Connect with us

RSS

‘Judenrein’: CUNY Professors Blast Faculty Union for Passing ‘Antisemitic’ BDS Resolution

CUNY pro-Hamas students and supporters setup encampment at the school’s campus in New York City on April 25, 2024. Photo: Steve Sanchez via Reuters Connect

Jewish faculty at the City University of New York (CUNY) are denouncing their public sector union’s passing of a resolution which called for the adoption of the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) movement against Israel.

The Professional Staff Congress (PSC) union, which represents over 30,000 CUNY staff and faculty, passed the measure on Jan. 23 by a razor thin margin of just three votes. It falsely accused Israel of war crimes and other affronts to humanity, including “genocide” and “apartheid,” and called for the union to divest its pension plan of holdings linked to “Israeli companies and Israeli government bonds no later than the end of January 2025.”

This is not the first controversial resolution passed by the CUNY faculty union. In 2021, during a previous conflict between Israel and Hamas, it voted to approve a defaming statement which accused Israel of “ongoing settler colonial violence” and demanded the the university “divest from all companies that aid in Israeli colonization, occupation, and war crimes.” Doing so set off a cascade of events, including a mass resignation of faculty from the union, the founding of new campus Jewish civil rights groups, and a major — ultimately unsuccessful — lawsuit which aimed to abolish compulsory public sector union membership.

History is repeating itself, Jewish faculty said following what has been described as the union’s latest outrage against the Jewish community.

“Since the mass exodus of Jews from the union after its antisemitic pro-BDS resolution in 2021, its delegate leadership is virtually Judenrein,” Jeffrey Lax, a Kingsborough Community College professor and founder of the advocacy group Students, Alumni, and Faculty for Equality (SAFE), told The Algemeiner on Wednesday in a statement. “This is a welcome development for the antisemitic, Marxist leaders who have been lying in wait to adopt a full BDS divestment policy, which they have now done, with few Jews still around to oppose it.”

Taking aim at PSC president James Davis, Lax continued, “Senior leaders like President James will pretend that they were against the vote as it ‘divides’ the union. No kidding. But the truth is, it’s no secret that Davis is a proud BDS supporter. We exposed video of him voting for BDS at the American Studies Association. And this is our union today: a corrupt, opaque, Jew-expunging entity that has just signed its own death knell by so blatantly breaking the law.”

Lax’s group, SAFE, is mounting an effort to thwart the resolution’s objectives, and filed on Tuesday a complaint with the New York State Division of Human Rights (DHR) alleging discrimination against Zionism, a central component of Jewish identity, and the “blatant violation” of a state executive order, EO 157, which explicitly proscribes boycotts of Israel. The letter also requested that DHR open a formal investigation of PSC CUNY to uncover any further acts of alleged antisemitism.

“It is no coincidence that hundreds — perhaps thousands — of Jewish faculty members have left the PSC union,” the complaint says. “The PSC-CUNY’s BDS boycott policy and singular divestment from Israel makes clear that Zionist Jewish and Israeli faculty members are not welcome to work with the union, will not receive the same benefits or protections, and will not receive any assistance of values from the union related or connected in any way to their protected nationality or ethnicity.”

Davis maintained in a statement issued on Wednesday that the union will continue to serve the interests of its members.

“We were elected to protect PSC members’ rights, to improve their pay and working conditions and working conditions, and to strengthen their union,” Davis said. “Keeping focus on these primary responsibilities while engaging in wider struggles for justice and peace is important, especially in this politically tumultuous movement. The PSC recently ratified a new contract and is intent on enforcing that contract and improving the working conditions of all members.”

CUNY faculty such as Queens College professor Azriel Genack, continue to be suspicious of the union’s intentions, however, and argue that its recent conduct is unbecoming of any institution which counts academics as members.

