Connect with us

RSS

Degrees or Direction?

Esau and Jacob reconcile. Photo: Francesco Hayez.

JNS.org – Who do you think is more likely to succeed, a yeshivah student with limited secular education or a university graduate with a degree? I imagine the statistics would confirm that the latter usually do better in terms of salary packages and income.

But increasingly, we are seeing a shift in that divide. A woman in South Africa recently shared her experiences in the workplace on LinkedIn, and it elicited a huge response in the online community. Esther Ekoko had several degrees but couldn’t find a job for years. She explains that employers are no longer interested in degrees but in experience, initiative and the skills an individual brings to a company.

She acknowledges the importance of education, but as a formerly unemployed with multiple degrees, her fortunes improved when she learned two digital skills: copywriting and data analysis. Her advice to job-seekers was that a degree is not enough; learn a skill and network.

This week in Parshat Vayishlach we read the dramatic story of the reunion between the estranged twin brothers, Jacob and Esau. Jacob’s messengers report that Esau is coming with murder on his mind, seeking to avenge Jacob’s procurement of the birthright and the blessings of their father, Isaac. Jacob prepares for war should it be necessary. He also prays to God for his family’s safety and employs a significant diplomatic initiative by sending his brother a huge gift of hundreds of animals stretching for miles.

Where did Jacob acquire so much wealth? The answer is that after working for his father-in-law, Laban, for 20 years, he left with enormous numbers of livestock. His gift to Esau was a fraction of what he had amassed in the farming business.

But Jacob was a yeshivah bucher, a student whose education was exclusively in Torah. He is described in the Bible as “a dweller of tents,” a reference to the proverbial “Tent of Torah.” Could this naive yeshivah student rival his brother Esau, who never stepped into a yeshivah and was a man of the world? Yes. When Esau protested and begged Jacob to keep the large gift he had sent him, Jacob declined and said he had all that he needed. Jacob was a very wealthy man.

May I be so bold as to suggest that we are now seeing many such “Jacobs” today, whose main education was studying Torah and who have done exceptionally well in a broad variety of businesses. We can debate over whether Talmudic study has sharpened their minds to succeed in business, or it is the blessings from God above (or both), but the bottom line is that the sands are shifting, and we should take note.

John Major was the youngest prime minister of England in the 20th century. Only much later did he reveal that he was a high school dropout. Guess what, he wasn’t impeached.

Now, I’m not suggesting that we raise a generation of dropouts, but we could use a rethinking and reassessment of our educational system. Is it working? The disrupters are making huge changes in today’s world. Perhaps we need some disruption in our educational system, too.

We are currently witnessing a serious breakdown in the world of higher education with many of our students becoming so “liberal” as to lose all common sense. Traditional family values are despised, and every type of “alternative” lifestyle is praised—all in the name of enlightenment and a so-called “progressive” philosophy of life. People would do well to heed the advice of scientist Carl Sagan, who was the first to advise us to “keep an open mind, but not so open that your brains fall out!”

And, of course, the Palestinian agenda has been adopted by many American students who are completely ignorant of the history of the Middle East and have no idea which sea or river they’re chanting about. It may as well be the Mississippi. They simply get caught up in the popularity of the campus movement of the day. Today, “Free Palestine” is the flavor of the month. I hope by next year they get back to saving the whales or the ozone layer.

Albert Einstein famously said that “education is what you’re left with when you’ve forgotten everything they taught you in school.” We need values just as much as we need facts. It’s more important to be a mensch than to have a master’s.

And when you consider the raw, blatant and brazen antisemitism on college campuses today, we could do with a serious reset and rethink. No wonder talk show host Dennis Prager advises parents not to send their kids to college. Just look at what the deans of the top Ivy League universities had to say last fall about calls of genocide on their campuses regarding Jews. That it depends on the “context!”

Maybe we should all take a leaf out of Jacob’s book and pay more attention to the study of what’s really important in life. Who knows? We may become millionaires, too.

