RSS
Canada Finally Targets Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps; More Action Is Needed
Gen. Hossein Salami, commander of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC). Photo: Reuters/Morteza Nikoubazl.
The recent move by Canada to list the Iranian regime’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization marks a significant moment in the international effort to curb Iran’s malignant activities on the global stage. This decision comes after years of extensive lobbying and is a clear indicator of the growing concern among nations about the IRGC’s role in fostering instability both regionally and internationally.
Iran’s IRGC, established in the aftermath of the 1979 mullahs’ terrorist revolt, is not merely a military organization; it is an influential political actor within Iran, wielding substantial economic power and executing the ideological and strategic intentions of the regime both domestically and internationally. More ominously, the IRGC’s mandate transcends traditional military duties, involving itself deeply in Iran’s political sphere, influencing its economic landscape, and most notably, orchestrating complex networks of proxy warfare across the Middle East and beyond.
The word Iran doesn’t appear in the name of the IRGC. Essentially, this terrorist organization is active in protecting the Islamic Caliphate of the Ayatollah Khamenei and promoting the destructive ideology of Khomeinism under the guise of Islamic Resistance (but in reality, it signifies Islamic terrorism).
The IRGC is a criminal terrorist organization with a global reach, shining wherever the name of terrorism is mentioned. The radical thugs of the IRGC are currently engaged in the domestic oppression and massacre of Iranians, and are expanding their global terrorism network abroad.
Strategic Export of Revolution
The core of the IRGC’s strategy has been to support non-state militant groups across the region, providing them with funding, weapons, and training to foment unrest and carry out attacks that align with Tehran’s strategic interests. This has been vividly demonstrated in their support for Hezbollah in Lebanon, various militia groups in Iraq, the Houthi rebels in Yemen, and their ongoing military support to the Assad regime in Syria. Such actions are not merely regional security issues, but are illustrative of the IRGC’s broader strategy to reshape Middle Eastern politics, counter Western influence, and promote Iran as the preeminent regional power.
Global Terror Operations
Internationally, the IRGC’s Quds Force, the branch responsible for extraterritorial operations, has been actively involved in planning and executing operations that clearly fall within the realm of international terrorism. These operations range from the orchestration of bombings and assassinations in Europe and South America, to the provision of arms and tactical support to various militant groups. The infamous case of the 1994 AMIA bombing in Buenos Aires, which killed 85 people, is a stark reminder of the deadly reach of the IRGC’s operations, directed and facilitated by its commanders.
Adapting to Modern Conflicts
In more recent years, the IRGC has adapted its methods and expanded its reach. It has increased its cyber capabilities, engaging in cyber espionage and attacks against foreign governments and industries, which constitutes a significant threat to global information security. The IRGC has also been implicated in military confrontations, such as the attacks on commercial shipping in the strategic waterways of the Middle East, which threaten global supply chains and international trade.
The international community must recognize the necessity of a robust, multi-faceted response to the IRGC’s activities. While the designation of the IRGC as a terrorist organization by nations like Canada represents a crucial step forward, it is an inadequate measure if not part of a broader, cohesive strategy that includes enhanced sanctions, targeted legal actions against IRGC affiliates, and a comprehensive international legal and diplomatic framework aimed at curtailing its operations globally.
Humanitarian and Ideological Counteractions
Moreover, nations must work together to address the humanitarian crises precipitated by the IRGC’s actions or IRGC-supported conflicts, particularly in war-torn regions like Syria and Yemen. The international community must prioritize diplomatic and humanitarian strategies to mitigate the suffering of civilians, who are often the most affected by the IRGC-supported conflicts. Additionally, the global community must counteract Iran’s propaganda by supporting democratic values and human rights narratives within Iran and among its regional allies.
Strengthening Global Alliances
It is also essential for countries to cut off the financial streams that support the IRGC’s extensive network; this includes stricter controls on international banking and finance channels to ensure that funds cannot be funneled to the IRGC or its proxies. Collaborative international efforts are required to dismantle the sophisticated networks that the IRGC uses to fund its operations, including those involving illicit trade and smuggling.
The global community’s response to the IRGC must also be ideological. It involves countering Iran’s extensive propaganda machinery, which justifies its actions and spreads its revolutionary ideology. Supporting counter-narratives within Iran and among its allies, emphasizing democratic values and human rights, is crucial.
