Connect with us

RSS

Los Angeles Teacher’s Union Is Engulfed in a Storm of Anti-Israel Hate

Anti-Israel demonstrators outside the Adas Torah synagogue in the heavily-Jewish Pico-Robertson area of Los Angeles, June 23, 2024. Photo: Screenshot

Judging by recent headlines in The Los Angeles Times, you might believe that thousands of United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) teachers had gathered to diligently learn about, discuss, and hold a massive referendum on the union’s foreign policy stance — but you’d be wrong.

Far from being the will of UTLA’s entire membership, the anti-Israel motion that was passed has been orchestrated in secret by the union’s tiny, six-member “Human Rights Committee.” The union’s House of Representatives held its vote on the motion on the last day of the Jewish holiday of Sukkot — a move that prevented observant Jewish members from attending. The motion supports a US arms embargo against Israel.

With no one present to object, their motion passed by an 80-40 vote with fewer than 200 people present. Given the Los Angeles Times’ publisher’s recent claim that the paper could not endorse Kamala Harris for president due to her positions on Israel, no one should be surprised that their headline on this story was as wrong as it was.

The recent vote is part of a larger pattern of antisemitic, exclusionary behavior throughout UTLA, which has marginalized Jewish voices. And now it’s bleeding over into schools and classrooms.

Union Overreach into K-12 Classrooms

UTLA’s anti-Israel stance goes beyond policy discussions. In fact, the activities the stance motivates brazenly violate ethical and legal boundaries, breaking Federal, state, and local laws with tacit leadership approval.

Many stunning examples of these violations took place at the UTLA leadership conference last August, which was held at a luxury hotel.

There, the union allowed non-members from anti-Israel organizations to co-sponsor their own sub-trainings in how to teach Israel hate. One elementary teacher encouraged teachers to discuss Israel’s “evils” with kindergartners, while another teacher — from the now-banned “Liberated Ethnic Studies Consortium” — presented her anti-Israel curriculum as if it were mainstream.

The sessions encouraged political activism in the classroom, including “Keffiyeh Thursdays” and decorating hallways with anti-Israel materials. Even more disturbingly, one LAUSD high school teacher outlined how he manipulates students into attending anti-Israel protests and arranges transportation for them in the cars of other un-vetted adults, a tactic he uses to evade professional liability.

LAUSD received 27,000 emails complaining about the illegal conduct; each Biard member received about 3,000, but the teacher in question is still teaching at an LA high school.

These actions violate Federal, state, and local safety and education laws against politicking in public schools, but neither UTLA nor the Los Angeles Unified School District seem the least bit bothered about it.

Neglecting Core Educational Priorities

While union leadership fixates on its anti-Israel activism, critical issues go unaddressed.

Enrollment in LAUSD has dropped from more than 746,000 in 2003 to 450,000 in 2024. Reading and math scores are in free-fall. Career satisfaction among teachers has plummeted, which has made hiring difficult.

UTLA could be helping to address these critical problems by advocating for better pay, improved school safety, reduced class sizes, or other meaningful educational reforms. But instead, they remain focused on anti-Israel activism.

Half the proposed motions at last month’s meeting focused on Israel.

So, what can teachers and families do to address this toxic union culture that contaminates school life?

More and more UTLA members are discovering that the 2018 Janus Supreme Court decision gives them an out. This ruling affirms that public sector employees have the right to opt out of union membership, and a growing number of Jewish and non-Jewish members have already left UTLA. The union has retaliated by complicating the process of canceling memberships and by blackballing Jewish educators who share this information.

UTLA, like other teacher unions, ignores parent voices because as 503(c)6 nonprofits, their members are their only constituencies. Jewish parents of Los Angeles emailed the UTLA House of Representatives on two separate occasions, asking for compassion towards Jewish and Israeli-immigrant families, and both times were met with hostility. It is up to the union’s members to generate changes.

Ultimately, members have two options for structural reform of UTLA.

One approach would be for UTLA to follow the Teachers Association of Long Beach in adopting a bylaw that it is “not within the scope or purview” of the association to engage in foreign policy. This would allow UTLA to refocus on its core mission of supporting teachers while stopping the exodus of Jewish teachers.

The other approach would be to get reform-minded teachers to run for leadership. Electing reform-minded leaders is the only way to ensure long-term change. A leadership slate could create a union that advocates for fair pay, better resources, and a safer learning environment.

Los Angeles teachers face a pivotal moment. UTLA must abandon its divisive, anti-Israel politics and focus on the real needs of its educator-members and our students. By holding UTLA accountable, enforcing existing laws, and electing better leaders, LAUSD teachers can play a vital role in ending hatred and restoring focus on quality education. If UTLA refuses to change course, teachers should feel empowered to leave a union that no longer serves their values.

