RSS
Columbia University President Minouche Shafik Resigns Amid Numerous Antisemitism Scandals
Columbia University administrators and faculty, led by President Minouche Shafik, testified before the US House Committee on Education and the Workforce on April 17, 2024. Photo: Jack Gruber/Reuters Connect
Columbia University president Minouche Shafik resigned on Wednesday, becoming the third Ivy League president in just the last year to leave office amid criticism of what many observers perceived as a refusal to protect Jewish students from antisemitic discrimination, harassment, and assault.
“I write with sadness to tell you that I am stepping down as president of Columbia University effective Aug. 14, 2024,” Shafik said in a statement announcing her decision. “This period has taken a considerable toll on my family, as it has for others in our community. Over the summer, I have been able to reflect and have decided that my moving on at this point would best enable Columbia to traverse the challenges ahead. I am making this announcement now so that new leadership can be in place before the new terms begins.”
Shafik, who took office in 2023, managed to survive a grating US congressional hearing earlier this year in which Republican lawmakers accused her of capitulating to riotous pro-Hamas demonstrators, who, following Hamas’ Oct. 7 massacre across southern Israel, flagrantly broke rules proscribing hate speech and unauthorized protests. Pledging to correct her alleged failures, Shafik seemed poised to continue leading Columbia University with the full support of its trustees and most of its faculty.
However, two incidents over the summer crumbled what little credibility she had left with the public, the Jewish community, and federal lawmakers who have been investigating her administration. In June, the university reached an out of court settlement with a student who accused it of neglecting its obligation to foster a safe learning environment during the final weeks of last spring semester. While stopping short of admitting guilt, the settlement virtually conceded to the plaintiff her argument that the campus is unsafe for Jewish students, agreeing to provide her and others “Safe Passage Liaisons” tasked with protecting them from racist abuse and violence.
Another scandal in the same month took longer to brew. Days before Columbia settled its student’s lawsuit, the Washington Free Beacon published an explosive report about four university administrators who took turns exchanging text messages which, as Shafik described, “touched disturbingly on ancient antisemitic tropes.” According to the Free Beacon, which obtained the communications from a trove of documents shared by the US House Committee on Education and the Workforce, four officials — Susan Chang-Kim, Cristen Kromm, Matthew Patashnick, and Josef Sorett, who is dean of Columbia College — described Jews as “privileged” and venal, reacting to a panel in which Jewish leaders participated to plea for help and explain the link between anti-Zionism and antisemitism.
No one was immediately fired after the report went viral. Outraged, Jewish and pro-Israel leaders lambasted what they perceived as a teflon privilege which insulated administrators from the controversy and pointed to the outcome of the matter as evidence that antisemitism at Columbia is institutional. In response, thousands of rabbis implored Shafik to resign.
“The bigotry and double standards are blatant, and entirely at odds with the experiences that I and others had at Columbia in the past. Imagine if something like this had happened during a session when Black, Latino, Pacific Islander, or LGBTQ faculty and students were speaking about hostility they faced on campus,” said Coalition for Jewish Values (CJV) vice president Rabbi Steven Pruzansky, who led the call for Shafik to step down. “Any faculty dismissing their concerns, much less ridiculing them or sharing hateful sentiments, would find themselves unemployed without delay.”
Pummeled by volleys of opprobrium, Shafik attempted to assuage concerns that Columbia University — one of America’s most prestigious institutions of higher education — had become a sanctuary for antisemites and those who proudly described themselves as enemies of both Israel and the US.
“We will launch a vigorous program of antisemitism and antidiscrimination [sic] training for faculty and staff this fall, with related training for students under the auspices of university life,” she said, addressing the administrators’ conduct. “Columbia’s leadership team recognizes this as an important moment to implement changes that will build a stronger institution as a result. I know that you all share this commitment.”
Ultimately, three of the Columbia administrators embroiled in the text message scandal resigned last week.
For many, Shafik’s words rang false, coming too long after the campus had been commandeered by Columbia students who praised Hamas’ Oct. 7 massacre across southern Israel and chanted “F—k the Jews,” “Death to Jews,” “Jews will not defeat us,” and “From water to water, Palestine will be Arab.”
