcus has published anything of interest since we wrote that article in June? We asked specifically whether Marcus had finished writing a piece about wrestling which, when we spoke with him last year, he said he was working on. Esther said that Marcus has indeed been busy and suggested we get in touch with him to find out what he’s been up to.
Here’s what Marcus wrote back after we asked him how his writing career has been going:
Hi Bernie,
Hope you’re doing well. Thanks for your interest again. So, yes, I have continued making some progress since we last talked. I’ll just clarify that I don’t have a full book out yet, but my wrestling piece, which is published in a book or journal alongside work from other writers appeared a couple months ago, and that is the piece from Boulevard, which publishes out of St. Louis, Missouri. The piece is called “The Inferno on Prime Time: Reflections on Vince McMahon and the WWE” and is available for print or online (though you need a digital subscription). Anyway, if you’d like to check it out a link can be found on my website (marcusspiegel.com), which will also give you a summary of my forthcoming publications. There are three others upcoming that I’ll mention here.
The first is a nonfiction piece that is set to come out in March at Sycamore Review from Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana. This piece is called “The Inglorious Beatitude of the Mall Cop.” I think of it as a kind of suburban picaresque. It recounts my misadventures as a mall security guard while I lived in Halifax, Nova Scotia. Mostly, as you will see in the piece, if you read it, I spent little time reprimanding troublemakers in the mall and more time trying to sneak off and pursue my literary education. But I also became addicted to Scratch and Win lotto cards for a period.
The second is also a nonfiction piece, entitled “Portrait of a Flat Earther,” that is supposed to come out in the late spring from Pembroke Magazine out of the University of North Carolina. This piece recounts how an old friend of mine, a Winnipegger who I’d become estranged from, reemerged into my life in recent years, as a dialogue sparring partner on the telephone. Even though we shared many of the same ideas as youths, I discovered that my old friend had deviated drastically since I’d last spoken with him. He’d become Far Right, and had become absorbed in various conspiracy theories, the most absurd of these being Flat Earthism. This little piece of comic and psychological memoir concerns my attempts to reason him out of Flat Earthism and when that plan fails, to try to figure what could be attracting him to his strange beliefs in the first place.
Lastly, Santa Monica Review, where my Pushcart Prize winning story, “A Tale of Two Trolls” first appeared, will be publishing a new piece of fiction called “The Corporate Jester” though not until the fall, or perhaps in spring of 2024. This short story involves the Californian television mogul Wayne Vortman’s attempt to keep producing a reality game show during the pandemic. In order to do this, he enlists his three sons and daughter, as well as servants into the cast. His daughter, though, not exactly pleased about her father’s dedication to creating lurid forms of spectacle, disobeys, prompting a weird family initiative to draft her into the Vortman army, as it were. All of this leads up to a surreal dialogue at four a.m. at one of the Vortman mansion’s jacuzzis between daughter and Dad.
On the writing side, I’m continuing to split my time between short fiction and nonfiction. Some of my nonfiction has involved me traveling to Pennsylvania and Arizona for research. Recent themes of my writing have dealt with the metaverse, country music, internet dating apps, historical anachronism societies, scuba diving, and an organization that seeks to prepare its members for the afterlife.
Thanks again for your interest at the Jewish Post.
Best wishes to you and your family,
Marcus Spiegel
Uncategorized
Volatility, Hit Frequency, and RTP: Why the Number Casinos Advertise Is the Least Useful One
The return to player percentage looks clean as a casino data point. It gives players a neat number, usually around 94% to 97% for many online slots, and that number feels easy to compare. A 96.5% game appears better than a 95.2% game. The problem starts when players treat RTP as a forecast for their next 50 spins or one evening.
You may find the RTP listed on slot pages on a leading online casino in Ontario, but the number only tells part of the story. Two games can share the same RTP and create different sessions: one may return small wins often, while the other may drain a balance before one bonus round changes everything.
The RTP Trap
Return to player (RTP) measures the theoretical share of total wagers a game returns across a very large number of rounds. In plain terms, a 96% RTP slot returns about $96 for every $100 wagered in the long run. That does not mean one player who deposits $100 should expect $96 back.
The trap sits in the word “theoretical.” RTP comes from the game’s math model. It works across huge samples, not personal sessions. A player can finish far above that percentage, far below it, or with nothing left after a short run of poor results.
Is it useless then? No, RTP can still help. It gives a baseline cost of play. Lower-RTP games cost more on average than higher-RTP games. Still, once a game passes a reasonable threshold, the next question matters more: how does it distribute that return?
Hit Frequency: The Number That Shapes Session Feel
Hit frequency tells you how often a game produces a winning outcome. This often misleads players because any win can count. A spin that returns $0.10 on a $1 bet may still count as a hit, even though the player lost $0.90 in real terms.
A game can feel active because symbols connect often, sounds play, and the screen keeps celebrating small returns. The balance may still fall. In many modern slots, “win” does not always mean profit on the spin.
Hit frequency answers one practical question: how much silence can you tolerate? Some players dislike long dry spells. Others accept quieter sessions because they chase bonus rounds or larger payouts.
The educational site Get Gambling Facts gives a useful distinction: RTP concerns the percentage of money returned over time, while hit frequency concerns how often a machine stops on a winning combination.
