RSS
Los Angeles Teacher’s Union Is Engulfed in a Storm of Anti-Israel Hate
Anti-Israel demonstrators outside the Adas Torah synagogue in the heavily-Jewish Pico-Robertson area of Los Angeles, June 23, 2024. Photo: Screenshot
Judging by recent headlines in The Los Angeles Times, you might believe that thousands of United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) teachers had gathered to diligently learn about, discuss, and hold a massive referendum on the union’s foreign policy stance — but you’d be wrong.
Far from being the will of UTLA’s entire membership, the anti-Israel motion that was passed has been orchestrated in secret by the union’s tiny, six-member “Human Rights Committee.” The union’s House of Representatives held its vote on the motion on the last day of the Jewish holiday of Sukkot — a move that prevented observant Jewish members from attending. The motion supports a US arms embargo against Israel.
With no one present to object, their motion passed by an 80-40 vote with fewer than 200 people present. Given the Los Angeles Times’ publisher’s recent claim that the paper could not endorse Kamala Harris for president due to her positions on Israel, no one should be surprised that their headline on this story was as wrong as it was.
The recent vote is part of a larger pattern of antisemitic, exclusionary behavior throughout UTLA, which has marginalized Jewish voices. And now it’s bleeding over into schools and classrooms.
Union Overreach into K-12 Classrooms
UTLA’s anti-Israel stance goes beyond policy discussions. In fact, the activities the stance motivates brazenly violate ethical and legal boundaries, breaking Federal, state, and local laws with tacit leadership approval.
Many stunning examples of these violations took place at the UTLA leadership conference last August, which was held at a luxury hotel.
There, the union allowed non-members from anti-Israel organizations to co-sponsor their own sub-trainings in how to teach Israel hate. One elementary teacher encouraged teachers to discuss Israel’s “evils” with kindergartners, while another teacher — from the now-banned “Liberated Ethnic Studies Consortium” — presented her anti-Israel curriculum as if it were mainstream.
The sessions encouraged political activism in the classroom, including “Keffiyeh Thursdays” and decorating hallways with anti-Israel materials. Even more disturbingly, one LAUSD high school teacher outlined how he manipulates students into attending anti-Israel protests and arranges transportation for them in the cars of other un-vetted adults, a tactic he uses to evade professional liability.
LAUSD received 27,000 emails complaining about the illegal conduct; each Biard member received about 3,000, but the teacher in question is still teaching at an LA high school.
These actions violate Federal, state, and local safety and education laws against politicking in public schools, but neither UTLA nor the Los Angeles Unified School District seem the least bit bothered about it.
Neglecting Core Educational Priorities
While union leadership fixates on its anti-Israel activism, critical issues go unaddressed.
Enrollment in LAUSD has dropped from more than 746,000 in 2003 to 450,000 in 2024. Reading and math scores are in free-fall. Career satisfaction among teachers has plummeted, which has made hiring difficult.
UTLA could be helping to address these critical problems by advocating for better pay, improved school safety, reduced class sizes, or other meaningful educational reforms. But instead, they remain focused on anti-Israel activism.
Half the proposed motions at last month’s meeting focused on Israel.
So, what can teachers and families do to address this toxic union culture that contaminates school life?
More and more UTLA members are discovering that the 2018 Janus Supreme Court decision gives them an out. This ruling affirms that public sector employees have the right to opt out of union membership, and a growing number of Jewish and non-Jewish members have already left UTLA. The union has retaliated by complicating the process of canceling memberships and by blackballing Jewish educators who share this information.
UTLA, like other teacher unions, ignores parent voices because as 503(c)6 nonprofits, their members are their only constituencies. Jewish parents of Los Angeles emailed the UTLA House of Representatives on two separate occasions, asking for compassion towards Jewish and Israeli-immigrant families, and both times were met with hostility. It is up to the union’s members to generate changes.
Ultimately, members have two options for structural reform of UTLA.
One approach would be for UTLA to follow the Teachers Association of Long Beach in adopting a bylaw that it is “not within the scope or purview” of the association to engage in foreign policy. This would allow UTLA to refocus on its core mission of supporting teachers while stopping the exodus of Jewish teachers.
The other approach would be to get reform-minded teachers to run for leadership. Electing reform-minded leaders is the only way to ensure long-term change. A leadership slate could create a union that advocates for fair pay, better resources, and a safer learning environment.
Los Angeles teachers face a pivotal moment. UTLA must abandon its divisive, anti-Israel politics and focus on the real needs of its educator-members and our students. By holding UTLA accountable, enforcing existing laws, and electing better leaders, LAUSD teachers can play a vital role in ending hatred and restoring focus on quality education. If UTLA refuses to change course, teachers should feel empowered to leave a union that no longer serves their values.
Amy Leserman is a veteran English and Social Studies teacher, vice president of the NEA Jewish Affairs Caucus, founder of her district’s Educators Caucus for Israel (JewTLA), and education policy director for JewishLAUSD.
The post Los Angeles Teacher’s Union Is Engulfed in a Storm of Anti-Israel Hate first appeared on Algemeiner.com.