The post Degrees or Direction? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Post Views: 380
Related Topics:
Continue Reading

RSS

Charlie Kirk Sought to Encourage Debate — His Murder Must Not Stop It

Charlie Kirk speaking at the inauguration of Donald Trump in January 2025. Photo: Brian Snyder via Reuters Connect

I first became familiar with Charlie Kirk after October 7, 2023, when my TikTok algorithm began showing me videos of him fiercely, and quite effectively, debating students on college campuses, often those in keffiyehs and with purple hair.

Thus began my fascination with what I soon learned was a man who was dedicating his life to debating and promoting what he believed in.

Charlie Kirk was the face of the young Republican movement, respected even by some Democrats. He had a promising future ahead of him. As Ben Shapiro wrote: “That kid is going to be the head of the Republican National Convention one day.”

Kirk dedicated his life to debate. To disagreement. To hearing the other side and persuading with facts and truth. And this, tragically, cost him his life. His assassination represents the meager and devastating state of the West, a state we have slowly, almost willingly, been accepting for years now.

There is a deep intolerance for differences. People do not want to be persuaded. They do not want to consider another perspective. Instead, they condemn what they believe is wrong, clinging to black-and-white narratives, even when an entire gray area holds the broader picture. They turn their heads away from nuance. Kirk aimed to change that. He devoted his life to it, fully aware of the risks.

As Adam Rubenstein wisely wrote for The Free Press: “Kirk was not naïve. In the video after he is shot, you can see a security team of at least half a dozen bodyguards surround him and spirit him away. Like anyone speaking their mind in public these days, he knew there was a risk.”

Kirk’s assassination signifies a low point for this country — and another attack on free speech. It was an assassination of dialogue, of diplomacy, of the ability to disagree without destruction. And perhaps the most bitter irony is that it all happened on a college campus, an environment that should foster growth mindsets and open-mindedness.

This attack was not only an attack on Charlie Kirk. It was an attack on freedom of thought and expression. And while it succeeded in killing the bright and young 31-year-old so many of us admired, I hope that is a rallying call to protect the broader freedom of speech we still enjoy — at least in part — in this country.

Alma Bengio is Chief Growth Officer at The Algemeiner Journal and founder and writer for @lets.talk.conflict

Post Views: 24
Continue Reading

RSS

Jews Are Indigenous to the Land of Israel — and Everyone Should Know It

The Western Wall and Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Photo: Wikimedia Commons.

Few words in modern political discourse carry as much distortion as “Palestine.” Today, the term is wielded not as history but as a weapon — designed to delegitimize the Jewish State and recast Jews as foreign colonizers in their own homeland.

Take away the propaganda, however, and one unshakable truth remains: the Jewish people are the indigenous nation of the Land of Israel. The Arab claim to “Palestinian indigeneity” simply does not line up with history.

The Jewish people trace their roots back over 3,000 years to the patriarchs Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, who lived in the land of Canaan — later Israel. By the time of King David, Jerusalem was the capital of a united monarchy, and Solomon’s Temple stood as the spiritual and political center of Jewish life. Even after the Babylonian exile, Jews returned, rebuilt, and re-established their national life in Judea.

Despite invasions, destruction, and exile, Jews never abandoned their homeland. They remained in Jerusalem, Galilee, Hebron, Safed, and along the coast. Their prayers, rituals, and festivals kept the bond to Zion alive. This is not the story of outsiders — it is the story of the land’s first and most enduring nation.

Rome tried to sever that bond by force. After the Bar Kokhba revolt in the second century, Emperor Hadrian renamed Judea as Syria Palaestina , borrowing the name of the long-vanished Philistines, and turned Jerusalem into Aelia Capitolina. It was an act of erasure, meant to punish the Jews by striking even their name from the map.

But the attempt failed. Jews continued to live, pray, and return to their ancestral soil. A new label could not undo thousands of years of rootedness.

The Arab story is very different; their origins lie in the Arabian Peninsula. The earliest records available to us describe nomadic tribes in Arabia and the Syrian desert. Their cultural centers were Mecca, Medina, Yemen, and Petra. It was only in the 7th century, with the rise of Islam, that Arab armies exploded out of Arabia and conquered the region. By 636 CE, they had invaded Byzantine Judea; within a century they ruled from Spain to Persia. Their presence in Judea was the result of conquest, not continuity.