“This new PSC Resolution does not mention Hamas or its unspeakably brutal attack [in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023]: the torture, rape, mutilation, kidnapping, and massacre of entire families that broke the ceasefire that has been in place since the previous war. Now the PSC has two resolutions condemning Israel and not a single resolution condemning any other country; not Russia, Iran, China, or North Korea,” Gunack wrote in an open letter shared with The Algemeiner. “The resolution does not speak truth to power; it hides and distorts the truth in order to find soulless solidarity that disgraces CUNY by seeking to demonize a people that faces an enemy that is sworn to annihilate it, even if this entails destroying the hopes of its own people for a better life.”

The City University of New York’s campuses have been lambasted by critics as some of the most antisemitic institutions of higher education in the country.

Last year, the US Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights (OCR) resolved half a dozen investigations of antisemitism on CUNY campuses, a consortium of undergraduate colleges located throughout New York City’s five boroughs.

The inquiries, which reviewed incidents that happened as far back as 2020, were aimed at determining whether school officials neglected to prevent and respond to antisemitic discrimination, bullying, and harassment. Hunter College and CUNY Law combined for three resolutions in total, representing half of all the antisemitism cases settled by OCR. Baruch College, Brooklyn College, and CUNY’s Central Office were the subjects of three other investigations.

One of the cases which OCR resolved, involving Brooklyn College, prompted widespread concern when it was announced in 2022. According to witness testimony provided by the Louis D. Brandeis Center for Human Rights Under Law — which filed the complaint prompting the investigation — Jewish students enrolled in the college’s Mental Health Counseling (MCH) program were repeatedly pressured into saying that Jews are white people who should be excluded from discussions about social justice.

The badgering of Jewish students, the students said at the time, became so severe that one student said in a WhatsApp group chat that she wanted to “strangle” a Jewish classmate.

“Some of the harassment on CUNY campuses has become so commonplace as to almost be normalized,” the American Center for Law & Justice (ACLJ) once alleged in July 2022. “Attacking, denigrating, and threatening ‘Zionists’ has become the norm, with the crystal-clear understanding that ‘Zionist’ is now merely an epithet for ‘Jew’ the same way ‘banker,’ ‘cabal,’ ‘globalist,’ ‘cosmopolitan,’ ‘Christ killer,’ and numerous other such dog-whistles have been used over the centuries to target, demonize, and incite against Jews.”

Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.

The post ‘Judenrein’: CUNY Professors Blast Faculty Union for Passing ‘Antisemitic’ BDS Resolution first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

US Issues New Sanctions Targeting Chinese Importers of Iranian Oil

The Liberian-flagged oil tanker Ice Energy transfers crude oil from the Iranian-flagged oil tanker Lana (former Pegas), off the shore of Karystos, on the Island of Evia, Greece, May 26, 2022. REUTERS/Costas Baltas

The United States on Wednesday issued new sanctions targeting Iran’s oil exports, including against a China-based “teapot refinery,” as President Donald Trump’s administration seeks to ramp up pressure on Tehran.

The US Treasury Department said in a statement the action would increase pressure on Chinese importers of Iranian oil as Trump seeks to restore his “maximum pressure” campaign on Iran, which includes efforts to drive its oil exports down to zero.

The action comes as the Trump administration has relaunched negotiations with Iran over its nuclear program this month, with talks in Oman last weekend and a second round expected in Rome this weekend.

The Treasury on Wednesday said it imposed sanctions on a China-based independent “teapot” refinery it accused of playing a role in purchasing more than $1 billion worth of Iranian crude oil.

Washington also issued additional sanctions on several companies and vessels it said were responsible for facilitating Iranian oil shipments to China as part of Iran’s “shadow fleet.”

Iran’s mission to the United Nations in New York and China’s embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

China does not recognize US sanctions and is the largest importer of Iranian oil. China and Iran have built a trading system that uses mostly Chinese yuan and a network of middlemen, avoiding the dollar and exposure to US regulators.

“Any refinery, company, or broker that chooses to purchase Iranian oil or facilitate Iran’s oil trade places itself at serious risk,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in the statement.