Faculty had engaged in similar behavior. On Oct. 8, Columbia professor Joseph Massad published in Electronic Intifada an essay cheering Hamas’ atrocities, which included slaughtering children and raping women, as “awesome” and describing men who paraglided into a music festival to kill young people as “the air force of the Palestinian resistance.” Additionally, Shafik stood by while her subordinates launched an investigation into a vocal pro-Israel professor, Shai Davidai, an action he described as revealing “the depths of [Columbia’s] hostility towards its Jewish community.”
In April, while Shafik testified on Capitol Hill, an explosion of anti-Israel demonstrations on the eve of the Jewish holiday of Passover forced the administration to shutter the campus and institute “virtual” learning. Prior to that, footage of the protest showed Columbia students — who occupied a section of campus and named it a “Gaza Solidarity Encampment” — proclaiming support for Hamas, calling for the destruction of Israel, and even threatening to harm members of the Jewish community on campus. The situation was so severe that security officials deactivated Davidai’s identification card and temporarily banned him from campus because his safety could not be “guaranteed,” a measure which reflected the administration’s belief that the students it hesitated to rein in, as well as the non-students they invited to campus, were prepared to perpetrate violence to make their point.
As of the date of her resignation, a lawsuit alleging that Shafik did nothing after pro-Hamas agitators beat up five Jewish students in the school’s Butler Library and another attacked a Jewish student with a stick, lacerating his head and breaking his finger, had yet to reach trial.
“I have tried to navigate a path that upholds academic principles and treats everyone with fairness and compassion,” she said in Wednesday’s statement. “It has been distressing — for the community, for me as president, and on a personal level — to find myself, colleagues, and students the subject of threats and abuse. As President Lincoln said, ‘A house divided against itself cannot stand’ — we must do all we can to resist the forces of polarization in our community. I remain optimistic that differences can be overcome through the honest exchange of views, truly listening — and always — by treating each other with dignity and respect. Again, Columbia’s core mission to create and acquire knowledge, with our values as foundation, will lead us there.”
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
The post Columbia University President Minouche Shafik Resigns Amid Numerous Antisemitism Scandals first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
IDF Confirms Death of Hostage Shlomo Mansour, Murdered by Hamas on Oct. 7
Shlomo Mansour. Photo: courtesy
Israel announced on Tuesday its conclusion that one of the hostages slated for release in the current Gaza ceasefire deal died on Oct. 7, 2023, during the Palestinian terrorist group Hamas’s invasion of and massacre across southern Israel.
According to the Israel Defense Forces, recent intelligence confirmed that Hamas murdered Shlomo Mansour, 86, and took his body from his home in Kibbutz Kissufim to Gaza.
In a statement, Mansour’s family called him “the pillar of strength for our entire family” and “a man of high morals and values, a lover of humanity, who always helped others wholeheartedly.” They described Mansour as “a man with a heart of gold, golden hands, and a smile worth gold.”
Born in Baghdad, Mansour survived the 1941 Farhud pogrom which targeted Jews in Iraq’s capital. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum says that “during the two days of violence, rioters murdered between 150 and 180 Jews, injured 600 others, and raped an undetermined number of women. They also looted some 1,500 stores and homes. The community leaders estimated that about 2,500 families — 15 percent of the Jewish community in Baghdad — suffered directly from the pogrom.”
Mansour, now the oldest hostage still in Gaza, immigrated to Israel at 13. He and his wife Mazel — who escaped during the Hamas attack — had five children and 12 grandchildren.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a statement that “my wife Sarah and I extend our heartfelt condolences to the family of the late Shlomo Mansour, upon receiving the bitter news of his murder by the terrorist organization Hamas.”
Netanyahu called Mansour “one of the builders of the country and the founders of Kibbutz Kissufim. He survived the Farhud riots in Iraq in his youth. During the brutal terrorist attack by Hamas murderers on Oct. 7, he was murdered and kidnapped to Gaza. We share in the family’s deep grief. We will not rest or be silent until he is returned to the grave of Israel. We will continue to act resolutely and tirelessly until we return all of our hostages — both living and dead. May his memory be blessed.”
Israeli President Isaac Herzog said in a statement that he sends “all my support and strength to the Mansour family and the community of Kibbutz Kissufim, who have received the bitter and painful news of the murder of Shlomo Mansour, who was taken hostage on Oct. 7.”
Herzog stated that “about a month ago, I had the privilege of meeting his incredible family and hearing from them about their beloved Shlomo, who survived the Farhud pogrom against Baghdad’s Jews in 1941, only to be brutally abducted from his home in Kissufim at the age of 86. They fought with all their might for his return throughout a year and four months of hell and pain, clinging in hope and prayer for his fate.”