In essence, the IRGC represents a profound challenge to international peace and stability, necessitating a concerted global response. A comprehensive approach that includes legal, financial, military, and ideological responses is vital. The international community must be unified and resolute in its actions against the IRGC to effectively curb its influence and operations. Failure to take decisive action risks not only further regional destabilization, but also increased global insecurity.
In confronting the IRGC, the international community must demonstrate both resolve and strategic foresight, ensuring that measures taken are comprehensive and sustained to dismantle the power structures that support the IRGC’s global terrorist activities. This is not merely a regional necessity, but a global imperative.
Erfan Fard is a counterterrorism analyst and Middle East Studies researcher based in Washington, DC. Twitter@EQFARD.
The post Canada Finally Targets Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps; More Action Is Needed first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
A pro-Israel rally at the University of Toronto was headlined by Columbia University professor Shai Davidai
Around 200 people gathered for a pro-Israel demonstration at University of Toronto’s downtown campus at King’s College Circle—which was the site of one of Canada’s largest pro-Palestinian encampments during May […]
The post A pro-Israel rally at the University of Toronto was headlined by Columbia University professor Shai Davidai appeared first on The Canadian Jewish News.
RSS
‘Not Welcome’: New Pro-Hamas Campaign Aims to Abolish Hillel Campus Chapters
A statue of George Washington tied with a Palestinian flag and a keffiyeh inside a pro-Hamas encampment is pictured at George Washington University in Washington, DC, US, May 2, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Craig Hudson
The campus group National Students for Justice in Palestine (NSJP) is waging a campaign to gut Jewish life in academia, calling for the abolition of Hillel International campus chapters, the largest collegiate organization for Jewish students in the world.
“Over the past several decades, Hillel has monopolized for Jewish campus life into a pipeline for pro-Israel indoctrination, genocide-apologia, and material support to the Zionist project and its crimes,” a social media account operating the campaign, titled #DropHillel, said in a manifesto published last week. “Across the country, Hillel chapters have invited Israeli soldiers to their campuses; promoted propaganda trips such as birthright; and organized charity drives for the Israeli military.”
It continued, “Such actions reveal Hillel’s ideological and material investment in Zionism, despite the organization’s facade as being simply a ‘Jewish cultural space.’”
DropHillel claims to be “Jewish-led,” although only a small minority of Jews oppose Zionism, and the group has been linked to and promoted by Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) chapters.
Hillel International has provided Jewish students a home away from home during the academic year. However, NSJP says it wants to “weaken” it and “dismantle oppression.”
The idea has already been picked up by pro-Hamas student groups at one college, the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, according to The Daily Tar Heel, the school’s official student newspaper. On Oct. 9, it reported, a member of Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) unveiled the idea for “no more Hillel” during a rally which, among other things, demanded removing Israel from UNC’s study abroad program and adopting the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement. Addressing the comments to the paper days later, SJP, which has been linked to Islamist terrorist organizations, proclaimed that shuttering Hillel is a coveted goal of the anti-Zionist movement.
“Zionism is a racist supremacist ideology advocating for the creation and sustenance of an ethnostate through the expulsion and annihilation of native people,” the group told the paper. “Therefore, any group that advocates for a supremacist ideology — be it the KKK, the Proud Boys, Hillel, or Heels for Israel — should not be welcome on campus.”
The #DropHillel campaign came amid an unprecedented surge in anti-Israel incidents on college campuses, which, according to a report published last month by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), have reached crisis levels.
Revealing a “staggering” 477 percent increase in anti-Zionist activity involving assault, vandalism, and other phenomena, the report — titled “Anti-Israel Activism on US Campuses, 2023-2024” — painted a bleak picture of America’s higher education system poisoned by political extremism and hate.
“As the year progressed, Jewish students and Jewish groups on campus came under unrelenting scrutiny for any association, actual or perceived, with Israel or Zionism,” the report said. “This often led to the harassment of Jewish members of campus communities and vandalism of Jewish institutions. In some cases, it led to assault. These developments were underpinned by a steady stream of rhetoric from anti-Israel activists expressing explicit support for US-designated terrorists organizations, such as Hamas, the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) and others.”
The report added that 10 campuses accounted for 16 percent of all incidents tracked by ADL researchers, with Columbia University and the University of Michigan combining for 90 anti-Israel incidents — 52 and 38, respectively. Harvard University, the University of California – Los Angeles, Rutgers University New Brunswick, Stanford University, Cornell University, and others filled out the rest of the top 10. Violence, it continued, was most common at universities in the state of California, where anti-Zionist activists punched a Jewish student for filming him at a protest.