RSS
Conservative Pro-Israel Advocate Charlie Kirk Assassinated at University Event in Utah
Charlie Kirk, a conservative activist credited with amassing youth support for the Republican Party, speaking at the inauguration of Donald Trump in January. Photo: Brian Snyder via Reuters Connect
Conservative activist and staunch pro-Israel advocate Charlie Kirk died on Wednesday after being shot during an event at Utah Valley University, according to a statement by US President Donald Trump posted to the Truth Social media platform. He was 31 years old.
“The great, and even Legendary, Charlie Kirk, is dead,” Trump wrote. “No one understood or had the Heart of the Youth in the United States of America better than Charlie. He was loved and admired by ALL, especially me, and now, he is no longer with us. Melania and my Sympathies go out to his beautiful wife Erika, and family.”
He added, “Charlie we love you!”
Kirk — founder of the Turning Point USA nonprofit, which is credited for drawing masses of young people, typically a reliable voting bloc for Democrats, to the Republican Party — was answering audience questions when a gunman fired off the fatal shot which impacted his neck, causing him to become limp and bleed profusely.
Since the advent of his career, Kirk has been a faithful supporter of Israel, taking on activists of both the far left and far right who promoted rising antisemitism and sought to undermine the US-Israel alliance.
“There’s a dark Jew hate out there, and see it, and I see it,” Kirk told a student during a podcast episode which aired earlier this year. “Don’t get yourself involved in that. I’m telling you it will rot your brain. It’s bad for your soul. It’s bad. It’s evil. I think it’s demonic.”
Born on Oct. 14, 1993, in Arlington Heights, Illinois, Kirk formally entered the political arena in 2012, five months before the reelection of former President Barack Obama, to found Turning Point USA (TPUSA) — which served as a bellwether of declining youth support for the progressive consensus on race, free speech, and economics that took hold in American college campuses in the 1960s.
TPUSA grew rapidly, challenging campus primacy of the College Republicans organization and exuding confidence in conservative ideas at a moment when political scientists and other experts speculated that the Republican Party would decline to the point that the Democratic Party would achieve long-standing majorities in local and federal government.
Following news of Kirk’s death, the Jewish community deluged social media with tributes to Kirk and prayers for his family and friends.
“Please stop what you’re doing and pray for our friend Charlie Kirk. Many in the Jewish community are reciting chapters from the Book of Psalms, and I ask you do the same,” Shabbos Kestenbaum, a Jewish civil rights advocate, tweeted. “Something is deeply broken in America. The political violence must END. GOD HELP AMERICA.”
“We have no words,” StopAntisemitism, a Jewish civil rights advocacy group, tweeted.
Meanwhile, Jewish conservative influencer Emily Austin said, “With deep pain and sorrow, we mourn the passing of Charlie Kirk. May he rest in peace, and may God welcome him into His eternal care. This is a profound loss for the world — Charlie was a truly blessed soul whose impact will never be forgotten.”
Kirk is survived by his wife, Erika, and his two young children.
Follow Dion J. Pierre @DionJPierre.
RSS
Lebanon’s Army to Disarm Hezbollah Near Israeli Border Within 3 Months in First Step to Restore State Control
Lebanese President Joseph Aoun, Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, and members of the cabinet stand as they attend a cabinet session to discuss the army’s plan to disarm Hezbollah, at the Presidential Palace in Baabda, Lebanon, Sept. 5, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
Lebanon’s army plans to fully disarm Hezbollah near the Israeli border within three months, the first step in the Lebanese government’s plan to restore authority and curb the influence of the Iran-backed terror group within the country.
On Tuesday, Lebanon’s Foreign Minister Youssef Raggi confirmed to AFP that the government received a five-stage plan last week from the military to enforce a policy placing all weapons under state control.
The move follows Lebanese authorities’ approval last month of a US-backed initiative to disarm Hezbollah in exchange for a halt to Israeli military operations in the country’s south.
Amid mounting international pressure to disarm the terrorist group, Lebanon’s cabinet tasked the army with developing a strategy to establish a state monopoly on arms.
For years, Israel has demanded that Hezbollah be barred from carrying out activities south of the Litani, located roughly 15 miles from the Israeli border.
However, Hezbollah has pushed back against any government efforts, insisting that negotiations to dismantle its arsenal would be a serious misstep while Israel continues airstrikes in the country’s south.
The terrorist group has even threatened protests and civil unrest if the government tries to enforce control over its weapons.
But as Hezbollah emerged weakened from a yearlong conflict with Israel, calls for the Islamist group’s disarmament have gained new momentum, reshaping a power balance it had long controlled in Lebanon.
Last fall, Israel decimated Hezbollah’s leadership and military capabilities with an air and ground offensive, following the group’s attacks on Jerusalem — which they claimed were a show of solidarity with the Palestinian terrorist organization Hamas amid the war in Gaza.
In November, Lebanon and Israel reached a US-brokered ceasefire agreement that ended a year of fighting between the Jewish state and Hezbollah.