Describing Mansour as “a talented carpenter, a modest and kind-hearted family and community man who radiated warmth and love to all those around him,” Herzog said that “we will continue to do everything in our power to bring Shlomo home to be laid to rest in dignity, and to bring back all our hostages — both the living and the fallen — until the very last one.”
Mansour’s family advocated in their statement for “decision-makers to make a brave and ethical decision to bring all hostages home immediately — the living for rehabilitation and the deceased for proper burial in their homeland.”
The American Jewish Committee said in a statement responding to Mansour’s murder that “we weep with his family, his kibbutz, and all of Israel today. May his memory be a blessing.”
The European Jewish Congress stated that “we will continue doing everything in our power to bring Shlomo home for a dignified burial and to return all our hostages — both the living and the fallen — until the last one is brought back. May his memory be a blessing.”
The Anti-Defamation League responded that Mansour “endured unimaginable tragedies yet was deeply loved by his family and community. For over a year, his loved ones clung to the cruel hope he was alive. We mourn this heartbreaking loss and send our deepest condolences to his family. May his memory be a blessing.”
Arsen Ostrovsky, CEO of the International Legal Forum, told Sky News Australia following confirmation of Mansour’s death that “there is no depths, no ends to the depravity, the cruelty and the monstrous evil of Hamas. They spare no one. From a Holocaust survivor, 86-year-old Shlomo Mansour whom they took hostage from his home, to the youngest of hostages, a 9-month-old baby, to women and the elderly — no one is spared by their evil. There is no end to that.”
Hamas announced on Monday its plan to suspend the planned releases of further hostages, accusing the Jewish state of violating the ceasefire agreement — charges which Israel denies.
The post IDF Confirms Death of Hostage Shlomo Mansour, Murdered by Hamas on Oct. 7 first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Kanye West’s Website Shuts Down After Selling Swastika Shirts, Celebrities and Jewish Groups Slam Rapper
The swatika shirt that was selling on Yeezy.com. Photo: Screenshot
After celebrities and major Jewish organizations blasted rapper Ye, formerly know as Kanye West, for selling on his Yeezy website shirts emblazoned with a swastika, the online store has shut down as of Tuesday morning.
Ye, 47, used a Super Bowl commercial to direct people to his website Yeezy.com, which since Sunday night was selling only one item — a short sleeve, white t-shirt that features in front a black swastika, a symbol of Adolf Hitler’s Nazi party that is still used by far-right extremists today. There was no description for the shirt on the website except for the letters “HH-01,” which according to the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) is code for “Heil Hitler.”
The shirts were being sold for $20 in three different sizes, but by Tuesday morning, the Yeezy.com website was down. “This store is unavailable,” said a message on the homepage. Shopify, which was helping to sell the product on the Yeezy website, has not publicly responded on its involvement with Ye. The president of Shopify, Harley Finkelstein, is the grandson of Holocaust survivors.
The ADL started a call to action, demanding that Fox Sports condemn Ye’s Super Bowl commercial. Meanwhile, StandWithUs, a pro-Israel nonprofit, is calling on the public to pressure Fox Productions to publicly apologize for airing Ye’s advertisement and to donate all proceeds from the ad to Yad Vashem, Israel’s national memorial to the Holocaust. Several other major Jewish organizations — including the Simon Wiesenthal Center and Campaign Against Antisemitism — all denounced Ye’s decision to sell the swastika shirt as well as the rabidly antisemitic comments he posted on X early Friday morning.
American pop singer Charlie Puth, who is Jewish from his mother’s side while his father is of German descent, posted a message on his Instagram story on Monday addressed to Ye, when the swastika shirts were still being sold. “@Ye The message you are sending to the world is incredibly dangerous,” he told the rapper. “Please, man, I beg you to stop. You are selling a T-shirt featuring a Swastika, and MILLIONS of people are influenced by you. Please, I BEG you to stop, PLEASE [sic].”
Photo: Instagram
“Since 1945, the swastika has served as the most significant and notorious of hate symbols,” according to the ADL website. In an Instagram video on Monday, former NFL player Emmanuel Acho criticized Ye for attempting to “desensitize” the mass genocide carried out by Nazis during the Holocaust.