GUIDANCE FOR SHIPPING

“The United States is committed to disrupting all actors providing support to Iran’s oil supply chain, which the regime uses to support its terrorist proxies and partners.”

The Treasury on Wednesday also updated guidance for shipping and maritime stakeholders on “detecting and mitigating Iranian oil sanctions evasion,” warning, among other things, that Iran depends on a vast shadow fleet to disguise oil shipments.

The Treasury said it was the sixth round of sanctions targeting Iranian oil sales since Trump restored his “maximum pressure” campaign on Iran, which includes efforts to drive its oil exports down to zero in order to help prevent Tehran from developing a nuclear weapon.

In his first 2017-21 term, Trump withdrew the US from a 2015 deal between Iran and world powers that placed temporary limits on Tehran’s uranium enrichment activities in exchange for sanctions relief. Trump also reimposed sweeping US sanctions.

Since then, Iran has far surpassed that deal’s limits on uranium enrichment.

Western powers accuse Iran of having a clandestine agenda to develop nuclear weapons capability by enriching uranium to a high level of fissile purity, above what they say is justifiable for a civilian atomic energy program. Tehran says its nuclear program is wholly for civilian power purposes.

“All sanctions will be fully enforced under the Trump Administration’s maximum pressure campaign on Iran,” State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said in a separate statement on Wednesday.

“As long as Iran attempts to generate oil revenues to fund its destabilizing activities, the United States will hold both Iran and all its partners in sanctions evasion accountable.”

The post US Issues New Sanctions Targeting Chinese Importers of Iranian Oil first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Why Is Qatar Getting Away with Undermining US Interests?

The Al Jazeera Media Network logo is seen on its headquarters building in Doha, Qatar, June 8, 2017. Photo: REUTERS/Naseem Zeitoon

While much of the American foreign policy conversation is consumed by China, Russia, and Iran, a far more insidious actor has been hiding in plain sight: Qatar. 

This tiny Gulf state has managed to infiltrate the American political ecosystem with surgical precision — through influence operations, media manipulation, academic funding, and elite lobbying. Its endgame? To bend US policy in its favor while funding the very extremists we claim to be fighting. 

For too long, Washington has treated Qatar as a quirky ally — an oil-rich outlier hosting the largest American military base in the Middle East — Al Udeid. But behind the airbase is a monarchy that plays both arsonist and firefighter: funding Islamist terror groups like Hamas while simultaneously branding itself as a necessary “mediator.” That’s not diplomacy — it’s blackmail. 

Qatar isn’t challenging US power head-on; it’s buying access, shaping discourse, and laundering its image through think tanks, universities, and former officials. The result is a foreign policy establishment increasingly compromised by Qatari influence — and unwilling to hold Doha accountable. 

Qatar has spent billions pouring into America’s elite institutions: Georgetown, Brookings, RAND, and more. These aren’t charitable donations; they’re strategic investments in influence. What happens when the same think tanks advising US policymakers are on the Qatari payroll? What happens when former diplomats and retired generals take consulting fees from a regime that funds Hamas and cheers on Al Jazeera’s anti-Western propaganda? 

After the October 7 Hamas massacre — one of the most brutal acts of terrorism in modern memory — Qatar remained untouched. While its ties to Hamas were public and long-standing, Qatar wasn’t sanctioned, pressured, or even criticized. Instead, it was elevated as a “key negotiator” in hostage talks. Imagine that: a state that hosts Hamas leaders in five-star hotels was rewarded with diplomatic prestige after the terrorists it bankrolls slaughtered civilians. That is influence at work. 

The fact that the US continues to rely on Qatar as a go-between reveals the depth of the problem. US institutions — media, government, academia — have been too thoroughly compromised to challenge the narrative. Every time the US spares Qatar from consequences, it sends a clear message: American foreign policy is for sale. 