Amy Leserman is a veteran English and Social Studies teacher, vice president of the NEA Jewish Affairs Caucus, founder of her district’s Educators Caucus for Israel (JewTLA), and education policy director for JewishLAUSD.

The post Los Angeles Teacher’s Union Is Engulfed in a Storm of Anti-Israel Hate first appeared on Algemeiner.com.

Continue Reading

RSS

Syria’s Sharaa Says Talks With Israel Could Yield Results ‘In Coming Days’

Syrian President Ahmed al-Sharaa speaks at the opening ceremony of the 62nd Damascus International Fair, the first edition held since the fall of Bashar al-Assad’s regime, in Damascus, Syria, Aug. 27, 2025. Photo: REUTERS/Khalil Ashawi

Syria’s President Ahmed al-Sharaa said on Wednesday that ongoing negotiations with Israel to reach a security pact could lead to results “in the coming days.”

He told reporters in Damascus the security pact was a “necessity” and that it would need to respect Syria’s airspace and territorial unity and be monitored by the United Nations.

Syria and Israel are in talks to reach an agreement that Damascus hopes will secure a halt to Israeli airstrikes and the withdrawal of Israeli troops who have pushed into southern Syria.

Reuters reported this week that Washington was pressuring Syria to reach a deal before world leaders gather next week for the UN General Assembly in New York.

But Sharaa, in a briefing with journalists including Reuters ahead of his expected trip to New York to attend the meeting, denied the US was putting any pressure on Syria and said instead that it was playing a mediating role.

He said Israel had carried out more than 1,000 strikes on Syria and conducted more than 400 ground incursions since Dec. 8, when the rebel offensive he led toppled former Syrian leader Bashar al-Assad.

Sharaa said Israel’s actions were contradicting the stated American policy of a stable and unified Syria, which he said was “very dangerous.”

He said Damascus was seeking a deal similar to a 1974 disengagement agreement between Israel and Syria that created a demilitarized zone between the two countries.

He said Syria sought the withdrawal of Israeli troops but that Israel wanted to remain at strategic locations it seized after Dec. 8, including Mount Hermon. Israeli ministers have publicly said Israel intends to keep control of the sites.

He said if the security pact succeeds, other agreements could be reached. He did not provide details, but said a peace agreement or normalization deal like the US-mediated Abraham Accords, under which several Muslim-majority countries agreed to normalize diplomatic ties with Israel, was not currently on the table.

He also said it was too early to discuss the fate of the Golan Heights because it was “a big deal.”

Reuters reported this week that Israel had ruled out handing back the zone, which Donald Trump unilaterally recognized as Israeli during his first term as US president.

“It’s a difficult case – you have negotiations between a Damascene and a Jew,” Sharaa told reporters, smiling.

SECURITY PACT DERAILED IN JULY

Sharaa also said Syria and Israel had been just “four to five days” away from reaching the basis of a security pact in July, but that developments in the southern province of Sweida had derailed those discussions.

Syrian troops were deployed to Sweida in July to quell fighting between Druze armed factions and Bedouin fighters. But the violence worsened, with Syrian forces accused of execution-style killings and Israel striking southern Syria, the defense ministry in Damascus and near the presidential palace.

Sharaa on Wednesday described the strikes near the presidential palace as “not a message, but a declaration of war,” and said Syria had still refrained from responding militarily to preserve the negotiations.

Continue Reading

RSS

Anti-Israel Activists Gear Up to ‘Flood’ UN General Assembly

US Capitol Police and NYPD officers clash with anti-Israel demonstrators, on the day Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addresses a joint meeting of Congress, on Capitol Hill, in Washington, DC, July 24, 2024. Photo: REUTERS/Umit Bektas

Anti-Israel groups are planning a wave of raucous protests in New York City during the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) over the next several days, prompting concerns that the demonstrations could descend into antisemitic rhetoric and intimidation.

A coalition of anti-Israel activists is organizing the protests in and around UN headquarters to coincide with speeches from Middle Eastern leaders and appearances by US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The demonstrations are expected to draw large crowds and feature prominent pro-Palestinian voices, some of whom have been criticized for trafficking in antisemitic tropes, in addition to calling for the destruction of Israe.

Organizers of the demonstrations have promoted the coordinated events on social media as an opportunity to pressure world leaders to hold Israel accountable for its military campaign against Hamas in Gaza, with some messaging framed in sharply hostile terms.

On Sunday, for example, activists shouted at Israel’s Ambassador to the UN Danny Danon.

“Zionism is terrorism. All you guys are terrorists committing ethnic cleansing and genocide in Gaza and Palestine. Shame on you, Zionist animals,” they shouted.

The Combat Antisemitism Movement (CAM), warned on its website that the scale and tone of the planned demonstrations risk crossing the line from political protest into hate speech, arguing that anti-Israel activists are attempting to hijack the UN gathering to spread antisemitism and delegitimize the Jewish state’s right to exist.