“I once talked to a Holocaust survivor and she told me, ‘Emmanuel, the Holocaust was created by the most brilliant minds; the greatest minds of the time,’” said the former NFL linebacker, who is not Jewish. “And Kanye West has proven to be a musical genius, a musical mind. Do not for a moment become desensitized to what is occurring in our culture. There is no space for racism, sexism, antisemitism, misogyny. And I believe that what Kanye West is currently doing is desensitizing us to one of the greatest forms of hate this world has ever seen. I hope you’re not laughing, because it stopped being funny a long time ago.”
Ye’s Super Bowl commercial was not aired nationally but viewed in the Los Angeles area. He started selling the swastika shirts shortly after posting numerous antisemitic comments on X in which he targeted Jews, and declared “Im [sic] a Nazi,” Im [sic] a racist” and “I love Hitler.” His X account is no longer active as of Sunday.
Ye has a history of making antisemitic comments, including glorifying Hitler and the Nazis.
American singer, songwriter, and musician Matthew Koma, who is Jewish, shared in an Instagram post that he is selling a t-shirt that says on front “F—k Ye.” He originally noted that all profits from the shirt would be donated to Backline, a nonprofit that supports mental health care for music industry professionals and their families. Koma, who is married to actress and singer Hillary Duff, originally wrote in the caption of his Instagram post: “I made this shirt because f—k Ye and his antisemitism but also I don’t trust my fellow Jews with money and all Jewish organizations have a questionable history.”
He also told one Jewish social media user in the comments section that he chose to donate all proceeds to Backline and not a Jewish-related organization because he “had a hard time figuring out which [Jewish] charities were legit or didn’t have a questionable history.” His anti-Jewish comments garnered backlash from social media users who noted the similarly between his remarks and Ye’s antisemitic rant on Friday, in which the rapper said he does not trust Jews and claimed, “They always gonna steal.”
Koma responded by saying on Tuesday that all proceeds from the “F—k Ye” shirt will now be given to Blue Card, a nonprofit organization that provides financial assistance to Holocaust survivors in the US.
The post Kanye West’s Website Shuts Down After Selling Swastika Shirts, Celebrities and Jewish Groups Slam Rapper first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Israel’s Hostage Dilemma: In Search of the World’s Understanding and Respect
Supporters and family members of hostages kidnapped during the deadly Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas, hold lit torches during a protest ahead of a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas, in Tel Aviv, Israel, Jan. 16, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Shir Torem
“As soon as you settle in America, gather your children, and go to Israel. Then, once you see that land, I want a letter from each of you, telling me in detail how it is over there.”
Those were the words of my grandfather, Misha, the family’s great patriarch, who was born in a tiny shtetl near Vitebsk in 1902 into the family of a rabbi.
He grew up to become an important surgeon, fought in three wars, had most of his immediate family murdered by the Nazis, survived Soviet antisemitism, and finally outlived his wife and all his children, including my father.
My grandfather was a Jew by faith, by race, and by identity. He was a true Zionist who believed that Jewish destiny was not just in its religion, but also in its absolute right to be able to determine its own independent future. For him, as an unbreakable Soviet Jew, betrayed by his country’s promises about egalitarianism and equality, bruised by the most humiliating acts of antisemitism, he believed in the State of Israel, the only place in the world that would not compromise a Jewish life.
My grandfather carried that Zionist flame within him for the rest of his life, but never got to see his promised land. Years and years later, I traveled there on his behalf, but I fell in love with it all on my own.
Jews in Israel learned not to compromise. They defended their state, so their land would never be taken, and their children would never be without a home. Israel knew how to listen to its own voice — until 2011, when Gilad Shalit, held captive by Hamas for 1,934 days, was exchanged for 1,027 Palestinian and Arab-Israeli prisoners. Of these, 280 were sentenced to life in prison.
Among them was Yahya Sinwar, serving four life sentences, who masterminded the October 7, 2023, attack.
As of late, while in the midst of its existential crisis, Israel is trying in vain to seek the world’s understanding and respect. It mistakenly believes it can achieve both. The world does not want to understand Israel, nor the Jewish plight within the context of Israel.
In 1976, Palestinian and German terrorists hijacked an Air France plane with Israeli passengers, diverting it to Entebbe, Uganda. Demanding prisoner releases, they threatened to kill hostages. Israel launched a daring rescue mission, freeing nearly all hostages but losing three in the process, including mission leader Yoni Netanyahu. The most heated debate took place before the actual resolution of this operation between then Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, who strongly believed in the deal in the absence of the military option, and Shimon Peres.