Under the agreement, Israel was given 60 days to withdraw from southern Lebanon, allowing the Lebanese army and UN forces to take over security as Hezbollah disarms and moves away from Israel’s northern border.
However, Israel maintained troops at several posts in southern Lebanon beyond the ceasefire deadline, as its leaders aimed to reassure northern residents that it was safe to return home.
Jerusalem has continued carrying out strikes targeting remaining Hezbollah activity, with Israeli leaders accusing the group of maintaining combat infrastructure, including rocket launchers — calling this “blatant violations of understandings between Israel and Lebanon.”
RSS
Israeli Military Expert: Doha Strike Was Backed by US and Qatar Coup, Will Bring Hostage Deal Closer
A damaged building, following an Israeli attack on Hamas leaders, according to an Israeli official, in Doha, Qatar, Sept. 9, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Ibraheem Abu Mustafa
Israel’s unprecedented strike on Hamas leaders in Doha this week was not a rogue act of military aggression, but rather the outcome of quiet coordination between Qatar and the US that could bring a hostage deal closer, Israeli intelligence expert Eyal Pinko said on Wednesday.
The strike, which officials have said was planned months ago, came a day after 10 Israelis were killed by Hamas in Gaza and Jerusalem. Four were soldiers who died in an attack on an Israeli tank in northern Gaza. The separate shooting attack in Jerusalem, in which six Israelis were killed and several more wounded, was the “straw that broke the camel’s back,” Pinko, a national security expert who served in Israeli intelligence for more than three decades, said in a press briefing.
Pinko contended that while Qatar publicly condemned the attacks, it also enabled them. “I am sure they were involved and the attack was coordinated with the [Qataris],” Pinko later told The Algemeiner.
The most recent round of negotiations to secure a Gaza ceasefire and hostage-release deal were nothing more than a “deception” by the US and Israel designed to gather Hamas leaders in one place “in order to set the timing to eliminate them,” he said.
Pinko said the strike should also be seen in light of US President Donald Trump’s impatience with the stalled hostage talks, arguing it showed Trump was on board with assassinations of Hamas leaders despite public declarations that he was “very unhappy” with the attack. He also pointed to Trump’s comments from last month, in which the US president predicted the Gaza conflict would reach a “conclusive ending” within two or three weeks.
Qatar, which has long hosted Hamas’s exiled leadership, benefits strategically from replacing the terrorist group’s leaders loyal to Iran with figures it can trust, Pinko maintained. Doha holds billions of dollars belonging to Hamas officials and has no interest in letting Ankara or Tehran displace it as the group’s patron. The timing of the attack is also significant, Pinko said, coming in the wake of Israel’s strikes against Iran’s nuclear program over the summer. “Iran is in a very bad situation. Qatar can easily overcome Iran,” he said.
Pinko further argued that the strike may serve to bring forward the release of the Israeli hostages still being held in Gaza since Hamas itself was no longer a coherent negotiating partner. The terrorist group operating in Gaza had become fragmented, “divided into five families that are fighting each other” and sometimes giving the impression that “they hate each other more than they hate Israel,” Pinko said. Recent talks proved “there was no longer a decisionmaker in Hamas,” and this disarray had allowed Hamas leaders to drag out the process with unrealistic demands. Removing those figures, he argued, would leave room for Qatar to install leaders who could cut a deal. “This will make the negotiation process much faster,” he said.
Pinko’s assessment stands in stark contrast to the fears of some of the families of the remaining 48 hostages held in Gaza, who said in a statement they had “grave fear” the Doha strike could sabotage the chances of bringing their loved ones home.
He placed the operation in a wider context, linking it to the revival of the Abraham Accords and US efforts to build a trade corridor from India through the Gulf to Israel and Europe as a counterweight to China’s trillion-dollar Belt and Road initiative, ending with Gaza as a key trade hub. “Trump is very serious in making the northern part of the Gaza Strip as [having] US autonomy. That will be the end of the American belt and road initiative to compete with the Chinese,” he said.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Wednesday called on Qatar, which “gives safe haven [and] harbors terrorists,” to expel them or bring them to justice, adding that if they don’t, “we will.”
Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, for his part said his country would retaliate over the strike, and accused Netanyahu of “wasting” Qatar’s time in negotiations and “leading the Middle East to chaos.”
Pinko called out Doha for its “duplicity” in pretending to be a peacemaker on the one hand, while “fueling Hamas and hatred” in the US and Europe, on the other.
“They are against Israel in their DNA. They don’t want Israel to exist,” he said. “So Gaza and Hamas are a very important asset for them.”
Some critics have denounced the Doha strike as a violation of international law, but international law experts note that Article 51 of the UN Charter recognizes a state’s inherent right to self-defense and that this right is not confined by geography if attacks are directed from outside its borders. The so-called “unwilling or unable” doctrine holds that if a host country does not act against militants on its soil, the victim state may use proportionate force.
The US relied on this doctrine when it killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan in a 2011 operation that was widely hailed by Western governments and the UN, whose then secretary-general Ban Ki-moon said at the time that he was “very much relieved by news that justice has been done” and called it “a watershed moment in our common global fight against terrorism.”