Outside the UN last week, masked protesters belonging to the activist group INDECLINE kicked a realistic replica of Netanyahu’s decapitated head as though it were a soccer ball.

Within Our Lifetime (WOL), a radical anti-Israel activist group, has vowed to “flood” the UNGA on behalf of the pro-Palestine movement.

WOL, one of the most prolific anti-Israel activist groups, came under immense fire after it organized a protest against an exhibition to honor the victims of the Oct. 7 massacre at the Nova Music Festival in southern Israel. During the event, the group chanted “resistance is justified when people are occupied!” and “Israel, go to hell!”

“We will be there to confront them with the truth: Their silence and inaction enable genocide. The world cannot continue as if Gaza does not exist,” WOL said of its planned demonstrations in New York. “This is the time to make our voices impossible to ignore. Come to New York by any means necessary, to stand, to march, to demand the UN act and end the siege.”

Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) and Palestinian Youth Movement (PYM), two other anti-Israel organizations that have helped organize widespread demonstrations against the Jewish state during the war in Gaza, also announced they are planning a march from Times Square to the UN headquarters on Friday.

“The time is now for each and every UN member state to uphold their duty under international law: sanction Israel and end the genocide,” the groups said in a statement.

JVP, an organization that purports to fight for “Palestinian liberation,” has positioned itself as a staunch adversary of the Jewish state. The group argued in a 2021 booklet that Jews should not write Hebrew liturgy because hearing the language would be “deeply traumatizing” to Palestinians. JVP has repeatedly defended the Oct. 7 massacre of roughly 1,200 people in southern Israel by Hamas as a justified “resistance.” Chapters of the organization have urged other self-described “progressives” to throw their support behind Hamas and other terrorist groups against Israel

Similarly, PYM, another radical anti-Israel group, has repeatedly defended terrorism and violence against the Jewish state. PYM has organized many anti-Israel protests in the two years following the Oct. 7 attacks in the Jewish state. Recently, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-AK) called for a federal investigation into the organization after Aisha Nizar, one of the group’s leaders, urged supporters to sabotage the US supply chain for the F-35 fighter jet, one of the most advanced US military assets and a critical component of Israel’s defense.

The UN General Assembly has historically been a flashpoint for heated debate over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Previous gatherings have seen dueling demonstrations outside the Manhattan venue, with pro-Israel and pro-Palestinian groups both seeking to influence the international spotlight.

While warning about the demonstrations, CAM noted it recently launched a new mobile app, Report It, that allows users worldwide to quickly and securely report antisemitic incidents in real time.

Continue Reading

RSS

Nina Davidson Presses Universities to Back Words With Action as Jewish Students Return to Campus Amid Antisemitism Crisis

Nina Davidson on The Algemeiner’s ‘J100’ podcast. Photo: Screenshot

Philanthropist Nina Davidson, who served on the board of Barnard College, has called on universities to pair tough rhetoric on combatting antisemitism with enforcement as Jewish students returned to campuses for the new academic year.

“Years ago, The Algemeiner had published a list ranking the most antisemitic colleges in the country. And number one was Columbia,” Davidson recalled on a recent episode of The Algemeiner‘s “J100” podcast. “As a board member and as someone who was representing the institution, it really upset me … At the board meeting, I brought it up and I said, ‘What are we going to do about this?’”

Host David Cohen, chief executive officer of The Algemeiner, explained he had revisited Davidson’s remarks while she was being honored for her work at The Algemeiner‘s 8th annual J100 gala, held in October 2021, noting their continued relevance.

“It could have been the same speech in 2025,” he said, underscoring how longstanding concerns about campus antisemitism, while having intensified in the aftermath of Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre across southern Israel, are not new.

Davidson argued that universities already possess the tools to protect students – codes of conduct, time-place-manner rules, and consequences for threats or targeted harassment – but too often fail to apply them evenly. “Statements are not enough,” she said, arguing that institutions need to enforce their rules and set a precedent that there will be consequences for individuals who refuse to follow them.

She also said that stakeholders – alumni, parents, and donors – are reassessing their relationships with schools that, in their view, have not safeguarded Jewish students. While supportive of open debate, Davidson distinguished between protest and intimidation, calling for leadership that protects expression while ensuring campus safety.

The episode surveyed specific pressure points that administrators will face this fall: repeat anti-Israel encampments, disruptions of Jewish programming, and the challenge of distinguishing political speech from conduct that violates university rules. “Unless schools draw those lines now,” Davidson warned, “they’ll be scrambling once the next crisis hits.”

Cohen closed by framing the discussion as a test of institutional credibility, asking whether universities will “turn policy into protection” in real time. Davidson agreed, pointing to students who “need to know the rules aren’t just on paper.”

The full conversation is available on The Algemeiner’s “J100” podcast.

Continue Reading

Copyright © 2017 - 2023 Jewish Post & News