He later shared with his speechwriter Yehuda Avner : “When it comes to negotiating with terrorists, I long ago made a decision of principle, well before I became prime minister, that if a situation were ever to arise when terrorists would be holding our people hostage on foreign soil and we were faced with an ultimatum either to free killers in our custody or let our own people be killed, I would, in the absence of a military option, give in to the terrorists. I would free killers to save our people.”
Shimon Perez, on the other hand, who at the time was Israel’s Defense Minister, held a different view. To him “deal” meant giving in to hijackers for the first time in Israel’s history. Although we all know Perez as the ambassador of peace, during that crisis he strongly believed that negotiation with terrorists was off limits because it was not part of Israel’s make up.
He said: “If we give in to the hijackers’ demand and release terrorists, everyone will understand us but no one will respect us. If, on the other hand, we conduct a military operation to free the hostages, it is possible that no one will understand us, but everyone will respect us, depending of course on the outcome of the operation.”
Israel under Rabin was on the verge of negotiations, but once the IDF presented the military plan, the decision to proceed was made, despite the risk of casualties. Thus, another chapter in Israel’s history of rescue missions was written. This demonstrated to both its enemies and the unfriendly international community that Israel would not compromise its national integrity to gain society’s understanding and insincere sympathy.
Why does Israel’s usually unbreakable spirit seem so influenced by actors with, at best, marginal interest in it? This may sound naive, as Israel needs major players like the US. However, that shouldn’t justify pushing Israel into bad deals.
The October 7, 2023, attack presented Israel with its most devastating hostage crisis. As of February 10, 2025, eighty of the 251 hostages abducted by Hamas remain in Gaza, with at least a third believed dead. Hasn’t Israel been here before? How could this deal be made after such a tragedy and most complex military operation, which drastically diminished Hamas?
There is intelligence that Hamas is regrouping; this cancer will grow. If Israel retreats after receiving hostages, some in body bags, it has every reason to anticipate a repeat of October 7th. Mothers embracing their children today may tomorrow be replaced by other mothers agonizing over their children’s fate all over again. The job of a parent is to shield their child from danger for as long as they can, but the job of a government, in this case the Israeli government, especially its leadership, is to protect the entire nation from all foreseeable danger, so that “Never Again” is Never Again FOREVER.
Throughout my life, first under the hypocritical iron fist of the Soviet empire and later as an immigrant in America, where some of the most important values and traditions of America’s greatness are too frequently compromised, I have always admired Israel, a nation salvaged from near extinction. I have revered Israel for its unwavering commitment to its core mission since its founding as a sovereign nation: the defense of its land and its people. For at least 63 years, it never faltered in this.
After the first three women were released this year, I heard: “Why not celebrate with them? They feared this day wouldn’t come. Celebrate with those young women!” or “Happy now? You got your deal, your hostages. Move on, stop this bloodshed.”
Frankly, it doesn’t concern me that non-Jews refuse to see this deal’s weakness; it saddens me that my people neglect how harmful it is for Israel and Jews.
As a human and mother, I want every hostage home, no matter the price. Seeing mothers with daughters breaks my heart with happiness, heartbreak, and disappointment. As a Jew, mother, and Zionist, these people are in hell because of deals like this, like 2011’s, which led to October 7th. Today’s rushed deal anticipates similar tragedies, different mothers lamenting, children orphaned. A new government will seek a new solution.
An understanding world is a luxury Jews and Israel cannot afford. To survive, Israel must fight.
The world will never understand or forgive a nation which, after losing 6 million to genocide, created its own state from the ashes and became a maverick of modern civilization. Had Jews and their promised land been losers, surrounded by enemies, swallowed by neighboring states, and become Israelis with a victimhood mentality, the world might have forgiven their roughness. But Israel’s story is different. The past 77 years, however difficult, have been a victory for Israel and every Jew there. Strong, courageous victors fighting for their people, knowing they are all potential hostages, these Israelis will never be sympathized with. All that remains is respect, existing without love or understanding, founded on reason. It would be impossible not to respect Israel’s refusal of weak deals — its only duty being to protect its country from future tragedies.
Anya Gillinson is an immigration lawyer and author of the new memoir Dreaming in Russian. She lives in New York City. More at www.anyagillinson.com.
The post Israel’s Hostage Dilemma: In Search of the World’s Understanding and Respect first appeared on Algemeiner.com.