In Israel, a corruption scandal now dubbed “Qatargate” has exposed how deep Qatar’s reach extends. Israeli media reported secret payments, PR services, and cozy ties between Netanyahu’s communications team and Qatari operatives. Arrests were made. Gag orders issued. The Shin Bet launched an investigation. The scandal has rocked the Israeli government — not because Qatar did something unusual, but because someone finally got caught. 

If Qatar can manipulate a tightly surveilled, security-conscious country like Israel, what has it already done in a distracted, divided, lobby-saturated Washington? 

Qatar has retained some of the most powerful lobbying firms in D.C., from those connected to Democratic insiders to Republican powerbrokers. It has poured resources into shaping US discourse, often by proxy. It funds conferences, media outlets, cultural programs, and fellowships. It hires former White House staffers and Pentagon officials to lobby Congress, and feed op-eds into major newspapers. The goal isn’t short-term gain. It’s long-term positioning: to ensure that no matter which party is in power, Doha remains untouchable. 

Unlike China or Russia, Qatar operates with a velvet glove. There are no cyberattacks or airspace violations — just cash, contracts, and calculated charm. And because its methods don’t trigger alarms, it has gotten away with it. 

Qatar undermines US allies like Egypt, funds the Muslim Brotherhood, gives voice to anti-American demagogues, and manipulates Western media through platforms like Al Jazeera. It hosts Taliban leaders one day and strikes multi-billion-dollar gas deals with US companies the next. It’s not an ally. It’s a shapeshifter — wearing whatever mask serves its interests. 

The American people need to wake up. Qatar is not simply playing both sides. Its billions buy silence, its PR campaigns buy credibility, and its influence buys exemption from the consequences that any other terror-sponsoring regime would face. 

Congress should immediately investigate Qatari lobbying efforts in the United States, including all funding to universities, think tanks, nonprofits, and media organizations. Every foreign donation to a US institution should be publicly disclosed. Any American policymaker, academic, or analyst who takes Qatari money must register it and explain it — clearly. 

The Pentagon should reconsider the military relationship with Qatar until a full review of its terror ties and foreign interference operations is conducted. Hosting a US base does not make you an ally. If anything, it makes you more dangerous — because it shields your true motives behind a curtain of cooperation. 

We must also reassert moral clarity. There is no world in which funding Hamas and being a responsible stakeholder are compatible. If Qatar wants the privileges of Western partnership, it must be held to Western standards. Until then, it should be treated like any other hostile regime that funds terror, meddles in democracy, and manipulates American policy for its own ends. 

This is not about partisanship. Qatar gives to Republicans and Democrats. It hires former officials from both parties. This is about national sovereignty — and the basic principle that American foreign policy should serve the American people, not the ambitions of a royal family in Doha. 

Amine Ayoub, a fellow at the Middle East Forum, is a policy analyst and writer based in Morocco. Follow him on X: @amineayoubx

The post Why Is Qatar Getting Away with Undermining US Interests? first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

How Canadian Universities Are Allowing Jewish Students to Be Doxxed and Harassed

The Fine Arts Building of McGill University in Montreal, Quebec. Photo: DXR/Wikimedia Commons

With the rise of the digital age, an entirely new form of harassment and intimidation has emerged. Nameless accounts run by faceless adversaries comment on, post about, and attack others — their identities hidden behind a digital mask.

What’s worse than this anonymous harassment is the increasingly common practice of doxxing, where one’s personal information is released to the public in an effort to intimidate and silence them.

That’s the situation that pro-Israel Jewish Canadians have been facing for over a year — and it threatens free expression, academic integrity, and open discourse.

In the year and a half since October 7, 2023, this harassment has become a common practice on college campuses for students who dare to voice any support for Israel, or criticism of Palestinians or Hamas. My school, McGill University, is no different. Pro-Israel students, Hillel staff, and even McGill security guards have been followed, photographed, and videoed.