Volatility: The Risk Label Players Need More Often
Volatility, also called variance, describes how unevenly a game pays. Low-volatility games tend to return smaller amounts more often. High-volatility games hold more value in rare events: bonus rounds, premium symbols, multipliers, or jackpots.
Here is where RTP becomes less useful on its own:
- A 96% low-volatility slot may give modest returns and longer play from the same balance.
- A 96% high-volatility slot may burn through funds quickly unless the player hits a strong feature.
- A progressive jackpot game may look exciting, but it often places more value on rare top prizes.
The same RTP can hide very different risk profiles. Players who ignore volatility often blame the casino or the game when the session follows its math design.
Why the Same RTP Can Feel So Different
Picture two slots with 96% RTP. Slot A pays small wins on many spins, has a modest top prize, and rarely creates dramatic balance swings. Slot B pays less often but offers a large max win and volatile bonus rounds. The advertised return matches, but the experience does not.
Slot A may suit a player who wants a slower bankroll drop and more regular feedback. Slot B suits someone who accepts sharper losses in exchange for a shot at a heavier payout.
A Better Way to Read a Slot Page
Most slot pages give players more clues than they notice. The trick is to read the details together rather than chase the highest percentage.
Start with RTP. If two games look similar, the higher number has better long-term value. Then check volatility. If the game uses terms such as high, very high, or extreme variance, lower your bet size or expect shorter sessions. Next, look at the paytable. A huge max win usually means the game saves a lot of its value for rare outcomes.
A sensible pre-play check looks like this:
- RTP: What is the average long-term return?
- Volatility: How rough can the session become?
- Hit frequency: How often will the game show any wins?
- Paytable: Where does most value sit?
To Conclude
Casinos advertise RTP because it looks objective, tidy, and easy to rank. Players should read it, but they should not give it more authority than it deserves. For long sessions, volatility may matter more than a small RTP difference. For comfort, hit frequency may explain the feel better than the payback rate.
Features
They Deserve the Very Best”: The Doctors Bringing Specialist Care to Holocaust Survivors at Home
Features
The Popularity of Simpler Slot Games in 2026: Review From Casino Online CrazyTower Experts
Online casinos now fill their libraries with numerous video slots that have dozens of functions, long bonus rounds, complex mechanics, and so on. Interestingly, despite this huge range of modern options, many Canadian visitors at sites like Casino Online CrazyTower here https://crazytower.com/ca/ no longer want complicated gameplay that requires constant attention and long explanations.
Simpler slots now attract a wider audience because they save time and create faster sessions. So, let’s figure out why this change happened and reasons for the popularity of simpler machines.
Why Many Players Are Returning to Basic Gameplay
Modern websites like Casino Online CrazyTower pushed complex video slots for years, but many people now prefer classic formats again. Simple gameplay has fewer interruptions and is simpler in terms of budgeting, which is important when you gamble for fun.
These are a few potential reasons explain why simpler slots became popular again in 2026:
- Faster rounds. Symbols appear quickly, and rounds continue without long animations or extended bonus sequences.
- Easier controls. Most classic slots have simple menus and familiar layouts that don’t confuse new visitors.
- Smaller feature lists. Simple slots usually have standard wilds, scatters, and multipliers instead of dozens of random mechanics.
- Better session flow. People spend more time on gameplay instead of reading explanations about symbols and special functions.
- Lower visual pressure. Simpler slots use calmer designs and shorter effects that don’t overload attention.
Classic gameplay also suits mobile devices better because shorter rounds work well on smaller screens. Plus, many visitors now prefer games that start instantly and explain their mechanics within seconds.
Features That Make Simpler Slots Appealing
Simple machines at Casino Online CrazyTower and similar websites continue to attract attention because they have a high gameplay speed. Many classic titles also replicate older casino machines that people already know from physical casinos.
However, these aren’t the only factors that attract gamblers. So, check out this list:
- Short bonus rounds. Free spins and multipliers finish quickly instead of interrupting gameplay for several minutes.
- Common and standard paylines. Traditional layouts help people understand payouts without long explanations.
- Faster loading times. Simpler graphics reduce waiting time on phones, tablets, and older computers.
- Stable gameplay pace. Long cutscenes and constant pop-up notifications don’t interrupt the session.
- Traditional themes. Fruit symbols, bars, sevens, and classic casino designs still attract large audiences.
- Smaller menus. Important information appears immediately without complicated tabs or hidden sections.
Modern video slots often contain too many mechanics in a single game. Developers now combine expanding reels, random modifiers, mission systems, tournaments, and multiple bonus levels in one title. Many visitors lose interest because gameplay turns repetitive and overloaded with constant interruptions.
Compare this to a session when you get results immediately and aren’t interrupted. These still have free spins and even mini risk games, but not as loaded as innovative titles.
Conclusion
Simple slots usually create better replay value because people understand the mechanics immediately. Common and standard gameplay doesn’t cause frustration and allows faster decisions during casino sessions.
Many classic slots also function better during short breaks because rounds finish quickly without long bonus interruptions. That’s why simpler slots became popular again at many casinos, including Casino Online CrazyTower and such.