For over a thousand years, under successive empires — Umayyad, Abbasid, Crusader, Mamluk, Ottoman, and finally British — the local Arab population never called itself “Palestinian.” They identified as Arabs, Muslims, Christians, or by their city and clan. In fact, during the British Mandate, the word Palestinian referred almost exclusively to Jews: the Palestine Post was a Jewish newspaper, the Palestine Symphony Orchestra was Jewish, and the Palestine Brigade that fought in World War II was Jewish.

Many Arabs in the region rejected the label, insisting instead that they were part of greater Syria or the wider Arab nation.

Only in the mid-20th century, particularly under Yasser Arafat and the PLO, did a separate “Palestinian” identity emerge. It was born not from centuries of shared history but from a political need: to create a narrative that could challenge Jewish nationhood and delegitimize Israel. It was, and remains, a tool of war by other means.

This is the historical bottom line: Jews are the only people with an unbroken, 3,000 year bond to the Land of Israel. The name Palestine was a Roman punishment, not an Arab heritage. Arabs arrived in the 7th century as conquerors from Arabia. The idea of a Palestinian people is a modern invention, forged in the 20th century as part of a political campaign against the Jewish State.

Israel is not a colonial project. It is the restoration of an ancient nation to its ancestral homeland. Jews are not foreigners in Judea; they are Judea’s people. By every measure — historical, cultural, and even genetic — the Jewish nation’s claim is authentic, continuous, and undeniable.

Sabine Sterk is the CEO of Time To Stand Up For Israel.

Post Views: 19
Continue Reading

RSS

Israel Attacked Terrorists in Qatar — and the Media Attacked Israel

Vehicles stop at a red traffic light, a day after an Israeli attack on Hamas leaders, in Doha, Qatar, Sept. 10, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa

On Tuesday, September 9, Israel targeted those who sought its destruction and planned the barbaric October 7, 2023 massacre.

Israel launched the daring attack on the Hamas leadership in their Qatari safe haven, after their ongoing refusal to agree to a Gaza ceasefire deal and in the aftermath of a deadly terror attack in Jerusalem, which Hamas claimed responsibility for.

But the media still shilled for Hamas by making Israel look like a rogue state attacking a key diplomatic player and destroying any chance for peace.

News outlets used three methods to achieve this goal:

  • Direct accusations
  • Subtle differentiation between a “legitimate” Hamas political wing and its military one
  • The glorification of Qatar as a business hub rather than a terrorist hub

The Independent and The Washington Post shamelessly employed headlines that portrayed Israel as the regional bully and an aggressor randomly attacking other Middle East countries in a bid for regional domination.

Sky News even blamed Israel for a previous attack on Qatar, although the Iranian regime carried it out:

After we publicly highlighted it, Sky quietly rectified its faux pas with no acknowledgment of the correction.

Meanwhile, the Economist was worried that attacking the very terrorists who ordered the mass murder of Jews on Oct. 7 was “a bridge too far” and that Israel had “crossed a line:”

And the BBC’s security correspondent called Israel’s surprising act of self defense “a campaign of score settling:”

NPR and The Wall Street Journal took the subtle approach of creating a false dichotomy between Hamas’ military and political wings — although the entire group is internationally designated as a terror organization.

This naive approach depicted the targeted Hamas leaders as legitimate officials simply because they carried pens and wore suits instead of AK-47s and green headbands.

They may not have got their hands dirty but this does not absolve them from orchestrating numerous bloody terror attacks, including the slaughter and kidnapping of thousands of people in Israel on October 7, 2023.

Finally, many outlets decried the violation of Qatar’s sovereignty, painting it as a peace-seeking state focused on business and regional cooperation, rather than a patron of terrorists.

The New York Times went as far as calling Qatar “a safe haven for business and tourism in a volatile region,” while it was, in fact, a safe haven for the region’s top jihadists.

How can this media distortion be explained? Why is a facade of legitimacy conferred upon terrorists in suits?

There are only two possible answers: Either the media believe the facade the terrorists want to sell, or they are carrying out an anti-Israel agenda.

Both options are detrimental to professional journalism, as well as to basic human ethics.

The author is a contributor to HonestReporting, a Jerusalem-based media watchdog with a focus on antisemitism and anti-Israel bias — where a version of this article first appeared.

Post Views: 24
Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News