A prime example of this phenomenon is the Instagram account, “Shart-Up Nation,” which regularly targets pro-Israel activists and the McGill administration by sharing photos and videos of Jewish students and professionals, and asking followers to find information about them so that they may release it to their 800+ followers.

Their feed and stories are flooded with vicious photos of McGill’s pro-Israel community accompanied by horrible insults, stating that “all Zionists look like this to a certain degree” and comparing Jewish students to an unflattering emoji.

Memes are drenched in antisemitic sentiments — such as one regarding a former hostage’s nose job paralleling the trope of a Jew with a large hooked nose, one suggesting Jews are constantly surveilling people (suspiciously close to the sentiments put forth in the Protocols of the Elders of Zion), or even another suggesting that Jews “want to swim in the blood of dead Palestinians,” echoing the age-old blood libel.

This past December, the group came across the Instagram page of another local pro-Israel organization, Allied Voices for Israel. The account manager captured screenshots of students’ faces on an educational trip to Israel, which focused on conversations between Israel and Palestinians “fighting for peace and coexistence.” The doxxers then located their LinkedIn profiles, and posted their academic and personal information along with their full names.

These actions extend far beyond violating privacy — they induce a fear to speak up and make opinions known in the pro-Israel community. It is clear that these actions are a thinly veiled threat — dare to engage in conversation about Israel, no matter if there is nuance, and your professional and personal life will be put at risk.

Despite the vicious posts about students — and the now illegal release of their private information — neither the Concordia nor McGill administration have identified the student perpetrator.

Unfortunately, hiding one’s identity while protesting, chanting some questionable (at best) statements, and performing illegal actions, is nothing new for the pro-Palestinian crowd at McGill.

On October 7th, 2024, students covering their faces with keffiyehs stormed McGill’s campus, pushing down protective barriers and covering school property with graffiti.

Protestors hiding under sunglasses or masks is a common sight on campus. Just recently, a group of masked individuals went so far as to smash over 20 windows in one of McGill’s largest buildings, leaving shards of glass and a terrified student body scattered around campus.

Their masking — and their unwillingness to be associated with their actions — is a tacit acknowledgment that they know what they are doing is wrong. If they were not undertaking destructive, illegal, and harmful actions, why take so much care to hide behind social media accounts and face coverings?

If they truly believe that they are fighting for a just cause and doing it in the correct way, there is no reason that they should feel the need to conceal their involvement or identity. Clearly, then, certain people recognize that their actions place them on the wrong side of history. They know that pushing down fences is not the proper way to instigate social change, that doxxing and humiliating fellow students online is a blatant violation of McGill’s Student Code of Conduct, and that chanting about restarting the “Final solution” while doing a Nazi salute is unacceptable.

If they were proud of their actions, they would not go through so much trouble to hide their identities.

The rise of anonymous harassment and doxxing in Montreal is not just a symptom of political division — it is a threat to the open discourse and academic integrity that is supposed to thrive on college campuses.

And this issue festers in the broader Montreal community as well. The police have yet to make any arrests following extreme acts of vandalism on McGill’s campus in early February; local newspapers misrepresent the facts of the conflict. The mayor of a prominent Jewish community in the city allegedly “tolerates illegal behavior by masked protestors.” McGill and Montreal must break out of this vicious cycle.

If universities fail to address these violations, then they are contributing to a culture where fear reigns supreme and productive dialogue is rendered not just impossible but dangerous. Our institution and our neighbors at Concordia University must take a stand — not just to protect those targeted in today’s world — but for the preservation of open and constructive discourse for generations to come.

Maris Brail is a student at McGill University, pursuing a Joint Honours degree in Jewish Studies and philosophy. As an active member of McGill’s Hillel and Students Supporting Israel executive boards, Maris is committed to fostering a space where Jewish life and advocacy can thrive. She is also a CAMERA on Campus Fellow, dedicated to promoting accurate and fair representations of Israel in academic and media discourse.

The post How Canadian Universities Are Allowing Jewish Students to Be Doxxed and Harassed first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News