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
The post ‘Not Welcome’: New Pro-Hamas Campaign Aims to Abolish Hillel Campus Chapters first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
‘Muslim for Trump’ Launches Initiatives in Key Battleground States, Says Candidate Will Bring ‘Peace’ to Gaza
Former US President Donald Trump is seen at a campaign event in South Carolina. Photo: Reuters/Sam Wolfe
The “Muslims for Trump” organization has officially launched initiatives to help elect Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump to the White House, arguing that he would be more likely to end the war in Gaza than Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris.
In a statement released on Monday, the group said it will focus on recruiting Muslim voters in key battleground states such as Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, Georgia, and North Carolina. The organization both praised Trump for his supposed “peace-focused” approach to ending the war in Gaza and condemned Harris for helping facilitate a so-called “genocide.”
“After meeting with President Trump, it was clear to me he is the right leader for Muslims to get behind,” Rabiul Chowdhury, co-founder of Muslims for Trump and former co-chair of the “Abandon Harris Movement,” said in a statement.
Chowdhury added that during his discussions with Trump, the former president vowed to “ending the escalation of wars and bringing peace to war-torn regions.” In contrast to Trump’s promise to stop the “bloodshed” in Gaza, he claimed, Harris has “recklessly pushed us toward World War III.”
Chowdhury, a self-described “peace advocate,” urged the Muslim community not to fall victim to supposed “misinformation” campaigns by the media and Democrats that paint the former president as hostile to immigrants. He claimed that the former president’s focus is on “ending war, not dividing families through false immigration claims.”
Samra Luqman, chair of the Michigan chapter of Muslims for Trump, underscored the need to punish the Biden administration for what he described as supporting a “genocide” in Gaza.
“The goal of this election is to hold the Biden administration accountable for a genocide. No amount of fear mongering or scare tactics will persuade my community into forgiving the mutilation, live-burning, and genocide of over 200,000 people,” he said.
According to data produced by the Hamas-controlled Gaza Health Ministry, roughly 40,000 people have died in Gaza since the war began last October. Israel has said that its forces have killed about 20,000 Hamas terrorists during its military campaign.
Israel says it has gone to unprecedented lengths to try and avoid civilian casualties, noting its efforts to evacuate areas before it targets them and to warn residents of impending military operations with leaflets, text messages, and other forms of communication.
On the organization Muslims for Trump’s official website, it claims that the Abraham Accords, a series of historic, Trump administration-brokered normalization agreements between Israel and several countries in the Arab world, helped stabilize the Middle East. It also says that had Trump not lost the 2020 presidential race, the so-called “genocide” could have been prevented.
“Under Trump’s leadership, the Abraham Accords were brokered, fostering peaceful relations between Israel and several Arab countries. Supporters might argue that Trump’s diplomacy prioritized peace and stability in the Middle East, reducing the likelihood of large-scale conflicts like genocide,” the group wrote.
Over the course of his campaign, Trump has repeatedly touted his support for the Jewish state during his singular term in office. Trump has boasted about his administration’s work in fostering the Abraham Accords, promising to resume efforts to strengthen them if he were to win November’s US presidential election.
Harsh US sanctions levied on Iran under Trump crippled the Iranian economy and led its foreign exchange reserves to plummet. Trump and his Republican supporters in the US Congress have criticized the Biden administration for renewing billions of dollars in US sanctions waivers, which had the effect of unlocking frozen funds and allowing the country to access previously inaccessible hard currency.
Trump also recognized Israel’s sovereignty over the Golan Heights, a strategic region on Israel’s northern border previously controlled by Syria, and also moved the US embassy in Israel to Jerusalem, recognizing the city as the Jewish state’s capital.
Despite Harris’s repeated efforts to woo Muslim voters, polling data indicates that the demographic has made a dramatic swing away from the Democratic Party. Polling data from the Arab American Institute reveals that Trump slightly edges Harris among Muslim voters by a margin of 42 to 41 percent. A report from the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) shows that Green Party candidate Jill Stein leads Harris and Trump with Muslim voters in the key swing states of Michigan, Wisconsin, and Arizona.
The post ‘Muslim for Trump’ Launches Initiatives in Key Battleground States, Says Candidate Will Bring ‘Peace’ to Gaza first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login